How Do Carbon Offset Credits Work? (2023 Guide)

How do carbon offset credits work? The billion dollar question, especially now that estimates say the carbon market will hit a $50 billion mark by 2030.

Carbon dioxide has the same effect on the climate no matter the place or the source of emissions. So, a tonne of carbon dioxide absorbed from the atmosphere in one part of the globe can be canceled out in another to neutralize it. 

In other words, entities can compensate for their footprint’s impact by supporting projects that remove or reduce CO2 or its equivalent gas. These projects are then awarded with carbon offset credits in the process they call carbon offsetting. 

We’ll talk about how exactly carbon offset credits work to guide you this 2023, their purpose, and how to buy them. For a beginner, let’s start from the top by explaining what carbon offset credits are.

What Are Carbon Offset Credits?

Carbon offset credits refer to measurable, verifiable emission reductions from climate action projects. These projects reduce, remove or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. But they also do other things apart from abating carbon emissions. 

Most climate-related projects also bring many other positive benefits such as restoring or protecting ecosystems and empowering local communities. Let alone reducing, if not stopping, reliance on fossil fuels. 

But to ensure that the credits are of high quality, projects must meet a rigorous set of criteria to pass verification by 3rd-party agencies and leading carbon standards like Verra and Gold Standard.

Theoretically speaking, 1 offset credit stands for 1 tonne of CO2 reduced or removed. 

After a company or an individual buys the carbon offset credit, it is permanently retired so it can’t be reused. 

Though carbon offset credits also trade in the compliance carbon market (cap-and-trade schemes), they’re more prevalent in the voluntary carbon market (VCM). That’s because many other companies outside the heavy emitting sectors seek to offset their emissions voluntarily. Credits circulating in the VCM are popularly known as carbon offsets. 

So why create carbon offsets in the first place? 

What Is The Purpose Of Carbon Offset Credits?

The end goal of carbon offset credits is to reduce or prevent the release of planet-warming GHG into the atmosphere. 

As mentioned, a carbon credit represents the right to emit one ton of CO2 or its equivalent gas. According to the Environmental Defense Fund, that is equal to about 2,400-mile drive in terms of CO2 footprint.

Since carbon dioxide is the principal GHG, people speak simply of trading in carbon. But other gasses are also measured in reduction claims such as methane and nitrous oxide. 

Under the compliance market, emitters are given a certain number of carbon credits (cap) that they can trade to help neutralize or offset global emissions (trade). Carbon credits in this market refer to certified emissions reductions or CER that follow a regulatory framework. These credits are issued and regulated by the government. 

If regulated entities emit more than their limits, they should buy the credits from others to comply with the required level. If they have an excess as they emit less than their cap, they can sell those credits to others who are short of them.

The major purpose of the scheme is to reduce the number of credits over time to incentivize emitters to look for ways to cut their footprint. 

In the VCM, things work differently but they all add up to the same intention. Market players don’t have to follow any limits but can decide how much emissions to offset by buying carbon credits. And same with mandated businesses, voluntary firms want to neutralize their footprint. 

Carbon offsets in the VCM are called voluntary emissions reductions or VER. They are independent and don’t need to follow government regulations. 

As a beginner in this space, you are perhaps thinking how carbon offset credits work. Maybe you’re wondering how carbon credits are calculated or if you can make money from carbon offsets. The good news is you can. 

Simply go over this guide on how you can make money producing and selling carbon offsets.

How Do Carbon Offset Credits Work for Beginners

If you’re a company owner, can you buy your way out of climate trouble with carbon offset credits? Yes and no. How is that so?

Under the climate mitigation hierarchy, buying carbon offsets is the last option. It means companies should not use carbon credits as an excuse to put off reducing emissions in business operations. 

But that doesn’t mean that carbon offsetting is useless and that it doesn’t work. The opposite is true…

Sales from carbon offset credits help channel money to the right projects that protect carbon sinks. 

In fact, many industry experts encourage companies to not just slash their own carbon emissions but also invest in actions outside of their value chain.

Moving the dial on climate change is critical to achieving global net zero emissions. And one key option in the dial is carbon offset credits. 

They provide a great way for businesses to fund climate actions such as protecting natural carbon sinks. Carbon credits are also crucial in scaling up carbon removal technologies which climate scientists consider elemental in keeping global warming from rising. 

More importantly, carbon offset credits work by ensuring that firms are putting a price on the impact their operations have on the environment. 

Best of all, offsetting hard-to-abate emissions through carbon credits attract funding to projects that effectively reduce emissions. 

Businesses should regularly assess their emissions and include them in sustainability reports. Reporting emissions is compulsory in many countries. 

In the United States, firms that emit 25,000 or more metric tons of CO2 must report those emissions to the EPA yearly.

The reporting threshold is lower in California – 10,000 metric tons.

If you think investing in carbon offset credits is worth every dollar, the next thing you should know is how to purchase them. 

How to Purchase Carbon Offset Credits? 

Obviously, you would be asking how much a single carbon credit is worth. The actual price depends on some things like the type of project and where its location.

But in general, carbon offset credits cost around $3 to $5 per ton of CO2. This carbon price, however, will rise dramatically in the next decade. Thanks to stronger climate policies and better standardization in the market.  

Again, you can do carbon offsetting voluntarily or to comply with certain regulations. 

There are various ways on how to purchase carbon offset credits

One way to do that is to ask for a broker’s help, for a fee, of course. The broker often has the knowledge about the different projects to support with the credits you’re going to pay. 

Brokers charge a fee based on your emissions level. They will then invest a portion of your payment in a certain carbon reduction or removal project like reforestation. 

You then get a certificate or some type of proof showing that you have bought the offset credit. You can then use it for compliance purposes or for any other intention. 

Still confused about how carbon offset credits work and how to buy them?  

Here are the main steps you can follow for successful carbon offsetting:  

Step #1. Calculate your carbon emissions

For an individual, this will be easier. You have to get all the data from your household and individual carbon-emitting activities. 

For a company, it tends to be more difficult as there is a lot of information and data to collect to get the total emissions. The more complex the structure of your organization, the harder it is to identify who or what are the sources of emissions. 

Usually, doing it involves identifying three different sources of emissions – Scopes 1, 2, and 3.

Scope 1 refers to direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls while Scope 2 is the indirect emissions from electricity, steam, heating, and cooling resources the company buys. Scope 3 are other indirect emissions that come from the company’s value chain.

The following diagram shows the common types of emissions sources under each scope.

For a more detailed explanation on calculating emissions, check out this complete guide here. 

Step #2 . Cut emissions where possible

After you get your total emissions, you can then use it to work on your sustainability or decarbonization strategy.  

The Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) provides guidelines for companies on how to reduce emissions. The organization’s Net Zero Standard aligns with the goals of the Paris Agreement. 

You can also achieve carbon reductions in smaller ways through your individual actions. For example, you can switch to greener transportation or go for a more sustainable diet. 

Step #3 . Offset unavoidable emissions

Any emissions that your company can’t reduce can be offset by investing in carbon reduction projects. But take note that a project must be certified to issue carbon offset credits.

The top carbon certifying bodies are Verra, Climate Action Reserve, Gold Standard, Plan Vivo, and American Carbon Registry. 

Verifying that a project meets criteria is important. It needs to show that its carbon reductions are real, additional, measurable, and permanent. Only by meeting these criteria that the carbon credits the project generates is of high quality. 

Once you have purchased the correct carbon offset credits, you must be transparent about it to your stakeholders. They should be aware of your offsetting strategy and which projects benefit from your credit.

Transparency is crucial to avoid greenwashing accusations. Greenwashing is a marketing ploy used to convince people that a firm’s products, goals or policies are eco-friendly.

So, you must show that buying carbon offset credits works for you and it’s good for your business. And it’s the last option you have to deal with the pollution you emit.

Buy Carbon Offset Credits

Offsetting your emissions is obviously not a last-resort mindset. While carbon offsetting and buying carbon offset credits is not that hard, you should know how to do it and where to start.

Not to mention that there are plenty of carbon credit marketplaces available online to begin your search.

But if you want to ensure that each dollar you invest in a carbon reduction or removal project counts, get ready to know the details. You can start by knowing who issues carbon credits and work your way from there.

You may also learn which carbon credits are best to buy to offset your footprint.

The post How Do Carbon Offset Credits Work? (2023 Guide) appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Chevron Allots $26M to Carbon Capture and Storage in Australia

Chevron Australia will invest a total of US$26 million (A$38m) to contribute to carbon capture and storage (CCS) research in Western Australia and Victoria. 

The investment of the US-based energy giant seeks to advance knowledge in CCS technology to promote a lower carbon future. 

The commitment comes as the Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association (APPEA) is calling on the Federal Government to consider more funding in new gas supply and emissions reduction measures in the 2023-24 Federal Budget. The group also calls for setting up a national carbon capture and storage roadmap. 

Advancing Carbon Capture and Storage in Australia

Of the total commitment, US$15 million will go to the Barrow Dampier CCS Regional Study led by global tech firm SLB. The study will provide a 3D seismic and storage assessment to find new carbon capture and storage in the Carnarvon basin in Western Australia. 

The remaining US$11 million will be for developing new infrastructure at the Otway International Test Centre in Victoria. The project is managed by the Australian CCS research organization CO2CRC. It will allow the testing of CO2 migration and validation of new modeling techniques for better CCS processes. 

Chevron is a founding member of CO2CRC. Its funding will ensure that the test center stays as a critical national research infrastructure for applied research into CCS that supports Australia’s transition to net zero.

Michelle LaPoint, Chevron Australia’s general manager of asset development, said the company is committed to advancing CCS in Australia. LaPoint also noted that:

“Chevron has decades of operational experience, a proven track record of carbon-capture projects and is already deploying CCS technologies in locations across the globe, including at Gorgon in Western Australia, one of the world’s largest integrated CCS projects.”

Meeting Net Zero with CCS 

The company’s VP had said that CCS has a crucial role in meeting net zero targets “in almost any scenario”. The firm has a target to bring its carbon emissions to net zero by 2050.

The energy giant’s experience has been reaffirming its confidence in the emissions reduction opportunities the CCS provides. The company believes that the technology is critical to cut emissions in hard-to-abate, energy-intensive industries. 

In fact, Chevron bought stakes in three offshore carbon capture and storage projects in Australia spanning about 7.8 million acres.

Last year, the company joined the first-of-its-kind carbon capture and storage project to bury CO2 in the Gulf Coast’s seafloor. The project will be the first to store carbon offshore in the U.S.

In 2021, the energy firm dedicated a $10 billion dollar investment into low carbon business initiatives. Half of that budget is for reducing emissions from fossil fuel initiatives.

Chevron uses large-scale decarbonization hubs to reduce its own carbon emissions. The company partners with 3rd-party emitters and clients for carbon offset credits, green fuels, and hydrogen. 

The two CCS projects in Australia, once completed, will satisfy Chevron’s expenditure commitments under a Good Standing Agreement between its affiliate company and the Joint Authority for the Commonwealth/South Australia offshore area for two exploration permits in the Great Australian Bight.

The post Chevron Allots $26M to Carbon Capture and Storage in Australia appeared first on Carbon Credits.

California Carbon Credits (How Does It Work?)

Over a decade ago, an innovative carbon credits or emissions trading system (ETS) was established in California. It refers to the state’s “cap-and-trade” program that limits carbon emissions, creates a market for tradable emissions credits, and helps fund climate-related projects. 

The program is a key element of California’s strategy to cut GHG emissions while complementing other efforts to ensure that the state meets its climate goals. Its history, operations, and ways of business can help similar programs elsewhere succeed. 

So, how do California carbon credits work? What are the key components of the state’s carbon credit program? Or you may want to know more about how to sell, or perhaps how to buy California carbon credits. Either way, this guide article gives you the answers you’re looking for in clear, easy way.  

Let’s start off by explaining how the California carbon credits program works. 

How Do Carbon Credits Work in California?

The Cap-and-Trade Program, established in 2006, sets a declining limit on major sources of GHG emissions throughout California.

The basic concept is to create a market-based compliance approach to drive investments in climate strategies. It’s the only economy-wide carbon market in the U.S. and one of the largest ETS in the world. It supplements a range of various carbon reduction programs in the state. 

The program is central to meeting California’s ambitious climate goals:

To reduce emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (which it met in 2016), 
40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and 
80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050

The state also has additional goals of reaching 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045 and economy-wide carbon neutrality by the same period.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) manages and oversees the program. The Climate Action Reserve (CAR) serves as the Offset Project Registry under the program. CAR can issue Registry Offset Credits (ROC) under CARB Compliance Offset Protocols.  

Fast Fact: ROCS are not compliance instruments under California’s Cap-and-Trade program. They must first be transitioned into CARB offset credits to be eligible for compliance under the program.  

The California carbon credits program covers about 85% of the state’s GHG emissions. The number of entities that are subject to the cap is 450+. They have to be large enough, emitting at least 25,000 MT of CO2e each year. 

CARB creates allowances, also called carbon credits, equal to the total amount of allowed emissions (the cap). One allowance or carbon credit equals one metric ton of CO2 or its equivalent emissions under the 100-year global warming potential (GWP). 

Every year, fewer carbon credits are created and the annual cap declines over time. Allowances have an increasing annual auction reserve or floor price. This, plus the decreasing annual credits, make a steady carbon price signal to stir action to cut emissions. 

All covered entities in the California carbon credits program are still subject to existing air quality permit limits for criteria and toxic air pollutants. Each of them has to surrender one carbon credit, which represents one permit to emit for each ton of carbon. 

The majority of those permits will be allowances but entities can still use a limited number of CARB offset credits. 

Some entities will have some mandated allowances. Yet, they can buy additional allowances at auctions, buy them from others, or buy offset credits through projects. 

Fast Fact: Compliance offset projects must be listed with an approved Offset Project Registry like CAR to be eligible to earn CARB Offset Credits. CAR offers CARB-approved services like listing projects and issuing carbon offset credits. 

State-run auctions occur on a quarterly basis. Entities under compliance can participate and buy the required number of carbon credits. They have to retire the credits on an annual basis against their cap levels.

To make things even clearer, let’s break down each of the basic components of the carbon credit market in California.

Key Components of Carbon Credits System in California

When talking about carbon credits in California, there are three major elements involved – allowances, offset credits, and compliance period. 

What is an allowance? 

An allowance is a tradable carbon credit serving as a permit to emit one metric ton of CO2e. Each allowance has a unique serial number. The total number of allowances that CARB provides each year is equal to the annual cap.

Carbon credits under the California ETS or cap-and-trade program are distributed under four broad categories:

Cost-containment (red)
Utility allocation (green)
Industrial allocation (yellow)
Auction (blue)

The chart below shows their distribution per category. 

California ETS Allowances Distribution

Cost-containment reserves and a price ceiling reduce price volatility, if needed. While allocation to electric and natural gas utilities is for the benefit of end-users. Allowances for industrial facilities meant to minimize relocation of their emissions to areas without carbon pricing. 

After satisfying the allocation to those three categories, the remaining state-owned carbon credits, in blue, are auctioned quarterly. Covered entities and voluntary market participants can buy the auctioned allowances. 

The auction proceeds go to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF). As of June 2022, the GGRF is worth ~$20 billion in total capital for the state to use. The fund has supported 500+ million individual emissions reduction projects across California.

What is an offset credit? 

An offset credit is equal to a GHG reduction or removal of one metric ton of CO2e. The reduction or removal credit must be real, additional, measurable, permanent, and verifiable. 

The carbon offset credits can only be issued to projects that comply with the Compliance Offset Protocols. 

CARB offset credits differ from allowances, but they are often both referred to as compliance instruments. That’s understandable though as they’re both used by entities to comply with the California carbon credit program. But it’s important to take note of the difference between them.

CARB offset credits vs. allowances: 

Carbon allowances don’t represent the reduction of any emissions but simply a permitted emission under a regulated scheme. They are issued by the state government who sets the overall number of allowances with an annual cap – permitted level of emission.

CARB offset credits, on the other hand, refer to the verified emissions reductions generated from a certain carbon offset project. A covered entity may only meet up to 8% of its compliance obligation using CARB offset credits

So, in sum, carbon allowances are issued annually by the regulator while carbon offset credits undergo a rigorous approval and verification process before being issued.

Compliance period:

It refers to the time frame that an entity has to comply with the mandated emissions reductions. The compliance period follows this breakdown:

First compliance period: 2013 and 2014
Second compliance period: 2015 – 2017
Third compliance period: 2018 – 2020

The required carbon credits under the California cap-and-trade program is determined by the amount of reported and verified emissions. CARB will directly allocate a proportion of allowances to covered facilities. Each of which is responsible to satisfy the remaining allowances or offset credits to meet the cap.

At the end of each compliance period each entity has to turn in the compliance instruments, allowances and CARB offset credits. They must be equal to their total carbon emissions throughout the compliance period.

How To Sell Carbon Credits In California Market

Same with other carbon credits programs in other parts of the world, selling the pollution permits in California also follows these general steps. 

1. Get your offset project approved.

When selling carbon credits through the California ETS, your project must follow the rigorous approval and verification process set by the CARB. Examples of a carbon offset project are tree planting, seaweed farming, and capturing CO2 using a removal technology. 

The CARB has carbon standards in place for producing carbon offsets. It also implements California Cap-and-Trade Program’s Compliance Offset Protocols. 

If you’re a landowner, you can enroll into the program by producing the required documents showing land ownership. You also have to show that your land management practices indeed have reduced certain CO2 emissions. Only by then can you get a signed contract from a buyer.

2. Pick a carbon credit marketplace.

If your project has been issued with carbon credits, you can then sell it to a covered entity that has to meet its cap. You can also sell them in a carbon market where offsetting is voluntary.

Or you can select a carbon exchange to trade on the credits. Here are the top exchanges to choose from; they work the same way as various stock and commodity exchanges. The only difference is that instead of betting on company stocks, you’re selling carbon credits.

3. Know the rules of the program.

Most carbon programs have certain requirements and thresholds to follow. Under the California carbon credits program, covered entities have specific regulations to comply with as mandated by the CARB.

But in the state’s voluntary carbon market, trading offset credits follows different rules set by the program. For instance, smaller landowners with credits to sell sometimes “pool” their offsets together to trade on the carbon market.

4. Get to know the buyer.

If you’re selling to a company or institutional buyer, it’s crucial that you do a thorough research about it first. You should understand the terms you need to agree with them and know what’s required of you. 

It’s also important that you ensure the amount you paid with is right. The current price for carbon under the California ETS averages at ~$30 per ton

If you decide to trade the credits in a spot exchange, make sure to read the fine details. A good carbon platform shows essential information about the project that generates the credits. It also provides details about the project developer, location, and other relevant information. 

The California ETS has collected over USD $14 billion since inception.

How To Buy California Carbon Credits

Buying carbon credits in California is straightforward; it works the same with other carbon markets. But before you make the purchase, you need to consider these important things first:

Timing – how fast you need to get the credits and when you need them
Quantity – how many carbon credits you need 
Price – how much you can afford to buy

After you make those considerations, you can now decide how to buy California carbon credits through these various options.

Option #1. Buying from a project developer

The most direct way to purchase the credits is getting them from the source: project developer. Here are the top five project developers that have the highest ranks in the market today.

Getting carbon credits directly from a developer in California means you can either make a direct investment in the project or sign a contract for delivery. 

The first option involves a long-term purchase agreement, around 3 to 5 years. But you’ll buy the credits at a lower cost than market price. The second option is to contract directly with the developer for delivery of the credits as they’re issued. 

Opting for the second means brings you the benefit to get the credits also at a lower cost. But then again, you also have to commit to a long-term agreement (2 to 3 years).

Option #2: Buying from a broker

Just like other commodities, there are brokers for carbon credits. Some project developers work with them to process the credit sales.

Brokers can make it easier for you to find the credits you’re looking for (project, price, location, etc). They can also give you an analysis of the projects in California that generate the carbon credits.

This is a practical option if you need to buy a lot of carbon credits. The broker deals with all the transactions on your behalf. Plus, the acquisition process doesn’t involve long-term contracts.

In other words, you won’t be busy looking around for carbon credits you need. But that comes with a price – you may pay more for all the services the broker did for you. 

Option #3: Buying from a retailer

In case you only need a small amount of California carbon credits, then this option will suit you right. Searching for a retailer could be the fastest way to get the credits you need. There are plenty of them in the California carbon market. 

Retailers can give you at least basic information about the projects where the credits come from. Most often than not, they have an account on the Registry like CAR, and retire the offsets on your behalf.

Option #4: Buying from an exchange

This last option gives you the opportunity not just to buy carbon credits; you can also earn profits.

There are a number of carbon exchanges or trading platforms operating in the state. They often work with registries to enable the trading transactions. Here are the top carbon exchanges in the market right now.

Getting the credits from an exchange can be quick, easy, and cheaper than brokers. But it may also be harder to get enough information to assess the offsets’ quality. Yet, they still allow you to trade carbon credits in California ETS and earn extra income for it.

Getting the Right Carbon Offset Credits in California

The emissions trading system in California serves as a precedence for similar markets to emerge worldwide. Through the state’s “cap-and-trade” program, a market for tradable carbon offset credits is created. It helps fund climate solutions and thus, is critical to cutting the state’s carbon emissions.

If you are scouting the California market for carbon offset credits, you should know the key components involved. That means knowing what are carbon allowances versus CARB offset credits, as well as the compliance period to follow. 

You must also have a general understanding how to sell or buy carbon credits, or both, in the state. The steps outlined above can help you get started to get your hands on the credits you need. Just keep them in mind and you’re good to go. 

For a more comprehensive guide on how to buy carbon credits in general, go over this article

The post California Carbon Credits (How Does It Work?) appeared first on Carbon Credits.

US Carbon Capture Firm LanzaTech Goes Public

LanzaTech Global, Inc. or “LanzaTech”, formerly known as AMCI Acquisition, starts trading its stock today on Nasdaq with the LNZA and LNZAW tickers. 

Chicago-based LanzaTech is an innovative carbon capture and transformation (CCT) company that converts waste carbon into materials like fabrics, packaging, and other products that people use in th eir daily lives. It will be the first US carbon capture company that goes public.

Chairwoman and CEO of LanzaTech, Jennifer Holmgren, stated:

“Today marks a tremendous milestone in our company’s journey, as the first shares of LanzaTech common stock will trade on Nasdaq… We are thrilled to complete this transaction, and begin this new chapter in the company’s history as we transition to a public company. The proceeds enabled by this transaction… provide a significant runway for us to drive shareholder value and execute on our mission of providing equal access to a post pollution future for all.”

A combination between LanzaTech and AMCI Acquisition brings the public company its $240 million in proceeds that will help expand its innovative CCT technology not just in the US but around the world. 

Holmgren further said that this historical event can ultimately lead to the creation of the circular carbon economy.

The Tech for Circular Carbon Economy

The CCT company’s gas fermentation technology is meant to offer a solution to abate the significant carbon emitted by heavy industry and manufacturing. LanzaTech will be able to support their decarbonization efforts. 

LanzaTech’s goal is to change the way the world uses carbon. It inspires a new circular carbon economy in which CO2 is not wasted but reused. How this happens in LanzaTech is shown in the video.

Its commercially scalable CCT tech can both help manufacturing firms and end users cut their carbon emissions in a profitable way. Product users can replace materials made from virgin fossils with the ones made from LanzaTech’s recycled carbon. The company calls it their CarbonSmart product, making a ton of it removes two tons of CO2. 

More remarkably, LanzaTech can also help industries comply with their emissions reduction goals. The company helps pave the way to global net zero emissions. 

LanzaTech Paving The Way to Net Zero

Since its founding in 2005, LanzaTech has managed to scale its proprietary bio-reactors used for making fuels and chemical production. The reactors use waste CO2 captured from industries as a feedstock. 

To date, the CCT firm has three commercial production plants and 1,250+ patents for various aspects of its technology. This caught the eyes of major investors, partners, and customers. ArcelorMittal, Suncor Energy, Shell, and BASF are just some of those who believe in LanzaTech’s technology. 

Add to that list the major airlines that are confident in adopting LanzaJet’s sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). For instance, British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, and All Nippon Airways are the key partners.

LanzaJet is a spin out company focusing on producing SAF using CO2 waste.  

Using various waste feedstocks, LanzaTech’s CCT tech shows the possibility of moving away from fossil fuels. Most importantly, by licensing its patented tech to customers, the company also allows them to meet their net zero goals.

Its commercially viable technology can enable decarbonization in many of the world’s most carbon intensive industries.

LanzaTech’s Partnerships and Developments

LanzaTech has been making major strides in the carbon capture sector, commercially and technologically. And in just one year, it’s able to achieve several tech developments and big partnerships.

Some of its most notable developments in 2022 are as follows:

Partnership with Twelve to make ethanol from CO2. The deal eliminates using fossil fuels to create ethanol by converting CO2 to CO through Twelve’s carbon transformation technology.
Renewable propane deal with SHV Energy. The strategic partnership will use LanzaTech CCT tech to bring renewable propane and other sustainable fuels to the market.
Bridgestone partnership for end-of-life tire recycling technologies. Co-developing the first dedicated end-of-life tire recycling process using LanzaTech proprietary technology for a pathway toward tire material circularity.
Strategic partnership with Brookfield. The deal is worth an initial $500 million commitment from Brookfield Renewable and its partners to build new commercial-scale production plants that will use LanzaTech’s CCT technology.
Producing ethylene from CO2. A major discovery that successfully engineers specialized biocatalysts to directly produce ethylene from CO2 in a continuous process.
Declared as a Finalist for the Earthshot Prize Awards. The Earthshot Prize, the world’s most prestigious environmental prize, is courtesy of HRH Prince William. It follows a rigorous, 10-month selection process and a panel of expert advisors who chose LanzaTech from more than 1,000 nominations.

Shares of LanzaTech’s common stock will trade under the ticker symbol LNZA while its public warrants under the ticker symbol LNZAW. 

The post US Carbon Capture Firm LanzaTech Goes Public appeared first on Carbon Credits.

DevvStream Announces Multiple Advancements in its Oil and Gas Wellbore Sealant Program for Methane Abatement and Carbon Credit Generation

DevvStream Holdings Inc. (“DevvStream” or the “Company”) (NEO:DESG), a leading carbon credit investment firm specializing in technology solutions, is pleased to announce significant initial developments in its future methane abatement offset program (the “Offset Program”) centered around the high-volume plugging of abandoned oil and gas wells with next-generation sealant technologies developed by its partner TS-Nano.

The Offset Program has completed the sealing of 7 wells with a high rate of success, generating impermeable cement plugs and closing off microcracks in existing cement barriers, which prevents the migration of CO2 and methane to the surface.

These successful tests represent critical progress toward the Company’s goal of using its Offset Program to address the estimated 3 million decommissioned oil and gas wells in the U.S. and the estimated 225,000 in Canada, all of which typically emit considerable quantities of methane into the atmosphere.

Reducing methane emissions is critically important in the fight against climate change, with methane release being responsible for roughly 30% of the increase in global temperatures since the pre-industrial era. Methane is up to 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide at trapping heat over the first 20 years after it reaches the atmosphere.

Methane emissions are one of the most prolific contributors to climate change, and are also one of the most insidious,” said Sunny Trinh, CEO of DevvStream.

Tackling the methane problem by sealing abandoned oil and gas wells is a significant challenge, but thanks to the proprietary nano-based technology developed by TS-Nano, we now have a tested, field-proven method for closing extremely thin microcracks (below 30 microns) in existing wellhead barriers. We’re pleased that TS-Nano has successfully capped the first round of test wells, validating the sealant application process in real-world environments and scenarios. Once the American Carbon Registry approves the methodology surrounding quantification, monitoring, reporting and verification, we will be poised and ready to generate carbon credits that will deliver previously unrealized economic benefits for oil and gas operators while providing a valuable asset for corporations and governments in their ongoing work toward Net Zero.”

As part of its continued efforts to make the Offset Program more efficient, affordable, and scalable moving forward, DevvStream has filed a second provisional patent application outlining its innovative programmatic approach to wellbore project management and carbon credit generation.

Similar to the Company’s provisional patent applications filed in January (as described in the Company’s news release dated January 25, 2023), this provisional patent application leverages the UNFCC CDM’s Program of Activities (or PoA) approach, recognized internationally, to aggregate multiple mitigation activities across multiple oil wells into a single offset project.

This umbrella approach will allow the Company to aggregate multiple abandoned and orphaned wellbores together under a single offset project, resulting in several anticipated improvements in efficiency, cost, and scalability.

Click here to Get More Info on DevvStream

Read more on Abandoned Oil Wells & Methane

Disclosure: Owners, members, directors and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option position in any of the companies mentioned: DESG

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involve risks which could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.

Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.

The post DevvStream Announces Multiple Advancements in its Oil and Gas Wellbore Sealant Program for Methane Abatement and Carbon Credit Generation appeared first on Carbon Credits.

China Ready to Reboot Carbon Scheme

China has revealed its plans to relaunch the China Certified Emissions Reduction scheme (CCER). The plan to reboot the CCER has been in the works as early as last year. However, it is now ready for operations to start.

In 2017, China had suspended the CCER scheme due to low trading volumes. The country now plans to reboot its voluntary carbon market through CCER. 

China Beijing Green Exchange (CBGE) manages the relaunching project. On February 4th, the CBGE revealed that the registration and trading schemes for CCER were complete. The systems are ready for inspection before operations commence. 

There is a lot of focus on China’s carbon emissions policies as the country is one of the largest economies in the world. It is also the number one carbon emitter in the world, with more than 10,000 million tonnes of CO2 emitted in 2020. It is responsible for almost 30% of the world’s carbon emissions. 

This means that if the world wants to meet its net zero goals, China must successfully manage its CO2 emissions.

A World Bank report revealed last year that China would require $17 trillion in investments to achieve their net zero targets. These investments are in the power and transport sectors alone.

CCER will supplement China’s ETS in reducing carbon emissions

The CCER and China’s ETS (Emissions Trading Scheme) are crucial to China’s goals to reduce carbon emissions. The ETS began trading in 2021 and has completed its first compliance period. 

The ETS is a scheme to limit or reduce carbon emissions. It is particularly prominent within the country’s power generation sector. It allocates emissions allowances to coal and gas-fired power plants but it will expand to other industrial sectors over time. The Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange oversees the ETS.

In terms of capacity, ETS is currently the largest carbon market in the world. It is three times the size of the EU carbon market. Its capacity is close to an annual 4.5 billion tonnes of CO2. This represents 40% of the country’s total carbon emissions per year.

The way China allocates the allowances differs from the EU. In the EU, allowances are capped and decided upfront. China determines allowances based on emissions intensity.

One allowance for a company means that it can emit 1 tonne of carbon. 

In the first year of operation, the ETS was off to a slow start, which is not unusual for these schemes. In 2021, it traded 412 million tonnes worth of carbon allowances. For comparison, the EU’s ETS traded 321 million tonnes of CO2 allowances in its first year.

The current ETS only allows fossil-fuel based Independent Power Producers (IPPs) to benefit by trading credits. It leaves no room for renewables-based IPPs to benefit. This is the issue the CCER hopes to address. The current ETS will expand beyond the power sector into other industries.

China’s CCER scheme broken down

CCER was a scheme where the Chinese government certified voluntary carbon emissions reduction activities by companies. These include projects such as renewable energy, waste-to-power generation and forestry. These projects generated carbon credits which can be sold and traded. 

CCERs could be used to offset carbon deficits or China Emissions Allowances (CEAs) deficits. Hence, companies with high emissions will pay entities like renewable power companies for credits.

However, there is a cap on CCER credits. It can offset 5% of emissions that exceed the ETS targets.

The CCER was first established in 2012. The country’s central economic planner, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) introduced measures to encourage voluntary carbon emissions reduction activities. 

With this scheme, both foreign and domestic entities were able to carry out transactions for different greenhouse gasses. These included carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride. 

Why the CCER was suspended

According to the NDRC, the CCER had some issues that caused its suspension. Firstly, there were low trading volumes on the CCER. Secondly, there was little standardization when it came to carbon audits. As a result, CCER registrations were temporarily suspended.

What to expect with the relaunch

It was announced at the end of 2021 that the Beijing Green Exchange will oversee the CCER trading. The exchange will also be open to foreign investors. 

Once launched, analysts predict that CCERs worth 300 million tonnes will be traded. The previous issue of low trading volumes in the CCER is also expected to be resolved. As the ETS expands to include more energy-intensive sectors, the CCER’s trading volume will increase.

However, the CCER relaunch does pose some challenges. How the ETS will incorporate the CCER scheme is not entirely clear yet. Currently, only wind and solar projects with an internal rate of return (IRR) of lower than 8% can apply for the CCER. 

This requirement leaves out a lot of renewable energy projects. It means that only new renewable projects with low IRRs can truly benefit from the CCER relaunch.

The post China Ready to Reboot Carbon Scheme appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Carbon Credit Platform Carbonplace Gets $45M From Large Banks

Nine global banks have invested a sum of $45 million in a new carbon credit platform to help ramp up transactions in the voluntary carbon market (VCM) and give the banks’ clients easier access to the market.

Banks’ $45M Climate Commitment

Demand for carbon offset credits is estimated to grow significantly as businesses are using them to achieve their net zero emissions targets

Right now, carbon credits change hands bilaterally on a project-by-project basis as well as through exchanges. 

Each of the nine banks entrusted $5 million into the carbon credit trading platform Carbonplace. The trading platform will connect buyers and sellers of carbon credits through the banks, namely.

BBVA
BNP Paribas
CIBC
Itaú Unibanco
National Australia Bank
NatWest
Standard Chartered
SMBC 
UBS 

Their $45 million capital injection shows a commitment to help tackle climate change. Those nine world’s largest bankers represent about $9 trillion in total assets. With their investment, each bank shares equal equity ownership in Carbonplace.

With this technological solution, each bank can now offer its customers committed to decarbonize direct access to carbon credits to offset their footprint. 

Carbonplace stated in its statement:

“The capital injection represents a commitment from some of the world’s largest financial institutions… to achieve Carbonplace’s vision of accelerating corporate climate action by providing transparent, secure and accessible carbon markets.”

The Carbonplace Platform  

Carbonplace is a trading platform launched in 2021 to connect buyers and sellers of carbon credits through their respective banks. The company received its seed funding from its founding institutions that developed its technology.

Carbonplace’ headquarters is in London under the leadership of its new CEO, Scott Eaton. He’s a financial tech veteran who chaired Nivaura, a capital markets fintech. Eaton described Carbonplace as transforming the way carbon credits are bought, distributed, and held. 

The trading network will use the $45m investment to scale up its platform’s infrastructure and grow its team. It will also seek more partnerships with other major market players such as stock exchanges and carbon registries worldwide.

The carbon tech firm said the carbon credits available would be from existing carbon offset standards bodies like Gold Standard and Verra.

Hailed as the “SWIFT of carbon markets”, Carbonplace has done pilot transactions with several buyers, sellers, exchanges, and registries. Some names include the global payments tech giant Visa and Climate Impact X, a carbon marketplace based in Singapore.

In summary, here’s what Carbonplace is all about. 

The network is seen as Xpansiv’s new carbon credit rival. It will facilitate the simple, secure, and transparent transfer of certified carbon credits. And that happens in real time.

Digital wallets allow the ownership of a credit to be reliably proven to the market, which lowers the risk of double counting and simplifies transparency.

Driving Corporate Climate Action

Large companies have been setting lofty net zero pledges such as these major airlines, T-Mobile, Disney, Stellantis, Lenovo, and more. Most of them follow the world’s goal to hit net zero emissions by 2050 while others have targets 10 years ahead. 

As the number of companies pledging to cut their emissions grows and investor pressure for clear plans intensifies, the importance of voluntary carbon market becomes even more obvious.

A representative from BBVA, Ingo Ramming, commented:

“Carbon markets are a fundamental pillar of our sustainability strategy and an enormous business opportunity… Carbonplace strengthens our value chain. Its modern, flexible, and secure technology will enable carbon markets to realize their full potential to drive large-scale climate action.”

The VCM has a key role in driving corporate climate action and helping companies achieve their net zero goals. Firms buy carbon credits to offset emissions they can’t avoid or reduce. 

As per BloombergNEF’ projection, demand for carbon offset credits can grow 40x to 5.2 billion tons of CO2 in 2050. That represents 10% of current global carbon emissions.

Investments in VCM projects grew to $10 billion last year, up from $7 billion in 2021, according to a report. While the volume of carbon credits bought as offsets (155 million) went down 4% from 2021, global supply jumped 2% (255 million). 

Carbonplace’ carbon credit platform will be available to the banks’ corporate customers later this year. It can also be open to retail customers in the future, the firm’s chief technology officer says. 

The post Carbon Credit Platform Carbonplace Gets $45M From Large Banks appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Carbon Credit Rating Firms Seek to Boost Buyers Confidence

Carbon credit rating firms seek to help companies have a better sense of carbon offset credits, from which many have turned their backs on due to the reputational risk of greenwashing. 

The notion of greenwashing refers to projects that don’t follow standards and have inaccurate measurements. It weakens the confidence of carbon credit buyers, especially businesses wanting to decarbonize their operations. 

Rating Carbon Credit Projects

Corporations, online carbon marketplaces, and traders are the common clients of carbon credit ratings. But recently, intermediaries that sell carbon credits also now have the scores along with them. 

Each carbon credit represents one metric ton of carbon dioxide avoided or removed from the atmosphere. 

Carbon credit rating agencies grade projects by considering social and economic data, academic research, and satellite imagery. They flag risks using various criteria. For instance, if a project issues too many credits or it’s financially reliant on income from carbon credits.

The rating firms have been flagging projects like anti-deforestation for issuing more credits than they should be. In fact, they already provided early warnings way before the media claims that projects don’t deliver the carbon reductions they promise.

For example, one of the carbon credit rating agencies, Sylvera, reported that below a third of REDD+ projects (preventing deforestation) are high quality. The rater’s CEO Allister Furey noted: 

“There is a historic problem with carbon markets lacking transparency and a big spread in quality has undermined [their] legitimacy.”

How grading or scoring is done

The market for voluntary carbon credits (VCM) reached $2 billion in 2022, according to Ecosystem Marketplace. Different estimates say it will hit $50 billion by 2030.

The carbon credit ratings industry primarily earns through subscriptions. The 4 most well-known companies in the sector are Sylvera, BeZero Carbon, Calyx Global, and Renoster Systems.

The recent carbon credit marketplace launched by Salesforce includes ratings from Sylvera and Calyx. The tech giant has also added BeZero to its rating partners.

Nina Schoen, head of product for Salesforce’s Net-Zero Marketplace said:

“A third-party rating for us is almost like education for buyers. It’s one piece of critical information alongside all sorts of critical information that buyers need.”

Each carbon credit rating firm has its own unique system. 

Sylvera scored projects using an 8-point scale with AAA as highest to D as lowest. BeZero uses a 7-point letter scale from a high of AAA+ to a low of A. 

Calyx Global opted to use a 5-point scale from A to E while Renoster rates projects in two stages and assigns a numeric score beginning at zero. The numbering represents how many tons of CO2 or equivalent emissions each credit abates. 

Rating agencies say that not every credit represents an actual ton of carbon avoidance or removal. Not all credits are made equal; some don’t deliver on their claims while others could be doing more than what they promise. 

Apart from the scores that carbon credit rating firms have, there are other grades that companies and investors use in measuring sustainability such as ESG scores and green bond assessment of a project. 

Discrepancies in Ratings

Scores from raters often vary. In fact, 26 out of 40 projects reviewed by the Wall Street Journal agree in broad terms but significant differences exist in rating large forestry projects. 

For example, a forestry project in Brazil got the lowest score from BeZero and Calyx but Sylvera gave it a better grade. 

In BeZero’s assessment, the project won’t likely need funding support from carbon credits as it is exporting lucrative wood products like mahogany. The rating agency also noted that Brazilian laws would protect the trees from getting harvested. 

Meanwhile, Calyx has three significant risk factors for the project. Potential over-crediting is one of them. 

Agrocortex, the project developer, said revenue from carbon credits accounts for about 60% of its income in 2021 and 2022. The developer said it will earn a gross profit of $17 million at the most during a three-decade period of producing timber sustainably while also allowing it to sell carbon credits. 

The developer also said that despite selling high-value timber, the return on investments is very low as it competes with illegal loggers that offer products at lower prices. 

More remarkably, carbon credits prompt the company not to harvest economically viable wood. This keeps deforestation rates in line with Sylvera’s expectations. 

Among the carbon credit rating agencies, BeZero rates more conservatively than others. 20% of projects got the highest rating from Sylvera, 10% of them were reviewed by Calyx, and 8% earned the top ratings from BeZero.

For instance, 40 projects rated by Sylvera and BeZero compared on a standardized scale showed the following differences on 5-point rating scales. 

Overall, there are thousands of projects in place that generate carbon credits. But only a fraction of them has been scored and rated, including the largest projects by credit volume. BeZero rated the most projects (280), followed by Calyx (260), Sylvera (115), and Renoster (9). 

BeZero and Calyx cover a broader range of projects, from capturing methane leaks from landfills to energy-efficient cookstoves. Sylvera and Renoster focus on rating nature-based projects.  

The post Carbon Credit Rating Firms Seek to Boost Buyers Confidence appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Transparency in Intermediaries’ VCM Transactions is Critical

Voluntary carbon credit markets (VCM) have a big role to play in financing climate actions but the actual amount of money that intermediaries earn and goes to climate projects remains unknown. 

According to a study commissioned by the Carbon Market Watch, 9 out of 10 intermediaries don’t reveal the fees they charge or profits they earn. Their role in the VCM has been increasingly scrutinized.    

Opaque Financial Transactions Involving Carbon Credits 

Intermediaries – brokers, retailers, or exchanges of carbon credits – have been under interrogation. 

Last year, an investigation noted that several brokers in the VCM are buying carbon credits from forestry projects in poorer nations and selling them at big margins. Likewise, an inquiry on SouthPole showed that the company was earning millions of dollars from brokering low-quality carbon credits.  

In a similar finding, Carbon Market Watch released a report saying that 90% of the intermediaries under investigation don’t reveal the exact fees or profits earned from selling carbon credits on the VCM. 

This lack of transparency in the financial transactions involving carbon credits is alarming. It doesn’t give the market players the true insight whether the VCMs are indeed successful in financing climate actions. 

Plus, it also makes it impossible to measure the real amount of earnings and speculation on the part of the intermediaries. These include the emerging craze among carbon crypto companies.

This opacity has to change. 

Checklist in Buying Carbon Credits

Being transparent about the information on the middlemen’s earnings per credit will allow buyers to support projects where the gap between how much they pay and what the project owner gets is the smallest. This will greatly benefit the project owners or developers, with more bargaining power with intermediaries.

So, carbon credit buyers should not be lenient anymore on demanding transparency from intermediaries. They must know what questions to ask to make informed decisions.

According to Carbon Market Watch, here are the questions that buyers must ask to channel their money to the right projects.

Carbon markets are a tool to channel finance to climate related projects. Yet, there’s limited data available to quantify it. 

There is not enough data on how much finance is going to climate action through the VCM.

The value of market size is determined by multiplying the number of trades by the estimated price.

Apart from carbon credit price transparency concerns, where the money paid by the final buyers goes is also unclear. This includes the amount of money that stays in the hands of the intermediaries and the cash that project developers make as profits.

In a best-case scenario, project developers sell directly to end buyers without the need for an intermediary. In this case, as much as 60% of revenues goes back to the climate project or local communities.

Under a worst-case scenario, brokers can take as much as 78% of the revenues of the carbon credit sales.

So why do project developers still work with brokers? Some think that they help connect with buyers and it’s convenient for price discovery.

The Role of Intermediaries in the VCM

Intermediaries have a big role to play in the VCM. They help connect project developers and carbon credit buyers.

Speculative intermediaries, in particular, are investing to buy carbon credits at a time when demand is extremely low at cheap prices. In effect, they’re still providing a lifeline to projects. But that was the case before.

Today, those speculative intermediaries are now cashing in, by reselling the credits at several times more the price they bought them. Though nothing is wrong in earning a profit, it would be if most of the money paid supposedly to finance climate action get stuck on intermediaries’ wallets. 

In a report by Thallo on scaling up the VCM, $650 million went to the pockets of investors and brokers – not project developers – out of the 500 million carbon credits traded in 2021, 

That accounts for 1/3 of the revenues the VCM generated in 2021.

This is where the concept of “fair deals” comes in. It offers a floor price to project developers and includes a means to ensure that they will benefit as well if market prices rise before the credit is used.

This calls for a discussion defining “fairness” in the carbon market, which has a positive societal and environmental impact. 

But if intermediaries still won’t disclose their fees and mark-ups, the real path that a carbon credit takes and the number of times it changes hands will remain secret. Keeping this information hidden will raise suspicions about who really benefits. 

Thus, intermediaries must improve transparency in their transactions to also improve trust in the VCM.

The post Transparency in Intermediaries’ VCM Transactions is Critical appeared first on Carbon Credits.