OPIS Expands Global Carbon Offsets Report to Increase Carbon Neutrality

OPIS, an IHS Markit company (NYSE: INFO), has expanded its Global Carbon Offsets Report.

It now includes a Carbon Neutral Fuels Index (OPIS CNFI) and a Core Carbon Credits (OPIS CCP) assessment.

In a statement, Fred Rozell, President of OPIS said that “Price clarity is imperative for negotiating a fair and competitive premium to existing commodities benchmarks for the cost of offsetting emissions.”

OPIS believes these tools can help the energy industry become carbon neutral.

What does it mean when a company is carbon neutral?

You may have heard the terms carbon neutrality and net-zero emissions used interchangeably, but they do not mean the same thing.

Net-zero is when a company stops its GHG emissions. This means they are not putting any more GHG into the atmosphere.

A company is carbon neutral when it offsets its GHG emissions. So, the company still emits GHG but it invests in environmental projects to help ‘offset’ those emissions.

Net-Zero =”Zero” Carbon. Carbon Neutral = “Neutral” Carbon. 

To be carbon neutral, companies purchase carbon credits through the carbon market. For every carbon credit purchased, a metric ton of carbon is offset.

1 Carbon Credit = 1 Metric Ton of Carbon.

Many industries do not have the technology to eliminate or reduce their GHG emissions. The tech is either too expensive, not ready for use, or non-existent.

This is why carbon markets are so important.

Carbon offsets help to fill that gap. This way, companies can do something good for the environment while they work on net-zero solutions.

How can these tools increase carbon neutrality?

OPIS CNFI will list offset prices for 18 standard liquids, gaseous fuels, and eight IMO shipping fuels. OPIS CCP will have CORSIA-eligible credits, REDD+ credits, and other agriculture, forestry, and land use (AFLOU) credits.

The OPIS Global Carbon Offsets Report was launched in December 2020.

The report is the most extensive in the world. Assessments are published each day – reflecting confirmed bids, offers, and trades.

The post OPIS Expands Global Carbon Offsets Report to Increase Carbon Neutrality appeared first on Carbon Credits.

London Stock Exchange Working on New Voluntary Carbon Market

To transition to a low-carbon economy, the London Stock Exchange (LSE) is developing a new Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM).

The market will:

Create capital for new climate projects worldwide; and
Provide access to high-quality carbon credits for companies and investors.

According to LSE’s CEO Julia Hoggett, by “raising the profile of the public listed fund market, we can enhance the disclosures and the visibility of that market and also direct capital into it.”

Once launched, how will this new Voluntary Carbon Market work?

First, the project developer identifies project(s) that will generate voluntary carbon credits.

If approved, the fund will list on the LSE (under the new VCM) for investors to invest.

The fund then issues carbon credits as a dividend to investors. Investors can keep buying or selling shares in the fund and receive returns in carbon credits, cash dividends, and other distributions.

The carbon credits can be used for their own purposes or traded.

What are carbon credits and why are they so popular?

Simply put, one carbon credit equals one metric ton of carbon. So, one metric ton of carbon is offset through an approved environmental project for every carbon credit bought.

The reason why carbon markets are booming is that companies need to find ways to lessen their carbon footprint. Deadlines to meet regulations are approaching, and quite frankly, the public is demanding it (which is a good thing).

Many believe that the increased financing that will be available through this new VCM will improve the supply of credits.

Since these credits are in high demand, supply right now is low.

Why are Voluntary Carbon Markets so important?

Not every industry has the ability to be at net-zero emissions yet. Much of the technology needed to get there is not developed or accessible. Or, the cost (currently) is exorbitant.

This doesn’t mean that companies don’t want to reach net-zero – they do. But they need to take action interim.

Carbon offsets prove to be a valuable solution.

Though LSE’s Voluntary Carbon Market solution is still being fine-tuned, it has attracted interest from a range of partners.

The post London Stock Exchange Working on New Voluntary Carbon Market appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The Ultimate Guide to Understanding Carbon Credits

Carbon Markets 101

A carbon market allows investors and corporations to trade both carbon credits and carbon offsets simultaneously. This mitigates the environmental crisis, while also creating new market opportunities.

New challenges nearly always produce new markets, and the ongoing climate crisis and rising global emissions are no exception.

The renewed interest in carbon markets is relatively new. International carbon trading markets have been around since the 1997 Kyoto Protocols, but the emergence of new regional markets have prompted a surge of investment.

In the United States, no national carbon market exists, and only one state – California – has a formal cap-and-trade program.

The advent of new mandatory emissions trading programs and growing consumer pressure have driven companies to turn to the voluntary market for carbon offsets. Changing public attitudes on climate change and carbon emissions have added a public policy incentive. Despite an ever-shifting background of state, federal, and international regulations, there’s more need than ever for companies and investors to understand carbon credits.

This guide will introduce you to carbon credits and outline the current state of the market. It will also explain how credits and offsets work in currently existing frameworks and highlight the potential for growth.

Executive Summary

1. Carbon Credits, Carbon Offsets, Carbon Markets – an introduction
2. What are carbon credits and carbon offsets?
3. How are carbon credits and offsets created?
4. What is the carbon marketplace?
5. Overall size of carbon offset markets
6. How to produce carbon credits

6.1 Who verifies carbon credits?

7. How companies can offset carbon emissions
8. Voluntary vs. Compulsory: the biggest difference between credits and offsets
9. The two types of global carbon markets: voluntary and compliance
10. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
11. Opportunity to maximize impact
12. New revenue streams
13. Do carbon offsets actually reduce emissions?
14. Can you purchase carbon offsets as an individual?
15. Do I need carbon offsets or carbon credits?
16. Why should I buy carbon credits?
17. What is Blue Carbon?
18. Second order effects of blue carbon credits

1. Carbon Credits, Offsets and Markets – An Introduction

The Kyoto Protocol of 1997 and the Paris Agreement of 2015 were international accords that laid out international CO2 emissions goals. With the latter ratified by all but six countries, they have given rise to national emissions targets and the regulations to back them.

With these new regulations in force, the pressure on businesses to find ways to reduce their carbon footprint is growing. Most of today’s interim solutions involve the use of the carbon markets.

What the carbon markets do is turn CO2 emissions into a commodity by giving it a price.

These emissions fall into one of two categories: Carbon credits or carbon offsets, and they can both be bought and sold on a carbon market. It’s a simple idea that provides a market-based solution to a thorny problem.

2. What are carbon credits and carbon offsets?

The terms are frequently used interchangeably, but carbon credits and carbon offsets operate on different mechanisms.

Carbon credits, also known as carbon allowances, work like permission slips for emissions. When a company buys a carbon credit, usually from the government, they gain permission to generate one ton of CO2 emissions. With carbon credits, carbon revenue flows vertically from companies to regulators, though companies who end up with excess credits can sell them to other companies.

Offsets flow horizontally, trading carbon revenue between companies. When one company removes a unit of carbon from the atmosphere as part of their normal business activity, they can generate a carbon offset. Other companies can then purchase that carbon offset to reduce their own carbon footprint.

Note that the two terms are sometimes used interchangeably, and carbon offsets are often referred to as “offset credits”. Still, this distinction between regulatory compliance credits and voluntary offsets should be kept in mind.

3. How are carbon credits and offsets created?

Credits and offsets form two slightly different markets, although the basic unit traded is the same – the equivalent of one ton of carbon emissions, also known as CO2e.

It’s worth noting that a ton of CO2 does refer to a literal measurement of weight. Just how much CO2 is in a ton?

The average American generates 16 tons of CO2e a year through driving, shopping, using electricity and gas at home, and generally going through the motions of everyday life.

To further put that emission in perspective, you would generate one ton of CO2e by driving your average 22 mpg car from New York to Las Vegas.

Carbon credits are issued by national or international governmental organizations. We’ve already mentioned the Kyoto and Paris agreements which created the first international carbon markets.

In the U.S., California operates its own carbon market and issues credits to residents for gas and electricity consumption.

The number of credits issued each year is typically based on emissions targets. Credits are frequently issued under what’s known as a “cap-and-trade” program. Regulators set a limit on carbon emissions – the cap. That cap slowly decreases over time, making it harder and harder for businesses to stay within that cap.

You can think of carbon credits as a “permission slip” for a company to emit up to a certain set amount of CO2e that year.

Around the world, cap-and-trade programs exist in some form in Canada, the EU, the UK, China, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea, with many more countries and states considering implementation.

Companies are thus incentivized to reduce the emissions their business operations produce to stay under their caps.

In essence, a cap-and-trade program lessens the burden for companies trying to meet emissions targets in the short term, and adds market incentives to reduce carbon emissions faster.

Carbon offsets work slightly differently…

Organizations with operations that reduce the amount of carbon already in the atmosphere, say by planting more trees or investing in renewable energy, have the ability to issue carbon offsets. The purchase of these offsets is voluntary, which is why carbon offsets form what’s known as the “Voluntary Carbon Market”. However, by buying these carbon offsets, companies can measurably decrease the amount of CO2e they emit even further.

4. What is the carbon marketplace?

When it comes to the sale of carbon credits within the carbon marketplace, there are two significant, separate markets to choose from.

One is a regulated market, set by “cap-and-trade” regulations at the regional and state levels.
The other is a voluntary market where businesses and individuals buy credits (of their own accord) to offset their carbon emissions.

Think of it this way: the regulatory market is mandated, while the voluntary market is optional.

When it comes to the regulatory market, each company operating under a cap-and-trade program is issued a certain number of carbon credits each year. Some of these companies produce less emissions than the number of credits they’re allotted, giving them a surplus of carbon credits.

On the flip side, some companies (particularly those with older and less efficient operations) produce more emissions than the number of credits they receive each year can cover. These businesses are looking to purchase carbon credits to offset their emissions because they must.

Most major companies are doing their part and will or have announced a blueprint to minimize their carbon footprint. However, the amount of carbon credits allocated to them each year (which is based on each business’s size and the efficiency of their operations relative to industry benchmarks)., may not be enough to cover their needs.

Regardless of technological advances, some companies are years away from reducing their emissions substantially. Yet, they still have to keep providing goods and services in order to generate the cash they need to improve the carbon footprint of their operations.

As such, they need to find a way to offset the amount of carbon they’re already emitting.

So, when companies meet their emissions “cap,” they look towards the regulatory market to “trade” so that they can stay under that cap.

Here’s an example:

Let’s say two companies, Company 1 and Company 2, are only allowed to emit 300 tons of carbon.

However, Company 1 is on track to emit 400 tons of carbon this year, while Company 2 will only be emitting 200 tons.

To avoid a penalty comprised of fines and extra taxes, Company 1 can make up for emitting 100 extra tons of CO2e by purchasing credits from Company 2, who has extra emissions room to spare due to producing 100 tons less carbon this year than they were allowed to.

The Difference between the Voluntary and Compliance Markets

The voluntary market works a bit differently. Companies in this marketplace have the opportunity to work with businesses and individuals who are environmentally conscious and are choosing to offset their carbon emissions because they want to. There is nothing mandated here.

It might be an environmentally conscious company that wants to demonstrate that they’re doing their part to protect the environment. Or it can be an environmentally conscious person who wants to offset the amount of carbon they’re putting into the air when they travel.

For example: in 2021, the oil giant Shell announced the company aims to offset 120 million tonnes of emissions by 2030

Regardless of their reasoning, companies are looking for ways to participate – and the voluntary carbon market is a way for them to do just that.

Both the regulatory and voluntary marketplaces complement one another in the professional (and the personal) world. They also make the pool of buyers more accessible to farmers, ranchers, and landowners – those whose operations can often generate carbon offsets for sale.

5. Overall size of carbon offset markets

The voluntary carbon market is difficult to measure. The cost of carbon credits varies, particularly for carbon offsets, since the value is linked closely to the perceived quality of the issuing company. Third-party validators add a level of control to the process, guaranteeing that each carbon offset actually results from real-world emissions reductions, but even so there’s often disparities between different types of carbon offsets.

While the voluntary carbon market was estimated to be worth about $400 million last year, forecasts place the value of the sector between $10-25 billion by 2030, depending on how aggressively countries around the world pursue their climate change targets.

Despite the difficulties, analysts agree that participation in the voluntary carbon market is growing rapidly. Even at the rate of growth depicted above, the voluntary carbon market would still fall significantly short of the amount of investment required for the world to fully meet the targets set out by the Paris Agreement.

6. How to produce carbon credits

Many different types of businesses can create and sell carbon credits by reducing, capturing, and storing emissions through different processes.

Some of the most popular types of carbon offsetting projects include:

Renewable energy projects,
Improving energy efficiency,
Carbon and methane capture and sequestration
Land use and reforestation.

Renewable energy projects have already existed long before carbon credit markets came into vogue. Many countries in the world are blessed with a natural wealth of renewable energy resources. Countries such as Brazil or Canada that have many lakes and rivers, or nations like Denmark and Germany with lots of windy regions. For countries like these, renewable energy was already an attractive and low-cost source of power generation, and they now provide the added benefit of carbon offset creation.

Energy efficiency improvements complement renewable energy projects by reducing the energy demands of current buildings and infrastructure. Even simple everyday changes like swapping your household lights from incandescent bulbs to LED ones can benefit the environment by reducing power consumption. On a larger scale, this can involve things like renovating buildings or optimizing industrial processes to make them more efficient, or distributing more efficient appliances to the needy.

Carbon and methane capture involves implementing practices that remove CO2 and methane (which is over 20 times more harmful to the environment than CO2) from the atmosphere.

Methane is simpler to deal with, as it can simply be burned off to create CO2. While this sounds counterproductive at first, since methane is over 20 times more harmful to the atmosphere than CO2, converting one molecule of methane to one molecule of CO2 through combustion still reduces net emissions by more than 95%.

For carbon, capture often happens directly at the source, such as from chemical plants or power plants. While the injection of this captured carbon underground has been used for various purposes like enhanced oil recovery for decades already, the idea of storing this carbon long-term, treating it much like nuclear waste, is a newer concept.

Land use and reforestation projects use Mother Nature’s carbon sinks, the trees and soil, to absorb carbon from the atmosphere. This includes protecting and restoring old forests, creating new forests, and soil management.

Plants convert CO2 from the atmosphere into organic matter through photosynthesis, which eventually ends up in the ground as dead plant matter. Once absorbed, the CO2 enriched soil helps restore the soil’s natural qualities – enhancing crop production while reducing pollution.

6.1 Who verifies carbon credits?

Visit our article here on how carbon credits are verified by the market.

7. How companies can offset carbon emissions

There are countless ways for companies to offset carbon emissions.

Though not a comprehensive list, here are some popular practices that typically qualify as offset projects:

Investing in renewable energy by funding wind, hydro, geothermal, and solar power generation projects, or switching to such power sources wherever possible.
Improving energy efficiency across the world, for instance by providing more efficient cookstoves to those living in rural or more impoverished regions.
Capturing carbon from the atmosphere and using it to create biofuel, which makes it a carbon-neutral fuel source.
Returning biomass to the soil as mulch after harvest instead of removing or burning. This practice reduces evaporation from the soil surface, which helps to preserve water. The biomass also helps feed soil microbes and earthworms, allowing nutrients to cycle and strengthen soil structure.
Promoting forest regrowth through tree-planting and reforestation projects.
Switching to alternate fuel types, such as lower-carbon biofuels like corn and biomass-derived ethanol and biodiesel.

If you’re wondering how carbon offset and allotment levels are valued and determined through these processes, take a deep breath. Monitoring emissions and reductions can be a challenge for even the most experienced professional.

Know that when it comes to the regulated and voluntary markets, there are third-party auditors who verify, collect, and analyze data to confirm the validity of each offset project.

However, be careful when shopping online or directly from other businesses – not all offset projects are certified by appropriate third parties, and those that aren’t, generally tend to be of dubious quality.

8. Voluntary vs Compulsory: The biggest difference between credits and offsets

Participation in a cap-and-trade scheme typically isn’t voluntary. Your company either needs to abide by carbon credit limits set by regulators, or no such limits exist. As more and more countries adopt cap-and-trade programs, companies increasingly need to participate in carbon credit programs.

Carbon credits intentionally add an extra onus to businesses. In return, the best cap-and-trade programs provide a clear framework for reducing carbon emissions. Not all programs are created equal, of course, but at their best, carbon credits have a clear impact on total carbon emissions.

In contrast, carbon offsets are a voluntary market.

There’s no regulation that mandates companies to purchase carbon offsets. Doing so is going above and beyond, particularly for companies operating where cap-and-trade programs don’t exist yet. Precisely for that reason, offsets provide a few advantages that credits simply don’t.

9. The Two Types of Global Carbon Markets: Voluntary and Compliance

There’s one more important distinction between carbon credits and carbon offsets:

Carbon credits are generally transacted in the carbon compliance market.
Carbon offsets are generally transacted in the voluntary carbon market.

Global Compliance Market

The global compliance market for carbon credits is massive. According to Refinitiv the total market size is US$261 billion, representing 10.3Gt CO2 equivalent traded on the compliance markets in 2020.

Source: Refinitiv

Mandatory schemes limiting the amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted have proliferated—and with them, a fragmented carbon compliance market is developing. For example, the European Union has an Emissions Trading System (ETS) that enables companies to buy carbon credits from other companies.

California runs its own cap-and-trade program, and nine states on the eastern seaboard have formed their own cap-and-trade conglomerate, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

Companies with low emissions can sell their extra allowances to larger emitters in a compliance market.

The Voluntary Carbon Market

The voluntary carbon market for offsets is smaller than the compliance market, but expected to grow much bigger in the coming years. It’s open to individuals, companies, and other organizations that want to reduce or eliminate their carbon footprint, but are not necessarily required to by law.

Consumers can purchase offsets for emissions from a specific high-emission activity, such as a long flight, or buy offsets on a regular basis to eliminate their ongoing carbon footprint.

Source: Katusa Research and Trove Intelligence

The voluntary carbon market is where many companies like Apple, Stripe, Shell and British Petroleum are actively seeking to offset their footprint. It’s the sector most ripe for growth.

10. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Consumers are increasingly aware of the importance of carbon emissions. Consequently, they’re increasingly critical of companies that don’t take climate change seriously. By contributing to carbon offset projects, companies signal to consumers and investors that they’re paying more than just lip service to combat climate change. For many companies, the CSR benefit can often outweigh the actual cost of the offset.

11. Opportunity to maximize impact

Not every carbon credit market is created equal, and it’s easy to find flaws even with tightly regulated programs like California’s. Carbon allowances in those markets might not actually be worth as much as they say on the tin, but since participation is mandatory, it’s hard for companies to control their own impact.

In theory, purchasing carbon offsets gives companies a more concrete way to reduce their carbon footprint. After all, carbon credits only deal with future emissions. But, carbon offsets let companies address even their historical emissions of CO2e right away.

Companies can also select the types of projects that provide the greatest impact – like Blue Carbon projects, for example.

Used correctly, carbon offsets are a way for companies to earn extra PR credit and achieve a more measurable reduction in carbon emissions. Since there’s no regulatory body overseeing carbon offsets, standards companies like Verra have become influential in vetting the carbon offsets market.

12. The offset advantage: New revenue streams

There’s one more big advantage of carbon offsets.

If you’re the company selling them, they can be a significant revenue stream! The best example of this is Tesla. Yes, that Tesla, the electric car maker, who sold carbon credits to legacy car manufacturers to the tune of $518 million in just the first quarter of 2021.

That’s a huge deal, and it’s single-handedly keeping Tesla out of the red. If the market for carbon credits continues to go up, and the pricing of credits keeps increasing, Tesla and other environmentally beneficial businesses could reap huge dividends.

13. Do carbon offsets actually reduce emissions?

Both offsets and credits don’t always work as intended. Voluntary carbon offsets rely on a clear link between the activity undertaken and the positive environmental impact.

Sometimes that link is obvious – companies that use carbon capture technology to remove CO2 emissions and lock them away can point to hard numbers.

Other programs, like offsets that promote green tourism or seek to offset the damage of international travel, can be more difficult to measure. The reputation of the organization issuing the credit determines the value of the offset. Reputable carbon offset organizations choose carbon projects carefully and report on them meticulously, and third-party auditors can help ensure such projects measure up to strict standards like those established by UN’s Clean Development Mechanism.

Once properly vetted, “high-quality” offsets represent tangible, measurable amounts of reductions in CO2e emissions that companies can use like they reduced their own greenhouse gas emissions themselves. Though the company has not yet actually reduced their own emissions, the world is just as well off as if the company had actually done so.

This way, the company has bought itself more time to make its operations more environmentally friendly, while as far as the atmosphere is concerned, they already have.

14. Can you purchase carbon offsets as an individual?

Unless you represent a large corporation, you’re unlikely to be able to purchase a carbon offset directly from the source company. For now.

Instead, you’ll need to turn to one of the growing number of third-party companies that function as intermediaries. While this may seem like an added step, these companies offer a few advantages.

The best ones also work as a verification mechanism. They vet and double-check to be sure that the carbon offsets you purchase are, well, actually offsetting carbon.

For example: Companies such as Galaxus, which is Switzerland’s #1 online retailer, offers consumers the ability to offset the carbon footprint of their purchase.

Carbon Footprint Calculator

Many organizations will also provide a carbon footprint calculator. You can use these calculators to determine exactly how many carbon offsets you will need in order to be carbon neutral.

For many investors, carbon offsets are a way to minimize their own carbon footprint and live an environmentally friendly lifestyle. The size of the market and the growing demand for carbon offsets indicate that there’s serious potential for companies that produce carbon credits to see large-scale growth over the next decades.

15. Do I Need Carbon Offsets or Carbon Credits?

Now that you know their differences and what they have in common, here’s how carbon credits and carbon offsets work in the grand, global scheme of emissions reduction.

The government is putting heavy caps on greenhouse gas emissions, meaning that companies will have to reconfigure their operations to reduce emissions as much as possible. Those that cannot be eliminated will have to be accounted for through the purchase of carbon credits.

Ambitious organizations, corporations, and people can purchase carbon offsets to reach net zero or even nullify all previous historical emissions.

Software giant Microsoft (MSFT), for instance, has pledged to be carbon negative by 2030, and to remove all carbon they’ve emitted since their founding by 2050.

So which do you need?

If you’re a corporation, the answer might just be “both” — but it all depends on your business goals, as well as the local regulations where your company operates. If you’re a consumer, carbon credits are likely unavailable to you, but you can still do your part by purchasing carbon offsets.

Returning to the illustration from earlier, our vital, global goal is to both stop dumping chemicals into the metaphorical water supply, and to purify the existing water supply over time. In other words, we need to both drastically reduce CO2 emissions, and work to remove the CO2 currently in the atmosphere if we want to materially reduce pollution.

16. Why should I buy carbon credits?

If you’re a corporation, there are plenty of compelling reasons as to why you should be seriously considering investing in carbon credits and offsets. For a detailed list of these reasons, to access our special guide, The Eight Major Business Advantages of Buying Carbon Credits or Offsets.

If you’re an individual looking to buy carbon credits, you’re likely interested for one of two reasons:

The first reason is that you’re environmentally conscious, and looking to do your part in combatting climate change by offsetting your own greenhouse gas emissions, or those of your family.

If that’s the case, then rest assured – carbon offsets from a reputable vendor such as Native Energy are the perfect way for you to negate your own carbon footprint.

The second reason you’re interested in buying carbon credits is because you think it represents an investment opportunity. The global carbon market grew 20% last year and that strong growth is expected to continue as climate change becomes an increasingly relevant concern to the world at large.

If you fall into the latter category, then head over to our carbon investor centre, where we showcase some of the best investment opportunities in the carbon sector right now.

17. What is Blue Carbon?

Blue Carbon are special carbon credits derived from sites known as blue carbon ecosystems. These ecosystems primarily feature marine forests, such as tidal marshes, mangrove forests and seagrass beds.

Yes, forests can grow in the ocean! Examples include the mangrove forests in sea bays, such as Magdalena Bay in Baja California Sur, Mexico.

Mangroves are trees (about 70 percent underwater, 30 percent above water) that have evolved to be able to survive in flooded coastal environments where seawater meets freshwater, and the resulting lack of oxygen makes life impossible for other plants.

Key Fact: Mangroves cover just 0.1% of earth’s surface

Mangrove trees create shelter and food for numerous species such as sharks, whales, and sea turtles. And thanks to their other second-order effects such as the positive impacts on corals, algae and marine biodiversity that have been so negatively impacted by activities such as over-fishing and farming, mangroves are considered to be extremely valuable marine ecosystems.

Over the past decade scientists have discovered that blue carbon ecosystems like these mangrove forests are among the most intensive carbon sinks in the world.

According to scientific studies, pound for pound, mangroves can store up to 4x more carbon than terrestrial forests.

This means that blue carbon offsets can remove enormous amounts of greenhouse gases relative to the amount of area they occupy. On top of that, they also provide a whole slew of other side benefits to their local ecosystems.

Accordingly, a blue carbon offset project will have its carbon offsets trade at a premium.

18. Second Order Effects of Blue Carbon Credits

Other positive second-order effects of mangrove forests include:

Their importance as a pollution filter,
Reducing coastal wave energy, and
Reducing the impacts from coastal storms and extreme events.

Blue carbon systems also trap sediment, which supports root systems for more plants.

This accumulation of sediment over time can enable coastal habitats to keep pace with rising sea levels.

In addition, because the carbon is sequestered and stored below water in aquatic forests and wetlands, it’s stored for more than ten times longer than in tropical forests.

The significant positive second-order effects attributed to each blue carbon credit are why many believe they will trade at a premium to other carbon credits.

Blue Carbon and the Food Footprint

There is a land-use carbon footprint of 1,440 kg CO2e for every kilogram of beef and 1,603 kg CO2e for every kilogram of shrimp produced on lands formerly occupied by mangroves. A typical steak and shrimp cocktail dinner would potentially burden the atmosphere with 816 kg CO2e if the ingredients were to come from such sources.

It’s estimated that over 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide is released annually from degrading coastal ecosystems.

There are around 14 million hectares of mangrove aquaforests on Earth today. And many are under attack by the deforestation practices caused by intense shrimp farming

Are the shrimp you eat part of the problem? Soon, these shrimps will be labeled, and consumers will know and be required to cover the offset costs for the environmental damage.

To put things into perspective, 14 million acres of wetlands would absorb as much carbon out of the atmosphere as if all of California and New York State were covered in tropical rainforest.

Think of blue carbon as the “high grade” gold mine at the surface.

Oceanic Blue Carbon

In addition to coastal blue carbon mentioned above, oceanic blue carbon is stored deep in the ocean within phytoplankton and other open ocean biota.

The infographic below shows the typical blue carbon ecosystem:

There are many factors that influence carbon capture by blue carbon ecosystems. These include:

Location
Depth of water
Plant species
Supply of nutrients

Improving blue carbon ecosystems can significantly improve the livelihoods and cultural practices of local and traditional communities. In addition, restoring blue carbon regions provides enormous biodiversity benefits to both marine and terrestrial species.

www.carboncredits.com

The post The Ultimate Guide to Understanding Carbon Credits appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Carbon Offsets Rating Provider Sylvera Raises $32.6M in Series A Round

Carbon offsets rating provider Sylvera has raised $32.6M in Series A funding. Index Ventures and Insight Partners co-led the round. Salesforce Ventures, Local Globe, and angel investors also participated.

Since its founding in 2020, Sylvera has raised $39.5.

The carbon credit industry is booming.

The demand for carbon credits is at an all-time high.

In 2018 the carbon credit industry was worth $300 million. Today it is at $1 billion. Many experts believe the value of the voluntary carbon market could reach $100 billion by 2030.

The carbon credit industry has grown because carbon credits allow companies to offset emissions they cannot eliminate. Over the past several years, it has also improved, causing more companies to buy-in.

In the past, critics felt that the carbon credit and offset industry lacked the oversight it needed. The data or the claims made weren’t accurate.

But companies like Sylvera have helped make a difference. Their tools can help measure the quality of an offset project – easing concerns.

Accurate offset ratings can help carbon markets grow.

“The [carbon] market is one of the world’s most powerful tools against climate change. But we need reliable data to determine the quality of carbon offsets, to incentivize people to invest in the projects that are actually doing good – and to reward the project developers doing good work,” said Dr. Allister Furey, co-founder, and CEO of Sylvera.

“That’s why we’re building the most accurate ratings for the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM). We’ll use the funding to expand our coverage so that, with our ratings, corporate sustainability leaders, carbon traders, and policymakers will have clarity, confidence, and choice when evaluating and investing in carbon projects. This is how you move billions of dollars into carbon abatement, sequestration, and removal.”

“We’ve seen incredible growth in the carbon offset market, but until recently, it’s been difficult for the companies that buy these offsets to measure their impact,” said Deven Parekh, Managing Director at Insight Partners.

“Sylvera’s advanced technology allows corporations to monitor the performance of nature-based offsets in real-time. Sylvera has quickly become a leader in the industry with a growing list of Fortune 500 clients. We’re excited to partner with Sylvera as they continue to scale up.”

The post Carbon Offsets Rating Provider Sylvera Raises $32.6M in Series A Round appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The 3 Best Carbon Stocks of 2022

Key Points:

These “carbon stocks” are doing their part to achieve a net-zero world. And catching investors’ attention.
KRBN, NETZ, OFSTF and BEP are stocks in focus in rising carbon markets.

An infographic version of this post can be found here or by clicking the image below.

As most of you are probably aware, 2021 was a banner year for carbon investments around the world.

And 2022 is setting up to attract a lot of investor attention in the carbon markets. Especially as it relates to carbon stocks.

Carbon prices went on a tear in the wake of rising awareness of the dangers of climate change thanks to the many extreme weather events that took place last year.

Not to mention other events like the highly publicized COP26 United Nations climate change conference in Glasgow.

Future Carbon Prices

By the end of the year, European carbon allowances were up over 150%. Their Californian equivalents saw a more modest, but still impressive, 80% gain:

Note: For live Carbon Market Pricing and charts you can click here

While these were impressive performances that might make you think you’ve already missed the boat, nothing could be further from the truth.

Carbon Markets Set to Soar In 2022

The carbon markets are still in their infancy and will need to see continued growth if the world is to meet the climate change target set out during the Paris Agreement.

This is the international accord to limit global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius, signed and ratified by all but four countries in the world.

Though the rough framework for a fully regulated global carbon market has already been laid out by the Article 6 agreement at COP26 last year, it could still be years before such a market actually comes into existence.

And when it does, it’s uncertain how it’ll interact with the current compliance and voluntary carbon markets. Will it merge with currently existing marketplaces or exist alongside them?

That’s why it’s the Wild West in the carbon markets right now. There are tons of unexplored territory with very little oversight. But opportunities abound, and there’s plenty of money to be made if you look in the right places.

So that brings us to the most important question of them all: where should we be investing right now?

3 Carbon Stocks You Should be Keeping Eyes On in 2022

Here are the carbon stocks with potential we’re focusing on:

KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF (KRBN.NYSE)

Currently the largest carbon ETF in terms of net assets, the KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF, KRBN, holds a mix of carbon allowance futures from each of the major compliance markets.

That includes European Union Allowances (EUAs), California Carbon Allowances (CCAs), Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative allowances (RGGIs) and U.K. Allowances (UKAs).

Though its holdings are slightly weighted in favor of the European EUAs at the moment, KRBN provides broad exposure to the performance of compliance market carbon credits.

These are currently one of the best ways for not only retail investors, but also corporations, banks and other financial institutions to invest in the carbon markets.

By matching the price performance of these compliance market carbon credits through its holdings, KRBN allows the average investor to add exposure to carbon prices to their portfolio without having to purchase futures, which are complicated and risky to invest in.

Investors who held KRBN at the beginning of 2021 would’ve seen their investment more than double by the end of the year, mimicking the price performance of European and Californian carbon credits.

Those of you who think carbon allowance prices are going to continue their strong performance in 2022 will definitely want to keep KRBN on your watchlists.

Click here to learn more about KRBN.

Carbon Streaming Corporation (NETZ.NEO and OFSTF.OTC)

As the carbon markets are still in their early stages, so too are the investment opportunities – most of the listed entities you’ll find are exchange-traded products of some sort.

Index funds and ETFs do an excellent job of tracking their underlying assets. However, those who are both able and willing to stomach greater risk will also see greater potential for return on their investments.

NETZ is just one such opportunity. It trades in Canada on the NEO exchange and in the S. markets under the symbol OFSTF for now.

The company has secured an early-mover advantage by not just being the first streaming/royalty deal in the carbon credit space, but also by being among the first carbon-credit-focused businesses to go public.

For those of you who aren’t in the know, the streaming/royalty business model is an extremely lucrative one whose roots lie outside of the financial markets.

Here’s how they work:

Find an asset with upside and pay an upfront fee
Get a share of the future output for set period of time

Music royalties, for example, are one of the oldest and most well-known examples. Artists can sell their catalog and rights upfront for $, the owners of the ‘royalties’ get a share in the profits in the future.

In the 1980’s Michael Jackson thought the Beatles catalog had upside paid over $50 million to secure the rights in the future (actually outbidding the actual Beatles).

Those assets grew over time and the value of the overall catalog grew alongside it.

The business model has since made its way into many different types of commodities, with gold and precious metals streaming and royalty companies being another prominent example.

And just like how Sony bought up the Beatles music catalog at a $1.5 billion valuation in 2016. NETZ is betting big to lock in agreements with some of the highest-quality carbon credit projects out there.

These include the Rimba Raya Biodiversity Project in Indonesia, one of the world’s largest REDD+ projects that’s expected to offset 130 million tonnes of CO2e over the next 30 years.

Those of you with a higher risk tolerance for your investment portfolios will want to check out NETZ. Its business model, in addition to it being the first of its kind in the carbon markets, could potentially allow NETZ to outperform relative to the rest of the carbon credit market.

Click here to learn more about NETZ.

Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP.NYSE)

It should be clear to everyone at this point that the surge of interest and capital into green investing isn’t going away anytime soon.

However, if you’re still not totally sold on the idea of carbon credits or have a lower appetite for risk in your portfolio, there are more conservative ways to play the green investment boom.

One such example would be with a company like BEP which trades on the NYSE. It’s one of the largest pure-play renewable energy companies in the world.

BEP has extremely diversified holdings, with nearly $60 billion in power assets located in over a dozen countries across four continents, split across hydro, wind, solar and energy transition projects.

Source: Brookfield Renewables website

The company has managed consistent growth over the past decade, with distributions to unitholders growing at an average annual rate of 6%. They have a strong balance sheet with a healthy capital pool, and no need to go back to the markets for equity.

In other words, BEP is an extremely well-run clean energy company with a great business model and a long history of solid performance – all before carbon credits even enter the picture.

To be fair, BEP is likely not a company that will benefit significantly from the growth of the carbon credit marketplace. Renewable energy projects are generally considered “low-quality” carbon credit projects due to their lack of additionality.

Simply put, many renewable energy projects are already profitable even before taking carbon credits into account. This makes any credits they could generate less worthwhile, because many of these projects would have happened even without the presence of carbon credits.

With all that said, as previously mentioned, BEP was already a great company even before carbon credits came along; the coming wave of decarbonization can maybe help lift it higher.

So, if you would still like a little bit of exposure to the carbon market in your portfolio, but you’re not very gung-ho about the future of carbon credits or would prefer a lower risk play, BEP is one company you might want to keep your radar.

Click here to learn more about BEP.

The Best Carbon Stocks Should Generate a Lot of Interest from Investors

With a large number of public companies declaring their Net-Zero ambitions and disclosing carbon emissions, socially responsible investing is becoming a major theme in financial markets. There are trillions of dollars of investment going into renewable energy and the offsetting emissions.

Facebook (Now Meta Platforms), Apple and Netflix are among the major tech companies leading this charge to net-zero targets for 2030. And major mining (Barrick, Newmont) and energy companies (Exxon, Shell) are doing the same.

These factors will drive increasing investor interest in all things carbon related in 2022 and beyond. Expect things to accelerate as net zero targets for 2030 draw closer.

Rising tides can lift all boats, and the best carbon stocks should generate some of the best returns for investors. These carbon companies have shown themselves to be steady value drivers with the financial acumen to capture many opportunities for solid returns in the past, and should be on the top of any green investor’s watchlist for 2022.

Please read our full DISCLOSURE here.

The post The 3 Best Carbon Stocks of 2022 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Infographic: 3 Carbon Stocks You Should be Keeping Eyes On in 2022

Click on the image to expand the view.

Please read our full DISCLOSURE here.

The post Infographic: 3 Carbon Stocks You Should be Keeping Eyes On in 2022 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Carbon Prices to reach $360 by 2030

According to a report by Getting to Zero Coalition, carbon prices might reach $360 per tonne by the 2030s.

The Getting to Zero Coalition is a collaboration of the Global Maritime Forum, Friends of Ocean Action, and the World Economic Forum.

Carbon dioxide currently accounts for 98 % of shipping GHG emissions.

The addition of LNG-powered tankers may cause carbon credit prices to soar even further.

LNG produces methane gas which has 25 times the emissions as carbon dioxide.  So one metric ton of Methane is equivalent to 25 carbon credits.

The 25x is conservative and based on a 20-year time frame. Over a 100-year timeline, methane can have over 80 times the equivalent emissions as CO2.

The report analyzes two scenarios in which emissions are lowered by 50% or 100% by 2050.

In each case, a carbon price is implemented beginning in 2025, with GHG emissions peaking in 2030.

To achieve a 50% decrease in GHG emissions by 2050, the carbon price level should average $173/tonne CO2.

In the event of complete decarbonization, the average carbon price would be roughly $191/tonne CO2.

In both scenarios, the price level begins at $11/tonne CO2 when introduced in 2025 and ramps up to around $100/tonne CO2 in the early 2030s, at which point emissions begin to decline.

The carbon price subsequently rises to $264/tonne CO2 in the -50% scenario and $360/tonne CO2 in the -100% scenario.

Last year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a body of scientists and others from 195 countries, warned that methane was a crucial component of LNG and that it needed to be reduced if the Paris targets of keeping global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius or less were to be fulfilled.

 

The post Carbon Prices to reach $360 by 2030 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Climate Activists Target 30 Global Corps

Environmental group, Friends of the Earth, which won a landmark court case against Royal Dutch Shell last year, is targeting 30 other firms with operations based in the Netherlands.

Last May, they won a landmark victory over Shell and forced then to decrease its environmental impact.

This time around they want significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in these large organizations.

Letters were addressed to the CEOs of some of the largest banks, retailers, oil, energy giants, builders, and industrial manufacturers.

The letter requested the firms present plans describing how they will reduce carbon emissions by 45% from 2019 levels by 2030.

Failing to do so may result in legal action and they have set a 3-month deadline for the corporations to present a climate plan, which is due on April 15.

Firms include:

Insurer: Aegon, Atradius, NN Group, ING Group,

Industrials: AkzoNobel (Paint maker), BAM Group (Builder), Boskalis Westminster (Dredger), Vopak (Storage), Stellantis (automotive), Tata (Steel)

Oil firms: BP, ExxonMobil, Shell,

Chemical manufacturers: Dow Chemical, Yara chemical, LyondellBasell

Dairy, & Agriculture & Nutrition: Friesland, Campina, Vion, DSM

Aviation: KLM, Schiphol airport,

Banks & Pension funds: Rabobank, ABP, PfZW,

Conglomerates: Unilever

Energy & Trading: Uniper, RWE, Vitol energy,

“We have made it plain that, if necessary, we are willing to go to court. But, of course, we hope that these businesses will go on their own ” spokesperson for Friends of Earth stated

They will be used to establish an emissions baseline against which progress in reducing climate-heating gases can be monitored, according to the group.

The post Climate Activists Target 30 Global Corps appeared first on Carbon Credits.

SpaceX to Explore Carbon Capture

Through carbon capture, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk announced a program to create rocket fuel. He is even offering a $100 million Carbon Removal X-Prize for new carbon capture technologies to help make it happen.

Elon Musk is the founder and CEO of SpaceX and Tesla.

Is there another reason behind SpaceX’s carbon capture program?

Many have criticized Musk for his space missions, saying these missions do little to benefit the Earth.

In fact, in 2021, SpaceX had 31 launches.

It is important to note that just one rocket launch emits over 300 tons of carbon into the atmosphere — staying there for years. Some flights are just six minutes long!

Musk believes that CO2 capture to use as fuel is the solution to:

1.) Improving the climate here on Earth; and
2.) Making a settlement on Mars possible (which is Musk’s ultimate goal).

Why is SpaceX offering a $100M prize for new carbon capture technology?

Believe it or not, making rocket fuel with carbon isn’t the tricky part. Capturing CO2 is, which is the reason behind the prize.

Direct air capture is so expensive that it can cost between $600 and $800 per ton.

To win, “teams must demonstrate a working solution at a scale of at least 1000 tons removed per year; model their costs at a scale of 1 million tons per year; and show a pathway to achieving a scale of gigatons per year in future.”

Does Carbon Capture work?

Not everyone is on board with carbon capture. Even Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a strong supporter of green initiatives, is skeptical. Others are less focused on carbon capture technologies and more interested in the carbon credit industry, which is booming.

But Musk disagrees.

If capturing  CO2 becomes more accessible and affordable, we can help life here on Earth while exploring space.

Musk is currently Time Magazine’s Person of the year.

The post SpaceX to Explore Carbon Capture appeared first on Carbon Credits.