Meta Invests in 650 MW of Solar Energy to Power AI and Data Centers

/0 Comments/in /by

Meta Invests in 650 MW of Solar Energy to Power AI and Data Centers

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, has taken another big step toward its clean energy goals through solar. The company announced a deal to buy 650 megawatts (MW) of solar power from AES, an American energy company. This new power purchase agreement (PPA) supports Meta’s fast-growing data centers in Texas and Kansas.

As Meta continues to expand its artificial intelligence (AI) services, it also increases its demand for energy. This latest solar deal highlights how the company plans to meet that demand with renewable energy.

A Big Push for Solar in the U.S.

Meta’s new agreement includes two solar-only projects developed by AES. These projects will supply 400 MW of energy from Texas and 250 MW from Kansas. The electricity will support Meta’s data centers, which need reliable and low-cost energy to run around the clock.

AES expects the projects to start operations in the next 2 to 3 years. The contracts will last 15 to 20 years, providing long-term clean energy. This type of agreement helps Meta meet its climate goals and also gives energy developers the confidence to build more renewable projects.

AES CEO Andrés Gluski explained why this partnership makes sense, noting:

“By providing energy solutions that offer fast time-to-power and low-cost electricity, we continue to be the partner of choice for companies, like Meta, at the forefront of artificial intelligence innovation.”

Urvi Parekh, Global Head of Energy, Meta, also remarked:

“We are thrilled to work with AES to bring forward these two solar energy projects. These solutions support our goal for 100% clean and renewable energy and will add new generation to the grid in these markets.”

Texas, in particular, has become a top spot for solar power. The state leads the U.S. in new solar capacity added in 2023 and 2024, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA). Developers like Texas because of its sunny climate, fast permitting process, and easy connection to the power grid.

Texas solar
Source: SEIA

Powering Meta’s AI and Data Expansion

Meta has been growing its renewable energy portfolio quickly. The company already claims more than 12 gigawatts (GW) of clean energy capacity. This includes solar and wind power projects across the United States.

Earlier in 2025, Meta signed several other deals in Texas:

  • A 595 MW agreement with Zelestra
  • Two 200 MW deals with Engie North America
  • A 260 MW deal for Engie’s Sypert Branch solar project

Altogether, these efforts show how serious Meta is about running its operations with clean energy. As AI technology expands, companies like Meta must build more data centers — and each one needs a large and steady supply of electricity.

data center power demand by GS

Data centers use a lot of power, often 10 to 50 times more energy per square foot than regular office buildings. By powering them with solar, Meta avoids using fossil fuels that release carbon into the atmosphere. These steps help Meta stay on track toward its climate goal: to reach net-zero emissions across its entire value chain by 2030.

A Long-Term Commitment to Clean Energy and Net Zero

As per its latest sustainability report, in 2023, Meta’s net emissions equaled 7.4 million metric tons of CO2. Key commitments include:

  • Reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 42% by 2031, compared to a 2021 baseline, and ensuring that maximum suppliers adopt science-aligned GHG reduction targets by 2026.
  • Keep Scope 3 emissions at or below 2021 levels by 2031.
  • Since 2020, Meta has successfully maintained net-zero emissions in its operations, and it is on track to achieve net-zero across its entire value chain by 2030.

Meta’s clean energy journey began years ago. The company reached 100% renewable energy for its operations in 2020. Since then, it has kept investing in wind and solar to match its energy use and reduce its carbon footprint.

Meta renewable energy projects map
Source: Meta

By the end of 2025, Meta expects to help add 9.8 GW of renewable energy to U.S. power grids. That’s enough electricity to power over 2 million homes. These projects support Meta’s needs as well as strengthen local energy systems and help nearby communities.

Long-term contracts like the 650 MW deal with AES are important for energy developers, too. They provide financial security and encourage the construction of more clean energy. This creates jobs, boosts local economies, and reduces pollution.

What It Means for the Energy and Tech Industries

Meta’s big solar push shows a wider trend in the tech world. More companies, especially those running large data centers, are investing in clean energy. These companies are often called “hyperscalers” because of their massive scale and energy use.

CEBA deal tracker

Why is this happening?

  • AI growth: Artificial intelligence tools require large amounts of computing power, which means more electricity.
  • Climate goals: Many companies have pledged to cut emissions and use renewable energy.
  • Cost savings: Solar and wind power are now some of the cheapest forms of new energy.

According to BloombergNEF, corporate renewable energy purchases hit a record 46 GW globally in 2023. Tech companies like Meta, Amazon, Google, and Microsoft led the way.

Solar power is especially attractive because it’s quick to build and affordable. In sunny places like Texas, developers can build solar farms in a few months. The electricity is also cheap, which helps companies lower their energy bills.

In Meta’s case, the ability to phase in power — meaning that parts of the solar farm can start delivering energy before the full project is finished — helps meet growing energy demand faster.

AES pointed out that “fast time-to-power” is one of the main reasons hyperscalers are turning to solar. This makes solar a good match for tech companies that need power right away.

Looking Ahead: Clean Energy and AI Together

Meta’s recent solar deals show how the tech and energy worlds are coming together to tackle climate change. As AI continues to grow, so will the need for clean, reliable power.

Meta’s long-term investments in solar energy will help meet its goals and support a cleaner grid for everyone. By buying power through PPAs, Meta also helps speed up the energy transition.

At the same time, these deals send a message to the market: Big tech is serious about clean energy. This encourages more investment in solar and wind, helping the U.S. move closer to its climate targets. The future of technology is deeply tied to energy. And for Meta, that future is increasingly powered by the sun.

The post Meta Invests in 650 MW of Solar Energy to Power AI and Data Centers appeared first on Carbon Credits.

EU Parliament Approves CBAM Changes to Aid SMEs and Cut Emissions

/0 Comments/in /by

EU Parliament Approves CBAM Changes to Aid SMEs and Cut Emissions

The European Parliament has approved a big change to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). This update makes the carbon import rules of the EU CBAM simpler. It also gives a major exemption for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

The new rule passed with a strong 564-20 vote. It sets a 50-tonne annual import limit. This change exempts about 90% of importers but still targets 99% of embedded emissions. These changes are a key milestone in European carbon policy. They aim to balance emissions responsibility with economic flexibility.

What Does the 50-Tonne Threshold Mean for SMEs?

The new CBAM framework supports small businesses. It reduces the expensive and complicated carbon compliance burden.

Under the new rules, SMEs that import less than 50 tonnes annually will no longer face CBAM’s import carbon tax. This greatly eases the workload for most importers, but it still holds bigger polluters responsible.

The EU is now taking a more inclusive approach to environmental laws. It has aligned with the Omnibus I simplification package. SMEs make up most of the EU’s import market by number, but not by emissions. Now, they can focus on sustainable growth without facing too much regulatory pressure.

Lawmakers emphasized that supporting smaller enterprises doesn’t dilute climate objectives. Instead, it makes room for innovation in business areas often left out of the green transition. This happens because of high compliance costs.

How Will Emissions Accountability Shift?

The new laws keep a close eye on the sectors that produce most carbon emissions. Industries such as steel, cement, fertilizer, aluminum, and chemicals remain central targets of the CBAM. Most businesses can get exemptions, but the system still detects nearly all emissions from imports in key sectors.

CBAM levied sectors
Source: OECD policy brief

This design protects the environment and tackles carbon leakage. Carbon leakage happens when production moves outside the EU to dodge emission costs.

EU reforms cut emissions by 175 Mt CO₂e but cause 34 Mt more in partner countries. This carbon leakage is reduced by CBAM. With it, non-EU emissions fall by 0.12 tonnes per EU tonne avoided.

Global emissions drop 0.54%. Low-emission exporters like Türkiye and Canada benefit, while high-emission ones like India see small losses.

Thus, the updated CBAM regulates imported emissions. It also strengthens anti-circumvention rules. This way, companies outside the EU have carbon obligations similar to those inside the EU.

CBAM’s Environmental and Carbon Footprint Impact

The reforms support the EU’s climate law mandate to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030. The CBAM still targets the main sources of emissions, even with wider exemptions. This helps reduce carbon in high-impact industries.

In 2022, the EU CBAM would have applied to $132 billion in trade—0.37% of global trade and 3% of EU imports. Most of this came from iron and steel, especially from China, Türkiye, and Russia, per the OECD policy brief.

CBAM-covered sectors made up 7% of EU manufacturing, 2.3% of output, 1.1% of value-added, and 0.6% of jobs. The mechanism counts emissions from fuel use (Scope 1), electricity (Scope 2), and some inputs (Scope 3).

  • It would have covered 171 Mt CO₂e in 2022, or 0.31% of global emissions. With a carbon price of €80, it could raise €14.7 billion ($15.3 billion) per year.
Simulated impact of EU CBAM on value added and emissions
Source: OECD

Streamlined reporting procedures and improved authorization processes for larger importers aim to boost operational efficiency and close compliance gaps. These changes also lower barriers to investment in low-carbon technologies.

Forecasters expect that the new CBAM could cut emissions in covered sectors by up to 30% by 2027, compared to 2020 levels. That pace helps the EU meet its environmental goals. It also holds major emitters accountable.

Moreover, simplification does not come at the expense of impact. New data shows that most carbon-intensive imports are still regulated. This is true even with many low-volume importers being exempt. The result is a clear, data-driven plan. It protects environmental progress and considers economic needs.

How Are Markets Reacting to the CBAM Revisions?

Analysts expect the new rules to reshape supply chains and elevate investments in cleaner alternatives. Big companies will likely choose certified low-carbon suppliers. They may also invest in carbon capture and reduction technologies.

These changes could reshape competition, especially in steel and aluminum markets. In these areas, production that emits a lot has less room for compliance mistakes.

Businesses that emit more will feel more pressure to cut down their carbon output. These CBAM changes should boost activity in the carbon market. Clear regulations usually boost investment in carbon credit trading, tech innovation, and emissions tracking solutions.

In this regulatory context, Europe retains its edge. The exemption helps SMEs by reducing compliance barriers. However, focusing on high-emitting imports keeps the carbon market’s signal strong. This ensures prices drive sustainable behaviors across the most impactful sectors.

International and Supply Chain Effects

The updated CBAM could accelerate global movement toward carbon regulatory alignment. Countries that export carbon-heavy goods might need to rethink their climate policies. This change will help them keep trading with the EU. By focusing on climate accountability, Europe’s role as a leader in global trade grows.

Firms that operate globally will likely see more attention on their emissions data and supply chain practices. Focusing on upstream emissions may push suppliers in less-regulated markets to adopt greener practices. This effect could promote global transparency in carbon emissions accounting. This is a key step for decarbonization worldwide.

What Comes Next for EU Carbon Policy?

The European Parliament’s action shows ongoing support for a practical, multi-layered way to control emissions. The balance between climate ambition and economic pragmatism is now central to the EU’s carbon tax reforms.

As the 2030 emissions reduction deadline approaches, further refinement of carbon market policies and trade-aligned environmental legislation is expected.

In the short term, lawmakers are likely to track the CBAM’s implementation impact on SMEs and high-emitting sectors. If necessary, adjustments could tighten compliance expectations or expand reporting obligations.

Observers expect more guidance from the European Commission soon. They also see deeper ties between CBAM and the Emissions Trading System (ETS).

The refined CBAM presents a clear policy signal: the EU intends to lead on climate through enforceable, scalable carbon regulation. This reform keeps strong emission controls and helps businesses stay resilient. It sets the stage for a carbon management strategy that supports the economy while also protecting environmental goals.

The post EU Parliament Approves CBAM Changes to Aid SMEs and Cut Emissions appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Microsoft Cuts 10,000 Tons of Scope 3 Maritime Emissions with NORDEN Biofuel Deal

/0 Comments/in /by

maritime

Microsoft has partnered with Danish shipping company NORDEN. The tech giant’s goal is to cut its Scope 3 maritime emissions by almost 10,000 tons of CO₂e in three years. This is why they are starting a sustainable shipping initiative. This uses NORDEN’s certified waste-based biofuel and its Book and Claim solution to decarbonize Microsoft’s global logistics.

Julia Fidler, Environmental Sustainability – Fuel and Material Decarbonization Lead at Microsoft, noted,

“This project with NORDEN, together with our pilot with the RSB, will further develop the important registry infrastructure required to help Microsoft lower our maritime supply chain emissions in a transparent and credible way, while fostering the growth of sustainable maritime fuels.” 

NORDEN powers specific shipping voyages with biofuel. This cuts lifecycle emissions by 80–90% compared to standard marine fuels. Microsoft’s cargo doesn’t ship on these voyages. However, it earns verified carbon savings through the Book and Claim system. This system allows Microsoft to track emissions reductions, no matter the fuel used, at certain ports.

NORDEN’s Book and Claim System: Links Emissions Reductions to Global Cargo

The press release highlights that NORDEN’s Book and Claim system separates biofuel usage from the environmental benefits. This allows customers, such as Microsoft, to claim emissions reductions. This is true even if their cargo is on regular ships. This approach is vital for expanding low-carbon shipping worldwide.

In the pilot, NORDEN used certified waste-based fuels for several biofuel voyages. The company calculated the emissions savings and shared them with Microsoft. An independent third party audited the process. NORDEN also followed the Smart Freight Centre’s Book and Claim framework for transparency and accuracy.

NORDEN and Microsoft worked with the Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB). They refined RSB’s global Book and Claim guidelines. This improves the traceability of sustainable fuel use in maritime transport.

Anne Jensen, COO at NORDEN said,

“We are pleased to work with a like-minded partner in Microsoft, sharing our ambition to scale the use of low-carbon fuels to reduce emissions in the maritime industry. With the addition of Microsoft to our portfolio of customers, we are demonstrating that NORDEN can help any company that is dependent on maritime transportation in reducing its supply chain emissions in the here and now, while we, as a carrier, overcome the challenges of limited geographic availability of low-carbon fuels.”

Biofuel Provides Immediate, Large-Scale Reductions Without Ship Changes

The company’s certified waste-based biofuel cuts lifecycle emissions by 80–90%. This reduction spans from production to combustion. This drop-in fuel works with existing ships, allowing for immediate decarbonization of operations.

Lifecycle emissions are measured from “well-to-wake,” covering extraction, production, transportation, and final combustion. This ensures comprehensive and reliable emissions accounting. Through Book and Claim, NORDEN gives Microsoft emissions data, voyage logs, and lifecycle assessments, all verified by independent registries.

norden maritime emissions
Source: Norden

Microsoft Aims to Reduce Scope 3 Emissions 

Microsoft’s Scope 3 emissions are a major climate issue. These emissions come from its supply chain, product lifecycle, and logistics. They account for more than 96% of the company’s total emissions. In FY23, these emissions increased by 30.9% from the 2020 baseline, despite the company’s climate goals.

Overall, its emissions mostly come from data centers, AI, and cloud infrastructure. However, it cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 6% by using more clean energy and enhancing energy efficiency.

To tackle these challenges, Microsoft has pledged to cut Scope 3 emissions by over 50% by 2030. It also contracted for 5,015,019 metric tons of carbon removal to be retired over the next 15 years.

The company keeps investing in low-carbon solutions for tough sectors that include steel, concrete, and maritime logistics.

Microsoft emisions
Source: Microsoft

A Blueprint for Decarbonizing Global Shipping

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) says, maritime shipping accounts for nearly 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Scalable and verifiable solutions like NORDEN’s approach could transform global logistics. This model raises the bar for sustainable shipping. It uses independent audits, lifecycle assessments, and clear carbon accounting.

Additionally, the 2023 International Maritime Organization (IMO) GHG Strategy aims to make international shipping more climate-friendly.

  • It sets a clear target: reduce the average CO2 emissions per unit of transport work by at least 40% by 2030.

The strategy also pushes for cleaner energy. By 2030, at least 5%—and ideally 10%—of the energy used in international shipping should come from zero or near-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emission fuels, technologies, or energy sources.

maritime emissions

The NORDEN-Microsoft partnership proves that big companies can also mediate the decarbonization of global shipping. And they don’t need to wait for perfect infrastructure. Biofuels and tools like Book and Claim help companies reduce their climate impact when clean fuel is difficult to access.

The post Microsoft Cuts 10,000 Tons of Scope 3 Maritime Emissions with NORDEN Biofuel Deal appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Banking in Carbon: JPMorgan Chase Invests $90M in Carbon Removal with CO280

/0 Comments/in /by

JPMorgan Chase, one of the largest banks in the world, has entered a landmark agreement with Vancouver-based carbon removal company CO280. The deal is worth $90 million and involves the purchase of 450,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) over the next 13 years. This move shows more confidence in carbon removal tech. It also reflects a strong effort by companies to combat climate change in clear, measurable ways.

The deal makes JPMorgan the first major bank to commit to engineered carbon dioxide removal at this scale. Each ton of carbon will cost less than $200, a notable price improvement in a field that has often struggled with high costs. This long-term agreement boosts CO280’s growth. It also speeds up new carbon capture projects in North America.

Turning Pulp and Paper Mills into Carbon Removal Facilities

CO280 is taking a different approach to carbon capture. The company is retrofitting old pulp and paper mills. They will use carbon capture technology instead of building new factories. These mills produce biogenic CO₂, a carbon dioxide from natural sources, like wood and plants.

CO280 aims to capture emissions before they reach the atmosphere. Then, it stores them permanently underground in deep geological formations.

CO280 carbon capture process
Source: CO280

The technology used comes from SLB (formerly Schlumberger) and is known as SLB’s “Capturi” system. It captures up to 95% of CO₂ emissions from flue gas and purifies them for transport to secure storage locations.

CO280 partners with legacy mills. This choice saves time and money by avoiding new infrastructure. It also helps cut emissions right at the source. This model is scalable, cost-efficient, and a strong example of how to bring older industries into the clean energy future.

The method uses the current infrastructure and supply chains of the pulp and paper sector. This sector emits around 88 million tons of biogenic CO2 each year in the U.S.

By retrofitting instead of rebuilding, CO280 cuts down on complexity, cost, and risk. It also speeds up deployment and keeps mills running smoothly. This approach also supports local economies by preserving jobs and using established supply networks.

JPMorgan’s Climate Strategy in Action

JPMorgan has been working on ways to reduce its carbon footprint and support a low-carbon economy. The company has committed to financing $2.5 trillion in sustainable investments by 2030. Out of that, $1 trillion is for green projects. This includes renewable energy, energy efficiency, and carbon capture. This $90 million deal with CO280 fits directly into that framework.

JPMorgan Chase green investments 2023 progress
Source: JPMorgan Chase

According to Taylor Wright, Head of Operational Sustainability at JPMorgan Chase, the bank is focused on “solutions that can scale and be verified.” She noted:

“We’re thrilled to continue to help speed and scale the growth and development of CDR technologies with this latest offtake. CO280’s ability to provide near-term, affordable removals at scale is a key catalyst for making high-quality, engineered CDR available to a wider range of buyers.”

Engineered carbon removal is different from nature-based solutions like tree planting. It is seen as more measurable and permanent. The agreement with CO280 marks a move to better carbon removal credits. These credits can be audited, monitored, and verified for many years.

The 13-year term lets CO280 raise more funds. It can keep growing its pipeline of retrofit projects. As more mills adopt the model, the volume of carbon captured will increase, and costs could go down even further.

A Growing Market for Carbon Removal

JPMorgan’s deal with CO280 is part of a growing trend. According to BloombergNEF, the global carbon management market could exceed $800 billion by 2030. Engineered carbon removal was once viewed as costly and experimental. Now, it is drawing significant investment.

Microsoft, Stripe, Shopify, and Frontier have made similar deals. They aim to support carbon capture startups. Frontier is a carbon removal fund backed by tech companies. Early offtake agreements help startups grow. They lower prices and build the infrastructure for large-scale operations.

  • CO280’s offering stands out because it delivers carbon removal for under $200 per ton.

Engineered removals cost more than nature-based offsets, which are often under $50 per ton. However, they are seen as more durable and reliable. They will be key to solving climate issues. This is especially true for sectors like aviation, shipping, and heavy industry. These sectors are tough to decarbonize.

Securing carbon removal for under $200 per ton is a big deal. Early-stage engineered CDR projects usually cost over $500 per ton. This price drop shows that CO280’s technology is now mature. 

As seen below, more CDR suppliers expect to have the average cost per metric tonne to go down by 2030. Lower prices make high-quality engineered CDR easier to access and more appealing to many companies.

average production cost per tonne CDR
Source: CDR.fyi

JPMorgan’s financial support adds credibility and visibility to this model. This helps attract more institutional investment in carbon removal. The deal comes after JPMorgan made several agreements worth over $200 million. This shows the bank’s strong role in backing climate technology on a large scale.

The Role of MRV: Making Carbon Removal Trustworthy

One of the biggest challenges facing the carbon credit market is trust. Critics say many voluntary carbon credits rely on weak assumptions or results that can’t be verified. That’s why CO280’s commitment to strong MRV standards (monitoring, reporting, and verification) is so important.

Every ton of CO₂ taken out through the JPMorgan agreement will be measured with third-party tools and checked by independent audits. This ensures that the carbon is not only captured but also stored in a way that is safe and permanent.

CO₂ will be stored in Class VI wells. These wells follow U.S. federal rules and are made for long-term storage of carbon dioxide.

A Blueprint for Scalable Climate Solutions

CO280 plans to continue expanding and is seeking further investment to bring more facilities online. The JPMorgan deal is a signal to other investors that carbon capture can be both environmentally and financially viable.

Each retrofit project could remove 100,000 metric tons of CO₂ per year. With dozens of mills across North America, the potential impact is significant.

From a climate perspective, biogenic CO₂ removal is particularly valuable. Capturing and storing carbon from renewable sources, like trees, has a net-negative effect.

Thus, CO280 doesn’t just cut emissions. It also removes carbon from the air. This helps balance out emissions from sectors that can’t fully go green.

The partnership between JPMorgan Chase and CO280 represents a promising shift in how major companies approach climate solutions. Their agreement uses real-world infrastructure and proven technology to deliver measurable, permanent results. With strong verification, clear pricing, and local job creation, this project serves as a blueprint for other corporations looking to invest in high-quality carbon removal.

The post Banking in Carbon: JPMorgan Chase Invests $90M in Carbon Removal with CO280 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

EU Greenlights Nearly €1 Billion for Green Hydrogen Projects

/0 Comments/in /by

EU Greenlights Nearly €1 Billion for Green Hydrogen Projects

The European Union (EU) has approved €992 million in funding for 15 renewable hydrogen projects in 5 countries across the European Economic Area. This investment, under the EU Innovation Fund, is a key part of Europe’s clean energy strategy.

The projects aim to produce about 2.2 million tonnes of green hydrogen over the next decade, helping to cut over 15 million tonnes of CO₂ emissions. The focus is on heavy industry and transport. These sectors are tough to decarbonize using regular clean energy solutions.

Why Green Hydrogen Matters in the Energy Shift

Green hydrogen forms when renewable electricity drives electrolysers. These devices split water into hydrogen and oxygen. This process does not produce any direct greenhouse gas emissions, unlike grey hydrogen, which comes from fossil fuels.

green hydrogen production
Source: Shutterstock

Green hydrogen is a clean option for industries that can’t easily use electricity. This includes steel production, aviation, shipping, and chemicals.

The high price of electrolysers and changing renewable electricity costs make it tough for green hydrogen to compete with fossil-based hydrogen. That’s why the EU’s direct financial support is critical. It helps lower the cost difference and speeds up the adoption of clean hydrogen technologies.

Environmental Gains from Funded Projects

The 15 projects backed by the EU will avoid over 15 million tonnes of CO₂ emissions by 2033. That’s roughly the same as taking 9 million cars off the road for a year. These projects are expected to generate 2.2 million tonnes of renewable hydrogen.

  • For comparison, producing one tonne of hydrogen using fossil fuels emits about 6.3 tonnes of CO₂.

Green hydrogen will help reduce emissions from hard-to-abate sectors. These sectors contribute a significant portion of Europe’s greenhouse gases. Globally, hydrogen production—mostly from fossil fuels—releases nearly 900 million tonnes of CO₂ each year. If green hydrogen replaces that, it could eliminate an important source of emissions.

EU renewable hydrogen projects
Source: EU

Boosting EU Energy Security

More than 70% of Europe’s energy is imported, most of it in the form of fossil fuels. Supporting local renewable hydrogen production helps the EU rely less on imported energy. This boosts energy security.

Electrolysers can use local wind or solar power, which means hydrogen can be made closer to where it’s used. This cuts transmission costs and prevents supply chain issues from global politics or market changes.

Developing green hydrogen also adds stability. It allows the EU to better manage global energy shocks and cut exposure to changing oil and gas prices.

Building a Competitive Hydrogen Market

This funding round is part of a wider EU plan to grow a €100 billion clean economy by 2030. The REPowerEU strategy aims to produce 10 million tonnes of renewable hydrogen domestically and import an additional 10 million tonnes by 2030. This makes hydrogen a key part of the EU’s energy transition and decarbonization goals.

EU hydrogen plan 2050
Source: EC

The European Hydrogen Bank (EHB) will hold its next auction in late 2025, offering another €1 billion to green hydrogen developers. These auctions promise a set payment for each kilogram of hydrogen produced over 10 years, which helps companies feel secure in their investments.

Hydrogen-related investments are growing globally. The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects that more than €150 billion will be invested in hydrogen annually by 2030.

global hydrogen 2030 IEA
Source: IEA

The EU’s funding structure helps lower costs and expand electrolyser manufacturing. Grants for individual projects go from €8 million to €245 million. Bigger amounts are available for tough areas like maritime shipping.

Each project must reach financial close within 2.5 years and start operations within five years. Many will back the production of chemicals like methanol and ammonia. Hydrogen plays a key role here. It can work as both an energy source and a raw material.

Jobs, Innovation, and Export Opportunities

The green hydrogen economy will create up to 1.4 million jobs by 2030. This is according to the European Renewable Energy Council. It also offers environmental benefits. These include jobs in engineering, manufacturing, logistics, and maintenance.

The EU also expects new hydrogen hubs to encourage innovation, similar to how the solar and wind industries grew. The Innovation Fund helps European businesses develop the entire supply chain. This includes everything from raw materials to energy management software.

Countries in Asia and North America are investing heavily in clean energy, and Europe’s early moves may offer a strong competitive edge.

Cross-Border Collaboration for a Unified Hydrogen Market

One of the key goals of the EU hydrogen strategy is to create a unified hydrogen market across member states. Many funded projects have cross-border elements. They connect producers, pipelines, storage, and end-users across national lines.

This integration is key. It balances hydrogen supply and demand. Countries with extra renewable power, like Spain and Portugal, can help those with high industrial needs, like Germany and the Netherlands. It supports building trans-European hydrogen corridors, which allow for large-scale transport and trade of renewable hydrogen across borders.

The EU is enhancing cross-border infrastructure. This builds a more flexible and connected energy system. It supports electricity networks and lets hydrogen move to where it’s needed most.

Public-Private Partnerships Are Paving the Way

Many EU Innovation Fund projects depend on strong partnerships. These partnerships involve governments, private companies, and research institutions. They combine technical skills, funding, and policy support, speeding up deployment.

Some winning projects show energy companies teaming up with electrolyser makers and local utilities. Together, they create complete supply chains. Some smaller startups are exploring niche areas. They focus on green hydrogen for uses like fertilizer and aviation fuel.

Challenges Ahead and A Strategic Step Toward a Greener Europe

Despite the progress, there are still hurdles. Electrolyser production needs to grow a lot. Also, renewable electricity capacity has to increase to satisfy hydrogen demand. Storage, transport, and end-use systems also need to be built quickly.

Many developers say that long permitting timelines and unclear rules slow things down. To fix this, the EU plans to launch a Hydrogen Mechanism platform in 2025. It will connect hydrogen buyers and sellers and will lower transaction costs.

Moreover, it will help track emissions better. This platform will make it easier for hydrogen to fit into existing energy systems.

The European Commission’s €992 million investment is more than just funding—it’s a clear signal of strategic direction. With auction-based support, market tools, cross-border coordination, and public-private partnerships, the EU is positioning itself as a global leader in renewable hydrogen. 

The post EU Greenlights Nearly €1 Billion for Green Hydrogen Projects appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Lithium Supply Outpaces Demand—for Now: What’s Ahead?

/0 Comments/in /by

lithium

Last month, the U.S. shocked global trade with a 10% tariff on all imports. China was hit harder—34% overall, and up to 145% on battery products. However, it was later reduced to 30%. So far, key battery minerals like lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, and copper are exempt. This is because the U.S. still depends on imports to meet clean energy targets.

In April 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order to investigate how relying on imported processed critical minerals could harm U.S. national security. Nonetheless, lithium is safe for now, but uncertainty is growing.

IEA has recently analyzed that new tariffs could raise EV costs, delay battery projects, and shake supply chains. If lithium is targeted, prices may spike, and the race for U.S. refining will speed up. Let’s study the case of lithium more deeply.

Lithium Prices Stabilize as Supply Overtakes Demand

After years of volatility, lithium prices have stabilized. As per the IEA’s Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025, last year global lithium demand rose 30% year-over-year. It reached more than 200,000 tonnes of lithium, or around 1.1 million tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE). This was roughly equal to all lithium demand in 2018.

Lithium demand
Source: IEA

This growth was largely driven by the electric vehicle (EV) sector, while energy storage systems (ESS)—now accounting for 9% of lithium use are contributing significantly.

However, supply grew even faster, jumping by over 35%. This oversupply pushed lithium prices down to around USD 12,000 per tonne of LCE, a sharp decline from the record highs of 2022.

Economic uncertainty and weaker consumer confidence in the U.S. could also reduce EV purchases, hitting lithium, cobalt, graphite, and copper demand. Large-scale supply projects, particularly for capital-heavy minerals like copper, may stall or face delays, impacting future availability.

China Remains the Demand Giant

According to the EU’s Raw Materials Information System (RMIS), China consumed over 75% of global lithium in 2024 due to its stronghold in battery manufacturing. South Korea and Japan followed, owing to their significant battery cathode production capacity.

The rise of LFP (lithium iron phosphate) batteries in EVs channeled most demand toward lithium carbonate, while lithium hydroxide, used in nickel-rich batteries, experienced slower growth.

However, RMIS has a different prediction. It reveals that demand for most battery materials will likely exceed supply after 2029–2030, except for graphite, because of China’s rapid growth in synthetic graphite production.

Lithium demand is rising fast. However, without major new investments, shortages could hit lithium markets between 2030 and 2040.

Forecast of global Supply-Demand Balance for Lithium

lithium supply demand
Source: RMIS

Cost Relief for Battery Makers

The dip in prices brought welcome savings. IEA highlighted that in 2022, the lithium cost in a typical 57 kWh EV battery was USD 67. By 2024, that figure dropped to just USD 15, easing the pressure on EV manufacturers.

Industry Shakeups: Mergers, Closures, and New Players

IEA also analyzed how the low-price environment triggered a major industry consolidation. For instance, Rio Tinto acquired Arcadium Lithium, a company formed from the merger of Livent and Allkem.

At the same time, mine closures and project cancellations occurred. Several Australian operations shut down, and projects in the U.S., like Rhyolite Ridge, were scrapped due to poor economics.

Yet, new production hubs emerged:

  • Africa saw a fivefold jump in lithium supply, contributing 30% of new output, especially from Zimbabwe and Namibia, up from just 6% in 2023.

  • Latin America recorded a 65% increase, led by Argentina and Brazil. One highlight was Eramet’s Centenario project in Argentina, which began small-scale production using direct lithium extraction (DLE)—a promising new method for tapping brine resources.

Lithium Prices in 2025: Volatility Ahead

Analysts at Shanghai Metals Market (SMM) expect lithium prices to remain volatile throughout 2025. Projections for battery-grade lithium carbonate range between USD 9,000 and USD 12,000 per tonne, depending on how supply keeps pace with growing EV and ESS demand.

Here’s the latest lithium price trend prevailing between April and May.

lithium prices
Source: SMM

Lithium hydroxide is also expected to rise in price, driven by the shift toward high-performance battery chemistries.

The post Lithium Supply Outpaces Demand—for Now: What’s Ahead? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Microsoft’s Major Biochar Deal Aims to Offset 1.24M Tonnes CO2

/0 Comments/in /by

Microsoft has signed the world’s largest biochar carbon removal agreement with Bolivia-based Exomad Green. The 10-year deal will permanently eliminate 1.24 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, equal to the yearly emissions of over 260,000 cars.

This marks a significant step in Microsoft’s push to become carbon negative by 2030 and remove its historical emissions by 2050.

By locking in high-durability carbon removals, Microsoft is demonstrating a long-term commitment to verifiable climate action. The deal is also one of the largest ever in durable carbon dioxide removal (CDR), putting biochar on the map as a serious climate solution.

Why Exomad Green’s Biochar Project Stands Out

Exomad Green’s biochar project offers a powerful, long-term carbon removal solution—while also benefiting local communities and the environment.

Biochar is made by heating biomass without oxygen, locking carbon into a stable form that remains in soil for hundreds of years. It not only traps emissions but also enriches the soil, helping crops grow better with fewer chemicals.

In this project, Exomad Green converts sawmill waste or wood scraps that would normally be burned into biochar.

So, instead of sending harmful smoke into the air, the company puts that carbon to good use by distributing biochar to local farmers. This helps improve soil quality, reduce air pollution, and lower the risk of fires in surrounding areas.

BIOCHAR market

Local Impact with Global Potential

Exomad Green’s approach supports rural and Indigenous communities by giving them access to biochar for use in farming. This helps:

  • Improve soil fertility and crop productivity

  • Reduce health risks from open burning

  • Prevent wildfires caused by unmanaged wood waste

The result is a carbon removal project that benefits both people and the planet.

Setting a New Standard in Carbon Removal Deals

This 10-year agreement isn’t just large—it’s groundbreaking. It brings new industry benchmarks in traceability, transparency, and quality.

  • Biomass traceability: Exomad runs a Forest Monitoring Center that tracks every batch of biomass used. This ensures all raw materials meet strict sustainability standards.

  • High product quality: Regular testing guarantees the biochar meets top international standards, making it effective both for carbon storage and soil health.

Exomad’s production process is certified under Puro.earth’s Biochar Methodology, ensuring full compliance with global best practices.

How Does This Impact Microsoft’s Climate Strategy?

Microsoft aims to be carbon negative by 2030 and to cut all its past carbon emissions by 2050. To achieve this, it also needs reliable ways to remove carbon from the atmosphere. This is one of the main reasons behind the tech giant’s partnership with Exomad Green.

Significantly, this deal adds trusted, long-lasting carbon removal to Microsoft’s climate strategy, using biochar that stores carbon for centuries.

Additionally, it also boosts Microsoft’s image as a leader in corporate sustainability. By choosing verified biochar over less reliable offset methods, the company builds trust with investors, employees, and business partners.

microsoft emissions
Source: Microsoft

In 2024, Microsoft made up 63% of all carbon dioxide removal (CDR) purchases, securing about 5.1 million metric tons of durable CDR credits.

As rules around carbon reporting become stricter, Microsoft’s clear and high-quality approach to carbon removal gives it a strong advantage.

What Is the Environmental Impact of This Deal?

Removing 1.24 million tonnes of carbon dioxide over ten years is a big step in fighting climate change while also improving land use. The biochar made in this project stores carbon in the soil for hundreds of years.

It also helps reduce harmful smoke and greenhouse gases that would normally come from burning leftover wood in Bolivia’s forests.

When added to soil, biochar brings many benefits. It boosts soil fertility, helps soil hold more water, and supports healthy microbes. This increases crop yields, especially in poor-quality farmland. So, naturally, these gains are helpful for farmers near Exomad’s facilities, giving them stronger harvests and better income.

This deal shows how large-scale carbon removal can work in real life. Thus, extending beyond reducing carbon dioxide, this deal also supports local communities.

More than 250,000 people in Concepción, Riberalta, and nearby areas in Bolivia are expected to benefit from the project’s social and environmental impact.

How This Deal Fits into the Carbon Credit Market

The carbon credit market is changing. It’s moving away from short-term solutions and focusing more on long-lasting carbon removal. Companies and governments now prefer projects that can clearly prove they store carbon for a long time. This shift is driven by global net-zero goals, and biochar is becoming a key part of that future.

By partnering with Exomad Green, Microsoft is backing a trusted, nature-based method for carbon storage. This deal shows that large-scale biochar projects can reduce carbon emissions while also creating jobs, cleaning the air, and helping farmers grow more. These added benefits make the deal more valuable for investors, communities, and regulators.

What the Market Trends Reveal

Experts predict the voluntary carbon credit market will grow to $200 billion by 2030. There’s a growing demand for carbon removal projects that show real, lasting impact. Microsoft’s agreement with Exomad Green is a strong example of this shift.

carbon market

Biochar stands out in the market because it does more than just cut carbon. It also improves soil health, helping farmers grow better crops. This win-win makes it easier to adopt and lowers the cost of carbon removal over time.

Carbonfuture’s MRV

Buyers also want credits they can trust. Projects that have solid tracking and third-party checks are seen as more reliable. Exomad Green uses Carbonfuture’s MRV+ system to follow every step, from collecting waste to registering the carbon removed. This level of transparency is key for scaling up carbon removal across industries.

Is Biochar the Future of Carbon Removal?

Microsoft’s support and Exomad Green’s growing capacity show that biochar is ready for big-scale climate solutions. Their facility in Concepción, Bolivia, plans to remove up to 1 million tonnes of CO₂ per year by 2027. That puts it among the world’s largest carbon removal projects.

If more companies copy this model, biochar could become a regular part of business and land management strategies. As rules around carbon get stricter and the public demands real action, companies will need to show real results.

This partnership sets a strong example. It proves that climate goals can be met while helping local communities and protecting the environment. Thus, Microsoft’s betting on biochar deals shows a major transition in the fight against climate change.

The post Microsoft’s Major Biochar Deal Aims to Offset 1.24M Tonnes CO2 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

CORSIA Carbon Credit Prices, Demand, and Supply: What the Future Holds

/0 Comments/in /by

CORSIA Carbon Credit Prices, Demand, and Supply: What the Future Holds

The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), launched by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), plays a major role in helping airlines offset their emissions and meet climate goals.

International air travel is bouncing back after the pandemic. This drives a surge in demand for carbon credits under CORSIA. A new report by Allied Offsets forecasts strong growth in both demand and prices of eligible carbon credits from 2025 through 2035.

This article explores the latest trends, price scenarios, and what this means for airlines, project developers, and the broader voluntary carbon market.

Rising Demand: Airlines Set to Purchase More Credits

Industry estimates say that demand for CORSIA-eligible carbon credits will hit 101 to 148 million tonnes (MtCO₂e) during Phase I (2024–2026). Demand will rise quickly in Phase II (2027–2035).

Cumulative needs are expected to be between 502 and 1,299 MtCO₂e. This will depend on how much international air traffic grows and how CORSIA expands its coverage.

This big increase comes from the rebound in international air travel and the start of Phase II in 2027. During this phase, most ICAO member countries must take part.

By 2035, demand might exceed 1 billion tonnes in high-growth scenarios. That’s about the same as the yearly emissions of a major industrialized country.

To summarize projected cumulative demand:

  • Phase I (2024–2026): 101–148 MtCO₂e

  • Phase II (2027–2035): 502–1,299 MtCO₂e

This growth presents both challenges and opportunities. Airlines need enough credits to comply with regulations. At the same time, project developers and suppliers face pressure to increase the verified supply of eligible credits.

Price Outlook: A Wide Range with Upward Pressure

The report outlines three price scenarios for carbon credits based on different market dynamics:

  1. Low Scenario: Prices start at $14/tonne in a tight supply scenario and grow slowly to $25/tonne in under supply scenario.

  2. Medium Scenario: Prices rise from $15/tonne to $29/tonne.

  3. High Scenario: Prices climb sharply from $16/tonne to $34/tonne.

CORSIA carbon credit supply, demand, and prices
Source: Allied Offsets

Even in the conservative case, prices show modest growth. But in the high-demand scenario, prices could grow over the next decade.

On the other hand, MSCI outlines a range of price scenarios for CORSIA-eligible carbon credits as follows:

  • Phase I (2024–2026): $18–$51 per tonne

  • Phase II (2027–2035): $27–$91 per tonne (by 2033–2035)

Projected CORSIA prices for two of four modeled scenarios
Source: MSCI

This price rise shows that airlines face more pressure to secure high-quality credits. This is especially true as more projects focus on long-term removal instead of just temporary avoidance.

High prices might lead some airlines to invest in sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) or insets. These options help reduce emissions in their operations.

Supply Gaps and Quality Filters

CORSIA doesn’t allow just any carbon credit. ICAO has strict rules for what qualifies — including restrictions on project start dates, crediting periods, and approved methodologies. Only credits from approved programs (like Verra, Gold Standard, and ART TREES) that meet these standards are eligible.

The report estimates that:

  • Only about 543 MtCO₂e of eligible credits will be issued by 2027.

CORSIA carbon credits supply
Source: Allied Offsets

Supply is projected to lag behind demand. Reports suggest possible deficits of 12–43 MtCO₂e in Phase I. Phase II may face even larger shortfalls. This is likely if stricter quality filters are used. These filters include co-benefits, permanence, and additionality. The exact numbers for filtered supply aren’t given, but these criteria would greatly lower the usable pool.

CORSIA credits issued versus forecast supply
Source: AlliedOffsets

Currently, most eligible supply comes from avoided deforestation (REDD+) and renewable energy projects. As demand increases and quality standards get stricter, the market will likely move toward lasting carbon removal solutions. This includes methods like reforestation, biochar, and direct air capture (DAC).

Regional Insights: Where Supply Comes From

The current credit supply under CORSIA is heavily concentrated in a few countries:

  • India, China, and Brazil together account for over 50% of the available supply.

Africa has fewer CORSIA-eligible credits now. However, it is expected to grow. This growth will focus on nature-based solutions, such as afforestation and cookstove projects.

This geographic concentration means that any changes in policy, political stability, or project approvals in key countries could disrupt supply. For example, if India were to change its rules on carbon credit exports — as some officials have suggested — global supply could shrink quickly.

Interest is growing in boosting credit generation in Southeast Asia and Latin America. Many areas there have good land for reforestation and carbon farming.

Market Trends and Implications for Airlines

CORSIA credits are part of the larger voluntary carbon market. This market has attracted a lot of interest from companies and governments. According to MSCI report, voluntary carbon markets could reach $250 billion annually by 2050.

carbon credit market value 2050 MSCI
Source: MSCI

But today’s CORSIA credits are selling for far less than the cost of removing CO₂ using high-tech methods like DAC, which can exceed $300 per tonne. This price gap has raised questions about credit quality and how buyers can demonstrate real climate impact.

SEE MORE: CORSIA Credits Soaring Costs: How They Are Reshaping Aviation’s Future

Some key trends include:

  • Airlines such as Delta, United, and Lufthansa are now mixing credit purchases with investments in SAF. They also support offsets from reforestation or engineered removals.

  • Programs like SBTi (Science-Based Targets initiative) encourage firms to reduce emissions. They also promote high-quality removals instead of bulk offsetting.

For airlines, this means they may need to:

  • Budget more for compliance over time

  • Diversify carbon offset portfolios

  • Communicate clearly about the credibility of their offsets

The Bigger Picture: What Comes Next

The Allied Offsets report shows that corporate buyers, like airlines, play a key role in global carbon markets. Their large, long-term offtake agreements — such as Microsoft’s 18 MtCO₂e deal with Rubicon Carbon — are shaping demand signals for the next decade.

ICAO plans to tighten CORSIA rules in future reviews. This may mean more removals and limits on older avoidance projects. This could further reduce supply and raise prices.

Policymakers can boost support for in-sector measures. This includes increasing SAF production and encouraging new removal technologies.

Airlines face challenges now. They must deal with rising prices, new rules, and increased scrutiny on carbon offsetting. In the long run, using durable carbon removals could change aviation and the climate finance system.

CORSIA is entering a critical phase. Demand is set to rise sharply. Meanwhile, supply is tightening due to stricter quality controls. As the report shows, the window to build a balanced, credible carbon market is narrowing. The next few years will shape the cost and credibility of airline decarbonization for decades to come.

The post CORSIA Carbon Credit Prices, Demand, and Supply: What the Future Holds appeared first on Carbon Credits.

SolarBank Stays Strong as Trump’s Clean Energy Rollbacks Loom

/0 Comments/in /by

SolarBank Stays Steady as Trump's Clean Energy Rollbacks Loom

Disseminated on behalf of SolarBank Corporation

The U.S. House of Representatives proposes rollbacks to key clean energy programs, which raises questions across the sector. Among the targeted provisions are the residential solar tax credit and funding elements of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)—a landmark climate package that helped spark record investment in clean energy over the past two years.

The proposal suggests ending the 30% federal residential solar tax credit by the end of 2025. This is nearly 10 years sooner than expected. This policy change could greatly affect companies in the solar industry.

Understanding the Proposed Policy Change

The residential solar tax credit, or Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC) is Section 25D of the U.S. Tax Code. It lets homeowners claim 30% of the cost of installing solar panels. This credit appears on their federal tax returns.

The credit, part of the Inflation Reduction Act, was to last until 2032. It will start to decrease gradually in 2033. The schedule is below. However, the new proposal aims to terminate this credit by December 31, 2025. 

solar tax credit sched
Source: Ecowatch

Experts warn that this sudden change might raise costs for consumers. It could also lower demand for residential solar installations and lead to job losses in the sector. Small solar installation businesses often rely on credit for competitive pricing. This makes them especially vulnerable.

The solar industry has expressed strong opposition to the proposed cuts. Many stakeholders say the tax credit has helped grow residential solar. It creates jobs and promotes energy independence.

The Solar Energy Industries Association says the residential solar market has grown 10x in the last ten years. The tax credit has played a big part in this growth.

The proposal passed the House Ways and Means Committee. However, it still has many hurdles to clear before it can become law. Some lawmakers, including Republicans from areas that benefit from clean energy investments, are worried about the possible negative effects of the cuts.

The final outcome will depend on negotiations in both the House and Senate. 

Policy Uncertainty and Its Limits

For many solar developers, these changes could signal uncertainty and disruption. For SolarBank, a developer focused on community and commercial-scale solar (as opposed to residential solar installations), the path forward remains steady. This is due to careful planning, strategic focus, and a shift in business model that favors long-term sustainability.

The company’s CEO, Dr. Richard Lu, says the company’s business model is largely shielded from this turbulence, saying:

“Over the next several years we are not expecting any major changes or challenges from the potential changes to federal solar tax incentives. Support for our community solar projects comes at a state level, and we only focus on the 22 states that have community solar policy.”

This is a key distinction. SolarBank focuses on commercial, industrial, and community solar projects. Unlike residential solar companies, it benefits from strong state mandates and incentives.

Moreover, the timeline for scaling back federal tax credits for commercial solar systems doesn’t begin until 2028 or 2029. SolarBank has already factored that into its long-term planning. Dr. Lu emphasized this, noting:

“We work with industrial and commercial large-scale solar projects, and not residential. The schedule to reduce tax incentives… has already been included in our operations to mitigate the effect.”

Resilience Through Integration

SolarBank isn’t shaken by the headlines. Instead, it is strengthening its operations. Its resilience comes from a vertically integrated model. This model covers development, construction, and long-term operations and maintenance.

This structure helps the company control costs, speed up deployment, and rely less on uncertain external factors. Dr. Lu stated:

“We have a vertically integrated system… which gives us the capability to manage our costs and simplify our process. This is really where our lean set up is competitive.”

That competitiveness is especially important in a rapidly evolving energy market. AI data centers, electric vehicles, and digital industries are driving high electricity demand.

Data center power use in the U.S. will grow twofold in 2030 due to AI. Meanwhile, traditional energy systems are having a tough time keeping up.

US data centers power use under 4 scenarios EPRI analysis
Source: Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

SolarBank sees this mismatch as an opportunity. The company can meet rising energy needs by staying agile and keeping costs in check, that is faster than many big, slower competitors.

Shifting from Build-to-Sell to Build-to-Own

In response to both market evolution and policy unpredictability, SolarBank is also adjusting its core business strategy. Once focused on a build-to-sell model, the company is now emphasizing build-to-own projects.

The CEO noted that this shift aims to create a more stable revenue base, making SolarBank less reliant on one-off transactions and external funding sources. He said:

“This will boost our long-term recurring revenue. It makes it easier to take on new projects with less external funding.”

This change also helps the company hedge against potential federal funding shortfalls. SolarBank can continue to grow by attracting private investment and forming strategic partnerships. This will help, even with solar tax credit challenges.

A recent collaboration with Qcells, involving the use of U.S.-manufactured solar modules, is one example of how the company is preparing for multiple future scenarios. SolarBank has the following project pipeline that will bring significant growth to the company:

SolarBank projects
Source: SolarBank

A Message for Policymakers

The company is confident in its own path. However, Dr. Lu emphasized the broader value of maintaining federal support for clean energy—especially for community solar and distributed energy systems. He remarked:

“Consistent and long-term support… is not just an investment in clean energy but also in social equity and economic resilience.” 

Community solar programs are especially important for expanding access to renewable energy among low- and moderate-income households, renters, and underserved communities. Without strong policy support, these groups risk being left behind in the clean energy transition.

Dr. Lu added:

“Stable policies and incentives are crucial for planning and investment. By supporting these initiatives, policymakers can drive job creation, foster local economic development, and advance national goals for carbon reduction and climate resilience.”

What’s The Future for Solar?

SolarBank’s calm response shows its strong position, even if the headlines are unsettling. The company is ready to succeed by using state support, seeking private investment, and adjusting its business model. This approach helps it thrive despite federal uncertainty.

Still, the broader industry faces real questions. Will Congress follow through with proposed rollbacks? Can community solar continue to grow if the tax credits vanish? And what does this mean for energy equity in the U.S.?

For now, SolarBank believes that its focus on fundamentals, policy-savvy expansion, and forward-thinking leadership will carry it through.

This report contains forward-looking information. Please refer to the SolarBank press release entitled “SolarBank Announces Third Quarter Results” for details of the information, risks and assumptions.

Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.

Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.

The post SolarBank Stays Strong as Trump’s Clean Energy Rollbacks Loom appeared first on Carbon Credits.