Ford’s EV Sales in U.S. Surge by Over 200%

/in /by

As the global transport sector continues to electrify mobility, Ford Motor Company reported a surge in EV sales amidst a slight overall drop in vehicle sales. Explore the key figures and trends driving Ford’s EV market growth, signaling promising developments for the company’s electrification strategy.

Ford’s EV Momentum

The American automaker reported 179,588 new vehicle sales in April, which reflects a slight decrease of 2.4% year-over-year. However, in the first four months of the year, Ford recorded 687,671 vehicle sales, marking a 4.2% increase compared to the same period last year.

Despite the overall softer performance compared to the previous year, Ford’s sales of electric vehicles (EVs) notably surged.

In April, Ford achieved a notable increase in EV sales, with 8,019 units sold, representing a remarkable 129% growth from the previous year. This surge in EV sales is promising for the company’s performance in the second quarter. 

Additionally, the proportion of EVs out of Ford’s total sales volume increased significantly, reaching 4.7%, up from 2.0% a year ago.

All three of Ford’s EV models contributed to this growth. The company sold 4,893 units of the Mustang Mach-E (up 205% year-over-year), 2,090 units of the F-150 Lightning (up 57% year-over-year), and 1,036 units of the E-Transit (up 86% year-over-year).

In the U.S. market, Ford has sold over 28,000 all-electric vehicles so far this year, marking a substantial 97% increase from the previous year. These EV sales constitute about 4.3% of Ford’s total sales volume.

Looking ahead, Ford aims to reach 100,000 units of EV sales this year. The company anticipates further growth, particularly in the sales of the F-150 Lightning, despite a slower start in 2024 compared to expectations. Ford recently resumed shipping the 2024 model year of the F-150 Lightning after a hiatus of over two months, accompanied by new pricing adjustments.

In April, the Ford Mustang Mach-E sales reached 4,893 units, reflecting a significant 205% increase from the previous year. However, production levels of the Mach-E in Mexico have decreased compared to last year, possibly due to supply outpacing demand.

The Ford E-Transit van also experienced robust sales growth in April, with 1,036 units sold, marking an 86% increase year-over-year. However, Ford does not disclose sales figures for other plug-in models, such as the Ford Escape PHEV, and Lincoln’s PHEV sales data remains undisclosed as well.

Powering the EV Surge

Same with other automakers, Ford’s EV surge rely on a critical mineral hailed as “white gold” – lithium. Lithium is a key component in the batteries that power EVs.

RELATED: Lithium Prices and The Insights into the EV Market’s Pulse

According to a report by S&P Global, lithium prices saw a slight increase in March. This uptick can be attributed to several factors, including production cuts, auction outcomes, and a more positive outlook regarding demand for traction batteries.

Many lithium producers have highlighted the challenge of accurately predicting the prices they will receive for their products during their fourth-quarter 2023 earnings calls. In response to changing market conditions, the world’s largest lithium producers adjusted or modified their investment strategies.

Nevertheless, strategic investments aimed at securing future lithium supply are on the rise, with major automakers and lithium producers committing over $1 billion in 2023 alone.

For example, GM invested $650 million in Lithium Americas, while Albemarle allocated $110 million to lithium developer Patriot Battery Metals. Projections say this trend will persist as companies strive to ensure their access to raw materials for EV batteries.

Securing Lithium for Global EV Expansion

As EV penetration expands worldwide, the demand for lithium is projected to surpass supply, particularly as EVs become mainstream. 

Though analysts note that growth in the EV market has been tapering off, it’s essential to maintain perspective. In 2021, EV sales more than doubled, experiencing a remarkable growth rate of nearly 120%.

In 2022, electric vehicle (EV) sales surged by almost 60%. Although this growth rate decelerated in 2023, the year still witnessed a remarkable 35% increase in global electric car sales.

The German luxury carmaker, Mercedes-Benz, recently revealed its all-electric truck, the G-Wagon. Meanwhile, the EV giant, Tesla, reported a dip in its profits with lower vehicle sales, but production targets remain strong. 

Batteries constitute a substantial portion of EV costs, presenting an opportunity for EV makers to either boost profits per vehicle sold or, more likely, reduce prices to stay competitive as competitors do the same. Lower prices typically attract more buyers, leading to increased demand for lithium.

Ford’s recent sales report reveals a mixed performance in overall vehicle sales but shows a significant surge in EV sales, signaling promising growth while underlining Ford’s commitment to electric mobility that aligns with broader EV market trends.

As Ford targets 100,000 units of EV sales this year, strategic investments in securing future lithium supply and the global expansion of EV penetration are pivotal. 

The post Ford’s EV Sales in U.S. Surge by Over 200% appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Tesla Can Trade Carbon Credits in South Korea, Valued at $145M

/in /by

In a significant development, Tesla has received approval from South Korea’s Ministry of Environment to sell regulatory automotive emission credits, also called carbon credits domestically, marking a pivotal moment for the electric vehicle giant. This move creates new revenue opportunities for Tesla while demonstrating a deeper integration of EVs into the South Korean market.

As reported by Korea Economy TV, Tesla currently possesses around 4 million grams/km of carbon credits in South Korea. Based on current penalty rates, the credits are valued at up to 200 billion won (around $145 million). The carmaker can sell these credits to its peers and earn starting this year. 

Driving Towards Net Zero: South Korea’s Green Mobility Goals

Korea’s ambitious push toward achieving 2050 net zero carbon emissions hinges on transitioning from internal combustion engines to eco-friendly vehicles.

The country aims to bolster its fleet with an accumulated 2.8 million eco-friendly vehicles by 2025, encompassing battery-powered electric vehicles (BEVs), fuel-cell EVs, and hybrids. Looking ahead to 2030, the government targets a significant expansion, aiming for 7.85 million eco-friendly vehicles. 

This would mean that 30% of all vehicles in Korea will draw power from electricity. Additionally, a staggering 83% of newly sold cars in 2030 would need to be eco-friendly models.

Such ambitious goals are not merely symbolic; the government anticipates a 24% reduction in GHG emissions over the next decade. This is crucial for the overarching aim of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

In South Korea, regulations mandate that automakers maintain average greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions below a specified standard. There are penalties for non-compliance, 50,000 won per g/km, or the option to purchase credits from other companies. 

The Ministry of Environment is responsible for implementing emission regulations for engines and vehicles in the country, with the National Institute of Environmental Research serving as an advisory body.

Korea adopts emission standards from either European or US sources depending on the application:

Light-duty gasoline vehicles adhere to US/California standards.
Light-duty diesel vehicles follow European standards.
Heavy-duty trucks and bus engines comply with European regulations.
Mobile nonroad diesel engines adhere to US standards.

Tesla’s Path to Carbon Credit Approval

Tesla’s entry into the carbon credit market in South Korea adds a new dimension to the country’s efforts to tackle automotive emissions.

However, Tesla faced challenges in establishing itself in South Korea’s emission credit market. The EV leader’s efforts were initially hindered by regulatory limitations that restricted participation to automakers selling over 4,500 vehicles annually as of 2009. 

But through persistent advocacy efforts, Tesla Korea successfully lobbied for regulatory amendments in 2021 to enable its participation.

The final hurdle was obtaining approval from the Ministry of Environment, which was granted earlier this year. This clears the way for Tesla to engage in carbon credit trading in South Korea. The Ministry highlighted the collaborative process involved, including consultations with other governmental bodies like the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy.

The sale of carbon credits has proven to be a lucrative revenue stream for Tesla, with the opportunity to enter the Korean market poised to bolster the company’s position even further. 

Tesla’s Carbon Credit Success

In 2023 alone, Tesla raked in $1.79 billion from the sale of carbon credits. Since 2009, the total revenue generated from this source has amounted to nearly $9 billion for Tesla.

In its first-quarter 2024 filings, Tesla disclosed a $442 million income from the sale of carbon credits. This amount reflects a modest 2% uptick from the preceding quarter of Q4 2023, which stood at $433 million.

Notably, this revenue from credits constitutes a significant portion of the company’s Q1 2024 net income, amounting to a staggering 38.6% of $1,144 million.

READ MORE: Tesla Profits Dip But Carbon Credits Revenue Up, 38% of Net Income

Tesla’s success in South Korea extends beyond emission credits, with the Model Y’s popularity propelling Tesla to become the country’s second-largest vehicle importer as of March 2024, surpassing established brands like Mercedes-Benz. With 6,025 vehicle registrations in March 2024, Tesla has firmly entrenched itself in the South Korean automotive market.

In summary, Tesla’s entry into South Korea’s carbon credit market represents a significant milestone in the company’s expansion and sustainability efforts. Overcoming regulatory hurdles and securing approval positions Tesla to play a crucial role in shaping the future of automotive emissions in South Korea.

The post Tesla Can Trade Carbon Credits in South Korea, Valued at $145M appeared first on Carbon Credits.

EU Takes Action Against 20 Airlines for Greenwashing Claims

/in /by

The European Commission’s move to address greenwashing practices among airlines is significant. Greenwashing, especially in industries as impactful as aviation, undermines consumer trust and misleads individuals about the environmental consequences of their choices. 

Air France, its Dutch subsidiary KLM, and Lufthansa’s Brussels Airlines are among the 20 airlines under investigation by the European Union for potential greenwashing practices. It’s unclear which other airlines have received a letter from the EC.

Eco-Friendly Flight or Marketing Mirage?

The Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) works with the European Commission to enforce EU consumer protection laws. They address cross-border issues, triggered in this case by a BEUC alert about misleading green claims by airlines.

The European Green Deal and the New Consumer Agenda prioritize sustainability and combatting greenwashing. Directives like the one on unfair commercial practices prohibit misleading actions. 

Additionally, the proposed Green Claims Directive aims to enhance consumer protection by requiring traders to substantiate explicit environmental claims and be transparent about offsetting claims, specifying the portion that relies on buying carbon offsets. The Directive ensures that traders adhere to requirements when making claims about the environmental performance of products. 

The involvement of the CPC emphasizes the collaborative effort to enforce EU consumer laws and hold airlines accountable for their practices. This approach sends a clear message to the industry that greenwashing will not be tolerated.

BEUC’s advocacy and the support of consumer organizations further highlight the growing awareness and demand for genuine sustainability efforts. Consumers deserve accurate information to make informed choices, and actions like this help protect their rights.

Legal Eagles vs. Misleading Claims: Aviation Edition

The recent legal rulings against KLM and Austrian Airlines demonstrate the consequences of misleading advertising in the aviation sector. Such rulings set precedents and serve as deterrents for other airlines engaging in similar practices.

The EC, along with EU consumer authorities, is targeting misleading claims regarding the environmental impact of flying. They particularly focus on airlines’ assertions that carbon emissions can be offset through additional fees or the use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF).

SAF is from renewable and sustainable resources, offering a way to reduce emissions when combined with fossil-based jet fuel. It’s a “drop-in” fuel, meaning airlines can use it without modifying their existing infrastructure. SAF is viewed by experts as a highly promising solution for accelerating the aviation sector’s transition to a low-carbon future.

RELATED: Google Signs Up Shell’s SAF Program to Cut Business Travel Emissions

The identified misleading practices include:

Creating the incorrect impression that additional fees can fully counterbalance CO2 emissions.
Using the term “sustainable aviation fuel” without adequately justifying its environmental impact.
Using terms like “green,” “sustainable,” or “responsible” without clear justification.
Claiming to move towards environmental performance like net zero emissions without verifiable commitments, targets, and monitoring systems.
Presenting flight emissions calculators without scientific proof of reliability.
Comparing flight emissions without providing sufficient information on the methodology.

These actions follow the EU Commission’s legislative proposals aimed at protecting consumers from greenwashing. These include updates to directives like the unfair commercial practices directive (UCPD) and the consumer rights directive (CRD). These updates aim to include green transition aspects and introduce rules banning unverified environmental claims and requiring independent verification of green claims.

Věra Jourová, EC Vice-President for Values and Transparency, emphasized the importance of providing consumers with accurate and scientific information, saying:

“More and more travelers care about their environmental footprint and choose products and services with better environmental performance. They deserve accurate and scientific answers, not vague or false claims. The Commission is fully committed to empowering consumers in the green transition and fighting greenwashing.” 

EU’s Greenwashing Battle Plan

The European Commission and CPC authorities have taken proactive steps to address concerns regarding environmental marketing claims made by airlines under EU consumer law. By inviting companies to provide responses within a specific timeframe and organizing meetings to discuss proposed solutions, the Commission is fostering dialogue and collaboration to ensure alignment with consumer legislation.

The process involves:

Invitation for Response: Companies have 30 days to outline proposed measures to address concerns raised about their environmental marketing claims.
Dialogue and Discussion: Following receipt of replies, the Commission will organize meetings with the CPC network and the airlines to discuss proposed solutions.
Monitoring Implementation: The Commission will monitor the implementation of agreed-upon changes to ensure compliance with EU consumer law.
Enforcement Actions: If airlines fail to take necessary steps to address concerns, CPC authorities have the authority to take further enforcement actions, including sanctions.

Overall, these legislative measures and directives aim to promote transparency and combat greenwashing, particularly involving airlines’ use of carbon offsets. By targeting airlines that make misleading claims about use of carbon offsets or the sustainability of flying, the Commission is taking a proactive step toward ensuring transparency and accountability in the sector.

The post EU Takes Action Against 20 Airlines for Greenwashing Claims appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Nickel 28 Capital Ousts CEO Anthony Milewski and President Justin Cochrane in Leadership Purge Over Misconduct

/in /by

In a dramatic overhaul at Nickel 28 Capital Corp., the board has ousted three top executives following a rigorous internal investigation. 

The shake-up at the nickel-cobalt producer saw CEO Anthony Milewski, President Justin Cochrane, and CFO Conor Kearns dismissed for serious breaches of conduct and policy non-compliance, sending shockwaves through the corporate ranks.

Nickel 28 shares soared 18% on the news of the termination in early trading on May 6th.

Cochrane and Milewski are founders of a research and consulting group
Milewski was the original CEO of Carbon Streaming Corp before Cochrane became the CEO in late 2020.
Kearns is the current CFO of Carbon Streaming Corp under CEO Justin Cocrhane
Maurice Swan, Board Member of Nickel 28, is also the Chairman of Carbon Streaming Corp.

The firings, effective after the close of business on May 3, 2024, were announced following findings from an independent special committee formed in early December 2023. This committee was tasked with examining the executives’ adherence to insider-trading, expense policies, and the code of business conduct and ethics. 

Their investigation revealed misconduct including breaches of duty, poor judgment, and various violations of Nickel 28’s internal policies. None of the company’s findings have been proven in court.

Dismissed Executives Justin Cochrane, Conor Kearns and Board Member Maurice Swan’s ties to Carbon Streaming Corp.

Amid the upheavals at Nickel 28, the connections between ousted executives and other industry entities have come under scrutiny. 

Notably, Conor Kearns, the former CFO, along with Justin Cochrane, the ousted president, and Nickel 28 board member Maurice Swan, are all known to have ties with Carbon Streaming Corp., a firm specializing in carbon credits and streams. 

This involvement raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the integrity of their professional judgments in their roles at Nickel 28, and now, potentially Carbon Streaming. 

The overlap in executive roles between different corporations is a common practice but invites a closer examination of governance and ethical standards, especially in light of the recent findings of misconduct at Nickel 28. Maurice Swan is Director of Nickel 28, and current Chairman of Carbon Streaming. Swan was the former Chair of the Compensation Committee at Carbon Streaming until he stepped down late in 2023.

Such relationships are particularly relevant as they could influence decision-making processes and strategic directions not only at Nickel 28 but across the broader business spectrum where these individuals hold influence.

Carbon Streaming has come under fire recently from activist shareholder groups for executive compensation and G&A spending. 
The company promoted a new CEO in June 2023, before he resigned after only 3 weeks on the job – and Cochrane retook the position.

Investigation and Findings

The special committee’s investigation at Nickel 28 delved into historical compensation arrangements and the compliance of these senior figures with the company’s insider-trading, expense policy, and code of business conduct and ethics. It also examined potential conflicts of interest and related party transactions involving company insiders and key employees.

Their thorough review culminated in an unanimous recommendation to the board to terminate the implicated executives for cause. The board, accepting these recommendations, has also reserved all rights to initiate legal proceedings to recover losses and gains obtained through the executives’ alleged misconduct. However, they noted that these findings are not expected to materially impact the company’s prior financial statements.

Immediate and Future Leadership Changes

In response to the leadership vacuum, the board acted swiftly to appoint Christopher S. Wallace as the interim CEO. Wallace, a current board member known for his extensive experience in leadership and finance within the critical-minerals industry, is expected to steer the company through this turbulent period.

Additionally, Brett Richards, another board member with over 37 years in the mining and metals industry, will provide consultancy services to assist with the transition.

Martin Vydra, Executive Vice-President of Strategy, and Craig Lennon, Head of Asia-Pacific, will continue in their roles, ensuring operational continuity.

Company Outlook and Strategic Vision

Despite these significant upper-management upheavals, Nickel 28 reassures stakeholders that its core strategic vision and objectives remain steadfast. The board and the continuing leadership team are committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability in all operations.

Nickel 28 Capital, known for its 8.56-percent joint venture interest in the producing, long-life, and world-class Ramu nickel-cobalt operation located in Papua New Guinea, continues to be a pivotal player in the nickel and cobalt markets. These metals are critical for the burgeoning electric vehicle sector, underscoring the company’s strategic importance.

In addition to Ramu, Nickel 28 manages a portfolio of 10 nickel and cobalt royalties on development, prefeasibility, and exploration projects across Canada, Australia, and Papua New Guinea.

Implications for Stakeholders

The abrupt leadership changes and the circumstances leading to them could stir investor concerns regarding governance and oversight within Nickel 28. However, the board’s proactive stance in addressing these issues and setting a course for robust oversight and transparent management practices might help in stabilizing trust among investors and partners.

As the company navigates through these changes, the outcomes of any legal actions and future disclosures related to the termination of the senior executives will be closely watched by shareholders and industry analysts alike. 

The full details of the impact of these terminations will be disclosed in the company’s future continuous disclosure filings, including its 2025 management information circular, ensuring that stakeholders are kept fully informed.

The coming months will be critical for Nickel 28 as it seeks to maintain its operational integrity and market position amidst these internal challenges. With a renewed leadership team at the helm, the company aims to navigate through these turbulent waters, reaffirming its commitment to best practices and shareholder value.

The post Nickel 28 Capital Ousts CEO Anthony Milewski and President Justin Cochrane in Leadership Purge Over Misconduct appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Multi-Billion Dollar U.S. Clean Energy Tax Credits Are Here

/in /by

President Joe Biden’s signature climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), has sparked a multibillion-dollar market for clean energy tax credits within a short span of time. This surge in activity is driven by a provision in the IRA that allows project developers and manufacturers to directly sell their credits for cash, thereby facilitating the “transferability” of tax breaks. 

Guidance from the US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service confirmed that this provision covers 11 types of tax credits.

Revolutionizing Clean Energy Financing

Previously, developers had to navigate more restrictive and complex tax equity deals, which limited their access to capital from a relatively small pool of investors, mainly large financial institutions. The IRA has changed this landscape, freeing up capital for deployment at a faster pace.

Frank Burkhartsmeyer, CFO of battery storage developer GridStor LLC, noted that the IRA has accelerated the energy storage industry’s ability to deliver cost-competitive zero-emission capacity. This is particularly true in areas where renewables have outpaced capacity market growth.

GridStor recently announced its first tax credit sale to JPMorgan Chase & Co. to support its California Goleta Battery Storage Project. The transaction exemplifies a broader trend of record solar PV and battery storage installations in the US. This is driven by the IRA’s impact on clean power financing.

RELEVANT: US Energy Storage Rises 59% Amidst the Era of EVs and Lithium

The IRA has particularly boosted the battery storage business by providing new investment tax incentives and offering an alternative to traditional tax equity financing structures. Now, developers have the option to sell tax credits for cash, attracting more corporate taxpayers to support various projects.

Market participants and analysts emphasize that the IRA has diversified the pool of potential investors. This leads to more competitive pricing and attractive financing structures for financial giants like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America. 

Arevon Energy Inc. President and CEO Kevin Smith highlighted the importance of a robust tax credit transferability market to meet the needs of the renewable energy industry, noting that:

“There’s no question that in order for the financial markets to meet the requirements of the growing renewable energy industry, it’s going to take a robust tax credit transferability market…That means we need other players entering into the market, and we are seeing other players entering in.”

Arevon recently secured financing for its Condor Battery Storage Project in California with $350 million. This comes along with commitments from Stifel Financial Corp. to purchase investment tax credits. 

Unleashing the Potential of Clean Energy Tax Credits

The tax credit transfer market saw a significant surge in activity in 2023, reaching an estimated $7 billion to $9 billion, according to Crux Climate Inc. This momentum is expected to continue, with Crux CEO Alfred Johnson anticipating the market to double in size in 2024. 

Crux has witnessed substantial interest, with nearly $9 billion in tax credits available for sale on its platform. Buyers are submitting around $1.5 billion in bids in the first quarter of 2024, primarily targeting renewable energy and battery storage projects.

RELEVANT: US Corporations Ramp Up Renewable Energy, Amazon Leads the Pack

The surging renewables and battery storage markets will fuel the growth of the clean energy tax credits market. Some analysts believe that this financial mechanism is more effective than carbon pricing. 

That’s because a carbon price, though generating revenue for the government, results in the highest electricity prices. In contrast, energy costs are lesser in clean energy tax credits market. 

For instance, a study conducted on a clean energy tax revealed that its benefits are 4x higher than its costs. The chart shows the cost and benefits of the “Build Back Better” policy. 

Moreover, the authors found that on a cost per tonne of CO2, the tax incentives tend to bring higher emission reductions than other climate policies available. 

Scaling Up for the Clean Energy Future

Johnson from Crux emphasized the need for the clean energy tax credit market to scale up considerably to meet future demand, aiming for a $50 billion market by the end of the decade. This expansion requires increased participation, efficiency, and standardization across the market.

Diversifying the pool of tax credit buyers, including large banks, smaller financial services firms, and companies from various industries such as industrial, energy, retail, and technology, can help mitigate economic uncertainties and regulatory challenges. By broadening the participation base, the market becomes more resilient to shocks affecting specific sectors.

Reunion Infrastructure Inc., another marketplace for tax credit transfers, has also experienced significant growth, with over $6 billion in credits available for sale on its platform. CEO Andy Moon projected the market to exceed $80 billion by 2030, indicating robust long-term growth potential.

The market’s rapid expansion is evident from various industry estimates, with projections ranging from $4 billion – $9 billion in 2023. S&P Global Commodity Insights executive emphasized the market’s extraordinary growth rate, despite being fundamentally unproven. 

This growth trajectory underscores the market’s potential to become a significant player in clean energy financing. As more deals are completed and more buyers enter the market, the transfer credit market would become increasingly robust and will play a pivotal role in accelerating the transition to a sustainable energy future.

The post Multi-Billion Dollar U.S. Clean Energy Tax Credits Are Here appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Data Centers Power Demand Fuel U.S. Utility Q1 Earnings Discussions

/in /by

US utility analysts anticipate that discussions on first-quarter 2024 earnings calls will continue to be driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and data center power demand. Analysts highlighted data centers as a key theme, expecting talks on various aspects surrounding it. 

Data Centers Powering Up Utility Investor Excitement

Data centers are power-hungry and their exploding energy needs create ripple effects on the power sector. The International Energy Agency estimates that power use in data centers will increase from 200 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2022 to 1,050 TWh in 2026, the same energy demand as Germany.

The company serving the largest data center market in the world, Dominion Energy Inc., currently focuses on building the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project, the nation’s largest once operational. The company has proposed delaying fossil fuel retirements and adding gas capacity due to anticipated growth in its service areas. 

Dominion has also outlined a $43.2 billion capital plan for 2025–2029 following a 16-month business review.

Another analyst at Scotia Capital (USA), Andrew Weisel, noted that data centers’ robust demand for continuous power generates excitement among utility investors. However, questions remain about how customers will pay for increased capital expenditure (capex) and how companies will raise capital. These concerns arise from stubbornly high interest rates. 

While Scotia Capital lowered target prices across the US utility sector due to rising interest rates, analysts expect companies to stick to their 2024 and long-term financial forecasts. Moreover, experts emphasized that utilities are generally in a good financial position and are likely to reaffirm their growth plans.

NextEra Energy Inc., the largest electric utility based on market cap, reported first-quarter 2024 adjusted earnings that surpassed expectations and reaffirmed its 6% to 8% long-term earnings per share (EPS) growth rate. The company expects adjusted EPS of $3.23 to $3.43 for 2024, followed by adjusted earnings of $3.45 to $3.70 per share for 2025 and $3.63 to $4.00 for 2026.

Analysts at BMO Capital Markets noted that the improvement in forward power prices has outpaced the movement in regional gas hub pricing. This indicates tightening conditions in the power market and validating investors’ optimistic outlook on the sector. 

BMO expects Constellation, NRG Energy, and Vistra Corp. to experience a 33% increase in EPS compared to the previous year. Additionally, NextEra Energy, with nearly 60 GW of renewable generation capacity, could benefit from the increasing electricity needs of data centers.

Capitalizing on AI Boom and Surging Energy Demand

Among independent power producers, analysts anticipate a significant focus on strategies to capitalize on the growing demand for AI. This follows Talen Energy Corp.’s affiliate Cumulus Growth Holdings LLC’s sale of a hyperscale data center campus in Pennsylvania to Amazon Web Services Inc. for $650 million.

The facility boasts a capacity of up to 960 MW for data centers and will be powered by Talen’s 2,494-MW Susquehanna Nuclear power plant in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. 

Recent reports from Morgan Stanley suggest that similar deals could emerge, highlighting the potential for merchant nuclear power plants to provide on-site generation for tech companies constructing data centers in the US. The reports identify generation assets totaling nearly 22 gigawatts (GW) as well-positioned to take advantage of this trend.

RELEVANT: Could Merchant Nuclear Plants be the Savior of Power-Hungry Data Centers?

The reports also projected that AI power demand causing massive growth of data centers will rise to an annual average of 70% through 2027. Thus, electric utilities, particularly the regulated ones would invest in renewable energy and storage initiatives to cope with the demand. 

In fact, renewable energy developers secured contracts for at least 4,012.6 MW of capacity in the 12 months. Tech companies will use them to power US data centers partially or entirely, per S&P Global Commodity Insights data.

Lagging Behind the Quick Pace 

While some utilities are racing to power data centers, some may not be quick enough to keep pace. 

Rudy Garza, CEO of CPS Energy, highlights the urgency of meeting the massive power demands of these facilities, which often require hundreds of megawatts of electricity in short timeframes, unlike traditional industrial plants with longer lead times. 

This immediate need for power presents a formidable challenge for utilities striving to keep pace with the relentless growth of data-driven industries.

Philip Nevels of AES Corp. echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the monumental task of accommodating the anticipated surge in capacity needs driven by AI and data centers. Nevels further acknowledges the inherent limitations in scaling up renewables fast enough to meet the escalating demand. 

RELEVANT: America to See a Surge in Renewable Capacity in 2024

Meanwhile, Kevin Chandra of Austin Energy underscores the importance of collaborative planning to address the spatial distribution of data center loads effectively. Shaun Hoyte of Consolidated Edison Inc. emphasizes the critical role of redundancy and resiliency in grid planning to mitigate potential disruptions caused by the increasing concentration of data centers. 

Sunny Elebua of Exelon Corp. acknowledges the benefits of load growth in advancing decarbonization efforts and optimizing grid utilization. However, Elebua also highlights the challenges posed by the retirement of baseload generation and the evolving supply stack, emphasizing the importance of ensuring resource adequacy amidst these transitions.

In navigating these complexities, utilities recognize the need for state-level support to streamline regulatory processes and facilitate the rapid deployment of energy infrastructure to meet data center demands. 

In summary, the proliferation of AI and data centers is reshaping the energy landscape, presenting both opportunities and challenges for utilities worldwide. As the demand for data-driven services continues to escalate, proactive collaboration, strategic planning, and innovative solutions are essential to ensure a resilient and sustainable energy future.

The post Data Centers Power Demand Fuel U.S. Utility Q1 Earnings Discussions appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Green Star Royalties Invests $5.6M In NativState LLC for Carbon Offset Portfolio

/in /by

Green Star Royalties, the world’s first carbon credit royalty and streaming company boasts funding top-notch North American nature-based climate solutions. It’s a joint venture between Star Royalties Ltd. Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, and Cenovus Energy Inc. 

In a recent announcement, Star Royalties, via its partner Green Star, signed a “definitive royalty agreement” with NativState LLC to acquire several gross revenue royalties on a carbon offset-issuing portfolio of Improved Forest Management (IFM) projects in the southeastern United States. 

NativState, an Arkansas-based forest carbon project developer, offers small to medium landowners an opportunity to realize the full carbon potential of their forests. They aggregate them into IFM projects registered under the American Carbon Registry (ACR).

Green Star’s Royalty Portfolio: Unlocking the Investment Plan

Green Star expects the royalties to generate high-quality voluntary carbon offsets over 20 years. The total payment of $5.6 million will be made in several installments in U.S. dollars unless specified otherwise. 

The key strategies of the investment plan defined by Green Star are:

1. Expanding Green Star’s North American nature-based portfolio:

Acquiring the Royalties on NativState’s IFM projects enhances and broadens Green Star’s existing portfolio of North American nature-based carbon offset solutions.

2. First carbon offset-issuing royalty for Green Star

Green Star’s first carbon offset-issuing investment, Project ACR 783 in Arkansas, is projected to deliver around 180,000 carbon offsets in 2024. It includes approximately 120,000 carbon offsets upon closing. Green Star anticipates that about 75% of its share of carbon offsets from the Royalties will occur within the first five years.

3. Aligned and defensive royalty structure

Green Star and NativState have established defensive mechanisms, including minimum carbon credit volumes to be delivered throughout the 20-year royalty term.

4. Multiple Royalties with strong investment metrics

The Royalties encompass a 20% Royalty on Project ACR 783 and a 10% Royalty on an additional 60,000 acres across Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Missouri, slated for development by NativState and registration as future ACR projects. At prevailing carbon offset prices, the Royalties are anticipated to yield significant net present value accretion and offer an attractive payback period.

5. Stable and rising demand for premium North American carbon offsets

Premium North American nature-based carbon offsets are witnessing increasing demand amidst limited supply. Current market pricing for these premium avoidance and removal carbon offsets are approximately $13-15/t CO2e and over $20/t CO2e, respectively.

6. Partnership with a rapidly growing carbon developer

NativState, managing over 300,000 acres, aims to become the largest U.S. aggregator of small-to-medium forest landowners. Green Star is pleased to forge a long-term partnership with NativState, financing American forest landowners eager to engage in both IFM practices and voluntary carbon markets.

Transaction Terms and Impact on Green Star’s Carbon Offset and Revenue Profiles

The transaction immediately provides Green Star with carbon offsets that can be monetized. Over the next 20 years, they’ll keep getting more offsets, with about 75% of them coming in the first five years. 

source: Green Star Royalties

However, the transaction terms and conditions are significant for the financial gains of both parties. They include: 

Green Star will acquire the Royalties for $5.6 million, with payments made in installments tied to ACR registration milestones.
In return for its investment, Green Star will receive a 20% Royalty on Project ACR 783 and a 10% Royalty on an additional 60,000 acres, slated for enrollment by NativState as ACR projects.
Each Royalty will span a 20-year term starting from the first carbon offset issuance date of the ACR project.
Carbon offsets will serve as the direct payment method for the Royalties.
Green Star and NativState have agreed to defensive mechanisms, including minimum carbon offset delivery requirements over the 20-year royalty period.

Enhancing Carbon Sequestration through Improved Forest Management (IFM)

Improved forest management encompasses methods that either reduce emissions from forests or enhance carbon removal and storage. Techniques such as decreasing harvest volumes, extending forest rotations, etc. lower emissions from forests. They generate credits for the curbed emissions. 

The conservation plans also elevate carbon storage above the baseline, guaranteeing excellent carbon sequestration.

From an economic perspective, 

These projects achieve increased net carbon stocks by either sequestering carbon through photosynthesis from expanded or maintained forest cover compared to the baseline or by curbing greenhouse gas emissions through reduced timber harvesting.
Acceptable IFM practices, like extending rotations, implementing thinning, adopting fire prevention methods, and altering harvesting techniques, must comply with the selected carbon registry methodology.

CarbonDirect reports,

“Improved forest management has the potential to increase total stored carbon annually by 200 million to 2.1 billion tonnes without compromising the wood product and ecosystem benefits that come with managed forestlands.”

 In the United States, timber harvesting is the most widespread disruption across forested areas, with most of the harvested timber sourced from private lands. Therefore, significant decisions about forest and land management can profoundly impact the capacity of forests to sequester carbon.

Presently, “premium avoidance carbon offsets” in the U.S. market are valued at about $13 to $15 per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent (t CO2e), while removal carbon offsets fetch over $20 per t CO2e.

Carbon Offsets and Habitat Protection: The Mission of Project ACR 783

Project ACR 783, also known as the S&J Taylor Forest Carbon Project spreads across 18,000 acres of sustainably managed forestland in Southcentral Arkansas. 

Forest project: work in progress

source: NativState

Green Star holding a 20% Royalty stake in Project ACR 783, is anticipating to produce ~ 1.5 million carbon offsets over the next two decades. 

Notably, Project ACR 783 focuses on maintaining forest carbon stocks through certified and sustainable management practices to achieve significant carbon sequestration in the designated areas. 

With its partner NativState, they are aiming to generate sustainable revenue streams through forest management and voluntary carbon markets (VCMs). The latter dedicates itself to conserving valuable hardwoods such as oak, gum, cypress, hickory, and pine forests within the Gulf Coastal Plain eco-region.

Besides carbon revenues, Project ACR 783 will also promote:

Landscape stability
Increased biodiversity, and 
Enhanced habitat protection for critical species

Alex Pernin, CEO of Star Royalties, has highly applauded NativState’s approach to the sustainable business model and its carbon offset issuance profile. He noted, 

“We are proud to announce this multi-royalty investment in NativState’s portfolio of high-integrity IFM projects in the southeastern United States. This thoughtful transaction transitions Green Star into free cash flow generation and provides desirable economic returns while expanding and diversifying our existing premium North American portfolio.”

FURTHER READING: US Department of Agriculture to Invest $300M to Boost Carbon Data in Agriculture and Forestry (carboncredits.com)

The post Green Star Royalties Invests $5.6M In NativState LLC for Carbon Offset Portfolio appeared first on Carbon Credits.