Silver to See Growing Deficit in 2024 as Supply Struggles

The global silver deficit is anticipated to increase by 17%, reaching 215.3 million ounces in 2024. This rise is attributed to a 2% growth in demand primarily driven by robust industrial consumption, coupled with a 1% decline in total supply, as reported by the Silver Institute industry association.

Balancing Demand and Supply Dynamics

Silver, used in various industries including jewelry, electronics, electric vehicles, and solar panels, as well as for investment purposes, is facing its fourth consecutive year of a structural market deficit.

In 2021, there was a deficit of 81 million ounces, followed by an even larger deficit of 253 million ounces in 2022. Despite these deficits, 2023 marked the second-highest year for annual silver demand on record, with a total demand of 1.27 billion ounces. This high demand contributed to the continuation of deficits in the silver market.

Source: Silver Institute / Metals Focus – Supply and Demand model from 2013 – 2023

Over the three-year period from 2021 to 2023, the Silver Institute estimates that there has been a cumulative deficit of 474 million ounces, which is equivalent to 14,743 tonnes of silver. This underscores the persistent imbalance between supply and demand in the silver market.

The Silver Institute, citing Metals Focus, emphasizes that the structural deficit in the silver market will persist beyond 2024. According to Metals Focus, this deficit is due to significant and expanding industrial demand for silver.

The forecast suggests that the imbalance between supply and demand in the silver market is not a short-term phenomenon but rather a structural issue that is likely to endure in the coming years. This underscores the ongoing importance of silver in various industrial applications and highlights the challenges in meeting the growing demand for this precious metal.

Philip Newman, managing director at consultancy Metals Focus, emphasized that the deficit in the silver market serves as a strong support and foundation for the price. Despite a 30% decrease in the deficit last year, it remained substantial at 184.3 million ounces.

While global supply has remained relatively stable around the 1-billion-ounce mark, industrial demand witnessed notable growth of 11%.

However, despite the shortage, visible silver inventories and significant metal stocks held by individuals and investors continue to shield the silver market from immediate pressure.

Newman highlighted that while identifiable silver inventories and off-exchange metal holdings remain considerable, some of these reserves may be tightly held. Consequently, the impact of ongoing deficits on the market remains to be seen.

Reportedly, stocks held in commodity exchange depositories and London vaults experienced a 5% decline last year, amounting to nearly 15 months of global supply by the end of 2023. The majority of the decrease in reported stocks occurred in China, where rapid industrial demand growth of 44% is reshaping local supply/demand dynamics.

Spot silver prices, experiencing an 18% increase year-to-date, reached $29.79 per ounce last week, marking their highest level in over three years, amidst a rally in gold prices and strong copper prices.

RELATED: Copper’s Price Breakout and Big Role in a Net Zero World

Shining Bright in the Solar Revolution

The surge in solar installations and electric vehicle production not only represents a current trend but also serves as a compelling indicator for heightened silver demand. Silver’s unparalleled conductivity and its crucial role in photovoltaic cells position it as a cornerstone in the transition towards renewable energy sources.

The demand for silver in the solar industry has experienced a notable uptrend, accounting for around 5% of the total silver demand in 2014 and expanding to about 14% by the end of 2023.

According to estimates by BloombergNEF, each gigawatt of solar capacity requires approximately 12 tonnes of silver. Using this figure as a basis, the demand for silver in solar panels could witness a substantial surge of nearly 169% by 2030.

This surge would translate to an approximate requirement of 273 million ounces of silver, constituting roughly ⅕ of the total silver demand based on current trend projections.

Much of this growth is attributed to China, which is poised to surpass the total solar panel installations in the United States this year.

Gregor Gregersen, founder of Silver Bullion, emphasizes that the solar industry exemplifies the inelastic demand for silver. Although advancements have enabled the solar sector to become more efficient in its silver use, emerging trends are shifting this dynamic.

RELATED: America to See a Surge in Renewable Capacity in 2024

Meanwhile, supply is showing signs of strain. Despite a nearly 20% increase in demand last year, silver production remained flat, according to data from The Silver Institute. This year, estimates suggest that production will increase by 2%, yet industrial consumption will climb by 4%.

Silver Squeeze: Meeting Demand Amidst Supply Challenges

However, boosting supply isn’t a straightforward task, given the limited availability of primary mines. Around 80% of silver supply comes from lead, zinc, copper, and gold projects, where silver is a by-product. This strain on supply has led to concerns about future shortages.

A study from the University of New South Wales suggests that the solar sector alone could deplete between 85–98% of global silver reserves by 2050.

Studies are ongoing for alternative technologies using cheaper metals but their viability remains uncertain. Despite current price fluctuations, experts anticipate that substitution will become more appealing as silver prices rise, ultimately leading to a market equilibrium at higher price levels.

As the global silver deficit expands and demand surges, the market faces a complex landscape. The current surge in silver prices reflects market dynamics influenced by industrial consumption and investor sentiment. However, the journey ahead requires strategic planning to address supply challenges and sustain the silver market’s vital role in the transition to renewables and net zero.

READ MORE: Silver’s Crucial Role in Achieving a Net Zero World

The post Silver to See Growing Deficit in 2024 as Supply Struggles appeared first on Carbon Credits.

GEO Prices Fall by 27% But VCM Volume Rose, Xpansiv Report

VCM spot volume experienced an uptick last week, largely due to acquisitions from Australian firms gearing up for end-of-month and annual reporting obligations, according to Xpansiv data. These purchases contributed to a total CBL spot VCM volume of 394,632 metric tons, a notable increase from the previous week’s tally of just under 120,000.

Xpansiv provides robust market data from CBL, the world’s largest spot environmental commodity exchange. These include daily and historical bids, offers, and transaction data for various environmental commodities traded on the CBL platform. 

Xpansiv’s VCM Spot Volume

The bulk of trading activity for the week centered around over-the-counter (OTC) blocks of Latin American nature credits. Newer-vintage REDD+ credits commanded prices as high as $7.50 per ton, while older vintage AFOLU credits were observed crossing at $0.37. 

Notably, vintage-specific mispricings were observed in the Katingan and Rimba Raya project credits. The older vintages are trading at premiums compared to newer ones.

Meanwhile, CBL GEO prices saw a significant decline of over 20%. The pilot-phase CORSIA bellwether spot and December futures contracts closed at $0.48 and $0.38, respectively. 

Last Thursday witnessed the bulk of trading activity, with 1,612,000 tons exchanged, including 1,462,000 Dec 2024-2025 calendar spreads priced between -$0.16 and -$0.19.

Amidst a backdrop of cautious optimism, market participants in Europe discussed progress with various initiatives such as ICVCM, VCMI, ICAO, and SBTi. However, there remained uncertainty regarding the timing of increased corporate VCM participation, with discussions revolving around the theme of “Survive to 2025”.

In terms of new listings, REDD+ project credits dominated, with carbon prices ranging between $10.50 and $2.95. Notable offerings included 20,000 Cambodia vintage 2021 REDD+ credits and nearly 95,000 split vintage Brazilian REDD+. 

Additionally, 45,000 China hydro vintage 2023 I-RECs were listed at $0.55.

RECord Breaker: Xpansiv Sets New Standards in Renewable Energy Trading

At a renewable energy event in Amsterdam, CBL announced record Renewable Energy Credits (REC) volumes in Q1, signaling bullish sentiment in the market.

REC volume on its CBL spot exchange set a record of 494,249 MWh in Q1 2024. A record 61,600 California Low Carbon Fuel Standard contracts were also traded on the spot exchange.  

PJM led the charge in Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) transactions, boasting 334,846 MWh within its market, while NEPOOL followed with 143,689 MWh. Furthermore, an extra 388,238 MWh of voluntary RECs found their way through CBL during this period, resulting in a combined REC volume of 867,799 MWh.

Notably, the total REC volume on CBL for the first quarter marked a significant 29% increase compared to the second quarter of 2023. This surge surpassed the previous compliance REC record set at 470,058 MWh.

Remarking on this achievement, Ben Stuart, Chief Commercial Officer, Xpansiv, noted that:

“Growth of our compliance REC business continues to demonstrate the utility of Xpansiv infrastructure to the US renewables markets. Our strong position as the platform of choice for corporates seeking products to satisfy reporting obligations and net-zero commitments continues to make Xpansiv an essential partner for the global energy transition

The surge in volume underscores the advantages of CBL’s fully transparent central limit order book. CBL’s connectivity with prominent global REC and carbon registries plays a pivotal role in facilitating OTC block trades.

In the North American compliance market, NEPOOL RECs resumed trading on CBL, with over 62,000 credits exchanged for Q4 2023 generation. Rhode Island new generation credits led in volume, followed by 2023 Massachusetts class 1 and solar 2 credits. 

In PJM markets, Maryland 2024 class 1 credits and Ohio solar credits were actively traded. Lastly, over 80,000 NAR credits were exchanged via CBL, consisting primarily of 2023 US-sited wind credits with some CRS eligibility.

READ MORE: Emissions Futures Rally by Over 25%: Insights from Xpansiv’s CBL Platform

The post GEO Prices Fall by 27% But VCM Volume Rose, Xpansiv Report appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Lower Royalty Rates Give Lithium Producers a Lifeline

Analysts anticipate that reducing royalty rates could provide much-needed relief for lithium producers grappling with plummeting prices. The decline in lithium prices since the beginning of 2023 has been significant, with battery-grade lithium carbonate prices dropping by over 80% by April 2023.

Amid this downturn, lower royalty obligations to local governments could help alleviate financial pressures on mining companies.

Lower royalty payments would directly reduce miners’ cost of sales, particularly as lithium prices decline, thus bolstering profitability amidst challenging market conditions. This adjustment is seen as a short-term measure to support miners until lithium prices stabilize or recover.

Lithium Challenges Amidst Price Decline

The financing landscape for lithium projects in the United States is also encountering hurdles amid sustained low lithium prices. This could impede the current administration’s efforts to strengthen the domestic battery supply chain. 

Despite plans for around 100 lithium mine projects across the US, the appeal of these ventures has diminished due to the significant decline in lithium prices.

Data from S&P Global Market Intelligence reveals an 81.7% decrease in lithium prices from their peak in 2022. This prolonged period of low prices has made numerous projects less appealing to investors, affecting the overall viability of the development pipeline. As a result, financing for these projects is facing challenges, while impacting the domestic battery supply chain in the US.

READ MORE: Issues Facing US Lithium Projects and Battery Supply Chain Plans Amidst Price Decline

Factors contributing to the current market dynamics include increased production capacity in 2023 alongside slower-than-expected growth in electric vehicle sales. These conditions have led to a scenario where lithium prices are expected to remain subdued until there’s a notable improvement in EV affordability. 

Consequently, mining companies adjust their strategies. Some high-cost miners exit the market while others scale back expansion plans and focus on cost-saving initiatives.

The Royalty Realities in a Volatile Market

The fluctuation in lithium prices has a direct impact on royalty payments made by producers. 

Royalties are payments made by a third party to the owner of a product or patent for the use of that product or patent. These payments are typically outlined in a licensing agreement, which specifies the terms and conditions under which the third party can use the product/patent. 

The royalty rate, which determines the amount of the royalty payment, is calculated as a percentage based on various factors. These include the exclusivity of rights, the value of the technology or intellectual property, and the availability of alternative options.

Royalty structures for lithium extraction vary across major producing countries, with most employing variable systems that adjust with market prices. 

In Argentina, royalties fluctuate by province but are capped at 3%. Meanwhile, Western Australia and Zimbabwe set theirs at 5%, with options for partial payment in minerals.

Chile, home to significant lithium reserves, implements a unique royalty system through its production development agency, CORFO. Operators like SQM and Albemarle, major players in the Salar de Atacama, face variable royalty rates ranging from 6.8% to 40%, linked to market prices. This approach aims to support miners during price fluctuations.

Despite Chile’s comparatively high royalty rates, investments in lithium projects there and in Argentina remain attractive. In fact, most projects in these countries maintain profitability even amid current price levels. Chile is the second largest lithium producer while Argentina takes the fourth spot. 

As the lithium market evolves, variable royalty systems are gaining popularity for their adaptability to price volatility and support for the mining sector.

The Impact on Lithium Miners’ Bottom Line

In 2022, when lithium prices soared to historic highs, miners saw their royalty payments surge by a staggering 960.1% compared to the previous year. This increase in royalties significantly elevated overall miners’ production costs, with royalties accounting for over 60% of total cash costs.

While miners were able to absorb these additional costs during the peak price period, the likelihood of lithium prices returning to such levels in the near future is uncertain. As lithium prices normalize, royalty adjustments are expected to have a lesser impact on miners’ profitability. This is particularly prevalent in a market characterized by lower prices.

Lower royalty rates in a depressed price environment can provide miners with some relief. This will allow them to preserve margins despite challenging market conditions. 

Market projections suggest a decrease in average royalty payments and total cash costs, providing a favorable outlook for lithium producers. More remarkably, investors still continue to show strong interest in lithium projects amid short-term price challenges, foreseeing their long-term potential. 

READ MORE: Why Lithium Prices are Plunging and What to Expect

As lithium prices continue to plummet, the call for reduced royalty rates emerges as a lifeline for struggling producers. With royalties comprising a significant portion of mining costs, lowering these obligations could inject much-needed stability into the industry. 

The post Lower Royalty Rates Give Lithium Producers a Lifeline appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Tesla Profits Dip But Carbon Credits Revenue Up, 38% of Net Income

Elon Musk’s Tesla continues to capitalize on the need of its competitors to comply with emissions standards, a business model that has proven highly profitable for the electric vehicle (EV) company. As the EV giant incurs minimal costs to earn these carbon credits, the revenue from their sale translates to pure profit.

While the specific recipients of these credits remain undisclosed, this revenue stream has been vital for Tesla’s financial success. 

Tesla’s Green Cash Flow: Profiting from Emissions Compliance

In its recent first-quarter 2024 filings, the company reported a $442 million income from the sale of carbon credits. This figure represents a slight 2% increase from the previous quarter of Q4 2023, which is $433 million. 

Remarkably, this credit revenue accounts for a whopping 38.6% of the company’s Q1 2024 net income ($1,144 million). 

However, Tesla’s profits took a significant hit in the first quarter, falling 55% to $1.13 billion compared to a year ago. This decline was attributed to a prolonged strategy of cutting EV prices and various unforeseen challenges that impacted the company’s financial performance.

Despite reporting revenue of $21.3 billion in Q1 2024, representing a 9% drop from the previous year, Tesla’s earnings fell short of analysts’ expectations. Operating income also decreased by 54% to $1.2 billion compared to the same period last year.

The gradual ramp-up of the updated Model 3 production at the Fremont factory in California contributed to the difficulties. The company also noted that global EV sales faced pressure as many automakers prioritized hybrids over electric vehicles.

In a report by S&P Global Commodity Insights, automakers are increasingly embracing plug-in hybrid EVs as a more affordable short-term solution on their journey toward full electrification. 

RELEVANT: Lithium Prices and The Insights into the EV Market’s Pulse

In China, the share of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) within the plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) market declined by 10% points to 57.0% in February compared to the same period last year. This trend of declining BEV share is also observed in the United States and Germany. Both the U.S. and the European Union (EU) are adapting their PEV targets based on feedback from the industry.

Behind the dipping financial results, Tesla managed to generate more revenue from its regulatory credits. And the hybrid approach of other carmakers means they have to purchase carbon credits from the EV giant. 

Since the company started selling carbon credits to its peers, this revenue stream has become a billion-dollar bonanza for Tesla. Last year, the automaker generated a total annual income from carbon credits amounting to $1.79 billion. That’s a record high so far for the company’s automotive regulatory credit revenue.

Beyond Cars: Tesla’s Surge in Energy Storage Deployment

While automotive revenues experienced a decline, Tesla saw growth in other segments of its business, particularly in energy storage, which is becoming increasingly profitable for the company. As Megapack installations continue to increase and fleet expands, Tesla anticipates consistent profit growth in this segment.

In Q1 2024, energy storage deployments reached a record high of 4.1 GWh. Additionally, revenue and gross profit from Energy Generation and Storage reached all-time highs. 

Compared to the same period last year, revenues were up 7% to $1.6 billion, and gross profit surged by 140%. This growth was primarily driven by increased Megapack deployments, although there was a slight decrease in solar installations. Energy Generation and Storage remains Tesla’s highest margin business.

RELATED: Tesla’s $413M Power Move: Megapacks to Revolutionize Massachusetts’ Energy Grid

In addition, Tesla generated $2.28 billion in revenue from services, which includes income from its Supercharger network. This revenue stream is expected to grow further as more automakers, such as Ford, GM, Rivian, and VW, adopt Tesla’s North American Charging Standard technology.

Tesla’s Carbon Credit Surprises and Future Innovations

Despite previous expectations that carbon credit income would decline as competitors ramped up electric vehicle (EV) production, Tesla has been surprised by sustained revenue in this area.

In 2020, the company’s former CFO Zachary Kirkhorn anticipated a decrease in the significance of this revenue stream over time. However, contrary to these predictions, Tesla’s earnings from regulatory carbon credits have not experienced a significant decline. In fact, last year’s earnings slightly exceeded the income from the previous year.

Despite the profit dip, Tesla used its earnings report to highlight its future initiatives. Notably, it emphasizes focus on advancements in autonomy through AI and the introduction of new products built on a next-generation vehicle platform. The company significantly increased its research and development spending, allocating $1.1 billion in the first quarter, a 49% rise from the same period in 2023.

Elon Musk underscored the company’s commitment to investing in the future, despite current challenges. Tesla aims to expedite the development of a new vehicle lineup, with production anticipated to begin in early 2025. 

Musk emphasized that these new vehicles, including more affordable models, will leverage aspects of both the next-generation platform and the existing ones. This enables for production on the same manufacturing lines as the current vehicle lineup.

Tesla’s Q1 results, though showing a decline in profits, sparked a surge in share prices, rising by as much as 12% following the announcement. Investors seemed more interested in Tesla’s forward-looking statements regarding future products, particularly introduction of cheaper vehicles by 2025.

Musk emphasized during the earnings call that while some automakers are shifting towards plug-in hybrids, Tesla believes that battery electric vehicles will ultimately dominate the market. And their strategy remains focused on EVs despite the challenges faced in the industry.

The post Tesla Profits Dip But Carbon Credits Revenue Up, 38% of Net Income appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Cobalt Crunch: Prices Plummet, Supply Challenges Loom in the Race to Net Zero

Decarbonization efforts, aiming for Net Zero emissions, require significant changes in the energy sector. This transition requires shifting from fossil fuels to metals and critical minerals like cobalt, copper, lithium, nickel, and rare earths.

The critical minerals market will grow 7-fold by 2030, and 10-fold by 2050 to over $400 billion, per the International Energy Agency estimates. Cobalt, in particular, has a central role in reaching the global net zero target.

Cobalt prices have plummeted to pre-2021 levels since the beginning of the year, with analysts predicting a continued decline. As of April 8, the London Metal Exchange cobalt cash price stands at $28,400 per metric ton, marking a 65.3% drop from the 2022 high of $81,900/t in March, 

This decline is attributed to the lack of expected demand from the electric vehicle sector, which has also affected demand growth in aerospace and consumer electronics.

RELATED: US Imports of Lithium and Critical Minerals Drop Amidst Shifting EV Market

The oversupply of cobalt in the market is exacerbated by increased output from producers in Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Chinese production has also surged, further pressuring prices. Forecasts indicate that the cobalt market will remain oversupplied by 4,000 metric tons this year and in the forthcoming years.

Balancing Supply and Demand

Despite the price reaction to excess cobalt, producers are unlikely to cut output significantly. Cobalt production is tied to the dynamics and production costs of the copper and nickel industries, both of which continue to see robust output. While some high-cost cobalt producers may reduce output, low-cost producers are expanding production.

The IEA predicts a substantial increase in cobalt demand, with growth projected to be 5x higher between 2020 and 2040 under its Sustainable Development Scenario

The expected dramatic growth in cobalt demand underscores the need for increased production, with the IEA forecasting a 3-fold increase by 2030. This growth trajectory calls for the development of new mines and deposits to meet sustainability goals and mitigate supply risks. 

The agency also predicts that as early as 2030, mines will produce only 50% of the cobalt and lithium and 80% of copper required for the energy transition. 

The High Stakes of Cobalt Mining

The pressure on the cobalt supply chain is already evident. This is especially considering that the Democratic Republic of Congo supplies about 70% of the world’s cobalt. This raises concerns about reliance on a single source with questionable environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credentials.

This heavy reliance on a single source also poses significant supply chain risks, as evidenced by recent challenges in the European natural gas market.

Apart from supply concentration, cobalt mining practices and related issues in the DRC raise concerns for investors. These include environmental degradation, human rights violations, and governance challenges. As a result, investors are increasingly seeking alternative cobalt sources that offer greater transparency and sustainability.

The cobalt mining industry also exhibits a degree of concentration, with the top four mining companies contributing over 40% of global production. Glencore, a diversified mining and trading company, stands out as the largest producer, accounting for over 15% of total production. Interestingly, many of these major mining companies are located in emerging markets.

Note: production in kilotons per annum (ktpa)

However, there are challenges associated with assessing the ESG performance of these companies, particularly those that are privately held. Vale, despite having the lowest cobalt production among the top five companies, boasts the highest ESG rating of C+.

Australia and Canada are notable for their substantial cobalt reserves of critical minerals and relatively strong ESG ratings. These countries offer opportunities to diversify the global production mix of critical minerals.

While the DRC remains a dominant cobalt supplier, there are alternative sources available, although they may not be as abundant. Exploring these alternative supply options is crucial for mitigating supply chain risks and ensuring responsible cobalt sourcing practices.

Investing in Cobalt for a Greener Future

In response to the risks posed by concentration and ESG concerns in cobalt production, stakeholders, including investors and active asset owners, can play a significant role. They can advocate for greater transparency across the cobalt supply chain, incentivize sustainable practices through capital allocation, and engage with companies to improve their ESG performance. 

Additionally, investors may explore opportunities to support projects in jurisdictions with stronger regulatory frameworks and environmental protections. There are tools available to assist investors in navigating these challenges and pursuing responsible investment opportunities.

Although the bottom for cobalt prices is uncertain, some analysts anticipate a gradual improvement in prices over the next few quarters. However, the market remains volatile, and the trajectory of cobalt prices will depend on various factors. These particularly include demand trends and production dynamics in related industries.

In summary, as the world moves towards Net Zero emissions, the critical role of cobalt in the energy transition highlights the importance of sustainable and diversified supply chains to meet increasing demand while addressing ESG concerns.

The post Cobalt Crunch: Prices Plummet, Supply Challenges Loom in the Race to Net Zero appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Denmark Made Largest Government CDR Purchase of Almost $24 Million

Denmark has made history with the largest government procurement of durable carbon dioxide removal (CDR), totaling almost $24 million (Dkr 166 million). The Danish Energy Agency has awarded contracts to three companies for new CCS (CO2 Capture and Storage) projects, marking the completion of the fund for negative emissions (NECCS fund). 

These projects will ensure the capture and storage of 160,350 tonnes of CO2 annually from 2026 to 2032. This is equivalent to the CO2 absorption of around 16,000 hectares of forest per year.

Denmark’s Carbon Capture Coup

The agreement, the second-largest of its kind globally, involves purchasing 1.1 million tons of durable carbon removal from three companies: BioCirc, Bioman ApS, and Carbon Capture Scotland. The largest CDR deal is between Microsoft and Ørsted, involving the purchase of 2.76 million metric tons of removal credits. 

BioCirc CO2 ApS and Bioman ApS have secured contracts for CO2 capture and storage, while Carbon Capture Scotland Limited is expected to finalize its contract soon. 

The successful bidding process indicates market interest in capturing and storing biogenic CO2 from biomass.

All three projects meet tender requirements and demonstrate the capacity for CO2 capture, transport, and storage. They are expected to advance and mature the CCS value chain in Denmark, with plans to store CO2 locally.

Each project has different support levels and will capture varying amounts of CO2. Together, they will capture and store 160,350 tonnes of biogenic CO2 annually starting from 2026 until the end of the contract period in 2032. Support will be provided upon confirmation of permanent underground storage of the captured CO2.

The NECCS fund, established as part of the Danish Financial Act of 2022, is designed to support negative emissions via CCS technology. Unlike capturing and storing fossil CO2, which merely reduces emissions, capturing and storing biogenic CO2 from sources like biomass results in negative emissions. 

That’s because the CO2 was originally absorbed from the air by plants, effectively removing CO2 from the atmosphere and storing it underground.

RELEVANT: Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): A Primer

The fund aims to facilitate the capture and storage of biogenic CO2, thus contributing to overall CO2 reduction efforts. While three contracts have been awarded from the NECCS fund, not all allocated funds have been used. There are also currently no plans for further bidding rounds.

Danish Decarbonization Drive Toward Net Zero 

This move is part of Denmark’s net zero strategies, which originally aimed at reaching net zero emissions by 2050. But the new Danish government set forth ambitious climate change targets. It has set a world-leading goal of a 70% emission reduction by 2030 and net zero by 2045.

Additionally, they plan to reduce CO2 emissions nationally by 110% by 2050, surpassing 1990 levels and reaching a negative emission rate. The Danish Parliament also decided to phase out oil and gas extraction in the North Sea by 2050.

To support these objectives, the government intends to implement an emission levy on the agriculture sector and impose a tax on air travel, similar to measures adopted in Germany and Sweden.

Denmark has seen a consistent decline in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with the electricity generation sector leading the way. The sector has reduced its emissions by ⅔ between 1990 and 2019, largely due to the increased use of renewables. This has resulted in Denmark having one of the lowest emission intensities among OECD countries

Over the past decade, Denmark has also reduced its energy intensity by a quarter, indicating a shift towards a more energy-efficient economy. Renewable energy sources, particularly biofuels, and wind power, play a significant role in Denmark’s energy mix. It contributes to its relatively high share of the total energy supply from renewables.

Despite these achievements, Denmark still faces challenges related to demand-based emissions. While production-based emissions have consistently declined over the past fifteen years, demand-based emissions remain significant.

However, Denmark’s efforts to reduce its energy intensity and increase renewable energy use demonstrate its commitment to transitioning towards net zero. 

Denmark’s Roadmap to Net Zero 

According to BCG’s new decarbonization roadmap for the Nordic nations, Denmark can reach its net zero goal through this pathway:

To achieve its climate targets, Denmark must address four challenging sectors:

Public electricity and heat production must transition to fossil-free sources.
The transport sector needs to adopt greener practices.
Agriculture must strive to become carbon neutral.
The industry sector must work towards becoming emission-free.

CCS technology can help Denmark’s industrial sector in reducing carbon emissions, which can contribute to a 34% reduction in the country’s total emissions. Other measures include enhancing fuel efficiency in engines, optimizing processes, and reducing energy consumption from equipment.

Moreover, using bio-based materials has the potential to abate 0.8 Mt CO2e emissions by 2050. Notably, implementing carbon capture and storage for about 50% of cement emissions are crucial steps toward achieving Denmark’s climate goals.

The NECCS announcement coincides with recent agreements among 5 northern European countries for the transport and storage of CO2 in the North Sea. Denmark’s proactive approach to carbon reduction includes previous agreements with Belgium, the Netherlands, and France to facilitate cross-border CO2 transport and storage.

All these initiatives are part of the Danish government’s CCS plan to ramp up the process for capture and storage. Under this proposed plan, Denmark earmarked EUR 3.6B (Dkr 27B) for CCUS tenders

Denmark is charting an impressive course towards achieving net zero emissions through a combination of innovation, investment, and collaboration. With groundbreaking carbon capture projects like the NECCS fund and ambitious climate targets, Denmark is largely contributing to the global effort of combatting climate change. 

READ MORE: Danish Company Turns Poop Into Profit via Biochar and Carbon Credits

The post Denmark Made Largest Government CDR Purchase of Almost $24 Million appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Scotiabank Launches 2024 Net Zero Research Fund

On April 16, 2024, The Bank of Nova Scotiabank aka Scotiabank, one of the biggest Canadian multinational banking and financial services companies headquartered in Toronto, Ontario announced its acceptance of grant submissions across its operational footprint for the Net-Zero Research Fund. 

The press release states that organizations engaged in innovative research aimed at decarbonizing key sectors and facilitating the transition to a low-carbon economy can submit proposals for funding until May 28, 2024. 

Scotiabank’s Funding Range for 2024 

Scotiabank, with total assets of approximately $1.4 trillion as of January 31, 2024, is listed on both the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: BNS) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: BNS)

For 2024, Scotiabank’s grants will range from CAD $25,000 to CAD $100,000. To qualify for support from the Scotiabank Net-Zero Research Fund (NZRF), eligible applicants must be registered charities or non-profit organizations.

Scotiabank launched its bold $10 million Net-Zero Research Fund in 2021 as part of the Bank’s Climate Commitments. For the last three years, the bank has partnered with leading research and academic institutions to fund climate mitigation and sustainability research. 

The bank has allocated CAD $3 million to over 30 registered charities and non-profit organizations involved in the climate sector. To qualify for funding through the Scotiabank NZRF, partner organizations must register as a charity or non-profit in their respective jurisdictions.

Submissions for the Scotiabank NZRF will undergo evaluation based on the following key criteria. 

Novelty: Firstly, emphasis will be placed on the novelty of the research, addressing gaps in current knowledge or understanding. 
Impact: Additionally, the potential impact of the research on sectoral, national, or global decarbonization endeavors, as well as its relevance to supporting financial institutions in these efforts, will be assessed. 
Expertise: Applicants’ climate change research expertise and organizational capacity to lead will be assessed. Projects must also provide clear deliverables, timelines, and budgets to qualify for funding. 

Study Scotiabank’s financing in the sustainability sector from the figure below:

source: Scotiabank, 2022 report

Projects in the pipeline…

Meigan Terry, Senior VP and Chief Social Impact, Sustainability and Communications Officer at Scotiabank.

“Climate change continues to be a major priority for Scotiabank and we are contributing to the development of sustainable options that help to advance a low-carbon economy,” 

For example, in 2023, Scotiabank awarded a grant to the University of Alberta to develop a net-zero vision and investigate transition pathways for Canada’s steel sector. 

Another recipient for 2022 was the Con Vida Foundation, a Colombian NGO dedicated to promoting sustainable, green avocado farming throughout the tropical Andes. The organization assesses the advantages of avocado crops mimicking a carbon sink across the region.

Various projects have received grants from the fund, including initiatives focused on 

Expanding carbon sequestration.
Enhancing greenhouse gas emissions measurement methodologies.
Identifying policy and regulatory changes to expedite decarbonization.
Stimulating demand for lower or zero-carbon technologies.

Navigating to Net Zero: All about Scotiabank’s Net-Zero Research Fund

Scotiabank has created the NZRF to facilitate the transition to a net-zero global economy by providing climate-related financing to clients in all sectors, including carbon-intensive sectors.

The bank’s prime mission is to advance to net zero by working with clients to achieve net-zero financed emissions by 2050. Furthermore, the company actively pursues emissions reduction efforts within its operations.

MUST READ: How Will Canada’s Carbon Price Increase Affect You? (carboncredits.com)

The navigation pathways as highlighted by 2024 Scotiabank’s NZRF Submission Guide are:

Encouraging research and dialogue to transition towards achieving net-zero emissions globally by 2050 or earlier, aligning with the goals of the Paris Agreement.
Recognizing initiatives for investment to ease adoption or broaden the application scale.
Enhancing ties between academic and non-profit research institutions and the corporate sector through collaborative efforts and knowledge exchange.
Advancing the Bank’s climate change strategy and perspectives on the transition to a net-zero global economy.

Here’s the link to the submission guide: NZRF_2024_Guide_ENGLISH.pdf (scotiabank.com)

Scotiabank’s Sustainability Focused Lending and Investment Guide

Scotiabank plays a crucial role in facilitating the transition to a low-carbon future while fostering sustainable economic growth. Through its Sustainable Finance group, Scotiabank helps clients integrate sustainability into financing. It also aligns capital market outcomes with corporate sustainability goals. 

The bank identifies eligible environmental and social projects and provides financing solutions to boost sustainability. It subsequently evaluates the eligibility of these activities, thereby, significantly evolving in the sustainable finance landscape.

source: Scotiabank

Let’s hope Scotiabank delivers the best financing to support the most deserving applicant and achieves its goal of becoming a net zero bank by 2050.

FURTHER READING: US EPA to Invest $20B in Climate and Clean Energy Projects for Underserved Communities (carboncredits.com)

The post Scotiabank Launches 2024 Net Zero Research Fund appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Power Play: California’s Virtual Power Plant Revolution

California is considering a mandate for virtual power plants (VPPs), with a potential capacity of 7.7 gigawatts by 2035. A recent report by The Brattle Group for GridLab highlights the potential of VPPs to cover about 15% of California’s peak power demand by the same period.

The report identifies various sources contributing to the VPP market potential, including orchestrated electric vehicles (EVs), behind-the-meter batteries, smart thermostats, water heaters, and demand response. These resources could significantly boost VPP capacity, especially from batteries behind residential or commercial meters and managed EV charging.

What is a Virtual Power Plant?

A Virtual Power Plant (VPP) is a network of decentralized, medium-scale power generating units, flexible power consumers, and storage systems. These units are aggregated and coordinated through advanced software and control systems to operate as a single, integrated power resource. 

A VPP aims to optimize energy generation, consumption, and storage in real time to meet demand, stabilize the grid, and maximize efficiency. By leveraging distributed energy resources, VPPs offer a flexible and responsive approach to managing electricity supply and demand, enhancing grid reliability, and supporting the integration of renewable energy sources.

Energy experts assert that VPPs are crucial for diminishing the power sector’s reliance on environmentally harmful fossil fuels as the country transitions towards electrifying transportation, buildings, and industrial sectors. While still in the early stages, VPPs are positioned for significant expansion in the United States in the forthcoming years. 

Thanks to by President Joe Biden’s recent climate legislation, which incorporates incentives for electric vehicles, solar panels, and home batteries.

RELATED: Transforming the American Clean Energy Landscape Under Biden’s Era

However, overcoming barriers to mass VPP deployment may require new policies. Senate Bill 1305 aims to accelerate VPP rollout by directing regulatory bodies, including the following:

California Public Utilities Commission (PUC), 
California Energy Commission (CEC), and 
California ISO to take actions supporting VPP deployment. 

The bill includes provisions for PUC adoption of VPP procurement requirements for investor-owned utilities. The effectiveness of such a mandate hinges on policy details and enforcement mechanisms. 

Legislation Propels California’s VPP Evolution

SB 1305 also tasks the CEC and CAISO with estimating the potential of “resource adequacy-qualifying virtual power plant resources” and addressing regulatory barriers.

This initiative builds upon California’s existing goal of achieving 7 GW of flexible demand by 2030. This aim is set to reduce consumer electricity demand during grid stress periods. 

The Brattle Group’s assessment reveals that batteries installed at homes and businesses, often coupled with rooftop solar arrays, hold the highest potential for inclusion in software-steered Virtual Power Plants (VPPs). 

By 2035, these batteries could cover 5.1% of California’s peak power demand. Synchronized smart thermostats follow closely, offering 4.3%, while managed EV charging, automated demand response, and grid-interactive water heating contribute 3%, 2.3%, and 0.5%, respectively.

The projected 7.7 GW of VPP market potential from these technologies could yield significant savings by 2035. A staggering amount of over $750 million per year could be avoided in traditional system infrastructure investments. Approximately $550 million of these savings would directly benefit consumers.

Realizing the Benefits of VPPs for All Californians

Edson Perez, California lead at Advanced Energy United, emphasizes the tangible benefits of VPPs for Californians, saying that: 

“Virtual power plants offer a very real opportunity for Californians to get paid back directly for helping keep the lights on in communities across the state.”

Accessible VPP technologies like smart thermostats and electric vehicles offer residents payments for their participation, he further noted. This would lead to more affordable rates and increased grid resiliency for all ratepayers.

To realize these benefits, the report suggests California adopt emerging best practices for VPPs, drawing from experiences globally. While pilot projects have provided valuable lessons, the focus now must shift to full-scale deployment. 

Regulators are also encouraged to ensure that successful pilot programs transition into broader implementation. Additionally, the report recommends providing sufficient incentives to encourage consumer participation in VPPs and support utilities or third-party aggregators in implementing and operating them.

Current payment structures may not fully reflect the value of VPP participation, requiring performance-based incentives for utilities and aggregators. Third-party aggregators could be incentivized with better access to wholesale markets and opportunities to participate in distribution investment deferral programs, among other strategies.

This interesting development comes handy as California faces a challenging task to meet its climate goals. The state must almost triple its efforts in reducing annual emissions to achieve its 2030 target.

READ MORE: Decarbonizing California: The Golden State’s Uphill Battle in the Climate Journey

Virtual Power Plants represent a crucial step towards a more flexible, efficient, and sustainable energy future. They offer tangible consumer benefits, grid reliability, and the integration of renewable energy sources. Policy initiatives like SB 1305 signal a commitment to accelerating VPP deployment, paving the way for a cleaner energy landscape.

The post Power Play: California’s Virtual Power Plant Revolution appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Canada’s 2024 Budget: Accelerating Towards a Clean Economy and Net Zero Future

In the global race for investment and innovation to reach net zero, Canada has positioned itself at the forefront, leveraging its abundant resources and progressive policies to attract capital and drive sustainable growth.

The Canadian government’s announcement of a net zero economic plan, backed by an investment of over $160 billion, marks a significant milestone in the country’s commitment to combatting climate change. 

At the heart of this plan are major economic investment tax credits totaling $93 billion by 2034-35. These incentives stimulate private investment, fostering Canadian leadership in clean energy and innovation while generating economic growth and high-quality jobs.

Canada Pioneers Net Zero Investment and Innovation

Investors, both domestic and international, are taking notice of Canada’s strategic vision. Despite global economic challenges, public markets and private equity capital flows into Canada’s net zero economy reached $14 billion in 2023. This is a testament to the effectiveness of Canada’s investments in driving sustainable business growth and job creation.

One area where Canada has particularly excelled is in the development of electric vehicle (EV) battery supply chains. BloombergNEF ranked Canada first in the world for attractiveness in building EV battery supply chains, surpassing even China. 

Chart from Canada Budget 2024

This achievement underscores Canada’s advantages, including abundant clean energy, high labor standards, and robust engagement with Indigenous communities. By capitalizing on these strengths, Canada creates high-skilled, well-paying jobs, from resource workers mining critical minerals to technicians assembling EV batteries.

Canada’s commitment to clean energy extends beyond EVs, encompassing a broad spectrum of clean technologies and industries. The government’s investments aim to unlock the full potential of Canadian clean technology firms, facilitating their growth and global competitiveness. 

Already, Canada boasts 12 companies on the Cleantech Group’s list of the 100 most innovative global clean technology companies, a testament to the country’s prowess in driving sustainable innovation.

By 2050, Canada’s clean energy GDP has the potential to increase dramatically, possibly growing fivefold to reach $500 billion. This growth trajectory aligns with Canada’s commitment to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. It shows that prioritizing climate action is synonymous with fostering economic prosperity.

Canada’s Blueprint for EV Dominance

Key ongoing actions outlined in the Canada 2024 budget include the following:

Delivering major economic investment tax credits, 
Catalyzing private investment through the Canada Growth Fund, 
Building clean electricity infrastructure, and 
Securing Canada’s position as a global supplier of critical minerals. 

These initiatives are essential for propelling Canada towards its net zero target by 2050 while fostering economic resilience and competitiveness.

A highlight of the budget is the introduction of a new Electric Vehicle Supply Chain investment tax credit, aimed at bolstering Canada’s position as an EV manufacturing hub. This 10% tax credit on the cost of buildings used in key segments of the EV supply chain incentivizes businesses to invest in Canada across EV assembly, battery production, and cathode active material production. 

By supporting multiple stages of the manufacturing process, Canada aims to secure its role in the global EV supply chain.

To seize the investment opportunities of the global clean economy, Canada is also implementing six major economic investment tax credits.

The government’s proactive approach includes delivering tax credits for clean electricity projects, carbon capture initiatives, and investments in clean technology. These incentives are crucial for accelerating the transition to a low-carbon economy and reducing emissions across various sectors.

RELATED: Canada Reveals $2.6B Carbon Capture Tax Credit, The Biggest Climate Item

Here are the details of the tax credits:

Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Investment Tax Credit: Available as of January 1, 2022.
Clean Technology Investment Tax Credit: Available as of March 28, 2023.
Clean Hydrogen Investment Tax Credit: To be introduced soon.
Clean Technology Manufacturing Investment Tax Credit: To be introduced soon.
Clean Electricity Investment Tax Credit: Already introduced, with expansions planned.
Electric Vehicle (EV) Supply Chain Investment Tax Credit: To be introduced soon.

Of these, the Clean Electricity Investment Tax Credit is particularly significant. It aims to support the growth of Canada’s electricity capacity to meet the increased demand expected by 2050. 

Clean Electricity Tax Credits Spark Economic Growth

As Canada’s economy expands, electricity demand is projected to double by 2050. To ensure a clean, reliable, and affordable grid to meet this increased demand, electricity capacity needs to increase by 1.7 to 2.2 times compared to current levels. Investing in clean electricity now can lower Canadians’ monthly energy expenses by 12% and generate around 250,000 quality jobs by 2050.

Canada already boasts one of the cleanest electricity grids globally, with 84% of electricity generated from non-emitting sources. However, significant investments are required in other regions to ensure clean, reliable electricity grids nationwide.

The federal government is committed to supporting provinces and territories in making these investments.

The Clean Electricity Investment Tax Credit offers a 15% refundable tax credit rate for eligible investments in new equipment or refurbishments related to low-emitting electricity generation systems, stationary electricity storage systems, and transmission infrastructure. It is available to both taxable and non-taxable corporations, including those owned by municipalities or Indigenous communities.

The tax credit is expected to cost $7.2 billion over 5 years starting in 2024-25, with additional expenditures projected in the following years.

RELEVANT: Canada’s $5 Billion Carbon Pricing Revenue Sparks Debate

As Canada charts its course towards a clean economy and net zero future, the 2024 budget stands as a testament to the country’s resolve and ambition. By leveraging its natural resources, skilled workforce, and progressive policies, Canada is not only embracing the challenge of climate change but also seizing the economic opportunities inherent in sustainability. 

The post Canada’s 2024 Budget: Accelerating Towards a Clean Economy and Net Zero Future appeared first on Carbon Credits.