On April 29, 2025, Mark Carney led Canada’s Liberal Party to a narrow electoral victory, securing a fourth consecutive term for the party. Carney, a former central banker and UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance, now leads Canada’s climate policy. 

Carney is now tasked with an urgent balancing act: easing economic pressures while advancing ambitious climate goals — at a time when both inflation and demand for climate action are rising.

Reforming Carbon Pricing: From Consumer Tax to Industrial Focus

One of Carney’s first actions as Prime Minister was to scrap the consumer carbon tax. This tax, introduced in 2019, grew unpopular as living costs rose. The tax, which was set to reach $170 per tonne by 2030, was repealed in an effort to alleviate financial burdens on households.

After its removal, gasoline prices in Canada fell sharply. Average gasoline prices dropped by 8–12 cents per liter nationwide. Some provinces saw drops of more than 10 cents per liter. Many Canadians welcomed this immediate relief. This was especially true in areas where energy costs make up a large part of household expenses.

• READ MORE: Carney Scraps Carbon Tax—Can Canada Reduce Emissions Without It?

Carney suggests replacing the consumer tax. He wants to encourage greener choices for consumers and improve carbon pricing for industries. This plan maintains output-based pricing for big polluters. It also adds subsidies for electric vehicles and home upgrades.

The output-based pricing system (OBPS) aims to hold high-emission industries accountable. It also gives flexibility to sectors that face international competition or are trade-exposed.

It uses the same carbon price as the old consumer tax — $65 per tonne of CO₂ now, rising to $170 per tonne by 2030. Instead of charging companies for every tonne of emissions, the government sets performance targets based on how much pollution is normal for their industry.

If a company pollutes more than its target, it must buy carbon credits or pay the carbon price. If it pollutes less, it earns credits that it can sell. This system lets industries avoid paying the full carbon price on all their emissions, but still pushes them to be more efficient.

The government is targeting industrial emitters. This plan focuses on the biggest sources of greenhouse gases. It also reduces the financial burden on everyday Canadians.

Carney’s plan also includes robust support for green technology adoption. Subsidies for electric vehicles help speed up the shift to cleaner transport. Incentives for home retrofits promote energy efficiency and reduce emissions in homes. These efforts include public awareness campaigns. They aim to help Canadians make smart choices about energy use and their carbon footprint.

Carney’s shift to industrial carbon pricing is complemented by a new international trade tool — the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

Introducing the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism 

Carney wants to tackle carbon leakage and stay competitive, and thus, he plans to implement the CBAM. This policy would set tariffs on imports from countries with weaker carbon rules. Thus, it encourages global emission cuts and helps protect local industries.

The CBAM helps Canadian manufacturers compete better. Without it, they may have higher costs from local climate policies than their international rivals.

The introduction of the CBAM marks a significant shift in Canada’s approach to climate policy. Carney’s government wants to align trade policy with climate goals. This way, it can encourage other countries to improve their carbon rules. This approach shows global trends. The European Union and other regions are moving toward similar systems.

However, implementing the CBAM needs careful coordination with trading partners. It must also follow World Trade Organization rules to prevent disputes.

Balancing Energy Development and Environmental Goals

Carney envisions Canada as a leader in both clean and conventional energy sectors. His administration wants to create a national energy corridor to help share energy resources across the country. It will also cut dependence on the United States and boost energy security.

The new corridor will help move electricity, oil, and natural gas more efficiently. This way, provinces can share resources and take advantage of their strengths in energy production.

While promoting clean energy investments, Carney also acknowledges the role of traditional energy sources in Canada’s economy. Oil and gas are key to GDP and jobs, especially in Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Carney stresses the need to work together with provinces, territories, and Indigenous communities. This teamwork is key for energy projects that support both environmental and economic goals. This involves helping to build renewable energy systems like wind and solar. It also ensures that current industries can shift to lower-carbon operations.

• RELATED: National Bank of Canada Targets $20 Billion in Renewable Energy Lending by 2030

The government’s approach is practical. It knows that quickly moving away from fossil fuels might hurt the economy. Instead, Carney advocates for a gradual transition, supported by investment in innovation and skills development to prepare workers for the jobs of the future. 

The Global Stage Awaits — Can Canada Deliver?

Although Canada accounts for roughly 1.5% of global emissions, its advanced economy and resource wealth position it as a key player in shaping international climate policy.

Carney has extensive experience in global finance and climate advocacy. This enables him to play a significant role in international climate discussions. As a former Governor of the Bank of England and the Bank of Canada, he brings credibility and expertise to the global stage.

Canada will play a bigger role in groups like the UNFCCC and the G7. It will push for teamwork on carbon pricing, sustainable finance, and climate adaptation.

However, Carney faces challenges at home. He must work with a minority government and tackle regional gaps in support for climate policies. Provinces that depend on fossil fuels might oppose federal plans. This means they need to negotiate carefully and design policies that help everyone meet emission reduction goals.

Canada has promised to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 40–45% below 2005 levels by 2030 as part of the Paris Agreement. The country also aims to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. 

The Canadian Climate Institute estimated that the carbon tax would have helped lower emissions by 8–9% by 2030. The carbon tax applies to emissions from transportation and buildings. On the other hand, the industrial carbon pricing systems could cut around 20-48% of emissions by 2030, as shown below.

Even though the tax on consumers is gone, government rebates for electric vehicles and home upgrades will still help reduce emissions in these areas. Without the tax, Canada will need new policies to stay on track, and Carney’s administration will be on it. 

Carney’s Climate Balancing Act

Public opinion remains divided. Some Canadians prioritize economic growth and energy affordability; others demand more ambitious climate action.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s challenge will be to bridge these divides. He needs to show that environmental responsibility and economic prosperity can go hand in hand.

Carney’s climate strategy reflects a pragmatic approach: balancing the need for economic stability with environmental responsibility. Carney wants to shift Canada from consumer-based carbon pricing to industrial regulation and international methods like the CBAM. This change aims to make the country a strong and innovative leader in global climate efforts.

As Canada works to reach its climate goals, the world will be watching. If successful, Carney’s balanced approach could offer a model for nations seeking both economic resilience and climate leadership.

• FURTHER READING: Canada’s $16.5 Billion Bet on Carbon Capture: Could It Cut Oil Sands Emissions?

The post Mark Carney’s Climate Strategy: Balancing Carbon Policy, Trade, and Energy Security appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Coca-Cola reported strong profits, while PepsiCo faced higher costs and slower growth. But beyond earnings, their updates on carbon emissions, water use, and plastic waste show how both companies are trying to balance business goals with environmental action.

Let’s study and find out which beverage giant is making faster progress on revenue and, more importantly, sustainability.

Coca-Cola Q1 2025: Strong Profits, Even as Sales Dip

Coca-Cola sold 2% more drinks in the first quarter of 2025, thanks to strong demand in India, China, and Brazil. While overall revenue dropped 2% to $11.1 billion, mainly due to currency changes and the shifting of some bottling operations.

Coke’s core business stayed strong. Organic revenue (which removes the impact of currency changes and one-time events) grew 6%, helped by higher prices and a small rise in concentrate sales.

Big Jump in Profit and Margins

Profit rose 71% this quarter, thanks to solid sales, better cost control, and smart timing on marketing. Coca-Cola’s profit margin jumped to 32.9%, up from 18.9% last year. Adjusted margins (non-GAAP) were even better at 33.8%. Earnings per share rose 5% to $0.77, even after being hit by currency losses. Adjusted earnings came in at $0.73, up 1%.

Coke Zero and Sparkling Drinks Lead the Way

Coke Zero Sugar saw big success, with a 14% jump in sales. Sparkling drinks like Coca-Cola and Fanta grew by 2%. Water, tea, and juice drinks also saw slight increases. Overall, Coca-Cola gained more market share in ready-to-drink beverages around the world.

Mixed Results Across Regions

• Europe, Middle East & Africa: Sales rose 3%, and profits held strong despite currency pressure.
• Latin America: Sales were flat, but smart pricing helped boost profits.
• North America: Sales dropped 3%, but profits grew thanks to higher prices.
• Asia Pacific: Sales rose 6%, with strong growth across all drink types.
• Bottling Operations: Volume fell 17% as Coca-Cola shifted bottling to partners. This lowered profits.

However, Coca-Cola’s free cash flow was down $5.5 billion. But this was mostly due to a large $6.1 billion payment related to its Fairlife deal. Without that, cash flow was still positive at $558 million.

Coca-Cola’s GHG Emissions in 2023: A Quick Look

• In 2023, Coca-Cola’s total manufacturing emissions were 5.62 million metric tons using the location-based method and 4.95 million metric tons using the market-based method.

Emissions directly from factories stayed the same at 1.61 million metric tons. Indirect emissions from electricity use increased slightly to 4.01 million metric tons (location-based) and 3.34 million metric tons (market-based).

However, carbon emissions per liter of product rose to 28.31 grams. Under CDP reporting, total emissions reached 5.62 million metric tons, with most coming from franchise operations.

Improved Water Efficiency

Water management is a key part of Coca-Cola’s sustainability efforts. Since 2015, the company has consistently replaced more water than it uses in its drinks. In 2023, it stayed committed to this goal by aiming to replenish over 100% of the water used in its finished products globally.

• Compared to 2022, Coca-Cola improved its water use efficiency in 2023. It used 1.78 liters of water per liter of product, slightly better than the 1.79 liters used the year before.

Meanwhile, total water withdrawal went up a bit, reaching 311,998 megaliters. Water consumption also increased to 194,853 megaliters.

Focus on Water-Stress Regions 

Importantly, 28% of the water was used in high water-stress areas signifies the need for efficient water management. On the positive side, wastewater discharge dropped to 117,124 megaliters, showing better control and treatment of wastewater.

Additionally, Coca-Cola expanded its focus on water in high-risk locations. Previously, the goal was to replenish 100% of the water used in 175 high-risk sites by 2030.

Now, the target encompasses all high-risk locations, i.e., more than 200 sites by 2035. This broader commitment reflects the company’s growing emphasis on supporting local ecosystems and communities where water resources are under stress.

• SEE MORE: The Bottled Truth: Coca-Cola’s New 2035 Environmental Goals Face Sustainability Backlash

PepsiCo Q1 2025: Mixed Performance in a Tough Market

PepsiCo released its Q1 2025 results on April 24, showing mixed performance due to slow demand and higher global costs. Still, international sales provided a boost.

Net revenue fell by 1.8% to $17.92 billion, but still came in above analyst estimates. Organic revenue grew by 1.2%, with strong international performance helping balance weaker North American sales.

Profit Drops Amid Cost Pressures

Core earnings per share (EPS) dropped to $1.48, slightly below forecasts. Net income was $1.83 billion, down from $2.05 billion in Q1 2024. Rising supply chain costs and new tariffs impacted profitability.

North America Slows, International Gains

Pepsi Zero Sugar and Gatorade helped beverage sales in North America grow by 1%. However, food sales dropped, especially in Frito-Lay. International business saw strong demand in countries like India, Brazil, and Egypt.

PepsiCo now expects flat earnings growth for the rest of 2025 due to inflation and global uncertainty. Earlier, it had forecasted mid-single-digit growth.

This year, the company plans to focus on affordable products, expand globally, invest in new snacks and drinks, and cut costs to manage inflation.

• SEE MORE: Nestlé Unveils New Initiatives to Cut Cocoa Supply Emissions

PepsiCo’s 2023 ESG Progress: Big Wins in Farming, Emissions, Water, and Packaging

In 2023, PepsiCo made strong progress on its environmental goals. The company focused on farming, clean energy, water savings, and cutting plastic waste. While it faced some challenges, it stayed on track toward its long-term targets.

Boosting Regenerative Farming

PepsiCo doubled its regenerative farming land. It grew from 900,000 acres in 2022 to 1.8 million acres in 2023. The company also beat its water-use goal. It improved water efficiency by 22% — far above its 15% target.

In 2023, 58% of key ingredients came from sustainable sources. Since 2021, PepsiCo has supported over 57,000 farmers and workers. It offered training and programs to help women and build local economies.

PepsiCo also met its water protection goals in high-risk areas two years early. Now, it will focus on broader water efforts instead of tracking this specific goal.

Cutting Emissions and Using Clean Energy

PepsiCo plans to hit net-zero emissions by 2040. It also aims to cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 75% and Scope 3 emissions by 40% by 2030 (from 2015 levels).

• In 2023, total GHG emissions (Scopes 1, 2, and 3) were ~58 million metric tons. It dropped 4% from 2015 and 5% from 2022.

Direct emissions (from PepsiCo’s operations) fell by 33%. Scope 3 emissions (from suppliers and others) dropped only 1%.

To help lower emissions, PepsiCo added more electric vehicles. These EVs covered over 3 million zero-emission miles in 2023. The company also used more renewable biogas from food waste, like potato peels.

Saving and Replenishing Water

Water remains a top focus for PepsiCo. In 2023, it improved water-use efficiency by 25% at high-risk sites. This means it achieved its target 2 years early.

The company gave back about 69% of the water it used in water-stressed areas. This added up to over 12 billion liters. Also, the number of PepsiCo plants meeting top water standards rose from 8 to 27 in just one year.

• In Spain, PepsiCo restored 70 million liters of water near its Alvalle plant by replacing invasive plants with native trees.

Reducing Plastic and Promoting Reuse

PepsiCo continued to cut plastic waste. In 2023, 10% of its drinks were sold in reusable packages. It also became the first brand in North America to replace plastic rings on multipacks with paper-based ones.

The company used 10% recycled plastic in its packaging. Its 2030 goal is 50%. Over 30 countries now sell PepsiCo drinks in 100% recycled PET bottles (except caps and labels).

PepsiCo cut virgin plastic use per serving by 1% in 2020. Overall, virgin plastic use was 6% higher than in 2020 — a smaller increase than the 11% in 2022.

• By the end of 2023, 89% of PepsiCo’s packaging was designed to be recyclable, compostable, biodegradable, or reusable (RCBR).
• It now expects 98% to be RCBR by 2025, and 92% of it will likely be recycled in real life.

That falls short of the 100% goal, but the company is pushing forward with new ideas and partnerships.

Coca-Cola Vs PepsiCo: Who’s Winning The Sustainability Game? 

In summary, PepsiCo’s reported emissions are much higher than Coca-Cola’s manufacturing-only figures due to broader reporting boundaries. Both companies have made progress versus their 2015 baselines, but PepsiCo achieved a year-over-year reduction in 2023, while Coca-Cola’s manufacturing emissions rose slightly.

• FURTHER READING: Starbucks Rakes in $1.9B International Revenue Amid Sales Dip: But how is its Sustainability Brewing Up? 

The post Coca-Cola vs PepsiCo 2025: Who’s Leading on Profits—and Planet Goals? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The Dutch government has committed $726 million (639 million euros) to the Aramis carbon capture and storage (CCS) project, the largest of its kind in the Netherlands. This major investment comes after energy companies Shell and TotalEnergies decided to reduce their financial support for part of the project.

Shell and TotalEnergies had originally planned to help fund the construction of a large pipeline system. This pipeline would connect factories and industrial areas to underground storage sites in the North Sea.

However, both companies have now chosen to focus only on developing the carbon storage sites and offering carbon storage services. They pulled out of investing in the pipeline infrastructure.

Without government help, Aramis’s future was uncertain. In response, the government stepped in to cover the risk and keep the project moving forward. Climate Minister Sophie Hermans said that the decision would help ensure that the country could still meet its climate goals, saying:

“This takes away a large part of the risk in the project.”

How Aramis Will Trap Carbon and Cut Emissions

The Aramis project is designed to capture carbon dioxide (CO₂) from industries and transport it to underground storage locations. These sites are in empty gas fields deep under the North Sea. Once stored, the CO₂ will stay underground permanently, preventing it from entering the atmosphere and contributing to climate change.

Aramis plans to transport up to 22 million tonnes of CO₂ every year. The system will be open-access, meaning many different industrial companies can use it. The goal is for construction to finish by 2030, after a final investment decision in 2026.

The pipeline is a central part of the Netherlands’ plan to reduce its carbon emissions. The country wants to cut emissions by 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. 

Although emissions were 37% lower than 1990 levels as of 2024, government experts warn that current policies are not strong enough to meet the 2030 target. Projects like Aramis are seen as essential to closing that gap.

By capturing and storing carbon from hard-to-decarbonize sectors like cement, chemicals, and steel, Aramis will help industries reduce their impact without shutting down operations.

Shell and TotalEnergies Shift Gears: What It Means

Shell and TotalEnergies’ decision to back away from the pipeline part of Aramis reflects a larger shift happening among European energy companies. In recent years, many companies have set ambitious climate goals and promised large investments in renewable energy. 

However, competition from American oil and gas companies, who stayed focused on fossil fuels, has made it harder for European firms to keep up financially.

Now, some European energy giants are slowing down their clean energy plans to focus again on their core oil and gas businesses. Shell, for example, announced in 2023 that it would focus more on delivering value to shareholders and less on expanding renewable energy investments.

• RELATED: Shell and Microsoft Are The Biggest Carbon Credit Buyers in 2024: What Projects Do They Support?

Despite reducing their funding, Shell and TotalEnergies are still involved in Aramis. They will work with Gasunie and Energie Beheer Nederland (EBN) to develop two offshore CO₂ storage sites. They also plan to offer carbon storage and transport services once the system is built.

With Shell and TotalEnergies pulling back on pipeline investment, state-owned EBN and gas grid operator Gasunie will take greater control of the Aramis infrastructure. They will jointly own and operate the pipeline system as a 50:50 partnership.

Building a Carbon Capture Superhighway

Aramis is not the only CCS project underway in the Netherlands. Several other infrastructure projects are linked to it, helping to build a broader carbon capture network.

One of these projects is CO₂next, a new terminal being built by Gasunie, Vopak, Shell, and TotalEnergies. Located in Rotterdam’s Maasvlakte area, the terminal will allow ships to bring in or ship out liquid CO₂. The CO₂next terminal will connect to the Aramis pipeline system, making it easier for industries not directly connected to the pipeline to use CCS services.

Another related project is the planned expansion of the Porthos compression station. This station will help compress CO₂ so that it can be safely pushed into storage sites under the sea.

In addition to these projects, the Dutch government announced a new €8 billion ($8.6 billion) package to support renewable energy, electric vehicles, and other sustainable technologies. Industries will also receive compensation to help deal with high energy prices, which can make the transition to cleaner energy harder.

Why CCS Matters More Than Ever

Carbon capture and storage is becoming an important tool in the global fight against climate change. Some industries, like cement and steel, are very hard to decarbonize.

Even with new technologies, they are likely to continue producing some emissions for years to come. CCS offers a way to deal with these emissions by capturing them before they enter the atmosphere.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 will require capturing more than 7.6 billion tonnes of CO₂ globally each year. Right now, global CCS capacity is much smaller — only about 50 million tonnes per year — so major expansion is needed.

As of 2024, the following is the global CCS project trend per McKenzie’s data.

Several European countries are investing heavily in CCS. Norway’s Longship project and the United Kingdom’s East Coast Cluster are examples of large CCS hubs being developed. The Netherlands hopes that by investing early, it can become a leader in carbon capture services for Europe.

• READ MORE: Shell, Equinor, and TotalEnergies Expand Northern Lights CCS with $714 Million Investment

By supporting Aramis, the Dutch government is not just working toward national climate goals. It is also protecting its industrial economy and creating new business opportunities for the future.

If it succeeds, the Aramis project could guide other countries. They can learn how to balance economic growth with climate action. It also boosts Europe’s efforts to use CCS technology. 

As the energy transition continues, partnerships between governments and businesses will be crucial. The Netherlands’ bold move to back the Aramis CCS project shows a clear commitment to finding practical solutions to the climate crisis — even as market dynamics shift and corporate strategies evolve.

• SEE MORE: What’s New in Verra’s Latest CCS Methodology Update? Find Out!

The post Netherlands Invests $726 Million in Aramis CCS as Shell and Total Shift Strategies appeared first on Carbon Credits.

According to BloombergNEF’s New Energy Outlook 2025, global energy-related CO₂ emissions likely peaked last year because of record growth in clean energy. They predict a a structural decline in emissions might now begin.

Let’s explore how new energy trends and policies are shaping a cleaner future.

Global Clean Energy Growth Outpaces Demand

BloombergNEF’s updated Economic Transition Scenario (ETS) shows a major shift. For the first time, clean energy additions outpaced the growth in energy demand. This could lead to a 9% drop in global energy emissions by 2030, deepening to 13% by 2035 and 22% by 2050 compared to the 2024 peak.

Solar, wind, and hydropower are driving three-quarters of the emission cuts. The rest comes from transportation electrification, fuel switching, and better energy efficiency. While clean energy demand is booming, fossil fuel demand is starting a slow but steady decline, expected to continue over the next 25 years.

Big Players: U.S., China, and Europe Behind the Change

Major economies like the United States, China, and Europe are leading the way. Countries under the Paris Agreement are preparing new climate targets for 2035, due by early 2025.

BloombergNEF notes that Australia, the EU, and South Korea would need to slash emissions by around 70% relative to earlier baselines to stay on track for a 1.5°C limit. Meanwhile, India can still grow its emissions by 27% and remain aligned with global goals.

Early movers include Brazil and the UK, both submitting 2035 targets that match net-zero ambitions. Japan’s targets fall somewhere between BloombergNEF’s base and net-zero scenarios.

Furthermore, emissions are expected to rise in Vietnam and Indonesia, while Africa and the Middle East may see emissions plateau rather than sharply decline.

• SEE MORE: Power Surge: Can Carbon Capture Keep Up with AI’s Energy Demand?

US Energy Transition Progress Amid Challenges

In the United States, energy-related emissions are forecasted to fall by 16% by 2035 and 29% by 2050 compared to 2024. Power sector emissions alone could decline by 22% by 2035.

However, sectors like road transportation are complicating the outlook. Rising travel and slower-than-expected EV adoption are pushing transport emissions higher. Meanwhile, oil refining and natural gas-fired electricity are expanding in some regions.

The clean energy buildout remains strong. US wind capacity is expected to double to 321 gigawatts by 2035, and solar could triple to 692 gigawatts.

Additionally, battery storage will grow from 29GW to 175GW. Even so, wind forecasts were cut by 15% due to higher costs and project delays, while solar and battery forecasts rose by 15% and 28%. This was the outcome of lower costs and policy incentives from the Inflation Reduction Act.

There are risks ahead. New tariffs on imported solar panels and batteries could slow adoption, potentially cutting future battery installations by 27% and solar by 7% by 2050 if policies are not carefully managed.

Data Centers Driving Massive New Demand

One of the newest challenges is the exploding electricity demand from data centers, fueled by AI, cloud computing, and crypto mining. Global electricity needs are projected to rise 75% by 2050 from 2022 levels.

By 2035, data centers could consume 1,200 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity annually, rising to 3,700 TWh by 2050, which will be nearly 9% of total global electricity demand. And meeting this surge will require around 362GW of new power capacity by 2035.

Although most of this will come from renewables, fossil fuels could still supply about 64% of data center power by 2035 unless policies shift significantly.

• MUST READ: Why Geothermal is the Hot Ticket to Low-Carbon Data Centers? 

Renewables and EVs Shaping the Future

Despite challenges like higher interest rates and rising costs, renewables and electric vehicles (EVs) are thriving. BloombergNEF projects that renewables will supply 67% of global electricity by 2050, up from 29% today. In contrast, fossil fuels’ share will shrink from 58% to just 25%.

Solar and wind alone will make up two-thirds of global electricity generation by 2050. In the transportation sector, annual EV sales are set to jump from 17.2 million in 2024 to 42 million by 2030.

• By 2050, two-thirds of the global passenger vehicle fleet will be electric, cutting oil demand for road transport by about 40%.

Fossil Fuels: Slow Decline Begins

Fossil fuels are not disappearing overnight but are clearly losing ground, even though the Trump government has a strong inclination towards them.

Oil demand is expected to peak around 2032 at 104 million barrels per day, before declining to 88 million barrels per day by 2050. Aviation and petrochemical sectors will drive most of the remaining oil consumption.

More significantly, coal use is forecasted to fall rapidly as it loses out to cheaper and cleaner alternatives. From now until 2035, global coal consumption drops by 25%. More precisely, it can decline by about 2% in 2025, mainly due to the drastic phasing out in China

Gas demand will stay relatively steady through 2050 but will eventually start falling as renewables expand.

This research shows that the surge in clean energy installations during 2024 may have triggered the first real, long-term decline in global emissions. Technologies like solar, wind, EVs, and improved energy efficiency are reshaping industries and creating real hope for a low-carbon future.

Challenges such as soaring data center demands, uneven sector transitions, and political uncertainty remain. However, with strong momentum behind clean energy and supportive policies, achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 is increasingly within reach. The green transition isn’t just coming, but it’s already here.

• SEE MORE: Is Trump’s Coal Comeback Derailing America’s Climate Commitments? 

The post Global Clean Energy Growth Surpasses Demand: Is Net-Zero 2050 Closer Than Ever? appeared first on Carbon Credits.