1.6 The World’s Shrinking Wasteline
The post 1.6 The World’s Shrinking Wasteline appeared first on Carbon Credits.
<img src="” title=”1.6 The World’s Shrinking Wasteline” />
The post 1.6 The World’s Shrinking Wasteline appeared first on Carbon Credits.
<img src="” title=”1.6 The World’s Shrinking Wasteline” />
The post 1.5 The Safest Deadly Poison in the World appeared first on Carbon Credits.
<img src="” title=”1.5 The Safest Deadly Poison in the World” />
India submitted its long-term climate strategy at the COP27 summit underway in Egypt, joining a selected list of countries that have clear pathways on how to achieve their net zero goals.
Under the Paris Agreement, all countries have to submit by 2020 a climate strategy to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) detailing how they’ll help fight global warming. These plans are called the Long-Term Low Emissions and Development Strategies (LT-LEDS).
So far, only 57 nations have submitted their LT-LEDS and India is the last of the biggest emitters to do so.
Unlike Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), LT-LEDS focus on a longer time horizon. Countries don’t have to report progress on their long-term climate plans as the case with NDCs.
The world’s second-largest consumer of coal aims to prioritize a phased transition to cleaner fuels. It will also reduce household consumption to reach net zero emissions by 2070, according to its 100-page low-carbon strategy.
Minister for Environment, Forest and Climate Change Bhupender Yadav launched the country’s LT-LEDS, saying that:
“This is an important milestone. Once again, India has demonstrated that it walks the talk on climate change… India’s LT-LEDS articulates India’s vision and action plan for achieving its NDC goals and the target of net zero emissions by 2070. And we are placing before all, the key elements of India’s transition to a low-carbon development pathway.”
India updated its NDC last August with these two major climate goals:
Slash emissions intensity of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 45% from 2005 levels by the year 2030
Achieve about 50% cumulative electric power installed capacity from non-fossil fuel-based energy resources by 2030
The country’s updated climate plan said India is on track to meeting its NDC commitment. That involves 2.5 – 3 billion tonnes of carbon sequestration in forest and tree cover by 2030.
The document also noted that the update will help the nation achieve its long-term decarbonization. It further states that climate finance estimates needed to hit net zero vary. But for India, it’s “in the order of tens of billions of dollars by 2050 and around ₹85.6 trillion ($1B) by 2030”.
Noting this, the Indian delegate at COP27 summit raised the issue of climate finance once again. Yadav said that the provision of climate finance by developed countries will play a very significant role and that:
“needs to be considerably enhanced, in the form of grants and concessional loans, ensuring scale, scope, and speed, predominantly from public sources, in accordance with the principles of the UNFCCC.”
The 3rd largest emitter has been pledging to phase down coal use. It has also become a big consumer of renewable energy such as solar.
It achieved its goal of having 40% of its electricity capacity come from renewable energy in 2021.
But what’s new in India’s climate strategy is its focus on slashing consumption at the household level and the inclusion of carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS).
CCUS includes technology that can capture carbon from polluting industries so it never enters the atmosphere. The Indian government will focus on the economic, technical, and political feasibility of CCUS while advancing its technologies.
India’s long-term low-carbon strategy is based on four key considerations.
The country has contributed little to global warming, as shown in the chart.
It has significant energy needs for development.
It commits to pursuing low-carbon strategies for development.
India needs to build climate resilience.
The nation’s LT-LEDS zooms in on 6 key areas to reduce emissions: electricity, urbanization, transport, forests, finance, and industry.
For instance, the government plans to increase the use of biofuels, particularly ethanol blending in petrol. This will help boost the number of electric vehicles in the country. This aligns with India’s aim to expand public transport networks and use more green hydrogen fuel.
In particular, India seeks to maximize the use of EVs and ethanol blending to be at 20% by 2025. Its net zero strategy also aims to achieve a 3x increase in nuclear capacity by 2032 to boost the power sector.
The government also announced a push on industrial development, aiming for energy efficiency improvements. These are especially in the sectors of steel, cement, and aluminum.
More importantly, the net zero strategies of India will center on the rational use of national resources with regard to energy security.
While its LT-LEDS outlines an ambitious plan, the COP27 delegate said the nation could not “have a situation where the energy security of developing countries is ignored in the name of urgent mitigation.”
On top of it all, the transition from fossil fuels will be done in a just, smooth, sustainable, and all-inclusive manner, India’s long-term plan said.
The post India Unveils Long-Term Strategy to Reach Net Zero at COP27 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
London-based climate tech startup BeZero Carbon secured $50 million (about €48M) in a Series B round to scale its carbon rating platform and expand into the US and Asia.
BeZero Carbon is a ratings agency founded in 2020 for the voluntary carbon market (VCM). Its ratings are determined by scientists, earth observation specialists, and financial analysts.
BerZero’s users include major energy institutions, commodities, and the financial sector. The firm’s platform also supports credit buyers, investors, project developers, brokers, carbon marketplaces, and top exchanges.
BeZero’s latest $50 million funding round is the largest Series B raise in UK climate tech this year. The company raised a total capital of over $70 million.
The firm’s CEO Tommy Ricketts said:
“… Starting with carbon, effective ecosystem markets have huge potential to accelerate the Net Zero transition and generate economic prosperity. Developing the information infrastructure that allows these markets to take off is fundamental to their growth. The raise will ensure we can continue to invest in our ratings, risk and analytics tools to make this vision a reality.”
US-based investment firm Quantum Energy Partners led the round, with more investments from old and new partners:
Molten Ventures
Norrsken VC
Illuminate Financial
Qima
Contrarian Ventures
EDF Pulse Ventures
Hitachi Ventures
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).
The startup said it would use the funds to drive innovation in the VCM. And that’s through developing ratings, risk and analytics tools, and opening offices in New York and Singapore.
The funding will also be for investing in creating risk-based products for other markets. BeZero will further use it to develop its proprietary toolkit, deepen its earth observation capabilities, and expand the team.
The BeZero Carbon Rating (BCR) gives users a risk based assessment for understanding and evaluating carbon credit of any type, in any sector and country.
The BCR of carbon credits represents the firm’s opinion on the likelihood that a given credit achieves a tonne of CO2e avoided or removed. It uses a 7 point scale across 3 categories: A, AA, AAA.
Projects must meet these 3 key criteria to be eligible for a BeZero Carbon Rating.
Applied an additionality test or provide enough information on how it is additional
Audited by a recognized independent auditor to ensure the credibility of data and information
Information on project design and ongoing monitoring must be available in the public domain at all times
The BCR follows a robust analytical framework with detailed assessment of the following 6 critical risk factors. They significantly affect the quality of carbon credits issued by the project.
BeZero rates a project’s carbon credits in a 4-stage process.
#1. Macro factor assessment: making top-down assessment of the credits based on country-specific risks, sector, and accreditation methodology.
#2. Project specific assessment: assessing project-specific risks based on all publicly available information on project’s credits.
#3. Risk factor weighting: summing up all the specific weighting for each risk factor, according to these percentage.
#4. BCR committee review: The Rating Committee reviews all ratings and must approve them before assigning final BCR to the carbon credits.
All BeZero Carbon Ratings are valid at all times and are tracked on an ongoing basis. The monitoring process involves reviewing all new information about the project, sector, and methodology.
That’s to ensure that the VCM grows in a transparent way, delivering a real impact on the planet.
Jeffrey Harris from Quantum Energy Partners noted that:
“Set to reach $50bn by 2030, the Voluntary Carbon Market will play a central role in the transition to Net Zero. BeZero Carbon has built the biggest ratings agency in the market, with an incredible team of experts that are leaders in their fields. We are excited to be supporting them with their next stage of growth to help build a new climate economy.”
All headline ratings are available on the firm’s website, making it the only carbon ratings agency to do so.
With more information readily available to assess a carbon credit’s quality, the more confidence investors and buyers can have that it’s achieving its claim towards a net zero emissions.
Paying clients can access full project assessments, research insights and risk tools via its platform. And by integrating its API, carbon credit marketplaces and exchanges can also host the BeZero Carbon ratings.
The post BeZero Carbon Closes $50M for Expanding Carbon Rating Platform appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Ghana and Switzerland, along with Vanuatu, have approved at COP27 the first-ever voluntary cooperation under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement called the Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcome (ITMO).
ITMO is a carbon emissions trading system where countries can purchase or trade carbon credits from other countries. This can open the door to creating new carbon markets and larger reductions in global GHG emissions.
The countries showed during the summit how the pioneering ITMO transaction will enable the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while promoting the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in developing nations.
According to the United Nations Development ProgrammeCommenting on this collaboration, UNDP Administrator said that:
“This initiative is an example of UNDP’s ‘future-smart’ approach to development, which aims to use innovative financial mechanisms and partnerships with governments and the private sector to empower countries to follow a sustainable development pathway, leaving no one behind…”
Article 6 of the Paris Agreement replaces previous forms of international carbon credits.
It recognizes that some countries may enter voluntary cooperation in implementing their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to allow for higher climate mitigation ambition and actions and promote sustainable development.
Apart from cutting emissions, climate mitigation projects can also deliver many development benefits. These include gender empowerment, food security, access to energy, livelihood support, job creation, and more.
At COP27, Ghana presented the landmark bilateral authorized project under ITMO deal with Switzerland. Meanwhile, Vanuatu also did the same for the first-ever unilateral ITMO projects.
By entering into bilateral agreements with Ghana and Vanuatu, Switzerland will reduce its GHG emissions by using ITMOs. Doing so will help the implementation of projects with development benefits.
The project in Ghana will help thousands of rice farmers practice sustainable agriculture to cut methane emissions. These farmers cover about 80% of Ghana’s rice production.
Via the ITMO deal, those farmers will also get extra income with carbon revenues for increased resilience and more efficient water use.
A representative from Ghana, Dr. Kwaku Afriyie, remarked that:
“Ghana’s leadership in Africa on carbon finance with the landmark bilateral agreement with Switzerland is something we are proud of. We want to leverage this collaborative approach to crowd in more carbon revenue to accelerate the implementation of our national climate plan for the benefits of many communities…”
While the deal with Vanuatu will provide access to electricity to those who don’t have it through renewable energy sources. Vanuatu is a small Island Developing State (SIDS).
The UN Development Programme (UNDP) is among the first to create strong demand for ITMOs via its Carbon Payment for Development facility. Through this initiative, the UNDP will help design and implement mitigation projects.
The goal is to leverage carbon markets to enable private investments to support SDGs. New projects can help reduce up to 2.3 million tCO2 equivalents. To amplify the impact of these projects, UNDP will focus on the ones supported by the private sector.
It will channel payments for ITMOs to project proponents who invest in low-carbon solutions that create additional revenue for investors.
Under this payment-for-result scheme, investments from the private sector will be up to 4x the carbon payments from the ITMOs.
UNDP launched at COP27 a new digital platform called Carbon Cooperation to help developing countries build capacity, enhance ITMO workflows, and improve their carbon market readiness. It will also make their ITMO projects become more efficient and transparent.
In partnership with UNFCCC, UNDP also introduced its Article 6.2 capacity development online course.
The course seeks to equip participants in making decisions related to cooperative approaches such as the first-ever ITMO agreement between Ghana and Switzerland. It will also help policymakers understand the vital components of executing this new carbon market mechanism in their country.
The post Nations Strike First-Ever “ITMO” Emissions Trading appeared first on Carbon Credits.
The COPs are the most important annual climate conferences but this year’s 27th annual summit or COP27 is different from the previous ones.
It’s all about moving from mere negotiations and planning for the net zero pledges to implementing promises to protect forests and provide climate finance.
During the first three days, talks center on carbon credits and compensating developing nations for ‘losses and damages’ caused by climate change. The UN had also made clear its zero tolerance for greenwashing.
But there’s a lot more to expect and learn from COP27 and here are the four key takeaways.
Climate TRACE, an NGO tracking emissions, released a report at COP27 that analyzed 72,612 individual sources of CO2.
Their study revealed that fossil fuel emissions could be up to 3x higher than what oil and gas companies claim.
The authors found that half of the biggest polluters are oil and gas fields. They used satellite technology to detect unreported emissions such as methane leakage.
The top sources of global emissions represent less than 1% of total facilities reported in Climate TRACE’s dataset. But they account for 14% of total emissions in 2021.
The Permian Basin, an oil and gas field in the USA, is the most polluting project in the world as per the report. It has emitted 471 million MT of CO2e in the last 20 years. A Russian oil and gas field, Urengoyskoye, came second, emitting 317 million MT of CO2e for the same period.
Understating emissions from fossil fuels by oil and gas firms is “greenwashing and cheating”, according to UN Secretary General António Guterres. He further remarked that:
“The climate crisis is in front of our eyes – but also hidden in plain sight. We have huge emissions gaps, finance gaps, adaptation gaps… But those gaps cannot be effectively addressed without plugging the data gaps. After all, it is impossible to effectively manage and control what we cannot measure.”
Al Gore, former US vice president and a founding member of Climate TRACE, also said at COP27 that:
“The climate crisis can, at times, feel like an intractable challenge – in large part because we’ve had a limited understanding of precisely where emissions are coming from.”
Gore further noted that accurate and detailed data on emissions sources help us prioritize efforts to reduce planet warming gasses significantly.
The COP27 summit has been dubbed as the “African COP”. What the African countries have to say takes center stage at the talks.
Africa is so vulnerable to climate change. NGOs in the continent said that staple crops and fish harvests will decline in the coming years. Plus, the 116 million people in Africa will experience issues with rising sea levels.
Investment opportunities are very important for the continent, especially when it comes to water, cooling, and coast protection, according to the International Finance Corporation analysis.
In fact, the Minister of Environment for Egypt Yasmine Fouad told COP27 that Africa needs up to $41.6 trillion (€41.4 trillion) by 2030 to deal with the damaging effects of climate change.
She also added that funding was a key challenge but is a must to “bridge the gaps between the needs and climate funding” for African nations.
Unfortunately, the world’s richest nations failed to deliver their $100 billion funding per year pledge for developing countries. And while there have been hunches of support, African nations have yet to see if COP27 can help them find the right investors.
Large banks and financiers form the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ). They pledged to hit net zero by 2050 before COP26 last year, knowing that protecting forests is vital to achieving it.
To date, the alliance members achieved only a 3% cut in investments associated with deforestation.
But a report launched at COP27 summit by Global Witness found that the finance giants still invest around $8.5 billion in firms at risk of causing deforestation. The NGO stated that:
“A year on from COP26, GFANZ membership is at risk of becoming little more than a badge to be worn by banks and financiers, who continue to plough money into practices that are destroying our forests.”
The report found that GFANZ members have investments in agricultural businesses accused of deforestation. Examples include the Brazilian firm JBS where members of the group have acquired shares since COP26. Their investments in similar firms have also gone up.
So key leaders of the alliance such as Mark Carney, the former Bank of England Governor, urged members to end financing deforestation. They warned that “the world will not reach net zero by 2050 unless we halt and reverse deforestation within a decade”.
And in October GFANZ announced it was dropping out of the ‘Race to Net Zero’. That came after the UN-backed campaign upped its standards and threatened to kick out non-performers.
Coral reefs have long drawn tourists to the Red Sea peninsula and the COP27 venue in Sharm El Sheikh. But these diverse marine ecosystems are more than just a backdrop to the climate summit. They are home to over a thousand various species of fish and corals.
Yet more importantly, Egypt’s coral reefs act as ‘coral refugia’ that can withstand the increasing impacts of climate change.
As such, they offer the global community the chance to protect marine ecosystems. And they also act as seed banks that can help restore degraded reefs.
Mindful of their global importance, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) announced a major new fund to support this local ecosystem. At COP27 summit, USAID pledged $15 million to the Global Fund for Coral Reefs (GFCR).
This funding from USAID makes the total money raised by the GFCR to protect reefs to $187 million.
There will be more ‘blue carbon financing’ announcements in the coming days at COP27 summit. They include financing mangroves and seagrass.
The post Fossil Fuels and Coral Reefs: 4 Key Takeaways From COP27 Summit appeared first on Carbon Credits.
In the simplest sense, financing is the process of putting money to entities or activities that most need them or can put them to the most productive use. While there are all sorts of financing for personal or business use, there’s one type that often makes head turns.
Carbon financing.
You may also be raising your eyebrows if it’s the first time you to hear it or if you want to know more about it. There’s no need to wonder about it though because this article will explore carbon financing.
It will help you know the tools of this financing and walk you through the world of carbon credits and carbon markets. You’ll also learn how the government and the private sector works under a carbon financing scheme. Then you’ll get to discover how you can also partake in this exciting space of carbon.
Carbon finance supports an asset that’s the main culprit of global warming and climate change – carbon dioxide or its equivalent. Its sole purpose is to reduce global carbon emissions by offering opportunities to mitigate the effects of climate change through emissions reduction projects.
Carbon financing creates climate systems that make it possible to measure carbon and incentivizes both firms and individuals to reduce their carbon footprint. It often takes the form of annual payment to a project partner, be it an NGO, private, or public entity, for the emission reductions delivered by the project.
The emission reductions are typically measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e) and are represented by carbon credits. One carbon credit is equal to 1 tonne of tCO2e removed or avoided.
As such, carbon financing improves the financial viability of projects while creating additional revenue streams for developers and beneficiaries. It also enables the transfer of technologies and knowledge in the industry.
Best of all, carbon finance provides various means to leverage investments in projects that reduce GHG emissions in countries where they’re most viable. All the while helping the world to transition to a low-carbon economy.
But what makes this kind of financing possible and feasible? A carbon bank.
Carbon financing can only be effective in spurring the transition if the challenges associated with it are addressed. This is where the role of a carbon bank comes into play.
A carbon bank is an independent entity, free from political influence, responsible for oversight and management of the carbon market.
It seeks to sustain confidence in the system and ensure compliance by managing and minimizing carbon pricing volatility. It can choose how to manage the price, using some of the cost-containment mechanisms available.
A carbon bank can also help tackle some of the underlying factors of price volatility, such as market expectations and investor activities. Plus, it can also react to volatility due to external drivers like fuel prices and weather conditions.
The bank will not only be charged with price management, but would perform a range of market oversight and management functions. These include:
Professional forecasting: judgments or assessments with regards to emissions and carbon prices
Allowance management: allocating and tracking allowances as well as conducting auctions
Monitoring emissions: ensuring compliance and evaluating progress towards emissions reductions
Cost containment: buying and selling allowances and approving offset projects
Coordinating with different government bodies
Many jurisdictions, including Australia, Canada, and the United States, have explored the possibility of using a carbon bank as a potential tool to manage their carbon pricing as part of the overall policy objectives of the government.
While there are a range of tools of carbon finance, the creation or allowance of carbon credits that can be traded in compliance or voluntary carbon markets, has been the top option.
That could be because this kind of financial mechanism places value on the reduction of carbon itself, which makes it a tradable asset. Turning emission reductions into carbon credits that can be traded in various exchanges and markets help stimulate the economy as the world fights climate change.
For carbon finance to work, carbon credits are essential. So, let’s dig deeper into this carbon financing tool and the markets the credits trade.
Carbon credits are tradable assets that represent one tonne of carbon avoided/removed from the atmosphere.
They are created through projects that reduce carbon emissions. These projects vary a lot, from nature-based solutions to carbon removal technologies.
The types of carbon credits also vary, depending on what project creates them. So far, there are 170+ types of credits available in the market.
Development and operation of projects that remove and reduce carbon from the air
Adopting practices or initiatives that purposefully reduce business-as-usual emissions
Under the first method, project developers document, report, and verify that their activities did remove and sequester or prevent a tonne of carbon from entering the atmosphere. Upon successful verification, a corresponding amount of carbon credits are created.
It’s the funds from carbon financing that support the emissions reduction projects. Common examples of these projects include forest management and protection, wind or solar power generation, and gas capture from landfills, mines or farms. The project developer can then sell the carbon credits they generate.
Under the second option, companies that alter their practices and verify the reduction in their business-as-usual emissions create carbon credits. For every tonne of carbon reduced, the entity gets a credit that it can trade in the market.
Both methods of creating carbon credits differ but they share one common goal – reduce emission levels. The ultimate aim is to reverse the effects of global warming.
Carbon credits in the voluntary carbon market (VCM) are known as carbon offsets of offset credits. Within the VCM, offset credits are exchanged horizontally between companies.
If one company removes one unit of carbon by improving their normal business activity, they generate a carbon offset credit. Other firms can then buy that credit to offset or compensate for their own emissions.
Here’s how the carbon offset credits trading performs over the years. The market’s total or cumulative value reaches $8 billion until 2021.
Individuals and corporations can decide to buy carbon offset credits at any time they choose. Part of the revenue from the sale of the credits is put back into the projects to maintain them or invested into new projects. As such, carbon credits bolster the positive effects of this form of carbon financing.
Within the compliance or regulatory markets, carbon credits are called carbon allowances or certificates. They work like permission slips to emit carbon and other GHGs. The credits represent the number of emissions they’re allowed for a given year.
In a sense, money from carbon financing flows vertically from entities to regulators inside the compliance market. But companies who have excess credits (emit less than their allowance) can sell them to other firms who go beyond their allowed emissions level.
But since players in this carbon market are business entities from the same sector, the impact of the carbon credit finance is industry-wide.
Carbon financing often involves government programs on compliance and how the private sector responds to carbon regulations. Climate policies that promote carbon finance in compliance markets can reduce the impacts large businesses have on climate change.
But it’s not only about companies changing their business models to comply with policies. Some entities in the private sector have also started to capitalize on carbon finance opportunities that compliance markets bring.
Let’s consider some instances of how governments and the private sector affect carbon financing.
There are plenty of incentives present for businesses looking to create green projects. Green bonds and loans, for example, that cater to green project firms do a great job of creating these opportunities.
Most governments worldwide have portfolios in banks consisting of loans dedicated to green projects.
Likewise, green bonds offer an opportunity for investors to support projects that reduce global emissions. They often come with tax incentives as they fall under the category of environmental, social, and governance or ESG investing.
The purpose of a carbon tax is to change how entities do business to reduce their emissions. Carbon taxes apply to an entity’s direct emissions as well as goods that emit CO2.
Taxing corporate emissions and goods like fossil fuels will prompt polluters to cut their carbon footprints. However, not all countries impose carbon taxes. Yet, some of them do such as in the case of EU states, some parts of the U.S. and Canada, too.
A cap and trade system works within the compliance carbon market. It sets a cap or limit on the level of carbon an entity can emit over a period of time. The cap decreases over time, so total emissions drop.
This scheme is also known as the Emissions Trading System (ETS). As mentioned earlier some industries emissions, particularly the heavy emitters like steel and iron, are heavily regulated.
Firms can sell their carbon credit allowances to others who need them to cover their cap to avoid fines. The carbon credits then become another revenue stream for the seller under this system.
ETS has been proven to reduce CO2 emissions significantly. For instance, the European Union’s ETS had reduced emissions by 29% in 2018 from 2005 levels. The California cap and trade program was also able to reduce covered entities’ emissions by 10% in 5 years.
You can find the real-time prices for carbon credits traded in different ETS here.
It’s undeniable that government regulations on emissions have significantly reduced carbon levels. Still, even more are possible with the help of individuals and businesses who seek to voluntarily slash their footprints.
This is where the voluntary carbon market becomes so important. When entities feel responsible to offset their emissions, they can work together and pool funds to finance carbon projects.
That resource is critical to help support new innovative climate solutions that are emerging today. If scaled, they may cut carbon emissions at a much faster rate than entities under the compliance markets alone.
The best way is to invest in emissions reduction projects by buying carbon offset credits they generate. You can choose from various carbon credit marketplaces online that sell those credits or directly from the project developers platform.
The amount of credits to buy depends on how much you want to voluntarily offset your personal or corporate emissions.
Carbon credit providers offer various options to suit different offsetting needs, from individual to big businesses.
You can even bet your money on carbon credits in spot exchanges and earn some profits. Blockchain-based or tokenized carbon credits are now emerging, giving market players a more transparent transaction.
Just see to it that the offset credits meet carbon standards to ensure they represent a real CO2 reduction.
Overall, whether it’s the VCM or compliance market, carbon financing creates essential opportunities to tackle emissions. More remarkably, the VCM enables individuals and companies to be part of the key financing that make carbon markets alive and grow.
The post What is Carbon Financing? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP) continues to look for positive environmental impacts of their investments.
The Fund’s recent climate report shows great progress on its net zero by 2050 plan. The Chief Investment Officer, Ziad Hindo said:
“We are increasingly evolving our thinking to consider how we can use our capital in a way that has clear and measurable real-world environmental and social benefits while creating value for our members.”
Indeed, one of the world’s biggest pension funds has been making huge strides on its net zero targets.
To date, OTPP delivers retirement security to 333,000 members and pensioners, invests in 50+ countries worldwide, and manages C$242.5 billion in net assets (as of June 30, 2022). 80% of those assets are managed in-house.
Ontario Teachers’ has put 2025 and 2030 targets in place to cut its carbon emissions to reach net zero investment activity by 2050.
OTPP aims to reduce portfolio carbon emissions intensity by 45% by 2025 and 67% by 2030, compared to its 2019 baseline. These emission reduction targets cover all the Fund’s assets, resources, and holdings.
Also, OTPP has an ambitious plan to achieve $300B in net assets by 2030 and $50B in green investments by 2050.
Since their net zero 2050 announcement last year, Ontario Teachers’ saw a significant drop in their emissions due to its investment shift from passive to active exposure.
Currently, the Fund’s private assets that represent 72% of its PCF (portfolio carbon footprint) holdings continue to achieve lower emissions intensity than other asset classes. Its wholly owned subsidiary Cadillac Fairview, for instance, has been taking actions that further reduce carbon emissions.
The following table shows Ontario Teachers’ progress in cutting its PCF as of 2021.
While here’s the sector-based carbon footprint contribution of the Fund.
Regarding other performance metrics, Ontario Teachers’ achieved the following results.
The annual total fund net return has been 9.7% since the pension plan started in 1990.
Ontario Teachers’ climate strategy reflects its commitment to reducing the environmental impact of its portfolio. Its decarbonizing strategies also capitalize on opportunities supporting the transition to a net zero future.
The Fund calls its net zero by 2050 plan “PART” short for Paris Aligned Reduction Target. One key element of the PART is decarbonizing OTPP portfolio companies. And so in 2021, Ontario Teachers’ set a target to align net zero goals of companies with significant stakes.
By providing resources to and working closely with its portfolio companies, they’ve made progress with PART by creating a “decarbonization playbook”. It’s a guidance for portfolio companies detailing:
The case for change, including board and management education
Carbon footprint baseline development
Decarbonization levers identification and assessment
Target setting, validation, and communication
Guidance on what a credible net-zero plan entails
They’re now engaging the first wave of select portfolio companies to implement the decarbonization playbook. By prioritizing those firms, it helps OTPP to focus its efforts on the highest-emitting companies where they influence emissions.
Part of this strategy is to make an initial investment of about $5 billion over the next few years toward “High Carbon Transition (HCT) assets”.
High Carbon Transition assets are very high-emitting companies with credible decarbonization plans that Ontario Teachers’ can accelerate via their capital and expertise.
To support the transition of select HCT assets, their approach will include:
Clear investment criteria. HCT assets as businesses with significant carbon intensity. That means ~10x the average of the Fund’s portfolio carbon footprint, or around 300 tCO2e/CAD MM.
Initial allocation of $5 billion to HCT assets.
Enhanced transparency.
Maintaining targets and commitment to net zero.
In 2021, OTPP reached ~$33 billion in green investments. These include investments in low-carbon transportation fuel and carbon credits.
In December last year, Ontario Teachers’ invested $250M in Sydney-based carbon credits developer, GreenCollar. The generated carbon credits are sold by GreenCollar to first and secondary markets.
OTPP invested in GreenCollar because they see the positive impact of its carbon credit projects that align with their long-term return goals.
To date, the developer produced +126 million Australian Carbon Credit Units and prevented 30,000+ kg of nitrogen from entering the ocean.
Interests in environmental programs such as ESG investing are growing fast and carbon credits have been the focus of these investments. In fact, industry estimates expect to see carbon markets hitting $22 trillion by 2050.
The post Ontario Teachers’ Invests Billions to go Net Zero appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Debt-for-nature swaps or debt-for-climate swaps are now getting more attention from the world’s developing countries who have around $500 billion of debt servicing payments.
According to the Nature Conservancy, debt restructurings tied to nature or climate-friendly outcomes present a multi-billion-dollar possibility.
While the instruments have been around since the 1980s, they start to gain more traction once again following the deals made by the Nature Conservancy.
The recent debt crises for developing nations due to COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and rising interest rates also prompted climate swaps to resurface.
The vital role of forests in capturing and storing carbon dioxide has attracted renewed interest in debt-for-nature swaps.
They are deals that allow a country to restructure its debt at a lower interest rate or for longer repayment periods. And that’s in exchange for the debtor’s commitment to fund conservation or climate-related projects.
Debt-for-climate swaps usually involve countries that are financially distressed or have difficulties in repaying their foreign debts. The proceeds through the swaps go to conservation or green projects managed by local environmental trust funds.
The lenders can be developed country governments, commercial banks, or even private companies. Commercial climate swaps involve selling a commercial bank’s debt on secondary markets at discounted rates.
Bilateral debt swaps involve government debt, known as sovereign debt, and typically need a restructuring plan for the debtor. Here’s how bilateral debt-for-nature swaps work.
A portion of the capital that would have otherwise gone to paying off the original debt is channeled towards pre-agreed investments in conservation projects or implementation of environmental policies.
Debtors benefit by reducing their debt burden and opening fiscal space for dedicated investments in climate projects. They also benefit by decreasing pressures on the exchange rate as their new obligations are in domestic currency.
As for creditors, the lending developed countries that are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) benefit by accounting the climate swaps toward their commitment to provide $100 billion per year in climate finance to developing countries.
58 of the world’s developing countries most vulnerable to climate change collectively have around half a trillion of debt servicing payments due in the next 4 years. An adviser from a coalition representing those nations said in an interview that:
“This huge debt service payment could obstruct opportunities to invest in adaptation or the low-carbon transition… Debt swaps must scale. We’re just not in a situation where we can have austerity because we need to invest out of the pandemic and invest out of climate impacts.”
Since 2016, the Nature Conservancy has organized 3 debt-for-nature swaps involving the Seychelles, Belize and Barbados. For these deals, the organization was able to convert over $500 million of debt into $230 million of money for conservation.
Previous examples of bilateral debt-for-nature swaps from Latin America are as follows:
“The opportunity for conservation here is huge… We see $10 billion right now of opportunity that can turn $2 billion into conservation, with not one penny of new philanthropy coming from the private sector.”
But the market for climate swaps is a niche due to its high transaction costs. Plus, there’s a need to monitor climate projects as well as the need for the debtor to make a long-term commitment to the scheme.
What’s even more remarkable is that the world’s biggest bilateral creditor, China, hasn’t been a part of these swaps substantially. Still, there’s growing interest from the developing nations recently.
For instance, Gabon revealed plans last month for a $700 million debt swap to fund marine conservation. This could be the largest transaction to date.
The island nation of Cabo Verde also plans to do a debt-for-climate swap.
Last year, Argentina committed to linking a portion of its foreign debt to investments in green infrastructure. This year, the president of Colombia suggested a debt-for-nature swap to protect its Amazon rainforest.
And most recently at the COP27 summit, several developing countries also expressed interest in supporting this kind of climate financing. These include statements from Gambia, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Kenya.
Countries most vulnerable to climate change face many problems as they need to spend more to improve resilience and reconstruction and also have a higher cost of capital.
This is where climate swaps become crucial by offering those countries the chance to still make necessary climate investments. And carbon credits can be part of the swaps, according to the director, wherein investment from the private sector is the key to debt restructuring.
But this can be challenging because the private sector can’t relabel the debt as development assistance. The use of carbon credits addresses this by providing incentives for private stakeholders.
And with the surge of corporate net zero pledges, the use of carbon offset credits is also growing. They can make use of the swaps and link them to their ESG and sustainable financing schemes.
Private holders of sovereign bonds can get the offset credits in exchange for a debt-for-nature swap or restructuring. These credits are from nature-based and other emissions reduction projects.
International climate bodies are currently investigating climate swaps in the context of programs to support a greener and sustainable economy.
The post Debt-for-Nature Swaps Are Drawing Attention, Carbon Credits Play A Role appeared first on Carbon Credits.