What Is COP31? Everything You Need to Know and What It Means for Carbon Markets

What Is COP31? Everything You Need to Know and What It Means for Carbon Markets

The world’s climate leaders will meet in Antalya, Türkiye, from November 9 to 20, 2026, for COP31. The annual United Nations climate conference brings together governments to negotiate how to limit global warming, cut greenhouse gas emissions, and help countries deal with climate change.

This year’s conference comes at a critical time. Countries have made climate commitments, but global emissions remain too high to keep the world on a path toward limiting warming to 1.5°C. Governments also face growing pressure to provide climate finance and turn their promises into real action.

For carbon markets, COP31 could bring further progress on international carbon trading, climate finance, and the rules that govern carbon credits under the Paris Agreement.

Here is what you need to know about COP31, the main issues on the agenda, and why the outcomes matter for carbon markets and the global energy transition.

What Is COP31?

COP31 stands for the 31st meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The convention is an international treaty adopted in 1992 that provides the basis for global climate negotiations.

The annual COP meetings bring together almost every country to discuss how to respond to climate change. Governments negotiate agreements, review progress, and decide on further action to reduce emissions and support countries facing climate impacts.

COP31 is also linked to two other formal meetings. These are the Kyoto Protocol parties’ 21st meeting and the Paris Agreement parties’ eighth meeting.

The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, aims to keep global warming well below 2°C and pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. Countries submit their climate plans, called Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). These plans outline their targets and actions to cut emissions and tackle climate change.

COP meetings help countries review these plans, negotiate common rules, and agree on ways to strengthen global climate action. However, COP decisions do not automatically force every country to adopt the same domestic policies. Countries must implement their commitments through their own laws, regulations, and national plans.

When and Where Is COP31?

COP31 will take place from November 9 to 20, 2026, in Antalya, Türkiye, at the Antalya Expo Center. Türkiye will host the conference, while Australia will lead the formal negotiations. This shared arrangement followed discussions between the two countries over hosting the event.

Türkiye’s Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change Minister, Murat Kurum, has been nominated as COP31 President. Australia’s Climate Change and Energy Minister, Chris Bowen, will serve as President of Negotiations.

The two roles have different responsibilities. Türkiye will host the conference and lead the presidency’s broader agenda. Australia will steer the formal negotiations between countries.

A World Leaders’ Summit is scheduled for November 11 and 12. It will allow heads of state and government to discuss climate priorities and build political support for the negotiations.

The conference will also bring together scientists, businesses, investors, Indigenous Peoples, youth groups, and civil society organizations. These groups can share research, announce initiatives, and encourage action, although formal decisions are negotiated by governments.

Why Is COP31 Important?

COP31 takes place as the gap between current climate commitments and the action needed to limit warming remains large. The UN Environment Programme’s Emissions Gap Report 2026 estimates that the world could face around 2.6°C of warming this century if countries fully implement their current NDCs. That would be well above the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal.

The report states that global greenhouse gas emissions must drop by 45% by 2035. They need to decrease by 69% by 2040, compared to 2025 levels. This change is crucial to keep warming under 1.5°C.

Global GHG emissions UNEP
Source: UNEP

By comparison, full implementation of current NDCs would reduce emissions by only 11% to 15% by 2035, relative to 2025 levels. These estimates show why countries face pressure to strengthen their climate plans and speed up implementation. They also show that meeting existing commitments alone will not be enough to put the world on the report’s lowest-overshoot pathway.

COP31 is expected to focus on turning commitments into practical results. The main issues are:

  • Cutting emissions,
  • Adapting to climate impacts,
  • Financing climate action in developing countries, and
  • Supporting a fair transition for workers and communities.

The conference will also continue work on the Global Stocktake, the process used to assess collective progress under the Paris Agreement. The first stocktake concluded at COP28 in 2023. The second process begins with gathering information in 2026 and is expected to continue through 2028.

The findings will help countries assess whether global climate action is on track and what further measures may be needed.

What Are the Main Topics at COP31?

Several issues are expected to shape the negotiations and related climate initiatives.

  1. Cutting greenhouse gas emissions

Countries will discuss how to reduce emissions from energy, industry, transport, buildings, and other sectors. This includes expanding clean energy, improving energy efficiency, and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

Türkiye’s presidency has also highlighted cleaner industry, electrification, circular economy measures, and more resilient cities as priorities for wider climate action.

  1. Climate finance

Developing countries need funding to cut emissions, adapt to climate impacts, and strengthen infrastructure. Negotiations will address how this money can be mobilized and delivered, including the roles of public funding, private investment, and international cooperation.

A key challenge is ensuring that financial commitments lead to actual funding for projects and communities.

  1. Adaptation and resilience

Countries are already facing the effects of climate change, including extreme heat, floods, droughts, and rising sea levels. COP31 will continue discussions on helping vulnerable countries prepare for these impacts and measure progress on adaptation.

  1. A fair energy transition

Governments must consider how to reduce emissions while protecting workers, communities, and economies that depend on carbon-intensive industries. The pace and cost of the transition remain major points of disagreement between countries.

  1. International cooperation

Countries will continue discussions on how to work together to meet climate goals. This includes carbon markets, technology sharing, financial support, and other forms of cooperation under the Paris Agreement.

What Could COP31 Mean for Carbon Markets?

Carbon markets allow companies or governments to support emissions reductions or removals through carbon credits. Each credit generally represents one metric tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent reduced or removed, subject to the rules of the program that issues it.

At COP31, talks will focus on carbon markets. There will be key discussions about climate finance and Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Article 6 provides rules for countries to cooperate in meeting their climate targets, including through the transfer of approved emissions reductions.

There are two main carbon trading routes under Article 6.

Article 6.2: Trading Between Countries

Article 6.2 allows countries to transfer authorized emissions reductions to other countries under bilateral or other cooperative arrangements. For example, one country could support a renewable energy or methane reduction project in another country and use the resulting authorized reductions toward its climate target, subject to the agreed rules.

These transfers require careful accounting. When a country transfers an authorized reduction for another country to use, it generally must make a corresponding adjustment to avoid both countries counting the same reduction toward their climate targets.

Article 6 Bilateral Cooperation Between Parties
Source: A6IP

At COP31, discussions are expected to include the reporting systems, technical reviews, registries, and funding needed to support these arrangements. These systems help countries track transfers and show how they account for the emissions reductions.

Article 6.4: The UN Carbon Crediting Mechanism

Article 6.4 established a United Nations-supervised carbon-crediting mechanism. It is designed to issue credits for eligible activities that reduce or remove greenhouse gas emissions under approved methodologies and rules.

The mechanism is now known as the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM).

Work on methodologies and the transition of eligible activities from the former Clean Development Mechanism continues. COP31 will provide an opportunity to review progress and discuss the resources needed to operate the system.

However, carbon markets are not the only focus of COP31, and the conference is not expected to rewrite the entire Article 6 rulebook. The main challenge is putting the existing rules into practice and ensuring that the supporting systems work effectively.

Why Climate Finance Matters to Carbon Markets

Carbon markets could help direct funding toward emissions-reduction projects, including renewable energy, methane control, forest protection, and carbon removal. However, they cannot replace all forms of climate finance.

Credit purchases depend on project quality, demand, and the rules governing how credits can be used. Many climate needs, particularly adaptation and public infrastructure, may not generate credits that can be sold.

Abatable’s analysis ahead of COP31 highlights the need to fund the systems that support Article 6 cooperation, including reporting, registries, technical reviews, and capacity-building. It also points to wider debates over how countries should finance climate action.

For carbon market participants, the practical developments to watch include new bilateral agreements, national rules for authorizing credits, updates on Article 6 implementation, and efforts to strengthen the credibility of international transfers.

These developments could influence future market access and demand, although their effects will depend on what governments agree and how they implement those decisions.

What Is the COP31 Action Agenda?

Alongside formal negotiations, the COP31 presidency will promote a wider Climate Action Agenda. This is a separate but related track that brings together businesses, cities, investors, civil society, and other groups to encourage practical climate action.

The Action Agenda focuses on areas such as clean energy, green industry, circular economy measures, sustainable agriculture, resilient cities, and climate finance.

Action-Agenda-COP31
Source: Geneva Environment Network

The presidency has also highlighted three headline targets: increasing electricity’s share of global final energy demand from just over 20% to 35% by 2035, halving the growth in global waste by 2035, and reducing energy-use intensity in buildings by at least 25% by 2035.

These are priorities for mobilizing action, not automatically binding targets for every country. Their impact will depend on the commitments made by participants, the resources available, and whether progress can be measured.

The distinction matters because announcements made alongside COP negotiations do not have the same status as formal decisions adopted by governments. The Action Agenda can help businesses and other groups contribute to climate solutions, while the negotiations set the international framework for cooperation.

What Should You Watch During COP31?

For people following climate policy and carbon markets, several developments will be worth watching.

  • National climate plans: Whether more countries strengthen their emissions targets and explain how they will meet them.
  • Climate finance: Whether governments make progress on funding for emissions cuts, adaptation, and vulnerable communities.
  • Article 6 implementation: Whether countries advance the systems needed to authorize, track, and report international carbon-credit transfers.
  • Carbon market cooperation: Whether countries announce new agreements or rules that create clearer paths for approved credit transfers.
  • Action Agenda commitments: Whether companies, investors, and other organizations announce measurable projects and funding rather than broad ambitions alone.

These developments will help show whether COP31 can move climate action forward. However, announcements alone will not prove that emissions are falling. The real test will be whether governments and businesses deliver measurable results over time.

COP31 Antalya Climate Action Infographic

The Bottom Line

COP31 will bring governments and other climate stakeholders together in Antalya from November 9 to 20, 2026, to address emissions, climate finance, adaptation, and international cooperation.

For carbon markets, the conference is an important opportunity to advance the implementation of Article 6 and discuss how carbon finance can support wider climate goals. It is also a chance to strengthen the systems that make international transfers transparent and accountable.

Still, carbon markets are only one part of the global climate response. Their contribution will depend on credible emissions reductions, clear accounting, effective oversight, and real demand for high-quality credits.

Ultimately, COP31 will be judged not only by the decisions and announcements made in Antalya, but by whether countries and other participants turn them into lasting climate action.

The post What Is COP31? Everything You Need to Know and What It Means for Carbon Markets appeared first on Carbon Credits.

US Army Backs Idaho Tungsten Project as China Controls Nearly 79% of Supply

US Army Backs Idaho Tungsten Project as China Controls Nearly 79% of Supply

The United States is taking another step to reduce its reliance on foreign critical minerals. The U.S. Army has awarded Perpetua Resources up to $40 million to evaluate the potential production of tungsten in Idaho, as the country seeks to strengthen its domestic supply of the metal.

The 36-month agreement will support exploration drilling, laboratory testing, and engineering work at the historic Stibnite Mining District. The project aims to determine whether tungsten can be produced in that mining location at a technical and economic scale.

The award comes as China remains the world’s leading tungsten producer. The mineral is important to manufacturing, construction, mining, and defense. It also supports industrial equipment and infrastructure used in the energy transition.

For the United States, developing a domestic source could improve supply security. Any new mining operation must also consider its environmental impact. This includes energy use, emissions, water effects, and land disturbance.

US Army Funds Tungsten Exploration in Idaho

The U.S. Army’s Defense Ordnance Technology Consortium provides funding to Perpetua Resources. It’s a cost-sharing program between the company and the U.S. government. The Army could contribute up to $40 million over three years. Perpetua has agreed to match that amount, bringing the potential combined investment to $80 million.

The first 18 months of work are expected to cost about $18 million, shared equally by the company and the Army. Funding for later phases will depend on the results of earlier work and approval of additional funding.

The program will focus mainly on tungsten mineralization beneath the Hangar Flats area of the Stibnite Mining District. Planned activities include:

  • Drilling to find a potential tungsten resource.
  • Collecting samples.
  • Conducting metallurgical tests to check if the material can be processed into tungsten concentrate.

The partners will also work on the design, permitting, and possible construction of an exploration decline. This underground access would allow further evaluation of mineral deposits beneath the planned open-pit area.

Importantly, the award does not mean that commercial tungsten production has been approved or that a mine is ready to operate. The work is intended to establish whether production is technically and economically feasible.

China Controls Most of the World’s Tungsten Supply

The project reflects growing concern about the concentration of critical mineral production in a small number of countries. According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), China produced an estimated 67,000 metric tons of tungsten in 2025 out of about 85,000 metric tons worldwide. That represents nearly 79% of global mine production.

tungsten production 2025 china dominance
Source: Katusa Research

The United States, meanwhile, has not mined tungsten commercially since 2015. It relies on imports and recycling to meet domestic demand.

China’s dominance matters because tungsten is difficult to replace in many industrial applications. Its high melting point, strength, and resistance to wear make it valuable for products that must operate under extreme conditions.

The metal is widely used in tungsten carbide cutting and drilling tools. These tools are essential in metalworking, construction, mining, and oil and gas operations. Tungsten is also used in electrical components, specialty steels, and defense equipment.

  • The USGS estimates that about 60% of U.S. tungsten consumption goes into cemented carbide parts used for cutting and wear-resistant applications.

China’s export controls have added to concerns about supply reliability. Countries that rely on imported tungsten face risks. Restrictions or disruptions can impact manufacturers and industries that require a steady supply.

China’s Tungsten Supply Infographic

Why Tungsten Matters to Energy and Industrial Supply Chains

Tungsten is not a major battery or renewable energy material like lithium, nickel, or copper. However, it plays an important supporting role in the industrial systems needed to build and maintain infrastructure.

Its hardness and resistance to heat make tungsten carbide useful in cutting, drilling, and wear-resistant tools. These tools help manufacture metal parts, build infrastructure, and extract other minerals used in energy systems.

Mining equipment, for example, supports the production of materials needed for electricity networks, renewable energy projects, and battery supply chains. Industrial cutting tools also help manufacturers produce components for a wide range of technologies.

This creates an indirect link between tungsten supply and the energy transition. A reliable supply of industrial materials can support the manufacturing and infrastructure needed to expand clean energy systems.

However, this does not make tungsten mining automatically climate-friendly. The environmental impact varies based on how the mineral is extracted, processed, and transported. It also depends on the energy sources used in the supply chain.

Mining Expansion Brings Environmental Questions

Developing a domestic tungsten source could reduce the United States’ dependence on overseas suppliers. Yet, increasing local production also raises questions about the environmental cost of mining.

Mining and mineral processing require energy to operate equipment, move rock, crush ore, and separate valuable materials. Depending on the energy mix, these activities can produce significant greenhouse gas emissions.

Projects can also affect land, water quality, and local ecosystems. These risks make environmental planning and monitoring important parts of any new mining development.

At Stibnite, the tungsten exploration work is linked to a larger proposed mining project that also contains gold and antimony. Perpetua has reported tungsten and antimony mineralization beneath the Hangar Flats pit, including high-grade drilling results.

  • The company has also said that the exploration program will test an existing 550-kilogram sample containing 4.2% tungsten and 9.2% antimony.

Any development beyond the currently permitted mine plan would require additional regulatory review and permitting. The company has not established that the new tungsten work will lead to commercially viable production.

For climate-focused investors and supply chain planners, the key issue is therefore not simply where tungsten comes from. It is also how efficiently and responsibly it can be produced.

US Government Funding for Critical Minerals Grows

The Army’s award is part of a wider U.S. effort to strengthen domestic supplies of materials considered important to national security and manufacturing. Perpetua said the new agreement brings its total U.S. government awards for critical mineral work to $126 million since 2022.

The company is also developing the Stibnite Gold Project, which contains antimony resources alongside gold. Antimony is another critical mineral used in defense applications and industrial products.

The USGS reported that the United States had no commercial tungsten mine production in 2025. However, the country has companies capable of processing tungsten concentrates, powders, and scrap into metal products and chemicals.

Domestic mining can help one part of the supply chain. However, it doesn’t eliminate the need for processing capacity, recycling, and steady access to other inputs.

Can Domestic Tungsten Supply Support a Lower-Carbon Economy?

The Army’s investment highlights the connection between mineral security, industrial development, and the energy transition.

Clean energy technologies depend on a broad network of materials and manufacturing processes. While tungsten is not a leading renewable energy mineral, it supports the tools and equipment used across industrial supply chains.

Building domestic supply could improve access to the metal and reduce exposure to overseas disruptions. But the climate benefits will depend on how new production is developed and powered.

The Stibnite program is still at the evaluation stage. Its results will help determine whether the deposit can support future tungsten production and what additional work would be needed.

As the United States seeks to secure more critical minerals at home, the challenge will be to balance supply chain resilience with responsible resource development. That means looking beyond production targets to include energy use, emissions, water management, and long-term environmental protection.

The post US Army Backs Idaho Tungsten Project as China Controls Nearly 79% of Supply appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Palantir (PLTR) Stock Falls Despite 96% Revenue Surge, Can Its Climate Goals Keep Up?

Palantir (PLTR) Stock Falls Despite 96% Revenue Surge, Can Its Climate Goals Keep Up?

Palantir Technologies reported another strong quarter as demand for its artificial intelligence (AI) software continued to grow. Revenue nearly doubled in the third quarter of 2026, and the company raised its full-year outlook. Yet, Palantir stock fell after the results as investors weighed its growth against slower contract growth and high expectations.

The financial results highlight Palantir’s growing role in the AI market. However, its expansion also raises an important question: Can the company keep growing while managing the environmental impact of its business?

AI software depends on large computing systems, data centers, and electricity. As more businesses and government agencies use these tools, the demand for computing power can increase. This makes energy use and greenhouse gas emissions important issues for fast-growing technology companies.

Palantir has set emissions reduction goals and reports its carbon footprint each year. Its latest emissions report shows progress against its 2019 baseline, but also a small increase in total emissions.

Palantir Revenue Nearly Doubles as AI Demand Grows

Palantir reported third-quarter revenue of $2.3 billion, up 96% from the same period in 2025. It was the company’s first quarter with revenue above $2 billion.

Its U.S. commercial business was a major growth driver. Revenue from this segment jumped 148% year over year to $984 million. For the first time, it was higher than U.S. government revenue, which reached $953 million, up 96%.

The company also reported net income of $1.1 billion and adjusted free cash flow of $1.2 billion. Both GAAP and adjusted earnings per share came in at $0.44.

Palantir Q3 2026 financial results.jpg
Source: Palantir

Despite beating earnings estimates and raising its full-year outlook, Palantir shares fell after the announcement. The stock closed at $178.34 on November 2, down 3.08% during the regular trading session. It then dropped about 6% in premarket trading on November 3, reaching around $167.66.

The decline came as investors focused on slower growth in new contracts. Palantir’s total contract value reached $2.918 billion in the third quarter, up just 6% from a year earlier, compared with 49% growth in the previous quarter. U.S. commercial contract value also slowed, rising 11% year over year.

Investors also weighed the company’s high stock valuation and the slower sequential revenue growth implied by its fourth-quarter forecast. The reaction shows that even strong earnings and higher guidance may not satisfy investors when expectations for future growth are already high.

Palantir PLTR stock

AI Growth Brings Greater Energy and Emissions Questions

Palantir develops software that helps organizations collect, analyze, and use large amounts of data. Its Artificial Intelligence Platform, or AIP, allows businesses and government agencies to use AI tools in their operations.

Alex Karp, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Palantir Technologies, remarked:

”The Sovereign AI moment is purpose-built for Palantir. Our products—from Foundry and Ontology to AIP with its ontologized, fine-tuned open-weight models—ignite a self-improvement loop that joins and aligns the workflow with its optimal model and us with our partners. This dialectic drives transformational value for both Palantir and our partners—and works only in artistic combination. Each becomes stronger as the sum becomes more powerful.”

As demand for these services grows, so does the need for computing resources. AI systems require powerful computer chips, servers, data centers, and supporting infrastructure. These facilities need electricity to run and often require cooling systems to manage heat.

The climate impact depends partly on where that electricity comes from. Data centers powered by fossil fuels can produce more greenhouse gas emissions than those using renewable or other low-carbon energy sources.

Palantir is not a data center operator on the same scale as major cloud providers. However, its business depends on computing infrastructure, and its own emissions reporting covers more than its direct operations. Its supply chain, business travel, and purchased services also contribute to its carbon footprint.

Palantir’s Global Emissions Rise 18% in 2025

Palantir’s latest carbon report shows that its global greenhouse gas emissions increased in 2025, reversing the progress reported in the previous year.

  • The company recorded 27,222 metric tons of gross emissions across Scopes 1, 2, and 3 in 2025. This was an 18% increase from 23,018 metric tons in 2024. Palantir linked much of the rise to higher business travel.
Palantir total ghg emissions 2025
Source: Palantir

Despite the increase, its 2025 emissions remained about 18.5% below its 2019 baseline of 33,400 metric tons. However, the company said its latest total was above the path set by its target to reduce absolute emissions by an average of 4.2% each year over ten years from the 2019 baseline.

Scope 3 emissions made up most of Palantir’s footprint in 2025, reaching 25,277 metric tons. Scope 2 emissions accounted for 1,922 metric tons, while Scope 1 emissions were 23 metric tons.

The company also reported an emissions intensity of about six metric tons of CO2e per employee. This was 57% lower than its 2019 level, showing that emissions per employee have fallen even as its total emissions increased.

Palantir emissions by scope 2025
Source: Palantir

Palantir follows the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which groups corporate emissions into three categories:

  • Scope 1: Direct emissions from sources a company owns or controls.
  • Scope 2: Emissions linked to purchased electricity, heating, and cooling.
  • Scope 3: Other indirect emissions across a company’s value chain, including business travel, suppliers, and purchased goods and services.

Scope 3 emissions can be difficult to manage because they come from activities outside a company’s direct control. For Palantir, business travel was the largest source of these emissions in 2025. Air travel, in particular, accounted for a significant share of its reported footprint.

Carbon Credits Help Address Remaining Emissions

Palantir purchased 30,000 metric tons of carbon credits in 2025, more than its reported gross emissions of 27,222 metric tons. The company said it plans to apply the remaining credits to future years, where applicable.

The credits supported five projects in Brazil, Chile, and France through its partners CNaught and Cool Effect. These projects focus on reducing or destroying landfill methane, ozone-depleting substances, and nitrous oxide.

Palantir uses carbon credits to support its goal of achieving carbon neutrality each year. However, credits do not replace direct emissions cuts. Their climate value depends on whether the claimed reductions or removals are real, measurable, and properly verified.

The company also says its emissions data are not independently verified by a third party, an important qualification when assessing its reported climate progress.

AI Could Help Other Industries Reduce Emissions

AI can help businesses improve energy efficiency, manage electricity grids, forecast renewable power output, and reduce industrial waste.

Palantir’s software helps organizations use data to improve operations and resource management. The company says its model-agnostic approach allows customers to choose the AI models they use, and that it does not own or operate data centers.

The firm further noted that its growing focus on AI has not meaningfully increased its own carbon emissions. However, the report does not provide a separate figure for emissions linked to AI activity. AI’s potential climate benefits do not automatically offset the emissions from developing and running the technology.

Its overall impact depends on energy use, software efficiency, and measurable emissions savings from customer applications.

Can Palantir Maintain Climate Progress as AI Demand Grows?

Palantir’s latest earnings show strong demand for its AI software, but its 2025 carbon report presents a more mixed picture. Gross emissions remained below the 2019 baseline but rose 18% in 2025, largely due to higher business travel.

The company also bought more carbon credits than its total reported emissions. While this supports its carbon neutrality goal, it does not replace the need to reduce emissions across its own operations and value chain.

As AI adoption grows, investors may need to look beyond financial results. Energy use, business travel, supply chain emissions, carbon credit quality, and progress toward climate targets are also important measures of long-term performance.

Palantir’s challenge is to keep growing its AI business while bringing gross emissions back toward its reduction target.

The post Palantir (PLTR) Stock Falls Despite 96% Revenue Surge, Can Its Climate Goals Keep Up? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Anthropic’s New IPO Filing Puts AI and Data Center’s Energy and Emissions in Focus

Anthropic’s New IPO Filing Puts AI and Data Center's Energy and Emissions in Focus

Anthropic’s plan to go public is drawing attention to the money flowing into artificial intelligence (AI). However, the company’s latest financial disclosures also highlight a growing challenge for the industry: how to power the rapid expansion of AI without adding to climate change.

The maker of Claude AI filed an updated registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 2, 2026. The filing revealed that Anthropic made almost $17 billion in revenue in the third quarter. At the same time, its costs for computing power and infrastructure kept increasing.

The company has also committed to about $895.4 billion in future spending, most of it linked to computing and infrastructure. These commitments support the data centres and computing systems needed to develop and run its AI models.

The filing is not an announcement that Anthropic has already completed its initial public offering (IPO). Instead, it gives investors a closer look at the company before its planned stock market debut. It also reveals the growing importance of energy to the AI business.

As Anthropic expands, access to reliable electricity, natural gas, water, and data center capacity could affect both its costs and its environmental footprint.

Anthropic’s Revenue Surges to Near $17B as Computing Costs Rise

Anthropic’s latest results show how quickly demand for its AI services is growing. The company reported third-quarter revenue of about $17 billion, up from $11.6 billion in the second quarter and $1.4 billion a year earlier. However, its quarter-on-quarter revenue growth slowed to 47%, compared with 144% in the second quarter.

Higher costs also affected its results. Anthropic reported an operating loss of $567 million in the third quarter, compared with operating income of $974 million in the previous quarter. The company attributed much of the pressure to higher computing costs, including computing capacity purchased through short-term agreements.

The Claude AI maker also reported a net loss of $23.3 billion for the quarter. Much of that loss was linked to an accounting charge related to the rising value of its convertible notes, rather than cash spent running its operations.

anthropic quarterly revenue 2026 Q3
Source: FourWeekMBA

These figures matter because developing advanced AI requires more than software and research. Companies need powerful chips, large data centers, cooling systems, and reliable electricity supplies.

Anthropic’s filing shows that computing capacity has become a major business expense and a key factor in its future growth. The company is investing in longer-term infrastructure arrangements to help meet demand and reduce its reliance on more expensive short-term computing capacity.

AI’s Growing Demand for Electricity

The financial growth of AI companies comes with a growing need for power. Data centers use electricity to run servers, process information, train AI models, and answer user requests. They also need cooling systems to prevent equipment from overheating.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that global data centers consumed about 485 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2025, which accounts for around 1.5% of the world’s total electricity demand. The agency expects data center electricity consumption to more than double to about 950 TWh by 2030, with AI serving as the main driver of the increase. One terawatt-hour equals one billion kilowatt-hours.

Electricity consumption by data centers
Source: IEA

This growth creates challenges for power grids. New data centres need large amounts of electricity, but building power plants and transmission lines can take years. In some regions, limited grid capacity is already delaying projects.

The IEA expects renewable energy to supply a large share of the additional electricity needed by data centers. However, natural gas and other power sources will also contribute. The climate impact depends on where data centers are located, which energy sources power them, and how fast cleaner energy becomes available.

Anthropic Plans to Use On-Site Natural Gas Power

Anthropic’s SEC filing offers a closer look at how the company plans to address its growing power needs. The company says some planned data center facilities will rely on dedicated on-site, natural-gas-fired power generation. These systems supply electricity directly to a facility rather than relying entirely on the wider electricity grid.

This approach could help data center developers secure power in areas where grid connections are delayed or insufficient. But it also creates risks tied to fuel prices, gas supplies, pipeline capacity, and environmental requirements.

Natural gas produces carbon dioxide when burned. Methane can also escape during gas production and transport, adding to its climate impact.

Anthropic’s filing warns that competition among data-centre operators for natural gas could increase costs or make fuel supplies harder to secure. It also notes that access to newer power sources, including solar, wind, batteries, nuclear, and geothermal energy, may be limited by availability, timing, or cost.

The company does not provide a complete emissions estimate for these planned facilities in the sections of its filing addressing energy and infrastructure risks. As a result, the full climate impact of its planned power supply cannot be calculated from these disclosures alone.

This distinction is crucial. On-site natural gas can help a data center get electricity faster. However, it doesn’t mean the facility is low-emissions by default. The outcome depends on the power mix, the amount of energy used, and any steps taken to reduce emissions.

Anthropic’s Expansion Raises Wider Environmental Concerns

Anthropic’s filing also highlights environmental concerns linked to data center growth, including electricity demand, water use, land use, and pressure on local resources.

Data centers need power to run servers and water to cool some of their equipment. Their climate impact also depends on the electricity they use. Facilities powered mainly by fossil fuels can produce more emissions than those supplied by cleaner energy.

The Claude AI creator says it has committed to covering electricity price increases for consumers caused by its data centers, including costs linked to power supplies and grid infrastructure. Such measures may help address community concerns, but they do not replace the need to track and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Anthropic’s AI Energy Challenge

AI Companies Face Pressure to Report Emissions

Anthropic’s filing talks about energy and environmental risks. However, it doesn’t fully cover the company’s greenhouse gas emissions from its operations and supply chain.

For AI companies, emissions can come from electricity use, on-site fuel burning, chip and server manufacturing, data center construction, and equipment transport. These sources fall into three reporting categories:

  • Scope 1: Direct emissions from sources a company owns or controls.
  • Scope 2: Emissions linked to purchased electricity, heating, and cooling.
  • Scope 3: Other indirect emissions across the value chain, including suppliers and equipment manufacturing.

Clear reporting helps investors assess whether companies are reducing their environmental impact as they grow. Efficiency gains alone may not lower total emissions if demand for AI services rises faster than energy use per task falls.

Can AI Growth Be Matched With Cleaner Energy?

AI can also support climate action. It can help energy companies forecast electricity demand, manage power grids, and integrate renewable energy. Other applications may help factories and buildings use less energy or detect methane leaks.

Per the IEA analysis, AI optimization can cut energy costs by 3% to 10% in high-use industries with low profit margins. If adoption barriers are cleared, these proven use cases could save 3% of global energy consumption by 2035.

Energy savings potential from AI, 2035
Source: IEA

However, these potential benefits do not automatically cancel out AI’s own emissions. The overall impact depends on the energy needed to run AI systems. It also hinges on whether these systems provide clear emissions reductions.

For Anthropic, the challenge is to expand its computing capacity while managing its energy needs and environmental risks. Its filing makes clear that access to power is central to its business strategy.

What Anthropic’s IPO Means for the AI Industry

Anthropic’s planned IPO highlights both the financial potential of AI and the resources needed to support its growth. The company’s disclosures reveal strong revenue growth. They also show major infrastructure investments and rising costs linked to computing power.

As AI companies expand, access to electricity, water, land, and data center capacity could affect their costs, project timelines, and emissions. Investors may therefore need to look beyond revenue and earnings to assess energy sources, resource use, and environmental performance.

The filing does not establish how much Anthropic’s total emissions will rise or fall. However, it shows that energy supply is already a key business concern.

The central question is whether AI companies can keep growing while securing reliable, affordable, and lower-emissions power. Their financial success depends on computing capacity, while their climate impact will partly depend on how that capacity is built and powered.

The post Anthropic’s New IPO Filing Puts AI and Data Center’s Energy and Emissions in Focus appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Zefiro Targets New Carbon Credit Revenue from Abandoned Methane-Leaking Oil Wells

Zefiro Methane Corp. (CBOE CA: ZEFI) is preparing to re-enter the carbon credit market as a new methodology for plugging abandoned oil and gas wells nears completion. The company has supported the development of a new protocol by carbon certification firm Isometric, which could allow Zefiro to generate carbon credits from methane reductions achieved through its well-plugging operations.

In the press release, Zefiro said it helped fund and provide technical input for Isometric’s Orphaned Well Plugging (OWP) Protocol. The draft methodology is currently open for public consultation and could create another revenue stream for the company once finalized.

Abandoned Wells Offer a New Methane Credit Opportunity

The opportunity is significant. According to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Global Methane Tracker 2026, abandoned oil and gas wells released around 3.5 million tonnes (Mt) of methane worldwide in 2025. The US accounted for about 40% of these emissions.

METHANE emissions abandoned wells
Source: IEA

The IEA estimates that nearly 8 million abandoned onshore oil and gas wells exist globally, including almost 4 million in the US. By plugging these leaking wells, companies such as Zefiro could reduce methane emissions and potentially generate carbon credits from verified reductions.

Zefiro Looks to Restart Carbon Credit Generation

Zefiro specializes in methane measurement, emissions reduction, and plugging abandoned and end-of-life oil and gas wells across North America. Its operations cover several stages of the well lifecycle, including methane monitoring, plugging and abandonment, site restoration, and carbon credit origination.

Through its operating subsidiary, Plants & Goodwin, Inc., the company serves government and private-sector customers across 15 U.S. states. Plants & Goodwin is a third-generation well services business with more than 50 years of operating history.

Why is P&G the contractor of choice for dozens of clients undertaking plug and abandonment projects?

Source: P&G

The new Isometric protocol could help Zefiro turn some of its well-plugging work into verified carbon credits. These credits would represent methane emissions avoided by permanently sealing leaking orphaned wells.

Importantly, Zefiro has already established a presence in this market. The company completed the first-ever sale of carbon offsets generated under the American Carbon Registry’s orphaned well methodology. Institutional buyers included Mercuria Energy America and EDF Trading.

Now, the company expects to resume carbon credit origination under Isometric’s upcoming framework. It plans to use the same crews, drilling rigs, and in-house methane measurement capabilities that support its existing operations.

This approach could help Zefiro enter additional projects without building an entirely new operating structure. However, the company must wait for the protocol to be finalized and meet eligibility, verification, and certification requirements before generating credits under the new framework.

Financial Performance and Additional Business Plans

The opportunity comes as Zefiro continues to expand its methane abatement business. The company reported record fiscal 2026 revenue of US$42.5 million, up 31.1% from the previous financial year.

zefiro revenue
Source: Zefiro

The company expects carbon credit revenue to complement this existing business. Since the new protocol only covers wells that public programs have not scheduled for plugging, carbon-financed projects could expand its addressable work rather than compete with government contracts.

Separately, Zefiro has re-engaged Germany-based Apaton Finance GmbH for investor marketing services. The agreement began on October 29, 2026, and has an expected term of approximately 12 months.

Apaton will provide online articles, digital and email marketing, video interviews, and investor conference presentations, with a primary focus on European markets. Zefiro will pay a monthly cash fee of €24,167, plus applicable taxes. No securities will be issued as compensation.

How the New Isometric Protocol Could Generate Carbon Credits

Isometric released its draft Orphaned Well Plugging Protocol on October 15, 2026. The 30-day public consultation period will remain open until November 14, 2026.

The protocol covers projects in the United States and Canada that permanently plug leaking orphaned oil and gas wells. These wells no longer have an operator responsible for their maintenance or closure, often because the original company became insolvent.

Many remain unplugged and can release methane into the atmosphere. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas that contributes significantly to near-term global warming.

According to Isometric, the United States has more than 141,000 documented orphaned wells across 29 states, with potentially another 740,000 undocumented wells. Public plugging programs cannot address the entire backlog, creating an opportunity for private investment and carbon finance.

The new protocol aims to direct funding toward wells that release measurable amounts of methane.

To qualify, projects must demonstrate that:

  • The well is genuinely orphaned and has no responsible operator.
  • A public plugging program has not scheduled the well for closure.
  • The well would not be plugged without carbon finance.
  • Project developers have the necessary operating rights and landowner consent.

The methodology also introduces strict measurement and monitoring requirements. Developers must directly measure methane leakage at each well before plugging. They then estimate the emissions that would continue over a 20-year crediting period using a conservative decline rate.

Furthermore, projects must provide engineering evidence that enough gas remains in the underlying reservoir to support the projected leakage estimates.

Every plugged well must also pass a permanence check 12 to 18 months after closure. Isometric will withhold a portion of the carbon certificates until this check confirms that the well remains properly sealed.

These requirements aim to ensure that credits represent actual, measurable methane reductions rather than estimated benefits based on broad assumptions.

Zefiro Chief Executive Officer Catherine Flax commented:

“Zefiro helped demonstrate that institutional buyers will pay for methane reductions from plugged orphaned wells, and we are pleased to support Isometric’s work on a protocol grounded in direct field measurement. For our shareholders, the opportunity is additive. Carbon finance gives us a way to plug orphaned wells that no public program is scheduled to address, using the same crews and equipment that already serve our government and private-sector customers.”

Carbon Credit Market Creates Another Growth Opportunity

The proposed methodology arrives as institutional interest in carbon credits continues to grow.

  • According to MSCI data cited in Zefiro’s announcement, capital committed and deployed in the global carbon credit market reached a record US$22 billion in 2025. Corporate buyers accounted for US$14.2 billion, more than three times the previous year’s amount.

Meanwhile, the value of carbon credit offtake agreements nearly tripled to US$12.3 billion.

MSCI estimates that the global carbon credit market could reach US$5 billion to US$20 billion by 2030. By 2050, its potential value could rise to between US$60 billion and US$270 billion.

However, buyers are becoming more selective. They increasingly want credits supported by reliable measurements, independent verification, and clear evidence of emissions reductions.

carbon credit market

Methane reduction projects could benefit from this shift because they target a highly potent greenhouse gas and can demonstrate reductions through direct field measurements.

Zefiro believes the Isometric protocol could help attract institutional buyers looking for credible methane credits. The company has already sold credits to established energy trading firms, giving it some experience in commercializing these environmental assets.

What Comes Next for Zefiro?

The proposed Isometric protocol could open a new opportunity for Zefiro in the voluntary carbon market. Its existing well-plugging operations, methane measurement capabilities, and previous carbon credit sales give it an operating foundation to pursue this opportunity.

Nevertheless, the methodology remains in the consultation stage. Its final requirements, project eligibility, independent verification, and eventual credit issuance will determine how much revenue Zefiro can generate.

For now, the development offers a potential way to combine methane abatement with carbon finance. If the protocol moves forward successfully, Zefiro could use carbon credit revenue to support the plugging of more abandoned wells while expanding its presence in the growing market for verified emissions reductions.

The post Zefiro Targets New Carbon Credit Revenue from Abandoned Methane-Leaking Oil Wells appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Meta Signs Multi-Year Deal With Fortera to Boost Low-Carbon Cement

Meta has signed a multi-year agreement with low-carbon cement producer Fortera to support the supply of approximately 200,000 tons of lower-carbon cement. The deal covers environmental attribute certificates (EACs) linked to Fortera’s cement production.

The agreement highlights growing corporate demand for cleaner building materials. It also shows how long-term purchase commitments can help new manufacturers raise money and expand production.

Under the deal, Meta will purchase EACs linked to the cement volume. These certificates allow companies to support the production of lower-carbon materials. They can also help reduce emissions linked to construction supply chains.

In addition, Meta has the option to use Fortera’s cement in its own building projects. Both companies can also increase the supply volume and extend the agreement in the coming years.

The deal will support Fortera’s planned cement plant in Ste. Genevieve, Missouri. It will also give the company greater revenue visibility as it works to secure funding for the project.

Meta Deal Supports Fortera’s New Cement Plant

Building a new cement plant requires significant investment. However, manufacturers often struggle to secure funding without long-term customers and clear demand.

Meta’s agreement could help address this challenge. By committing to purchase EACs over several years, the company gives Fortera a stronger business case for its planned facility.

Long-term agreements can make it easier for manufacturers to attract investors. They also give lenders more confidence that future customers will buy their products.

Ryan Gilliam, CEO of Fortera, said agreements of this size and length can help move projects from planning to production. He added that the deal shows growing interest in low-carbon cement among large corporate buyers.

For Meta, the partnership supports its efforts to cut emissions from the construction of its buildings and data centers.

Fortera Uses Captured CO₂ to Make Cement

Fortera makes ReAct Cement using its proprietary ReCarb technology. The process uses captured carbon dioxide (CO₂) as a raw material for cement production.

The company says its cement produces up to 70% fewer emissions than ordinary Portland cement (OPC).

Traditional cement production releases large amounts of CO₂. Manufacturers heat limestone at high temperatures to make cement. This process releases emissions both from the fuel used and from the chemical reaction that breaks down limestone.

Fortera takes a different approach. Its technology turns waste CO₂ into a useful input for cement production.

Fortera cement
Source: Fortera

The company has also designed its process to work with existing cement and lime plants. This means manufacturers can continue using their kilns, limestone supplies, and distribution networks. As a result, they may not need to replace their entire production systems to adopt the technology.

Fortera says its cement has passed extensive third-party testing and meets ASTM standards for use in concrete. The company also reports that it can produce cement at a cost similar to conventional Portland cement.

These factors could support wider adoption. Builders need lower-carbon materials that meet industry standards and perform well without adding major costs.

low carbon cement

Fortera currently operates a facility in Redding, California, with an annual production capacity of 15,000 tons. The company is now working to expand its production capacity through a global commercial pipeline.

One of its main projects is the planned 300,000-ton-per-year cement plant in Missouri.

Missouri Plant Could Boost Domestic Cement Supply

The Meta agreement will help support the development of Fortera’s planned plant in Ste. Genevieve, Missouri.

The location offers access to the Mississippi River and established transport networks. This could help Fortera move its cement across the United States and into international markets at lower transport costs.

The project could also strengthen U.S. cement production. The country still depends on imports to meet part of its construction demand.

  • According to the 2025 U.S. Geological Survey, imported cement accounted for 21% of U.S. cement consumption.

                                       U.S. portland and blended cement production

us cement production
Source: USGS

Therefore, new domestic production could help reduce reliance on foreign suppliers. At the same time, Fortera aims to bring lower-carbon cement to more construction markets.

The project is also expected to create local jobs. These will include construction jobs during plant development and permanent positions once the facility begins operating.

Devon Lake, Meta’s Head of Net Zero Strategy, said the agreement could help move the Missouri plant closer to production. He also pointed to the potential for new construction and manufacturing jobs in the state.

Meta Steps Up Its Low-Carbon Construction Efforts

The Fortera deal supports Meta’s wider plan to reduce emissions across its operations and supply chain.

The company has set a target to cut its Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 42% by 2031, compared with its 2021 baseline.

It also wants suppliers responsible for at least two-thirds of its supply chain emissions to set science-based reduction targets by 2026. Meanwhile, Meta aims to keep its Scope 3 emissions at or below 2021 levels by the end of 2031.

cement emissions
Source: Meta

Construction materials play an important role in this effort. Cement and concrete create significant emissions before buildings even begin operating.

This is especially important for Meta because it continues to build data centers to support its digital services and artificial intelligence (AI) operations.

To address these emissions, Meta is testing and using lower-carbon concrete. One approach involves replacing part of the cement in concrete mixes with materials such as fly ash and slag.

The company is also supporting new technologies that can reduce or remove the need for traditional cement.

  • For example, Meta has partnered with CarbonBuilt to expand the production of its lower-carbon concrete. It has also provided carbon finance to CarbiCrete to help manufacturers produce cement-free concrete.
  • In addition, Meta is working with the Infrastructure Masons Climate Accord and more than 70 companies to reduce emissions from digital infrastructure materials.

The company is also using AI to develop better concrete mixes. In a project with Amrize and researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Meta developed a new concrete formula that cut emissions by 40% compared with an industry baseline.

The mix also showed faster curing and higher strength. Meta has used the selected formula in some of its newer data center projects, including at its Rosemount, Minnesota, site.

Can Long-Term Deals Help Scale Low-Carbon Cement?

The Fortera and Meta agreement highlights a major challenge in industrial decarbonization. New technologies need more than technical success. They also need customers willing to buy their products.

                                    Global cement emissions chart

CEMENT EMISSIONS

Cement manufacturers face high construction costs and long development timelines. Moreover, conventional cement remains widely available. This makes it harder for newer technologies to compete and attract investment.

However, long-term purchasing agreements can help change this situation. They give manufacturers a clearer picture of future demand and can make new projects more attractive to investors.

For Fortera, Meta’s commitment could help secure funding for its Missouri plant and expand its low-carbon cement business.

For Meta, the agreement offers another way to reduce emissions linked to construction. It also supports the growth of domestic production of cleaner building materials.

More broadly, the deal shows how large companies can help bring new industrial technologies to market. As demand for data centers, buildings and infrastructure grows, the need for lower-carbon cement will also increase.

Therefore, long-term corporate commitments could play an important role in scaling cleaner cement production and reducing emissions across the construction industry.

The post Meta Signs Multi-Year Deal With Fortera to Boost Low-Carbon Cement appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Apple (AAPL) Stock Faces Pressure Despite Strong Q4 Earnings and Climate Goals

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) reported record fourth-quarter revenue for fiscal 2026, supported by strong iPhone sales and growth in its Services business. The company also made further progress toward its 2030 carbon neutrality goal, with lower greenhouse gas emissions, more renewable energy across its supply chain, and greater use of recycled materials.

The company reported September-quarter revenue of $114.5 billion, up 12% from $102.5 billion a year earlier. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) increased 14% to $2.10, while net income reached $30.7 billion.

The results capped a strong fiscal year, with total revenue reaching $478.8 billion. Alongside its financial performance, the company continues to work on reducing emissions across its global operations and manufacturing network.

This progress is important because most of its carbon footprint comes from its supply chain and the production and use of its devices, rather than its offices and retail stores.

Apple Q4 Earnings: Revenue and Profits Rise

The September quarter showed strong growth across several business segments. Product sales reached $82.9 billion, compared with $73.7 billion in the same quarter last year. Services revenue increased to $31.6 billion from $28.8 billion, setting another quarterly record.

Here are the main financial highlights:

  • Total revenue: $114.5 billion, up 12% year over year.
  • Net income: $30.7 billion, compared with $27.5 billion a year earlier.
  • Diluted EPS: $2.10, up 14% from $1.85.
  • Gross margin: 47.9%, including an approximately one-percentage-point benefit from tariff refunds.
  • Operating cash flow: Approximately $28 billion for the quarter.
apple earnings
Source: Apple

For the full fiscal year, revenue increased 15% to $478.8 billion, while net income rose to $132.2 billion from $112 billion in fiscal 2025.

iPhone remained the biggest revenue contributor, generating $57.6 billion, up 17% year over year. Mac sales increased 24% to $10.8 billion, while Services revenue grew 10%.

iPad revenue declined 10% to $6.2 billion, and Wearables, Home and Accessories sales fell 8% to $8.3 billion.

The results show that the company continues to benefit from strong demand for its devices and a growing Services business. Its installed base of active devices also reached a new record across major product categories and geographic markets.

AAPL Stock Faces Pressure Despite Record Earnings

Despite beating market expectations, Apple shares came under pressure following the earnings announcement.

The stock closed at $338.32 on November 2, down 1.83% for the session. It fell further in premarket trading on November 3, reaching $321.53.

Investors are watching rising component costs and their potential impact on profit margins. The company expects gross margin to decline to 45%–46% in the December quarter, compared with 47.9% in Q4.

apple stock

Higher memory chip costs and expenses linked to its artificial intelligence (AI) rollout could put additional pressure on profitability.

For the December quarter, management expects:

  • Revenue growth of 7%–10% year over year.
  • Services revenue growth of 8%–9%.
  • Gross margin of 45%–46%.

This outlook suggests that strong product demand may not fully offset higher manufacturing and technology costs. Investors will also watch holiday-season sales and whether the company can maintain its revenue growth without sacrificing margins.

Emissions Down 60% Since 2015

Beyond its financial results, the 2026 Environmental Progress Report highlights progress toward Apple 2030, its goal to become carbon neutral across its entire value chain by 2030.

The company aims to reduce its gross greenhouse gas emissions by 75% from 2015 levels before addressing the remaining emissions through carbon removal solutions.

Its 2025 emissions data show meaningful progress:

apple sustainability
Source: Apple

This represents a reduction of approximately 60% in gross emissions over the decade.

The company also reported that its business revenue grew substantially over the same period, showing that it has reduced its overall carbon footprint while expanding its operations.

Its environmental programs focus on several areas:

  • Switching suppliers to renewable electricity.
  • Using recycled and lower-carbon materials.
  • Improving manufacturing energy efficiency.
  • Reducing emissions from transportation and product use.
  • Supporting carbon removal and nature-based projects.

The challenge is to maintain these reductions as production expands and demand for its devices and digital services grows.

Scope 1, 2 and 3

For 2025, the report’s corporate emissions breakdown showed approximately 55,200 metric tons of Scope 1 emissions, 1,100 metric tons of market-based Scope 2 emissions and 513,700 metric tons of corporate Scope 3 emissions.

Product-related emissions are reported separately in the product life cycle breakdown. These reached approximately 14.71 million metric tons of CO2e.

Manufacturing was the largest contributor, accounting for 8.15 million metric tons. Product use added 4.12 million metric tons, while transportation contributed 2.37 million metric tons.

This difference highlights an important point: reducing emissions from offices and company facilities alone will not be enough. The company needs its manufacturing partners to make bigger changes.

scope emissions
Source: Apple

Renewable Energy and Recycled Materials Gain Ground

Renewable electricity is one of the biggest parts of the company’s emissions reduction strategy.

Its corporate offices, retail stores, research facilities and data centers already use 100% renewable electricity. The next major step is helping suppliers make the same transition.

In 2025, suppliers in its clean energy program had more than 20 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy capacity operational. These projects generated over 38 million megawatt-hours (MWh) of clean electricity.

The company is also working with manufacturers to improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions from industrial processes.

Other environmental milestones include:

  • 30% recycled content: A record share of materials across all products shipped in 2025 came from recycled sources.
  • 100% recycled cobalt: All batteries designed by the company now use recycled cobalt.
  • 100% recycled rare earth elements: All magnets use recycled rare earth materials.
  • Plastic-free packaging: Products now ship in fibre-based packaging.
  • Water conservation: The company and its suppliers saved 17 billion gallons of freshwater in 2025.

These efforts help reduce demand for newly mined materials, limit manufacturing waste, and lower the environmental impact of its products.

                                      Resource Efficiency Data

Source: Apple

Can Apple Keep Its Climate Goals on Track?

The latest results show that strong financial growth and emissions reductions can move forward together. However, the harder part of the climate transition lies across the global supply chain.

Manufacturing remains the largest source of product-related emissions, and moving suppliers toward clean electricity will require investment, reliable renewable power, and better industrial technologies.

The company has made measurable progress, but its 2030 target will depend on how quickly its manufacturing partners can reduce their dependence on fossil fuels.

For investors, the next question is whether it can maintain revenue growth, protect profit margins, and continue cutting emissions as its business expands.

The coming years will show whether its climate progress can keep pace with its ambitions for growth.

The post Apple (AAPL) Stock Faces Pressure Despite Strong Q4 Earnings and Climate Goals appeared first on Carbon Credits.

COP31 Presidency Calls for AI Pledge Pushing Cleaner Data Centers and Emissions Reporting

COP31 Presidency Calls for AI Pledge Pushing Cleaner Data Centers and Emissions Reporting

The COP31 Presidency of Türkiye has released a new pledge calling for cleaner energy use, better environmental reporting, and more responsible development of artificial intelligence (AI). The initiative aims to address the growing climate impact of AI while using the technology to support climate solutions.

Released on October 27, 2026, the Antalya AI Pledge invites governments and organizations to make voluntary commitments on AI and climate action. It focuses on the environmental costs of running AI systems, including the electricity and water needed by data centres. It also calls for more financial and technical support to help developing countries use AI for climate action.

The pledge comes as demand for AI services grows worldwide. Data centres need large amounts of electricity to train AI models, answer user requests, and run cloud services. The challenge for governments and technology companies is to meet this demand without slowing efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

What the Antalya AI Pledge Aims to Change

The pledge sets out a voluntary approach to making AI more climate-friendly. It covers how AI is designed, purchased, powered, used, measured, and managed.

One key focus is greater transparency about AI’s environmental impact. Governments and organizations are being encouraged to improve reporting on the energy and other resources used by AI systems. Better data can help policymakers, investors, and companies understand the environmental costs of AI and identify where improvements are needed.

The pledge also calls for data centres to use lower-emission energy. This could mean increasing the use of clean electricity, such as wind and solar power, and improving how facilities use energy.

Another goal is to help developing countries gain access to funding, technology, and expertise for AI projects that support climate action. These projects could use AI to improve energy systems, support cleaner industries, or help communities prepare for climate risks.

However, the pledge is voluntary, not a binding climate regulation. It does not automatically require every country or technology company to meet specific emissions limits. Its impact will depend on how many organizations support it and whether they follow through with measurable action.

Ai energy use vs 3 nations

Data Center Power Demand Is Set to Rise

The pledge addresses a growing challenge for the global energy system. Data centres already use significant amounts of electricity, and demand is expected to rise as AI services expand.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that data centers will use about 415 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2024. This is roughly 1.5% of global electricity use. The agency expects this figure to more than double to about 945 TWh by 2030, with AI as the main driver of the increase. One terawatt-hour is one billion kilowatt-hours of electricity. 

Goldman Sachs analysis also shows the same data, increasing power use by over 160% by the decade’s end.

data center power demand AI 2030 Goldman

Meeting this demand could put pressure on electricity grids, especially in areas where data centres are growing quickly. If new power supplies rely heavily on coal or natural gas, the expansion of AI could also increase emissions.

The IEA expects renewable energy to meet a large share of the additional electricity demand from data centers. However, natural gas and other power sources will also play a role. The actual impact on emissions will depend on the energy mix in each region and how quickly new clean power becomes available. 

This makes the pledge’s focus on cleaner electricity important. But simply buying renewable energy or announcing clean power deals does not always mean a data center runs entirely on clean electricity at every hour. Tracking actual power use and emissions will help show whether companies are making progress.

Emissions Reporting Still Has Gaps

Better reporting is another major issue for the technology sector. Companies may disclose some of their emissions but leave gaps in their reporting on electricity use, suppliers, equipment, and other parts of their business.

A report from September 2026 by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA) looked at 200 digital companies. They used publicly available information for the 2024 reporting year. It found that 89% reported direct emissions, while 81% reported emissions from purchased electricity and other energy. Only 47% reported emissions across all relevant value chain activities.

International Telecommunication Union
Source: International Telecommunication Union

These categories are often called Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions:

  • Scope 1: Direct emissions from sources a company owns or controls.
  • Scope 2: Emissions linked to the electricity, heating, and cooling it buys.
  • Scope 3: Other indirect emissions across its value chain, including those linked to suppliers and equipment.

For AI companies, these wider emissions matter because data centres need servers, chips, buildings, cooling systems, and other equipment. Producing and transporting these materials can add to a company’s total carbon footprint.

The ITU and WBA report found that 200 companies had 301 million metric tons of operational emissions from Scope 1 and Scope 2 in 2024. This was a 1.2% increase from 2023. This figure covers the digital companies assessed, not AI alone. It shows why better reporting and emissions cuts remain important as digital services expand.

AI Could Also Help Cut Emissions

The pledge does not focus only on AI’s environmental costs. It also seeks to encourage the use of AI to support climate action. AI tools can help energy companies forecast electricity demand, manage power grids, and improve the use of renewable energy. They can also help industries identify ways to reduce energy use and support early warning systems for extreme weather.

The chart below shows projected global greenhouse gas emissions (in GtCO₂e) and potential reductions driven by AI across key sectors by 2035.

AI emissions reductions in power, transport, and food
Source: Trellis Group

Türkiye’s COP31 Presidency has also announced an AI for Clean Technologies Initiative. It aims to develop pilot projects that use AI in areas such as smart energy systems and cleaner industry, while connecting these projects with business partners and investors.

Still, potential benefits should not be confused with proven emissions reductions. An AI tool can help a company save energy. However, the overall climate benefit depends on a few factors. It matters how widely the tool is used, how much energy it needs, and if it actually reduces emissions.

The challenge is to measure emissions avoided by AI applications carefully, and not just assume these reductions are greater than the emissions generated by the technology itself.

Developing Countries Need Funding and Support

The pledge also highlights the need for financial and technical support for developing countries. Many countries face barriers to adopting AI for climate action, including limited computing infrastructure, funding, technical skills, and access to reliable electricity.

Support could help these countries use AI to improve energy planning, monitor environmental changes, or strengthen climate adaptation. It could also help local organizations develop projects that use technology to address specific climate risks.

However, the pledge’s call for support will need to translate into practical funding, technology access, and skills development. Without these resources, countries with fewer technical and financial resources may struggle to benefit from AI while managing its environmental costs.

Call for Stronger Accountability: From Voluntary Pledge to Measurable Progress

The pledge has received support as a starting point for international cooperation, but questions remain about how progress will be measured and enforced.

The World Resources Institute (WRI) announced on October 27 that the pledge focuses on two key points. First, it highlights the chances AI brings for climate action. Second, it addresses the strain data centers put on electricity, water, and local communities. However, WRI also warned that the pledge lacks strong accountability measures.

The organization called for clearer requirements on energy and water reporting, cleaner power for data centres, and greater involvement of local communities in decisions about new facilities. These issues matter because data centres can affect local power supplies, water resources, and air quality.

The first progress review at COP32 could provide an opportunity to assess whether countries and organizations have turned their voluntary commitments into action. However, the results will depend on the quality of the data reported and whether participants set clear goals and follow through.

The Antalya AI Pledge brings the environmental impact of AI into the wider climate discussion. It recognizes that AI can help address climate change, but that the infrastructure behind it also uses energy and resources.

Its success will depend on more than the number of countries and organizations that sign on. Progress will need to show up in better emissions reporting, cleaner electricity supplies, more efficient data centres, and measurable climate benefits from AI applications.

The post COP31 Presidency Calls for AI Pledge Pushing Cleaner Data Centers and Emissions Reporting appeared first on Carbon Credits.

ArcelorMittal, BHP, and Mitsubishi Achieve Over 90% Carbon Capture at Gent Steel Plant

ArcelorMittal, BHP, and Mitsubishi Achieve Over 90% Carbon Capture at Gent Steel Plant

ArcelorMittal, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI), BHP, and Mitsubishi Development have completed the first phase of a carbon capture trial at a steel plant in Gent, Belgium. The project tested whether carbon capture technology can remove carbon dioxide (CO₂) from gas released during steel production.

The pilot captured more than 90% of the CO₂ in the treated gas during over 4,500 hours of testing. Based on the results, the partners estimate that using the technology at full scale on the plant’s blast furnace gas could cut the site’s CO₂ emissions intensity by up to 24%.

Frederik Van De Velde, CEO of ArcelorMittal Belgium, remarked:

“Together with our partners, we set out to better understand how carbon capture technology can be incorporated into existing steel plants. I am therefore very pleased at the successful outcome of the first stage of this important carbon capture trial at ArcelorMittal Gent. Scaling up the technologies we need to decarbonise is the vital next step in our journey, and the blast furnace gas trial has given us important data in this respect.”

The result marks progress in testing ways to reduce emissions from existing steel plants. However, the 24% figure is a projection for potential full-scale use, not a reduction already achieved across the plant. The partners are now moving to the next phase, which will test the technology on gas from another part of the steelmaking process.

Carbon Capture Trial Runs for More Than 4,500 Hours

The first phase focused on gas released by the Gent plant’s blast furnace. This gas contains CO₂ and carbon monoxide, as well as dust, sulfur-containing compounds, and other impurities that can make carbon capture more difficult.

The partners used MHI’s Advanced KM CDR Process, a technology that uses a chemical solvent to separate CO₂ from gas. The trial tested the system under real steelmaking conditions rather than in a laboratory.

Over more than 4,500 hours of operation, the pilot captured over 90% of the CO₂ in the gas stream treated by the system. BHP has also reported that the separated CO₂ reached 99.9% purity on a dry basis. This is an important technical result because the purity of captured CO₂ can affect how it is handled and whether it is suitable for later use or storage.

The trial did not capture all emissions from the steel plant. It treated only a portion of the blast furnace gas, and the system captured CO₂ rather than all carbon in the gas.

The remaining carbon monoxide can still be used to produce heat and power at the site. When that gas is burned, however, it releases CO₂. This is one reason the expected emissions reduction across the plant is lower than the pilot’s capture rate.

Full-Scale Use Could Cut CO₂ Intensity by Up to 24%

The partners estimate that applying the technology at full scale to the blast furnace gas could reduce the Gent site’s CO₂ emissions intensity by up to 24%.

Emissions intensity measures the amount of greenhouse gas released for each unit of output. In this case, the estimate is based on the emissions linked to producing hot-rolled steel, using a cradle-to-gate boundary. That means the calculation covers the production stages from raw material extraction through to the finished product leaving the plant.

The estimate also reflects a specific limit: the capture process separates CO₂ from blast furnace gas before combustion. However, carbon monoxide remaining in the gas can later release CO₂ when used for heat or power. The 24% figure therefore should not be read as a 24% cut in all emissions from the plant under every condition.

The result is still important because steelmaking is a major source of industrial emissions. The International Energy Agency estimates that the iron and steel sector accounts for about 7% of global energy-related CO₂ emissions. Cutting emissions from existing steel plants will be important while the industry develops and expands other lower-emission production methods.

steel carbon emissions

Next Trial Phase Will Target Hot Strip Mill Emissions

The next phase will expand testing to gases from the Gent plant’s hot strip mill reheating furnace. This furnace heats thick steel slabs so they can be rolled into thinner sheets.

Unlike the first phase, which captured CO₂ from blast furnace gas before it was burned, the next phase will test post-combustion capture. This means separating CO₂ from gas after fuel has been burned.

The furnace uses a blend of gases produced by different steelmaking processes, along with natural gas. This creates a different and more variable gas stream for the capture system to handle.

The partners plan to use the next phase to learn how the technology performs across more than one emissions source at an integrated steel plant. The findings will support updated engineering and deployment studies for possible full-scale use.

The wider aim is to assess whether carbon capture across multiple parts of the plant could bring the blast furnace steelmaking route closer to near-zero emissions intensity. That outcome remains a potential future result, not a confirmed achievement.

Tatsuto Nagayasu, Senior Vice President and Head of CCUS at MHI, noted:

“The campaign has demonstrated the ability of the Advanced KM CDR Process™ to operate under challenging blast furnace gas conditions… The next phase at the hot strip mill will further strengthen our understanding of how carbon capture can be integrated across multiple emission sources at an operating steelworks. This project demonstrates how MHI’s proven carbon capture expertise can be applied to one of the world’s most challenging industrial decarbonisation applications.”

Why Carbon Capture Matters for Steelmaking

Steel is used in buildings, transport, machinery, and infrastructure. It is also needed for the energy transition, including wind turbines, power networks, and other clean-energy equipment.

Making steel from iron ore in a traditional blast furnace requires coal. This is both to provide heat and to help remove oxygen from iron ore. This makes emissions difficult to eliminate through renewable electricity alone.

The IEA estimates that blast furnace-based steelmaking accounts for about 70% of global steel production. Reducing emissions from this route could therefore help the industry lower its climate impact while alternative production methods develop.

Carbon capture is one option for reducing emissions from existing industrial facilities. It separates CO₂ from gas produced during industrial operations so it can potentially be transported for use or stored underground.

However, capture is only one part of the process. A project’s climate benefit also depends on how much energy the equipment uses, what happens to the captured CO₂, and whether emissions are reduced across the full system.

The Gent trial focused on testing the capture technology and generating data for future engineering assessments. The announcement does not set out a final commercial-scale cost or confirm a full-scale investment decision.

MHI’s Advanced KM CDR Process
Source: MHI

Partners Fund the Next Step Toward Lower-Emission Steel

Each partner has a different role in the project.

  • ArcelorMittal is hosting the trial at its Gent steelworks.
  • MHI provides the capture technology and leads the process engineering and technical assessment.
  • BHP and Mitsubishi Development are providing funding, drawing on their roles as suppliers of steelmaking raw materials to ArcelorMittal’s European operations.

The project builds on a collaboration announced in 2022 to test carbon capture at industrial sites. The pilot unit began operating at Gent in 2024. It aims to assess whether the technology could eventually be used at a larger scale.

For ArcelorMittal, carbon capture is one part of a wider effort to reduce emissions from steel production. The company has a long-term net-zero emissions ambition for 2050. Yet, its ability to meet near-term targets depends on factors such as technology costs, clean energy availability, infrastructure, and policy support.

Steel Plant Carbon Capture Breakthrough

Commercial Scale Remains the Key Test

The Gent trial provides evidence that MHI’s technology can capture CO₂ from blast furnace gas under operating steel plant conditions. More than 4,500 hours of testing and capture rates above 90% give the partners data to support further engineering work.

The next challenge is to determine whether the technology can be applied across more emissions sources and at a commercial scale. That will require further testing, engineering, and decisions on cost, energy use, and how the captured CO₂ will be handled.

For the steel industry, the project offers one possible way to reduce emissions from existing blast furnace operations. However, the trial’s results are a step toward deployment. They don’t prove that large-scale carbon capture is already achieving the expected reductions.

The next phase at the hot strip mill will help show whether the technology can work across different gas streams. Its results will shape the assessment of whether carbon capture can play a larger role in lowering the carbon intensity of steel production.

The post ArcelorMittal, BHP, and Mitsubishi Achieve Over 90% Carbon Capture at Gent Steel Plant appeared first on Carbon Credits.