What is the Voluntary Carbon Market?

In an effort to curb climate change, big companies like Microsoft, Google, and Starbucks are setting ambitious goals to achieve carbon neutrality and the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) is helping them to do so.

The VCM gives companies, non-profit organizations, governments, and individuals the opportunity to buy and sell carbon offset credits. A carbon offset is an instrument that represents the reduction of one metric tonne of carbon dioxide or GHG emissions.

To put this in perspective, to capture one ton of CO2 emissions you would have to grow approximately 50 trees for one-year ¹.

Companies that are unable to reach their greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets can purchase carbon offset credits by investing in environmental projects that are designed to avoid, reduce, or remove carbon emissions.

For instance, an airline company that wants to claim carbon neutrality can calculate how many carbon emissions they are unable to get rid of. They can then purchase an equivalent amount of carbon offset credits by investing in a regenerative farming project in Brazil using the VCM. In doing so, the airline company can claim carbon neutrality.

What is the Difference Between the Voluntary Carbon Market and the Compliance Market? 

The compliance market is regulated by national, regional, or international carbon reduction regimes. These markets operate under a cap-and-trade system where only a certain amount of ‘allowances’ (basically a permit that ‘allows’ you to emit GHGs) are created. This then limits the amount of GHGs that can be emitted by a country or industry.

The cap represents a finite supply of allowances. You can’t create or remove allowance but they can be traded.

If an industry is able to achieve its mandated targets or, better yet, if they emit less than they were allowed, it can sell the extra credits to someone else. The ability to trade surplus credits can financially motivate participants to reduce their overall emissions.

Examples of compliance carbon markets include the Kyoto Protocol, The European Union emissions trading system, the California emissions trading system, the Australia emissions trading system, the British Columbia emissions trading system, and the New Zealand emissions trading system.

The voluntary carbon market functions outside of the compliance market. Those that participate in this market are not required to reduce their emissions, it’s entirely voluntary. Many companies participate because they feel it is the socially responsible thing to do, because of shareholder pressure, or because it’s a good PR move.

Instead of a cap-and-trade system, the VCM uses a project-based system in which there is no finite supply of allowances.

Within the VCM more carbon credits can be created through the development of environmental projects. These credits can be purchased by companies in order to offset unavoidable emissions and reach their targets.

Voluntary vs. Compliance Market

Voluntary Market
Compliance Market 

Exchanged Commodity
Carbon offsets. Facilitated by the project-based system
Allowances. Facilitated by the cap-and-trade system.

How is the market regulated?
Functions outside of the compliance market.
National, regional or international carbon reduction regimes E.g. Kyoto Protocol, California Carbon Market

What is the price?
Voluntary credits tend to be cheaper because they cannot be used in compliance markets.2 The price is impacted by project type, project size, location, co-benefits, and vintage.
Compliance credits tend to be more expensive because they are driven by regulatory obligations.3

Who can purchase credits?
Businesses, governments, NGOs, and individuals
Companies and governments have adopted emission limits established by the United Nations Convention on Climate change

Where do credits trade?
Currently no centralized voluntary carbon credit market. Project developers can sell credits directly to buyers, through a broker or an exchange, or sell to a retailer who then resells to a buyer.
Companies that surpass their emission targets can sell their surplus credits to those looking to offset emissions. Credits can be sold under the Kyoto Protocols emissions trading scheme.4

What Type of Environmental Projects are Found in the VCM? 

The VCM offers a wide variety of environmental projects to interested investors. The goal of all of these projects is to reduce or remove GHG emissions or carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Projects range from small community-based activities such as clean-cookstoves, to large industrial-style projects including high-volume hydro plants and commercial reforestation.

Community-based projects typically produce smaller volumes of carbon credits but also generate more additional socio-economic and environmental co-benefits.5

A co-benefit can include anything from saving endangered animals from extinction to improving local water quality or creating sustainable jobs. Project developers often align co-benefits with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as these co-benefits can help to increase the overall value of a credit.

Large industrial projects are capable of producing larger volumes of carbon credits but don’t always generate strong co-benefits. As a result, credits from these large projects may trade at a discount compared to the projects that achieve SDGs.

Source: Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets – Summary Pack, 2021

While there are a wide variety of projects to choose from, they all have one thing in common. To be part of the VCM, each project must be “additional.”

This means that the removal or reduction of carbon or GHGs would not have occurred without the offset project.

For instance, a project developer looking to preserve a forest that is to be clear cut in Vietnam will have to prove that if the proposed project did not occur, the forest would be cut down.

Examples of the types of projects that can be invested in on the VCM include:

Renewable energy
Industrial gas capture
Energy efficiency
Forestry initiatives (avoiding deforestation)
Clean water
Regenerative agriculture
Wind power
Biogas
Oil recycling
Solar power
Water filters

Who participates in the VCM?

There are several key participants actively involved in the VCM. These participants include:

Project developers. Project developers work to produce the carbon credits that other sectors or industries will buy.
Consumers. This group is made up of private companies, NGOs, governments, universities, and individuals that purchase carbon credits from producers.
Retail traders. Traders purchase credits in bulk from suppliers, bundle the credits in portfolios, and then sell them to the end buyer, usually for a commission.
Brokers. A broker will buy carbon credits from a trader and market them to a consumer. A broker will typically charge a commission. It is common for a broker to also act as a trader.
Third-party verifiers. These are organizations, typically NGOs, that verify that a project meets its stated objectives and volume of emissions.

What is the pricing for VCM vs the compliance markets?

The pricing of carbon credits in the VCM is not as straightforward as it is in the compliance market. This is due to the many types of environmental projects that are available. Prices vary widely according to the category of the project (e.g. renewable energy vs. forestry) and even within a particular category. Several other variables also contribute to how a carbon credit is priced, including:

Size of project. Larger projects that produce higher volumes of carbon credits are often associated with a lower price. Smaller projects are often more expensive to implement but produce fewer carbon credits.
Location of offset. Where does the environmental project take place? Locations where there is conflict and higher risk may make the project more expensive.
Vintage. What year did the emission reduction occur? Older projects are typically priced lower.
Quality. The standard in which the project was certified can affect the price.
Co-benefits. A co-benefit is any positive impact that is produced by the project above and beyond GHG emissions. For instance, if a project creates jobs for local communities or increases biodiversity, these would be considered co-benefits.

According to a 2020 report by the World Bank, carbon prices on the VCM start at less than US$1/ton CO2e and increase to US$119/ton CO2e and almost half of emissions are priced at less than US$10/tCO2e.6

Rabobank, a Dutch multinational banking financial services company, reports that renewable energy projects have the lowest average prices at US$ 1.4/ton CO2e while projects in forestry and land use are on the higher end of the scale at US$ 4.3/ton CO2e.7

Pricing can also be affected by the co-benefits generated by the project. Projects that meet the UN’s SDGs can help to increase the value of the carbon credits.

Larger scale projects that don’t generate as many co-benefits or don’t meet the additional SDGs may trade at a discount.

To meet the temperature goals outlined in the Paris Agreement, the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices stated that prices of at least US$40-80/tCO2 were required by 2020 and US$50 to $100/tCO2e are required by 2030.8 The OECD estimates a price of US$147 is needed by 2030 to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.9 

In the compliance market, the current weighted carbon price is $34.99.10 This is considerably higher than the VCM pricing but still below the High-Level Commission threshold.

The bottom line when looking at both the VCM and compliance markets is that the current carbon prices are too low to meet targets.

Where do these Credits Trade?

There is currently no centralized voluntary carbon credit market.11 Instead, project developers, or companies can sell their credits directly to buyers or through a broker. Project developers can also sell their credits to a retailer who can then resell the credits to a buyer. All voluntary credits must be verified by an independent third party and must adhere to existing standards.

Voluntary Demand Scenarios

There is incredible demand projected for the voluntary market. According to the Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Markets, the market is projected to grow to around 15-fold from 0.1 to 1.5-2 GtCO2 of carbon credits per year in 2030.

And that will sacle up to a maximum of 100-fold by 2050 (7-13 GtCO2 of carbon credits per year).

Producing this incredible scale of carbon elimination will be a massive challenge. And it will provide many nations and corporations with incredible opportunities. As the taskforce mentions in their 2021 report,

“This underlines the need for emissions reduction to be implemented as urgently as possible, and likely at a faster pace than identified in the NGFS scenarios.

Who verifies the Variable Carbon Market Credits

When purchasing carbon offset credits, consumers should only consider offsets that are third-party verified.

There are a number of standards that use different methodologies for measuring and verifying carbon emission reduction. These standards provide a robust verification process to ensure the credibility of emission reduction projects. The most widely used standard include:

Verra (The Verified Carbon Standard)
Plan Vivo
The Gold Standard
The American Carbon Registry
Climate Action Reserve
The Verified Carbon Standard Program

Can regular Mom-and-Pop Investors Invest in Voluntary Credits?

The VCM is open to anyone who wants to participate. From businesses to governments, non-profits, universities, and even individual investors.

If you are taking a long flight or vacationing on a luxury yacht and you want to absolve your environmental sins, you can purchase carbon credits to offset your emissions. In fact, many airlines are making it easy for individuals to offset their flights. These airlines list the amount of CO2 emitted by the flight and then give customers the opportunity to fly net-zero for a price which is offered at checkout.

The Bottom Line

Voluntary carbon credits are here to stay. More and more companies and individuals are feeling the need to do their part to reduce their carbon footprint. And, for companies that want to achieve carbon neutrality, the VCM is often a necessary tool.

References

¹ Climate Neutral Group. What Exactly is 1 Tonne of CO2? Accessed Aug 4, 2021
2 Carbon Offset Guide. Voluntary Offset Program. Accessed Aug 3, 2021
3 Carbon Offset Guide. Mandatory & Voluntary Offset Markets. Accessed Aug 3, 2021
4 UN Climate Change. Emissions Trading. Accessed Aug 3, 2021
5 S&P Global. Voluntary Carbon Markets. Accessed Aug 3, 2021
6 World Bank. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2020. Accessed Aug 4, 2021
7 Rabobank. Can voluntary carbon markets change the game for climate change? Accessed Aug 5, 2021
8 World Bank. Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. Accessed Aug 5, 2021
9 UN Environment Programme. Discussion Paper on Governmental Carbon-Pricing. Accessed Aug 5, 2021
10 Carbon Credit Capital. Value of Carbon Market Update 2021. Accessed Aug 5, 2021
11 White & Case. Voluntary Carbon Markets:A Blueprint. Accessed Aug 5, 2021

The post What is the Voluntary Carbon Market? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Carbonplace Gets More Banks to Scale Carbon Trading

Last year, Project Carbon (as it was called at the time) was launched by 4 major banks NatWest Group, CIBC, National Australia Bank, and Itaú Unibanco.

The goal is to develop a new technology platform, (now called Carbonplace), to provide trading of voluntary carbon credits.

UBS, Standard Chartered, and BNP Paribas have recently joined the Carbonplace project to help scale and build secure infrastructure.

They expect to have it fully operational by the end of 2022, with the goal of:

Increased delivery of high-quality carbon offset projects
Create a liquid carbon credit marketplace with price certainty and transparency
Develop a strong ecosystem to support the offset market
Create tools to help clients manage climate risk

Last Sept, they announced that they did their first transaction on the platform.

Carbonplace will reduce barriers to entry in the voluntary carbon market, and give project developers in the global south direct access to large numbers of customers looking to fund carbon reduction and removal projects,” said Chris Leeds, head of carbon markets development at Standard Chartered.

The voluntary carbon market is growing at a record pace as more and more companies are setting net-zero pledges.

The easiest way for companies to reach those carbon-neutral targets is by purchasing carbon credits from a verified source such as Verra, Gold Standard, Climate Action Reserve, and the American Carbon Registry.

The post Carbonplace Gets More Banks to Scale Carbon Trading appeared first on Carbon Credits.

EU Proposes Carbon Market Reform to Limit Price Spikes

Policymakers in the European Union are looking at carbon market reforms. The goal is to make it easier for policymakers to interfere in the system if prices climb too quickly.

The EU emissions trading system (ETS) comprises a dwindling number of carbon offset permits that emitters must purchase to offset their emissions.

In the last year, the carbon prices increased by almost 150%, recently reaching record highs of 98.49 Euros per tonne of CO2.

The proposed amendment goal is to make it easier to issue additional carbon offset purchase licenses during periods of rapid price increases.

The rationale for the modification according to German lawmaker Peter Liese is that “high carbon prices have led to concerns regarding excessive price increases and market volatility. Any intervention, however, should avoid price shocks or sudden volatility”

The current regulations of the EU ETS allow nations to add more permits under certain circumstances.  If the carbon price is 3x the average price in the 2 prior years for at least 6 months, they can add more permits.

Some policymakers are arguing that this does not reflect market realities. Their plan is to release an additional 100 million carbon permits from its “market stability reserve” if the carbon price is 2x the average price in the 2 prior years for at least 6 months.

The market stability reserve is a pool of surplus permits that have been pulled from the market to help provide stability.

Before Parliament and EU governments draft the final law, EU parliamentarians will discuss and vote on their final position in June.

The post EU Proposes Carbon Market Reform to Limit Price Spikes appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Europe’s biggest banks provide $32B to Oil

Less than a year after pledging to be net-zero,  Europe’s biggest banks gave $32 Billion (£24B) towards oil and gas company expansions.

Banks include HSBC, Barclays, and BNP Paribas.

While banks have acknowledged that the move away from fossil fuels would happen gradually, ShareAction found that 25 banks that committed investments to renewable energy sources have financed 50 companies expanding oil and gas production.

The importance of targeting fossil fuels to reduce carbon emissions.

These companies include ExxonMobil, Said Armco, Shell, and BP.

Oil and gas are currently leading polluters. Experts agree that the expansion of oil and gas production must stop to reduce global carbon emissions. Only when this is achieved could the world avoid heating more than 1.5C.

However, companies find that investors may not be on board as they thought.

Another report by accountants at EY said that 70% of UK firms have encountered resistance from investors and shareholders about green plans. 42% even said they want them to wait for competitors to act first.

Net-zero emissions goals.

A spokesperson for the NZBA secretariat, based in the United Nations, said that members who joined the alliance in April 2021 were due to set their first 2030 targets in the fall of 2022. Their focus should include oil and gas companies.

Targets must “align with no/low-overshoot 1.5°C transition pathways as specified by credible science-based climate scenarios.”

Bank spokespersons responded:

HSBC said they would publish science-based targets for oil, gas, and electric companies this month, and are committed to the transition.
Barclays said they are committed to reaching net-zero by 2050 and plan to have a 15% absolute reduction by 2025. They also have a restriction on fossil fuel exploration in the Arctic.
BNP said it invests in renewable energy and other solutions to speed up the transition.

Since 2016, HSBC, Barclays, and BNP Paribas have provided the most finance to these companies 2016, at $59B, $48B, and $46B.

The post Europe’s biggest banks provide $32B to Oil appeared first on Carbon Credits.

SEC Pressured to Include Carbon Credits in Disclosure

Environmental groups have urged the U.S. SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) to include offset purchases in a broader climate for firms to disclose their greenhouse-gas emissions.

Environmental groups (such as Sierra Club, Public Citizen, and Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund) sent a letter to the SEC stating that disclosures about the carbon offset credits markets are critical.

According to the letter, carbon credits have “significant environmental, accounting, and social integrity problems” that jeopardize the climate pledges that companies have made“.

Companies that fail to “report their investments in primary and secondary market offsets… pose a material risk to investors and the financial system“.

The letter urged the SEC to include mandatory disclosures about issuers’ use of offsets in its climate risk disclosure rule.

The SEC’s officials declined to comment on the letter, but an earlier statement from the SEC chief Gary Gensler says he’s working “closely” to firm up details on a mandatory climate-risk proposal.

Many people expected the SEC to release its climate change rule before the end of last year. That deadline has now been pushed back to March at the earliest.

The hope of the new restrictions is to increase openness in the financial markets about climate issues. However, the rule’s progress has been halted by disagreements over how much information the agency may compel corporations to reveal without facing a court battle from industry lobbyists.

Environmental groups aren’t the only ones arguing for carbon offsets disclosure.

Ceres, a nonprofit investor group, made similar remarks, saying, “we recommend the commission carefully consider how carbon offsets should be disclosed”.

The New York State Comptroller is recommending the SEC require disclosure of both quantitative and qualitative information related to carbon offsets.

The voluntary carbon market is growing fast. Trove Research, a data advisory business, predicts that the market will grow by up to 80% by 2022, reaching $1.7 billion.

Former Bank of England governor Mark Carney, who helped establish the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market, thinks that offset sales might reach $100 billion by 2030.

The post SEC Pressured to Include Carbon Credits in Disclosure appeared first on Carbon Credits.

New Carbon Capture Tech Removes 99% of CO2 from Air

Researchers at the University of Delaware developed a way to capture 99% of carbon dioxide from the air.

This new technology involves an electrochemical system powered by hydrogen.

“It turns out our approach is very effective. We can capture 99% of the carbon dioxide out of the air in one pass if we have the right design and right configuration,” said Professor Yushan Yan who led the research.

Here’s why this new carbon capture technology is so important.

Researchers at UD  focused on Fuel Cell Energy for many years.

Simply put, this is where fuel cells convert fuel chemical energy into electricity. They can use that electricity to power hybrid or zero-emissions vehicles.

But researchers faced a bit of a problem.

When exposed to CO2, fuel cells lose efficiency.

So, Yan’s research team has been searching for a solution for more than 15 years.

And that search is what led them to this discovery.

First, researchers found a way to implant the power source for this electrochemical technology inside a separation membrane. Then, they developed a filtration membrane that could separate gases – like carbon dioxide.

Best of all, the tech is practical and affordable. So, for a vehicle, the device would only be about the size of a gallon milk container.

Long-term, researchers believe they could use this technology within planes and buildings.

“We have some ideas for a long-term roadmap that can help us get there,” said Brian Setzler, assistant professor for research in chemical and biomolecular engineering and the paper’s co-author.

The race to reduce CO2 emissions.

The world sees the effects of climate change.

Companies are working to develop new technology to reduce their carbon footprint to accomplish this. They are investing in carbon credits and carbon offsets too.

So, as carbon capture becomes more accessible, it can also be a part of the climate solution.

The post New Carbon Capture Tech Removes 99% of CO2 from Air appeared first on Carbon Credits.

In green energy push, the UK plans to hold annual renewables auctions

In a green energy push, the UK plans to have renewables auctions every year to support low-carbon electricity. Currently, the UK has them every two years.

The UK believes this change is the best way to stop volatile gas prices. Also, it will give firms investing in wind and solar energy an incentive to keep doing so.

According to Energy Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng, “We are hitting the accelerator on domestic electricity production to boost energy security, attract private investment and create jobs in our industrial heartlands.”

Kwarteng went on to say, “The more clean, cheap, and secure power we generate at home, the less exposed we will be to expensive gas prices set by international markets.”

Renewables Auctions can help the UK meet net-zero emissions goals.

The UK wants to meet net-zero emissions by 2050.

So, in addition to their Emissions Trading System (ETS), the UK must do more.

To hit targets, the UK must quadruple its installation rate. This is no easy feat. But, renewables auctions are a way to do just that.

Investments include onshore wind, solar, floating wind, green hydrogen, and marine power.

According to Morag Watson, director of policy at Scottish Renewables, “By 2050, electricity demand will have almost doubled, and the vast majority of that electricity must come from renewable sources if we are to meet net-zero [emissions].

However, some in the UK do not approve. They believe the UK should produce its own gas by fracking to prevent price increases.

Where did renewables auctions come from? Are they effective?

Renewables auctions were developed by an unknown UK civil servant. They have helped to drive down the price of wind by 65% in the UK.

Renewables auctions have also saved billions of pounds globally.

As such, these auctions have been copied around the globe.

The post In green energy push, the UK plans to hold annual renewables auctions appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Carbonized Crypto, Part 3: Leading Carbon Crypto Projects

Harness the blockchain, verify carbon credits, and solve two problems with one cutting-edge stone. All the projects on this list promise some variation on that idea; the only challenge is putting everything into practice in a market-friendly, cost-efficient way.

Here are current carbon crypto projects that are generating buzz and drawing some attention. Not all of them are equally successful, and few have established anything like a long-term track record. But all of them offer 

Moss

Moss is two projects in one: a popular token (MCO2) and a climate-based NFT project. Both projects rely on the concept of tokenization to incentivize carbon offset production and emissions reduction.

The MCO2 token is available as an ERC-20 token on popular exchanges such as Coinbase. Purchase of the token (trading at $11.46 at time of writing) funds carbon offset projects. Most are based in and around the Amazon rainforest.

Moss doesn’t administer offset projects directly. Instead, they source high-quality offsets from other providers and tokenize them. Each project results in a given amount of offsets; Moss produces a set amount of tokens based on the projected offsets. One MC02 token = an offset for one tonne of CO2.

By burning MC02 tokens, Moss locks in offset projects permanently, reducing the overall supply of offsets in the market and boosting the price of remaining offsets.

The Moss Amazon NFT project operates a bit differently. Moss purchases portions of the Amazon that are at-risk for deforestation. That land is then divided into 1-hectare portions, each roughly the size of a football field. The rights to those portions are digitized and tokenized as NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens). Each NFT is unique and tied to a unique piece of property.

The Moss Amazon NFTs are actual land sales; proceeds from the sales fund further purchases, with 30% of the proceeds going to a preservation fund. That fund pays for patrolling and physically protecting the Amazon NFT holdings.

Moss distinctives:

Amazon NFT based on actual ownership
Due diligence for purchase and enforcement
Part of the Celo Reserve, supporting a climate-based stablecoin (cUSD, cEUR)
Brazil-based

KlimaDAO

Read the documentation.

KlimaDAO is nothing if not ambitious. Built on the common crypto carbon model of tokenized carbon offsets, Klima is also a DAO. As a Decentralized Autonomous Organization, KlimaDAO aims to boost the price of offsets on the VCM. This is done by purchasing carbon offsets, tokenizing them, and then selling or burning them to influence the market.

What sets Klima apart is its stated goal to be a carbon-backed currency, rather than simply a marker for credits held in reserve. To that end, all KLIMA tokens are backed 1:1 by reserve holdings in BCT, tokens issued by Toucan (see the next review). 

Put more simply, to mint more KLIMA tokens (and increase supply), KlimaDAO needs to lock away BCT (Basic Carbon Tonne) in the treasury. KLIMA is pegged to BCT 1:1, and BCT is pegged to real-world offsets. Klima’s treasury functions as a blackhole for BCT and carbon offsets, removing them from the market and pushing the real-world carbon price higher.

The DAO structure allows holders of KLIMA to participate in Klima’s governance. Holders can propose new measures and vote on their passage.

KlimaDAO Distinctives

DAO structure and governance
KLIMA as the currency of a new, carbon-based ecosystem
Pegged to the BCT

Toucan

It’s not enough to describe Toucan.earth as a crypto carbon project; Toucan is more about bringing a number of related projects together, each with their own distinctives. 

Toucan is more accurately described as a bridge. Toucan links the Web3 architecture to the decarbonization push. Put another way, Toucan forms the base of a new, carbon-focused Web3 stack.

The core of Toucan’s project is the TCO2, which simply stands for Tokenized CO2. Each TCO2 represents one verified, real-world carbon credit. TCO2’s are semi-fungible, with unique information about each project encoded on-chain. The tokens are Verra verified, linking Toucan to one of the premier carbon offset standards.

Most projects planned for the Toucan stack won’t use the TCO2 directly. Trading TCO2 tokens one-for-one isn’t always possible, simply because the projects each token represents are different. To achieve the necessary liquidity for market projects such as Klima, the TCO2 tokens are fractionalized and pooled.

The first such pool was the Klima/Toucan project, which created the Base Carbon Tonne (BCT). Each BCT token isn’t tied to a specific offset project, allowing them to be traded one-for-one. But all BCT tokens are still backed by verified projects, because of the use of TCO2.

The pooling process is known as gating, and projects are able to set parameters for which TCO2 tokens they’ll allow into the pool. The Klima/Toucan project only created BCT from Verra-approved offsets created after 2008. Gating would allow other carbon crypto projects to be more narrowly focused, all while maintaining an approved and verified link between their tokens and real-world projects. 

Toucan forms the foundation for a Web3 carbon crypto stack. Projects like KlimaDAO build on that stack. Tokenized carbon credits are the key.

Toucan.earth distinctives

TCO2 token
Token pooling and gating; BCT token
Development of a Web3 carbon crypto stack

SavePlanetEarth

Read the whitepaper.

SavePlanetEarth’s self-description captures it all: a “carbon sequestration crypto project.” Structurally, SavePlanetEarth shares similarities with the Toucan/Klima project. The base of the project is tokenization of verified carbon credits, on which an entire ecosystem will be built – a currency and a blockchain powered by green energy.

There are a few key differences; the base token is $SPE, and the verification standard used for the carbon offsets is the Gold Standard, rather than Verra. The SPE project also relies more heavily on NFTs for the initial stage of project management, as well as something called “carbon credit certificates.”

The SPE roadmap includes a multi-level exchange, powered by the $SPE currency, where carbon credits can be bought and sold. It will also encourage external investment by allowing companies to trade their own credits on the exchange, once verified by SPE.

SPE distinctives

Phantasma blockchain (with native SPE blockchain in development)
Carbon-based exchange in roadmap
Uses The Gold Standard verification
Projects conform to all 17 of UN Sustainable Development Goals

Other notable projects:

Not every project is as well-developed as the ones above. Some are in the early stages, while others are more narrowly-focused. Here are a few significant projects to keep in mind.

AirCarbonExchange

AirCarbonExchange made the news by helping Abu Dhabi’s financial sector achieve full carbon neutrality. As an exchange, ACE sources carbon offset projects and tokenizes them into several different tokens, each tailored to a specific sector of the market. There’s no broader plan; AirCarbonExchange exists to facilitate the adoption of carbon crypto tokens as a commodity, and to trade them accordingly.

See how it works here.

Base

Base Carbon focuses on funding and support for developing crypto carbon projects. It also serves to source and verify suitable projects for entry into Toucan’s TCO2 and BCT programs.

Details at the link.

CarbonTokenProject

Tokenization on the smallest scale – the trees in your backyard. CarbonTokenProject uses an innovative approach of human verification, data oracles, and the blockchain to tokenize trees. With its innovative approach, CarbonTokenProject is probably the first grassroots (treeroots?) carbon crypto initiative.

Read more here.

KumoDAO

Another crypto carbon currency, but with a twist: KumoDAO aims to be a USD-pegged stablecoin. Stablecoins pose unique technical challenges, but offer increased ease of use with the traditional monetary system. KumoDAO is in the early stages, part of a wave of carbon crypto projects begun in the wake of KlimaDAO’s launch in 2021.

More info here.

The post Carbonized Crypto, Part 3: Leading Carbon Crypto Projects appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Carbonized Crypto, Part 2: The Crypto Carbon Ecosystem

Blockchains, in their simplest form, are distributed ledgers for digital information. In an information-driven age, that means that almost any bit of information could, at least in theory, be linked to a blockchain.

Cryptocurrencies still draw the lion’s share of media attention and investor interest. But as the crypto world matures, developers have begun to apply blockchain to one of the other hot markets of recent years: carbon credits.

The idea is simple. Carbon offsets are a unit of measure, certifying that a particular action, project, or thing has removed the equivalent of one metric tonne of CO2. One credit = one tonne. The math is simple, but applying it to the real world proves challenging. 

Measurement – how do you measure how much CO2 a certain set of actions will remove, before it even does so? This can be especially complicated when you add in living organisms, such as trees, as is teh case for the majority of nature-based offsets.

Verification – even if you can measure things accurately, how do you verify that the set of actions did actually result in a measurable offset?

The blockchain can, in theory, help with both of those issues by linking offsets to blockchain-based cryptocurrencies or tokens. The tokens help to incentivise verification, while tokenizing offset projects can ensure accurate measurement.

The emerging crypto carbon world is dominated by a number of trends coming together at once. Not all are directly aimed at tokenization. Here are three of the biggest trends that form the crypto carbon ecosystem.

Trend 1: Carbon-friendly Crypto

The OG cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, employed a Proof-of-Work consensus mechanism. That mechanism is well-known for being energy-intensive and therefore not particularly environmentally friendly. Just how unfriendly? It’s hard to nail down for certain, but studies in 2019 put Bitcoin mining as responsible for 22 million metric tonnes of CO2e, roughly the same amount of CO2 emissions as the Netherlands. A significant amount, for sure. And it’s worth noting that even crypto-friendly news sources place recent emissions for 2020 and 2021 even higher – 36 million tonnes and 41 million tonnes, respectively.

However, even the higher numbers pale when compared to global emissions. As a number of outlets noted recently, Bitcoin mining accounted for less than 0.10% of global CO2e. Far less, even, than the CO2e produced by mining and printing traditional fiat currency.

Regardless, the idea of “carbon-hungry crypto” has stuck, particularly with Bitcoin. The result has been to push the crypto world towards a more carbon-friendly approach. Sometimes that takes a particularly mundane form, such as Elon Musk dropping Bitcoin payments and then accepting Dogecoin

In other cases, it can mean developing entirely new ecosystems around more carbon-friendly blockchains. The recent increase in Solana’s exposure owes something to its reputation as a carbon-neutral blockchain. And the industry-wide turn towards Proof-of-Stake instead of Proof-of-Work can be attributed to the former’s more eco-friendly consensus mechanism. 

Trend 2: Tokenized Carbon Offsets

The global market for carbon offsets shows no sign of slowing down, and is projected to be worth billions by the end of the decade. A market growing so fast, and so widespread across the globe, poses unique challenges in verifying and enforcing offsets.

Tokenization answers some of those challenges. Non-fungible tokens are by their very nature unique. That allows some crypto carbon projects, like Moss, to issue NFTs for particular projects or even particular pieces of offset projects. The Amazon NFT by Moss is one of many examples; a far splashier one is the Rimba Raya NFT which sold for $70,000. That’s a single carbon offset, for a price exponentially beyond current market value. 

More down-to-earth NFT offset projects include the much-anticipated Save Planet Earth effort, the first to incorporate industry-leading Gold Standard offset verification into its NFT schemes.

Most of these efforts are in the early stages, and there’s little track record on which to assess their performance. But the ability to link carbon offsets to a blockchain offers a solution to a number of long-running VCM problems, such as double-counting credits. That promise alone will be enough to drive the NFT offset trend even further.

Trend 3: Blockchain-powered Carbon Exchanges

Carbon NFTs and tokenized offsets are frequently sold on blockchain-powered carbon exchanges. Abu Dahbi reached carbon neutrality by purchasing offsets on AirCarbon Exchange. The exchange offers offsets from around the globe, but tokenizes them on its own exchange. AirCarbon follows the same model as a traditional commodities exchange to facilitate carbon trading.

Nor is AirCarbon the only game in town. Some of the upcoming efforts follow all three major trends at once: Cambridge University’s proposed carbon exchange will be built on Tezos, another eco-friendly PoS blockchain. 

Other projects often involve aspects of each trend. The CryptoCarbons NFT project produces art-inspired NFTs that are linked to already-generated offsets. But the project also allows users to request custom NFTs generated just for them, and linked to a specific number of offsets. 

Major crypto exchanges, like Binance, Coinbase, and others, may sell carbon-related tokens without being a dedicated crypto carbon exchange. Some of the biggest crypto carbon projects, like Klima, Toucan, and others, are only available on these centralized exchanges.

The crypto world is increasingly aware of the need to be environmentally friendly. That awareness has led to an ecosystem primed to accept ambitious carbon offset NFT projects and tokenized offsets. 

Read Part 3 of our Crypto Carbon Series HERE

The post Carbonized Crypto, Part 2: The Crypto Carbon Ecosystem appeared first on Carbon Credits.