BP has indefinitely paused its carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in Indiana. The plan, aimed at making the state a hub for low-carbon hydrogen, faced strong local opposition. Public safety fears and economic uncertainties have slowed progress. This pause could delay clean energy investments and climate goals across the Midwest.

Why BP Shelved Its Indiana CCS and Blue Hydrogen Plan

BP intended to capture carbon dioxide emissions from its Whiting Refinery and store them underground. This process was crucial for producing blue hydrogen, a cleaner fuel created using fossil fuels paired with carbon capture. This effort was part of its involvement with the Midwest Alliance for Clean Hydrogen (MachH2), with the goal of building a regional hydrogen hub.

But the project hit a wall due to intense local resistance. BP cited several reasons for the pause: economic uncertainty, a slow hydrogen market in the Midwest, a lack of long-term federal support, and one of its main roadblocks—finding a safe site to store the captured carbon

Residents raised concerns about underground CO₂ leaks, water contamination, and long-term environmental risks. Past pipeline accidents in the region heightened these fears. Compounding the issue, Indiana laws allow potential liability to fall on taxpayers if storage sites fail, making investors nervous. As a result, BP shifted focus to its global low-carbon portfolio.

Local Resistance Derails BP’s Low-Carbon Push

Community opposition played a key role in BP’s decision. People living near the proposed storage site feared pipeline ruptures and threats to water, agriculture, and seismic safety. Many voiced a broader distrust of CCS projects, especially when developers fail to fully explain safety protocols.

Environmental justice advocates also challenged why high-risk industrial projects are often sited near low-income or rural communities. Without early and honest engagement, clean energy efforts are likely to stall, even when backed by solid science and funding.

Environmental Setbacks for Indiana and the Midwest Hydrogen Hub

The project would have captured millions of tons of carbon dioxide annually, helping the Whiting Refinery shrink its carbon footprint. This would have positioned Indiana as a key player in the $1 billion U.S. Department of Energy’s Midwest Hydrogen Hub.

However, with the project on pause, those emission reductions—and Indiana’s clean energy leadership—are on hold. The delay puts federal hydrogen funding at risk and could weaken confidence in regional CCS and hydrogen initiatives.

• READ MORE: Hydrogen in 2025: The Journey through Progress, Pitfalls, and Policy Shifts 

Future of BP’s Hydrogen Strategy Remains Unclear

BP believes hydrogen can play a crucial role in achieving a net-zero energy system. When used as a fuel, it reacts with oxygen to produce only water, without releasing any carbon dioxide.

If its production is fully decarbonized, hydrogen becomes an ideal energy solution for hard-to-abate sectors such as iron, steel, and chemical industries. It is also well-suited for heavy transport modes like trucks, ships, and aircraft, which require compact, high-energy fuels.

Even if BP remains committed to global low-carbon projects, Indiana’s setback casts doubt on how quickly blue hydrogen can scale in the U.S. The Whiting Refinery will now continue emitting CO₂ without a capture system, weakening the region’s contribution to federal hydrogen goals.

Going forward, federal agencies may tighten requirements around community engagement before funding new CCS or hydrogen infrastructure. Companies, too, may need to prioritize public education and transparency to gain local approval.

• READ MORE: The “Northern Lights” Shines: Shell, Equinor, and TotalEnergies JV Powers the Norway CCS Project

Is Carbon Capture Still a Viable Climate Solution?

BP’s project pause reveals how community pushback can disrupt billion-dollar energy plans. The U.S. government under Biden committed billions to boost hydrogen production and carbon storage. But without local support, these projects struggle to get off the ground.

States like Texas and Louisiana are advancing more smoothly because of clear legal frameworks and stronger public outreach. They may become CCS leaders while regions with legal uncertainty and public skepticism fall behind. Investors are also wary of sudden shifts in strategy, adding to market instability.

Despite setbacks, the carbon capture and storage market is projected to grow.

• According to DNV’s 2025 Energy Transition Outlook: CCS to 2050 report, cumulative global investment in CCS could reach $80 billion over the next five years, or by 2030. This represents 270 million tons of carbon dioxide captured (MtCO2) each year.

Wood Mackenzie estimates the U.S. CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and storage) sector could offer a $196 billion investment opportunity over the next 10 years. This is especially true for the oil, gas, chemical, and power industries.

But Indiana’s experience is a cautionary tale. Legal uncertainties and weak community trust can stop even well-funded, scientifically sound projects. Meanwhile, the blue hydrogen market faces growing competition from green hydrogen, which doesn’t rely on fossil fuels or underground storage.

The pause of BP’s Indiana carbon capture project underscores a critical reality—technical innovation and funding aren’t enough. For carbon capture and hydrogen projects to succeed, companies must build community trust, ensure safety, and operate within clear legal boundaries. Until then, the clean energy transition will remain vulnerable to delays, just when the fight against climate change demands urgency.

• SEE MORE: Global Investment in CCS Surges Toward $80 Billion as Climate Goals Drive Demand 

The post BP Halts Indiana Carbon Capture Project Amid Safety and Economic Concerns appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Amazon is ramping up its net-zero commitment and reducing carbon emissions from its logistics operations by increasing its use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). The e-commerce giant just announced it will buy over 9 million liters, or about 7,500 metric tons, of SAF. This will come from Finnish producer Neste.

The fuel will power Amazon Air cargo flights until 2025. This volume will aid cargo operations at two key California airports: San Francisco International and Ontario International.

This move follows Amazon’s previous SAF investments, including more than 6 million liters used in 2023. Since then, the company has been increasing its SAF purchases, aiming to make air freight more sustainable.

What’s Sustainable Aviation Fuel? The Science of Cleaner Jet Fuel

Air freight has a history of high emissions. Amazon’s choice to work with Neste, a top renewable fuel producer, shows how private firms are speeding up climate action in supply chains. And SAF shows a promising solution.

Sustainable aviation fuel is a renewable alternative to conventional fossil-based jet fuel. SAF can come from many sources. These include used cooking oils, agricultural waste, municipal solid waste, and woody biomass.

Renewable sources can cut aviation fuel’s lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80% compared to traditional jet fuel. SAF meets aviation standards – it can blend with fossil fuels, so no engine modifications are needed.

Despite these benefits, SAF still represents only a small fraction of total jet fuel consumption worldwide. In 2024, it accounted for just 0.3% of global aviation fuel use, according to estimates from the International Air Transport Association (IATA).

Yet, the push to scale up SAF production is gaining momentum. Amazon’s investment in SAF helps meet its net zero and climate goals. It also supports the wider push to reduce carbon emissions in aviation.

Carl Nyberg, Senior Vice President, Commercial, Renewable Products at Neste, remarked:

“We are excited to provide SAF to Amazon Air at two major airports in California… This milestone sends a positive signal that SAF is available to airlines and cargo operators, like Amazon Air at these airports.”

• RELATED: Gevo and Axens Boost SAF with Innovative Ethanol-to-Jet Technology

The SAF Struggle: Costs, Feedstocks, and Gaps to Fill

• High Cost and Supply Gaps. SAF typically costs 2 to 7 times more than fossil jet fuel, creating hurdles for airlines unless long-term commitments and mandates exist.
• Feedstock Scarcity. HEFA feedstocks (like used fats and oils) are limited, pushing producers toward agricultural or woody waste—though these bring logistical and certification challenges.
  Regional Supply-Demand Mismatch. In Asia, production capacity is soon to exceed demand, potentially lowering prices, but without mandates, airlines may lack incentive.

Amazon’s SAF Purchase: Why It Matters?

Amazon’s decision to purchase nearly 10 million liters of SAF in 2025 is important for several reasons. First, it shows that sustainable fuels can be scaled to serve logistics operations, not just commercial passenger flights.

Amazon’s fuel volume is now over three times its 2023 SAF usage. This makes the retail giant one of the top adopters of SAF among large cargo operators.

Second, the deal provides a level of demand certainty for Neste and other SAF producers, encouraging them to expand production capacity and invest in new technologies. Long-term agreements like this help stabilize the growing SAF market.

Also, this deal gives producers the confidence to expand their operations. Thus, major buyers will fund decarbonization efforts, even without global rules.

Third, the emissions impact of this fuel use is notable. SAF has the potential to reduce lifecycle emissions by up to 80%. Based on the 2023 figures, Amazon’s SAF purchases that year helped avoid an estimated 15,600 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e).

With even more fuel planned for 2025, Amazon’s climate gains could be substantially higher. These cuts help the company keep its promise to The Climate Pledge. Amazon plans to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2040.

Using SAF for cargo flights meets rising demands from consumers, investors, and regulators. They expect companies to lower their environmental impact. Amazon’s global growth may lead the way in clean logistics. This investment could inspire other big retailers and logistics firms.

Boosting Fossil Fuel Free Aviation

Neste is a Finland-based global leader in the production of renewable fuels and sustainable aviation fuel. Originally an oil refining company, Neste has transformed itself into one of the largest producers of renewable diesel and SAF made from waste and residue raw materials like used cooking oil and animal fats.

The company operates SAF production facilities in Finland, the Netherlands, and the United States. It supplies fuel to airlines, airports, and corporations aiming to reduce their carbon footprint.

Neste’s SAF can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80% over the lifecycle of the fuel compared to fossil jet fuel. The company plays a key role in helping the aviation industry meet climate targets. It is actively expanding its SAF production capacity to meet rising global demand.

Future Fuel: Where SAF Goes from Here

The outlook for SAF is promising, though challenges remain. Global SAF production reached about 1.3 billion liters in 2024 and is projected to increase sharply over the next five years.

Forecasts suggest SAF annual production could reach between 23 and 30 billion liters—roughly 6 to 8 billion gallons—by 2030. This would be a big step, but it would only meet a small part of global jet fuel demand. So, more policy and industry support are still necessary.

Efforts are also underway to diversify SAF production technologies. Current supplies mainly use HEFA (hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids) from used oils.

Researchers and producers are also working on alternatives. These include alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) fuels, Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, and synthetic e-fuels. The latter uses green hydrogen and carbon capture. These technologies can ease feedstock limits. They also allow for bigger emissions cuts in the long run.

Amazon’s SAF Bet Sets the Pace

In the meantime, corporate buyers like Amazon play a critical role in demonstrating market demand and driving investment. Using SAF widely and building strong supply chains can help companies lower the environmental impact of air travel.

Amazon’s expanded use of sustainable aviation fuel marks a pivotal step in its efforts to decarbonize its supply chain. By securing more than 9 million liters of SAF for 2025, the company is not only reducing emissions from its cargo flights but also helping the aviation sector move closer to net zero.

As policies tighten and global demand for low-carbon logistics increases, Amazon’s leadership in adopting SAF could influence competitors and partners to follow suit. While the journey to net-zero aviation is far from complete, initiatives like this one from Amazon show that meaningful progress is underway.

• READ MORE: United Airlines Invests in Twelve for Sustainable Aviation Fuel

The post Amazon Flies Greener to Net Zero with 9M Liters of Sustainable Fuel from Neste appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Disseminated on behalf of StorEn.

Disseminated on behalf of StorEn.

Demand for home energy storage is booming, with up to 47% of US homes expected to have rooftop solar installations by 2050. But there’s one major flaw: the batteries powering those systems don’t last.

That’s why StorEn has created a home battery with the potential to last twice as long as Tesla’s Powerwall (the current market leader).

Here’s why investors need to watch this company.

How StorEn Is Solving the Home Battery Problem

Most home battery systems, including Tesla’s Powerwall, rely on lithium-ion technology. These batteries degrade quickly, pose safety risks, and create environmental waste. They typically need replacement every 5–10 years and aren’t built for long-term use. They can also burn for days when disaster strikes, releasing toxic fumes, as we saw in the recent California wildfires.

That’s why the most advanced power plants in the world have been using vanadium flow technology. It’s the same reliable, low-risk battery tech that powers major cities around the world today.

No one has been able to scale vanadium flow tech down to the residential level. But StorEn is doing it with their first-of-its-kind vanadium flow battery for homes. Instead of 10 years, it’s built to last 20. It’s also small enough to fit inside a garage, with a non-flammable and 100% recyclable design.

Why StorEn Is A Major Energy Disruptor

The residential energy storage market is expected to surpass $90 billion by 2033, and lithium-ion batteries simply aren’t sustainable enough to meet demand.

That’s why, while Tesla’s Powerwall holds 62% of the market, StorEn is a prime contender to dominate in the rise of home energy storage.

Not only can StorEn power homes for up to 20 years, but their solution also unlocks major commercial potential in the telecom and microgrid markets.

Amid this once-in-a-generation shift in energy, StorEn has all the pieces to thrive. What’s more, they have the track record to prove it.

StorEn Is Proving Themselves As We Speak

With a pipeline of $11M+ in forecasted revenue and a community of 9,000+ investors already, StorEn is on track to become the leader in long-duration home energy storage.

The company is led by pioneers in energy storage and battery chemistry, including CEO Angelo D’Anzi, a 23-year veteran in fuel cell and electrolyzer development. Angelo himself holds 18 WIPO patents in Vanadium Flow Batteries and Fuel Cells.

Now, this team has patented a vanadium flow battery compact enough to power homes—with the same durability and reliability trusted by cities and industrial plants.

And you have an opportunity to join them.

Why Now Is the Time to Invest in StorEn

As clean energy adoption grows, the need for longer-lasting, safer, and more sustainable batteries is becoming urgent.

StorEn has raised $12.5M from 9,000+ investors and is preparing for global expansion.

As lithium supply chains face pressure and investors seek genuine innovation, StorEn’s vanadium flow technology offers the long-term solution the market has been anticipating.

Become a StorEn shareholder as they redefine energy storage.

This is a paid advertisement for StorEn’s Regulation CF offering. Please read the offering circular at https://invest.storen.tech/

Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.

Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.

The post StorEn – Home Battery Built to Last 20 Years appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Demand for critical minerals like lithium, nickel, cobalt, and rare earth elements is rising sharply as the world moves toward a low-carbon future. These materials are vital for clean technologies. They are used in electric vehicle batteries, wind turbines, and solar panels.

Canada holds vast reserves of these minerals and has the potential to become a global leader in sustainable supply chains. However, according to a new report from the Canadian Climate Institute, Canada risks missing out on billions in investment if it fails to act swiftly.

The Critical Mineral Boom Is On — Who Will Win?

Global demand for critical minerals will likely quadruple by 2040. This surge is due to clean energy technologies and increasing electrification.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that by 2030, demand for minerals in energy technologies will exceed 40 million tonnes each year. This is a big jump from only 7 million tonnes in 2020. This surge is causing strong international competition. Countries are racing to secure stable and ethical supplies.

In response, the United States and European Union have introduced massive incentives and trade frameworks under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and Critical Raw Materials Act, respectively. These policies are changing supply chains. They emphasize “friend-shoring,” which means getting materials from countries that share the same values.

As a resource-rich and politically stable country, Canada is well-positioned to benefit. But the “Critical Path: Securing Canada’s place in the global critical minerals race“ report warns that its policy and permitting frameworks are falling behind.

Billions at Risk Without Swift Action

Canada currently supplies 60% of the world’s potash, 14% of nickel, and is home to 31 of the 50 minerals listed as “critical” by the U.S., EU, and IEA. Yet, its share of global investment in critical mineral extraction and processing has been declining.

• RELATED: Vale Base Metals Boosts Nickel: Completes Underground Mining of Voisey’s Bay Project in Canada

The Canadian Climate Institute report says that tens of billions in investment could be lost by 2030 without strong action. The report specifically stated:

“Yet current investment in Canada’s upstream mining of critical minerals is not keeping pace with both domestic and global demand growth… We estimate that Canada requires new investment between about $30 billion and $65 billion in upstream mining projects between now and 2040 to tap into its production potential… Based on average production capacities, this would mean that Canada must open more than 30 new mines over the same time period.”

According to the authors, regulatory delays, uncertain timelines, and a lack of coordination between governments are slowing progress. It currently takes 10 to 15 years to bring a new mine into production in Canada — too long to meet rising demand and capture near-term investment.

The U.S. and EU are fast-tracking projects with incentives, permitting reform, and strategic partnerships. Canada has launched funding programs such as the Critical Minerals Strategy and the Investment Tax Credit for Clean Technology Manufacturing. However, experts warn that these programs should be streamlined. Better coordination with Indigenous communities, provinces, and industry is also needed.

Why Critical Minerals Matter for Climate—and for Canada

Critical minerals are more than just economic opportunity — they’re key to achieving climate targets. Battery-grade lithium and nickel are essential to electric vehicles (EVs), while rare earth elements are used in wind turbines and electric motors. Without secure supplies of these inputs, global decarbonization will stall.

McKinsey estimates that global investment in critical minerals supply chains could reach $3 trillion by 2040. Canada has to act now to secure a meaningful share. The World Bank also projects that mineral production must increase by nearly 500% by 2050 to meet clean energy goals.

Canada’s climate goals depend on electrifying transport and industry, both of which require reliable access to critical minerals. The report says Canada’s clean energy shift might double the need for minerals by 2050. This includes a big demand for copper, lithium, and graphite.

Developing domestic supply chains also reduces reliance on unstable or unethical sources. Over 60% of the world’s cobalt comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo. This often happens in poor labor and environmental conditions. 

Moreover, the report further noted that Canada’s future exports don’t rely solely on the United States. Instead, demand could grow significantly in other nations.

The Fab Five: Minerals That Will Power the Clean Energy Era

The Canadian Climate Institute report highlights five key minerals that are especially vital to Canada’s clean energy ambitions. Here’s a closer look at their roles:

1. Lithium:

Often called “white gold,” lithium is a core component of lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles (EVs), laptops, and grid-scale storage. Canada hosts multiple lithium exploration projects, particularly in Quebec and Manitoba.

The country’s lithium sector is gaining momentum, particularly in Quebec, where Sayona Mining and Piedmont Lithium jointly operate the North American Lithium (NAL) project. This is currently the only active lithium production site in Canada. The project is part of Quebec’s broader ambition to become a hub for battery metals, supported by proximity to clean energy and auto manufacturing.

As demand for EVs grows, the International Energy Agency estimates lithium demand could grow more than 40 times by 2040.

• RELEVANT: Lithium Prices Crash Below $10K, Hitting a 4-Year Low: Will the Market Rebound?

2. Nickel:

High-grade nickel is used in EV batteries, particularly for extending vehicle range. Canada is the sixth-largest nickel producer in the world. Its main operations are in Ontario, Manitoba, and Newfoundland.

Nickel demand may triple by 2040. Canada’s low-emission production gives it an advantage in ESG-conscious markets.

One notable nickel company is Vale Canada, which plays a leading role in nickel production. With operations in Ontario, Manitoba, and Newfoundland, Vale is a major supplier of battery-grade nickel, a key input for electric vehicles. The company recently completed underground mining development at its Voisey’s Bay site, reinforcing Canada’s status as a reliable source of high-grade, low-emissions nickel for global supply chains.

3. Copper:

Essential for electrification, copper is used in electric wiring, power grids, EVs, and renewable energy systems. Canada’s reserves are concentrated in British Columbia. Demand for copper is expected to double by 2035 as countries invest in electric grids and renewable infrastructure.

Teck Resources, one of Canada’s largest mining companies, is a significant copper producer through its Highland Valley Copper operation in BC. The company also has projects in Chile and is positioning itself as a global copper supplier for electric grids and renewable energy infrastructure.

4. Graphite:

A lesser-known but vital mineral, graphite is the single largest component in lithium-ion battery anodes. Canada doesn’t have much commercial graphite production now, but Quebec and Ontario are developing their deposits. 

Northern Graphite is emerging as a leading graphite producer in Canada, owning the Lac des Iles mine in Quebec. The company also has plans to expand through new developments in Ontario and Namibia. With demand for graphite projected to rise 25-fold by 2040, Northern Graphite is well-positioned to supply this essential material for lithium-ion battery anodes.

5. Cobalt:

Cobalt is another important battery material that is used to improve battery life and stability. Canada has large cobalt deposits, mainly found as a byproduct of nickel and copper mining. It is one of the few countries outside the Democratic Republic of Congo with these resources.

Fortune Minerals is developing the NICO project in the Northwest Territories, one of the few cobalt-focused projects outside the Democratic Republic of Congo. Fortune’s plans include building a processing facility in Alberta, creating a fully integrated North American cobalt supply chain.

• SEE MORE: Canada’s Cobalt Cache: Pentagon Invests US$20 Million in Electra Battery Materials

These minerals aren’t just powering EVs—they’re critical to building an entire ecosystem of clean technologies. Prioritizing sustainable extraction and refining of these resources will help Canada stay competitive in the clean energy economy.

The Path Forward: Recommendations for Canada

To stay competitive and take advantage of the critical mineral opportunity, the report suggests a few key recommendations:

• Streamline permitting with clear timelines and regulatory certainty, especially for low-risk projects.
• Increase funding for processing and refining capacity, not just extraction.
• Align tax incentives with U.S. and EU frameworks to avoid capital flight.
• Support Indigenous leadership through equity partnerships, revenue-sharing, and capacity support.
• Enhance coordination between federal, provincial, and territorial governments to eliminate policy duplication.

Canada’s edge lies in its reputation for environmental stewardship, rule of law, and strong ESG standards. But these advantages will only deliver returns if backed by speed and policy clarity.

Ticking Clock: Global Players Are Moving Fast

The global landscape is moving quickly. China currently dominates the processing of most critical minerals — refining over 80% of rare earths and lithium globally. Western countries are now trying to diversify these supply chains, making Canada a natural partner. But without policy action, that window may close.

Other countries are already moving. The U.S. Department of Energy recently awarded $2.8 billion to 20 companies for domestic battery material production. Meanwhile, Australia has invested over $1 billion in downstream mineral processing. Yet, Canada has the geology, the workforce, and the credibility. What’s needed is urgency — and alignment — to turn potential into action.

• READ MORE: Unlocking the Power of Critical Minerals with US DOE’s $45 Million Investment: A Focus on Antimony

The post Canada’s $65B Critical Minerals Challenge: Can It Keep Up? appeared first on Carbon Credits.