Has the Energy Transition Failed and is it Over?

Many fail to realize this is not the first energy transition.

Although the media have made it appear as if it’s the first energy transition, it’s not.

For example, the nuclear energy industry development which started in WW2 was a major energy transition. In today’s dollars, half a trillion dollars went into the research and development of nuclear reactors along with uranium mines and fabrication plants that would feed the operating nuclear reactors.

In fact, one of the most fascinating stories of collusion, corruption and cartels happened as America was developing its first energy transition. Amazingly, it almost “destroyed” the nuclear industry.

So, before you think the current Energy Transition has failed (which it is not over and will happen) let’s explain the drama that almost took down the first major Energy Transition in America.

Have you ever heard of the Yellow Cartel?

The Yellow Cartel

Everyone knows about the oil cartel called OPEC. But did you know that in the 1970s, a uranium cartel was conspired by one of the largest mining companies in the world and the Canadian government?

From 1955 through 1970 hundreds of billions of dollars were being committed by the US, France, Sweden, Japan and West Germany to build nuclear power plants. The Yellow Cartel started in 1971 with the London based mining giant, Rio Tinto approaching the Canadian government concerning the formation of a cartel for controlling uranium market pricing.

The first official meeting occurred in February 1972, in Paris, and the International Uranium Cartel was created.

Eventually, 29 producing companies would become members of the International Uranium Cartel, which was nicknamed the ‘Yellow Cartel” for the color of yellowcake that the cartel was colluding to price fix.

Rio Tinto, Uranerz (the large German uranium producer in the 70s), the Canadian Government and ultimately a total 29 uranium producers made up the Uranium Cartel.

The Uranium Cartel was successful in increasing the price of uranium almost 10-fold in a few short years by deploying illegal tactics such as price fixing schemes.

Later, the Canadian government would form two uranium entities which would lead to the creation of Cameco, a top 5 uranium producer worldwide.

There were two real catalysts that caused the formation of the International Uranium Cartel. But why did Rio Tinto pitch this plan that almost would turn the energy world upside down and risk America’s energy security and the first major energy transition?

The first catalyst was the move by the US government to place an embargo on all foreign uranium in 1964 to protect its own uranium mines.

At that time, the United States consumed about 70% of the global uranium production (for both its military and energy needs) and with that demand for uranium now gone outside the USA, the price of uranium crashed to $5 per pound in 1970.

But because the price of uranium was so high during the 1950s and first half of the 1960s, significant amounts of risk capital was spent on exploration for new uranium deposits globally. As a result of all this new uranium exploration was major uranium discoveries were made in places like Niger and Australia.

By the late 1960s significant uranium deposits would be discovered in Australia such as Jabiluka 1 & 2.

Eventually the massive discovery of Olympic Dam which would become one of the largest polymetallic mines (including uranium) in the world. Olympic Dam would soon replace the depleting uranium from the Rum Jungle Mine in Australia which was producing uranium since 1954 and was shut down for good in 1971.

Because of and other events such as those mentioned above, by 1971, there was over 220 Million pounds of global uranium production and only 55 Million pounds of uranium global demand. The uranium market was oversupplied by 400%.

Because of both the US embargo on foreign supplies of uranium and an oversupply of uranium production to demand by 400%, the price of uranium was hovering around $5/pound in 1971.

But because of the price fixing tactics of the Uranium Cartel, the price of uranium surged to $40/pound.

The move in uranium prices brought down the world’s largest nuclear reactor builder in the world, Westinghouse Electric Corp. on September 8, 1975.

Westinghouse was able to become the world’s largest developer and installer of nuclear reactors because it had the best track record, nuclear technology and most importantly it promised a long-term supply of uranium feed to power the Westinghouse PWR reactors. A dream trifecta for large utilities and government entities alike.

To put things in perspective, half of the world’s current operating nuclear power plants are using the basis of Westinghouse’s PWR reactor technology. Between 1960 and 1970, Westinghouse was able to secure US government backed utility contracts (and same in Sweeden) worth tens of billions of dollars because Westinghouse committed to supply 65 million pounds to the American and Swedish nuclear reactors with a fixed price contract.

But things quickly turned very bad for Westinghouse. The utilities, citizens and the American Government. Because the price of uranium increased 10X (1000%) from when Westinghouse signed those fixed price utility contracts, on September 8th, 1975 Westinghouse announced that it would not honor the 65 million pounds of uranium it committed to the American and Swedish utilities.

It was revealed in legal documents that the American consumer ended up paying billions of dollars in additional electricity costs due to the Uranium Cartels actions. In fact, New York state alone paid over $1Billion in electricity prices shortly after the Yellow Cartel activities.

On October 15, 1976, Westinghouse took matters into its own hands. It filed for conspiracy, in violation of United States anti-trust laws against the 29 producing uranium companies that made up the International Uranium Cartel estimating damages between $4-6 Billion.

Uranium continued to soar after 1976, surpassing $100 per pound throughout the late seventies.

Around that time, people called for the end of the energy transition citing the negative impact caused by the Uranium Cartel. This was just one of many attacks survived by the uranium industry. In fact, the nuclear sector not only survived the Uranium Cartel fiasco, but Chernobyl, Fukushima and countless other project and sector setbacks over the years.

Right now, we are in the greatest energy transition in human history. Tens of trillions of dollars will be spent worldwide on energy transition and decarbonization. Nuclear is a big part of the solution.

In fact, without uranium, there is no clean, long term base load nuclear power. Which is why we are currently in one of the greatest uranium bull markets of all time.

There are three uranium giants in global uranium production. The largest global producer came out of the fall of the Soviet Union, Kazatomprom. The third largest global uranium producer, as described above, was the result of the Canadian Government merging two state owned enterprises and created Cameco.

But do you know who the second largest producer of uranium globally is?

And the major moves this company is making after almost blowing itself up?

In an upcoming feature article, we will bring to the forefront the under the radar moves that the second largest producer of uranium is doing and how investors can benefit.

The post Has the Energy Transition Failed and is it Over? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Global Consortium Backs Early Coal Retirement With Carbon Credits

The Coal to Clean Credit Initiative (CCCI), with help from The Rockefeller Foundation, teams up with ACEN Corporation to look into a pilot project in the Philippines, it revealed at the COP28 climate summit in Dubai. This plan aims to use credits earned from reducing carbon emissions to shut down a coal-powered plant. 

COP28, happening until December 12, is the largest conference to find solutions to shift the world away from fossil fuels. The consortium wants to replace the carbon-intensive plant with renewable energy while also helping out people who might be struggling. It is the first of its kind, aiming to move away from coal plants following the Paris Agreement. 

CCCI and ACEN are working with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to move this plan forward.

From Coal to Clean: A Paradigm Shift

If the world keeps relying too much on coal, these plants will release a massive amount of carbon emissions. In particular, current and planned coal-fired power plants will emit 273 billion tons of carbon dioxide over their lifetimes, according to the Rockefeller Foundation’s President, Dr. Rajiv J. Shah.

Annual Emission Reduction in Unabated Coal-Fired Generation

Source: International Energy Agency

As per the International Energy Agency’s Net Zero Emissions by 2050 scenario shown below, the world needs about 9% annual reduction in unabated coal-fired generation between 2022 and 2030.

Achieving such massive feat requires encouraging plant owners and communities to retire coal plants. And the CCCI agreement would be a way to do it in the Philippines. 

The project is focused on the South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation (SLTEC) coal plant. It could be the first coal plant in the world to use carbon credits to shut down early. 

While there are financial methods to support closing coal plants and switching to clean energy, it’s tough to use these methods in developing countries. The partners are checking if they can retire this plant early and change it to cleaner energy sources by 2030. That’s 10 years earlier than its originally planned retirement.

CCCI started in June 2023 with the aim to reward moving away from coal and shifting to clean energy in developing countries. They will incentivize such transition through ‘coal-to-clean’ credits, also called ‘transition credits’. 

READ MORE: Global Team Develops World’s First “Coal-to-Clean” Carbon Credit Program

Accelerating Energy Transition with Carbon Credits 

In a similar direction, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) announced that it had tentatively agreed to shut down an Indonesian power plant much earlier than scheduled through its Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM).

The CCCI plans to work with programs like the ETM to accelerate the closure of power plants in the Philippines by using the credits. Vikram Widge, formerly in charge of carbon finance at the World Bank and involved in this initiative, shared this information.

A preliminary method for verifying these coal-to-clean credits has been put forward for public consultation. Verra, the leading global carbon standard, will approve the methodology.  

The method allows organizations to create customized projects shifting from coal to clean energy. These projects focus on what local communities need and then offer transition credits to buyers worldwide.

After public consultation, which runs until January 16, 2024, CCCI’s method is likely to be completed. Once finalized, it’s expected to enable one of the initial transactions involving transition credits in the global carbon markets

Entities can use these carbon credits voluntarily to mitigate their emissions or for meeting certain regulations. This initiative would assist in putting into action Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. It supports countries’ efforts to control global warming and keep the temperature rise within 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Global Collaboration for Climate Resilience

Authorities are aiming for stricter evaluation of carbon credits, as many environmental groups have criticized them for enabling the ongoing use of fossil fuels instead of decreasing emissions.

During COP28, numerous representatives suggested that establishing a global carbon price could be a part of the solution. Businesses argue that this could offer clarity for planning, but creating such a price has been challenging for many years.

Highlighting their innovative collaboration, Eric Francia, President & CEO of ACEN Corporation remarked during the announcement:

“Today’s development marks a critical contribution to accelerating a global energy transition. Without a rapid and proactively managed transition away from coal-fired power, the world will not meet its climate goals; the urgency of solving this problem cannot be understated.” 

ACEN Corporation operates around 4,500 megawatts (MW) of energy in the Philippines, Australia, Vietnam, Indonesia, and India. Its renewable energy contribution is one of the highest in the region.

The CCCI news aligns with the Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA) set to launch in April. The ETA, created by the Rockefeller Foundation and other organizations, shares a similar goal of speeding up the move away from coal. Days ago, the philanthropic organization announced a target to bring its $6 billion endowment to net zero emissions by 2050.

READ MORE: Rockefeller Foundation Aims 2050 Net Zero for $6B Endowment

The ETA plans to achieve the clean transition by using what they claim are top-quality carbon credits. Their initial estimates suggest this approach could generate over $200 billion in transition finance by 2035. 

CCCI is teaming up with the COP28 Presidency to attract more interest from governments and get power companies in developing countries more involved. This effort aims to make the use of ‘transition credits’ a reality in transitioning the world towards cleaner and sustainable energy.

The post Global Consortium Backs Early Coal Retirement With Carbon Credits appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Voluntary Carbon Credit Buyers Willing to Pay More For Quality

The recently released “State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2023” report by Ecosystem Marketplace (EM) reveals a significant trend shift within the VCM. It identifies a concentration of demand toward high-integrity and high-quality voluntary carbon credits, despite their higher price, that offer co-benefits beyond mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.

Analysis of transaction data indicates a substantial 82% surge in average carbon credit prices from 2021 to 2022, accompanied by a decline in overall transaction volumes. These findings imply a market consolidation among smaller yet dedicated purchasers willing to pay more for credits of superior quality. 

Notably, there’s a high demand for nature-based credits that hold certifications for co-benefits and align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Here are the key points to particularly note from EM’s research.

5 Key Takeaways From the Report: 

Prices are at their peak, volume is down

The average prices of voluntary carbon credits have reached their highest point in 15 years, while the overall trade volumes have declined from the peak seen in 2021. Even though the volume of voluntary carbon credits traded fell by 51%, the average price per credit surged significantly by 82%. It jumped from $4.04 per ton in 2021 to $7.37 in 2022, which hasn’t been seen since 2008. 

Chart from EM Report
Chart from EM Report

Despite the drop in trade volume and value, this price increase allowed the VCM to remain relatively stable in 2022. In fact, despite dropping ~$0.40/ton, average prices to date in 2023 are still higher than in 15 years. 

Nature-based credits take the biggest market share

Nature-based solutions (NBS) were a primary contributor to the high market value, constituting nearly half of the market share – 46%. NBS credit prices were more than doubled in 2021 and 2022. EM is also seeing more premium for these credits in preliminary 2023 VCM data. 

The average price of credits from nature-based projects, including forestry, land-use, and agriculture projects, witnessed an increase of 75% and 14%, respectively, from 2021 to 2022. 

REDD+ projects dominate the NBS credits, but also include other projects in the Agriculture and Forestry and Land Use categories. These include Sustainable Agriculture Land Management Afforestation/Reforestation/Revegetation (ARR), Agroforestry, Improved Forest Management (IFM), and Blue Carbon (mangroves, seagrasses).

Agriculture project credits, also called agricultural carbon credits, also experienced a substantial surge in volume, rising by 283%.

Credits with co-benefits are pricier

Credits associated with robust environmental and social co-benefits, extending beyond carbon, commanded a significant price premium. Projects with at least one co-benefit certification had a 78% price premium compared to those lacking such certification. 

According to experts surveyed by Ecosystem Marketplace, these certifications are becoming increasingly necessary for buyers actively looking for these projects. Moreover, projects aligned with the UN SDGs demonstrated a considerable price premium, 86% higher than projects not linked to SDGs. This indicates a strong buyer preference for credits that contribute more to societal and environmental well-being. 

RELATED: Carbon Credits and the Sustainable Development Goals

Buyers prefer newer credits

Newer carbon credits are commanding a higher price, suggesting that voluntary buyers are inclined towards recent vintages featuring more robust methodologies. EM reporters also suggested that these buyers prefer credits closely aligning with their current emissions years. 

In 2022, there was a 57% premium for credits with a more recent vintage, reflecting recent emissions reduction activities, compared to a 38% recency premium observed in 2021. This comparison used a historical 5-year rolling cutoff date from the transaction year.

CORSIA-eligible credits surge

Credits eligible under CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation) experienced a significant surge in market value, marked by a 126% increase in price. The notable growth of CORSIA in the VCM in 2022 indicates an expanding relationship between compliance markets and the VCM. This is crucial for market participants due to several factors:

The quality criteria outlined by CORSIA have been adopted by the Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative (VCMI) until the Integrity Council’s core carbon principles are fully established. 
CORSIA will enter its inaugural compliance phase in 2024. 
Countries are beginning to implement Paris Agreement’s Article 6, further emphasizing the relevance of CORSIA in broader carbon markets.

A Shift Towards Integrity and Quality

The latest report by Ecosystem Marketplace delves into self-reported transaction data from >160 participants in their annual market survey. These contributors represent credits sourced from 1,530 projects across over 130 project types traded globally. 

Typically, respondents encompass project developers, investors, and intermediaries. Moreover, data regarding project registrations, credit issuances, and retirements were collated from project registries, adding depth to the comprehensive analysis presented in the report.

Stephen Donofrio, Managing Director of Ecosystem Marketplace, highlighted the pivotal moment witnessed in the VCM, noting that:

“While the data do not show the same type of growth by volume present in previous reports, our market analysis shows a critical, increased shift in market behavior towards integrity and quality.”

READ MORE: Real Voluntary Carbon Market Value is $2 Billion

Donofrio further emphasized the evolving sophistication of credit buyers, underscoring their eagerness to understand the actual impact of their investments.

EM’s full report is available for download here.

The post Voluntary Carbon Credit Buyers Willing to Pay More For Quality appeared first on Carbon Credits.

UAE’s $30B Climate Fund: A Boon or Concern for COP28 Dialogue?

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is gearing up to launch a substantial climate-related investment fund, $30 billion, in collaboration with BlackRock, TPG, and Brookfield. 

This initiative coincides with the UAE‘s efforts to strengthen its position as host of the United Nations Climate Summit COP28.

UAE’s Strategic Climate Investment Fund 

Overseeing the fund is Lunate Capital, a new Abu Dhabi-based asset manager, backed by $50 billion in assets. 

Earlier this year, Lunate began operations under the guidance of UAE national security adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al-Nahyan. He is the brother of the Gulf state’s ruler, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan. Chimera Investment, along with its senior management, owns Lunate.

Executives of Abu Dhabi Growth Fund and Abu Dhabi wealth fund ADQ will be the managing partners of Lunate Capital. 

At least $5 billion of the fund’s investment is slated for Global South countries, reflecting the oil major’s intentions to allocate a significant portion of resources to these regions. Leveraging its significant oil and gas reserves, estimated at $2.5 trillion, UAE could direct substantial funds toward climate-related initiatives.

Sultan al-Jaber, the president of COP28, has consistently emphasized the importance of climate finance during the summit in Dubai. Up to 180 heads of state or government and tens of thousands of delegates are attending the summit over the next two weeks.

RELATED: Carbon Credits to Take Center Stage at UN COP28 Climate Talks

Financial Times’ analysis showed that the Arab nation was associated with about $100 billion in green energy investments this year. 

However, the UAE’s selection as COP28 host raised scrutiny due to concerns about its role in overseeing global climate negotiations. After all, it’s the world’s largest oil and gas producer. 

Climate Finance Landscape and COP28 Imperatives

Each year since the creation of the COP, member countries meet to discuss matters related to climate change. The COP’s 21st session created the Paris Agreement, a global consensus to collectively achieve critical climate goals.

One such goal is to limit global temperature rise by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieve net zero by 2050. To meet this goal, the world needs about $125 trillion in climate investments by 2050, according to 2021 UN research. 

Similarly, the International Energy Agency, noted that around $4.5 trillion is needed every year to be invested in clean energy by the early 2030s. 

In January, BloombergNEF reported that investment in clean energy transition increased by 31% in 2022, at $1.1 trillion.

There has also been a movement to reform multilateral development banks’ financing focus, such as the World Bank and IMF. They have to pump more funds to climate-related investments. 

Over a week ago, the World Bank decided to certify forest carbon credits and climate finance to boost carbon markets. 

READ MORE: World Bank’s Push for Forest Carbon Credit and Climate Finance

Meanwhile, there’s also a rising plea for private investors to work with public finance to support green projects. This is especially important in developing countries that lack enough funds to transition their energy systems to greener power sources. 

Plus, there is a shortfall in cash to make the world’s economies adapt to rising global temperatures. 

A climate finance expert remarked that the $30B investment is a serious figure that will make the UAE a center of climate finance.

‘Loss and Damage’ Fund: A COP28 Milestone

The first days of COP28 witnessed a pivotal moment with the establishment of a critical ‘loss and damage’ fund to assist vulnerable nations in handling climate-related disasters. COP28 President Sultan Ahmed al-Jaber lauded this as a positive step forward for the summit.

The creation of this fund prompted contributions from various nations, with the UAE leading with a commitment of $100 million. Subsequent pledges followed from Britain, the United States, Japan, Germany, and the European Union. 

A longstanding request from developing countries, the fund marks a good start for further negotiations during the two-week summit.

A think tank representative emphasized the importance of this breakthrough, highlighting that isolating the ‘loss and damage’ fund in negotiations could pave the way for more genuine agreements.

As COP28 unfolds in Dubai, the UAE’s $30 billion climate investment initiative alongside the establishment of a ‘loss and damage’ fund signifies both progress and scrutiny. 

While investments in climate action are lauded, the nation’s role as a major oil and gas producer sparks apprehensions. The climate summit’s early momentum via these initiatives presents a platform for crucial negotiations, setting the tone for meaningful compromises in the weeks ahead.

READ MORE: What Is COP28? Key Issues to Watch Out at 2023 Climate Summit

The post UAE’s $30B Climate Fund: A Boon or Concern for COP28 Dialogue? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Nasdaq Reveals Revolutionary Tech for Carbon Credits to Propel Carbon Markets

Nasdaq has introduced a groundbreaking technology aimed at securely digitizing the issuance, settlement, and safekeeping of carbon credits. This innovative offering will be made available to market infrastructures, registry platforms, and other global service providers.

The primary objective of this service is to foster the growth and institutionalization of global carbon markets. 

Currently, the carbon credit market operates with bilateral trading and significant reliance on manual processes, limiting its scalability as the market progresses. This rigidity, combined with a lack of standardization in credit data, has hindered substantial capital inflows into the market.

Nasdaq’s Cutting-Edge Carbon Credit Digitization Technology

Executive Vice President at Nasdaq, Roland Chai, highlighted the need for flexibility, standardization, and connectivity in carbon markets. He further noted that:

“Bringing institutional grade technology to underpin the market will drive ever-greater liquidity across carbon marketplaces and open the possibility of greater interoperability between registries in the future.”

Nasdaq’s new technology will allow market operators and registries to create standardized digital credits and distribute them with full auditability throughout the transaction lifecycle. 

RELATED: The Carbon Credit Lifecycle

Nasdaq has also developed a carbon taxonomy framework that can readily incorporate new types of credit as the market expands. There will also be comprehensive APIs that will allow participants to seamlessly interact across the market. 

Together, this will help establish a standardized, trusted ecosystem capable of attracting high-quality liquidity from a variety of investors.  

Using smart contract technology, the service enables secure creation, processing, and management of rights linked to the underlying asset. By automating asset servicing and settlement procedures, the technology promises increased efficiency and transparency throughout the trade lifecycle.

Digitization and automation will ensure a comprehensive audit trail of credit ownership and retirement. 

The issuance, settlement, and custody capabilities are adaptable to integrate with existing financial system architectures or operate as an independent platform. As such, it allows flexibility to connect with traditional payment networks and bilateral settlement options. 

This enables infrastructure providers to continue serving conventional markets while tapping into growth prospects in carbon markets without paying for the substantial costs associated with major changes.

Additionally, Nasdaq offers infrastructure optionality that enables the technology to be deployed on either a centralized database or using private blockchain technology.

Partnership for Carbon Removal Excellence

Alongside the service launch, Nasdaq has unveiled a collaboration with Puro.earth, a prominent standards and registry platform specializing in engineered carbon removal

Their partnership aims to register CO2 Removal Certificates (CORCs) and monitor the issuance, retirement, and transfer of these assets. The ultimate goal is to prevent duplication of carbon removal projects, ensuring complete traceability and transparency.

The game-changing technology will help propel the growth of voluntary carbon markets through a suite of APIs and standardized contracts. 

Standardizing carbon credit contracts is crucial. This is particularly critical at this time when questions arise regarding the real climate impacts of projects generating these credits.

As per Antti Vihavainen, CEO of Puro.earth, accurate management of carbon credit lifecycle is critical in establishing trust. With Nasdaq’s new technology, their carbon crediting infrastructure will be modernized.

It was in February last year when Puro.earth launched Puro Registry in Nasdaq, a public registry dedicated to CORCs.

READ MORE: NASDAQ’s Puro.earth Launch Carbon Registry

The new system will be accessible through the Puro Connect API, catering to carbon marketplaces and exchanges. It will also align CORCs with Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.

Puro.earth’s Puro Standard represents the first carbon removal standard tailored for engineered carbon removals within the VCMIt also includes top-tier carbon removal methodologies in line with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) definition for carbon removal.

Certified carbon removals suppliers are verified by an independent third-party. Companies seeking to offset their carbon emissions can buy the CORCs directly from suppliers or through a third-party marketplace.

Nasdaq’s cutting-edge technology aims to transform carbon markets by offering digitized issuance, settlement, and custody for carbon credits.

The technology’s integration with Puro Connect API and adherence to IPCC guidelines sets a new standard for carbon removal within VCM. Nasdaq’s innovation paves the way for a dynamic, trusted ecosystem attracting diversified investors while modernizing the carbon crediting infrastructure for market growth.

The post Nasdaq Reveals Revolutionary Tech for Carbon Credits to Propel Carbon Markets appeared first on Carbon Credits.