Are you looking to directly reduce your carbon footprint or support projects that cut emissions elsewhere? Then carbon credits allow you to do either of these.
A carbon credit is also called carbon offset in the voluntary carbon market (VCM).
Each credit goes through a general lifecycle process that starts from creation to retirement. Individuals and firms use these credits to voluntarily offset their emissions.
With growing pressure on corporations to take climate action, the VCM demand deems to grow up to 10x over the next 10 years and 30x by 2050 from 2020 value.
As such, we’re also expecting to see more carbon offset project developers enter the market to meet the rising demand.
This calls for a better understanding of the role of developers in the VCM. The same goes for the state of the carbon project developer ecosystem and its maturity level.
That’s important to inform the supply-side views on the market’s ability to deliver on the integrity claims of carbon credits.
Most notably, this article will also shed light on what are the top carbon offset project developers that contribute to the growth of the market. We’ll identify five of them to help you find the best developer you need.
The Role of Carbon Project Developers in the VCM
Delivering the promise of the Paris Agreement calls for adopting more ambitious emission reduction initiatives.
It also requires more commitments to develop carbon offset projects to neutralize unavoidable emissions.
It’s becoming clearer that well-designed VCMs are critical to achieve the Paris Agreement goal. That’s to enable the world to reach net zero emissions by 2050.
And carbon project developers play a central role in the VCM. They are key to delivering its success given the current state of the market and its projection.
Project developers perform several tasks to help ensure the growth of the VCM. These include:
Sourcing carbon offset projects
Working with carbon credit standards and verification bodies, and other partners, and
Bearing the financial risks of developing carbon projects
The Current State of Carbon Project Development
Observing the current state of the carbon project development ecosystem reveals a couple of insight.
One of them tells us that the carbon project developer ecosystem remains concentrated by volume into a few players with big portfolios.
Yet, it’s the small and mid-sized carbon project developers holding smaller carbon portfolios that dominate the market.
The difference is so huge that you’d think the developer market remains largely untapped. And it seems to be the case right now.
9 out of the top 10 carbon offset project developers by issued volume are working on large-scale avoided conversion / REDD+ or improved forest management projects.
Another notable observation is the dominance of avoidance carbon offsets, particularly with renewable energy.
Renewable energy developers, which are mostly from India and China, dominate the market by number.
But the recent supply shifts prompt project developers with avoided emissions portfolios to expand into nature-based projects.
However, lack of expertise in nature-based projects may limit developers with removal portfolios producing industrial carbon capture credits.
This may give them higher project development risks like fire.
Lastly, when it comes to type of project, nature-based seems to be dominant.
Almost half of total volumes of credits issued was from nature-based project developers. This result is due to high entry to market barriers.
Most issuances are in the hands of a few large nature-based operators in the Global South.
While the top carbon offset project developers of most improved forest management portfolios are in the U.S. Blue Source and Finite Carbon are the dominant players in this field.
Offset buyer preferences are forcing project developers to shift to nature-based solutions and removal credits.
But with limited new market players, there’s a risk of failing to meet increasing demand. This may further impact the current carbon pricing.
Project developers tend to focus on nature-based avoidance carbon credits. But other types of carbon credit projects are also available to consider for your offsetting needs.
With that being said, here are the top five carbon offset project developers that made it to our list.
Top Carbon Offset Project Developers
1. BlueSource, now Anew
Formally founded in 2001, Blue Source has a new brand name called Anew after merging with the Element Markets last June. It gets the top one slot when it comes to providing offset credits from improved forest management, carbon capture, and other projects.
It has offices in the U.S., Canada, and Europe, and an environmental commodities portfolio that extends across 5 continents.
Since inception of its legacy companies, Anew has the following achievements:
transacted 150+ million tonnes of carbon
provided 240+ million diesel gallons equivalent of renewable fuels for transportation
developed projects on over 3.5 million acres of forest and farmland
developed 400+ overall projects
Anew’s activities amount to the emissions avoidance of 539 million solar panels generating power for an entire year.
Plus, the firm also developed projects with protocols made via scientific review and public stakeholder processes. Oversight for these projects comes from the top carbon standards, including:
Climate Action Reserve,
Verified Carbon Standard (Verra),
American Carbon Registry,
California Air Resources Board,
Alberta Environment, and
Canadian Standards Association.
What sets Anew apart from other project developers is that it serves the multiple functions of a broker, trader, retailer and advisor in the carbon space.
Under its core project development expertise, forestry projects, Anew follows these steps for a project to be eligible for offset crediting:
Apart from developing natural climate solutions like forestry projects, Anew also offers the following services and project development:
2. Finite Carbon
Finite Carbon, founded in 2009, is North America’s biggest developer of forest carbon offsets by volume. It focuses mainly on improved forest management projects.
With offices in 7 US states, it combines unparalleled project development experience with extensive carbon market knowledge.
To date, this offset developer is able to achieve the following performance.
The developer generated over ⅓ of all compliance offset supply. It has also delivered 800+ million dollars to landowners.
Unlike other top carbon offset project developers such as Anew, Finite Carbon is working with landowners who have 5,000 acres or more. Anything less than 1,000 acres is not a cost-effective project for the company.
But with its upcoming Core Carbon program, those who own as little as 40 acres can enter the growing carbon offset market.
Its entire offset project development process can take up to 6 months long, depending on several factors. In general, it involves the following processes:
Same with other developers, Finite Carbon pays the capital for each project. And then it collects only a percentage of the carbon offsets once completed.
With its wide coverage, the developer’s projects are in every region and major forest type from the Appalachians to coastal Alaska. Below is its project map showing its forest projects.
If you’re after a project developer that demonstrates expertise in forestry offsets, Finite Carbon should be on your top list.
For over 15 years, 3Degrees has been a pioneer in providing climate solutions. Within that time period in the project development market, the company has achieved these results:
The company also deals with many other carbon offset projects apart from nature-based solutions. They mostly include landfill gas capture projects.
3Degrees’ project development solution is broken down into 5 major phases:
Setting aside its proven track record in the space, what makes 3Degrees stand out from other top carbon offset project developers are a couple of differences. They include the following:
3Degrees works with all four of the major internationally-recognized voluntary carbon offset standards. They include Verra, Gold Standard, American Carbon Registry, and Climate Action Reserve. The firm ensures that each project adheres to approved protocols.
3Degrees help organizations build a portfolio of high-quality projects that are relevant to their business and engage stakeholders.
The project developer takes a holistic approach to portfolio management. It works with clients to balance immediate needs with long-term program goals.
All these enable 3Degrees to be a strategic partner for entities looking to build a portfolio of high-integrity carbon reduction and removal projects. They include opportunities both for long-term and new project development.
4. Forest Carbon
Making it to the top 4 spot, Forest Carbon’s main goal is to restore degraded tropical forest and wetland ecosystems. These projects fall under the broad category of REDD+.
So far, it’s a premium restoration project developer in Southeast Asia. Its projects deliver benefits for local communities, biodiversity and investors.
With offices in Jakarta and Singapore, Forest Carbon’s team is built on a track record of success in the region. The team brings a decade of experience working on the ground, from mapping wetlands and assessing below-ground carbon storage, to winning community support.
The REDD+ developer follows these key project development stages.
Forest Carbon is on the ground to assess threats to tropical forest ecosystems and develop business models to protect them.
From the dry dipterocarp forests of Malaysia to the carbon-rich peat swamp forests of Indonesia, the developer specializes in assessing these areas. It offers the following major advantages in creating carbon credits from natural climate solutions:
Rapid GIS assessments with our in-house team
Automated carbon credit calculations
Drone-based aerial surveys
In designing its REDD+ projects, Forest Carbon works exclusively under the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS). It also adopts the Climate Community and Biodiversity Standard.
Forest Carbon has designed Indonesia’s first peatland restoration project in Central Kalimantan under VCS. It also did the same with Seima, Cambodia – WCS Restoration Project.
Forest Carbon is leveraging IoT sensors and machine learning for a project’s robust impact verification.
These IoT sensors monitor water table levels for peatland ecosystems. They also provide fire risk data in real-time in a project dashboard. The data generated make it easier to measure project impact by auditors.
5. C-Quest Capital
C-Quest Capital (CQC) is a social impact project developer that aims to transform the lives of families in poor communities worldwide.
The firm does it by providing access to sustainable energy services and clean energy technologies that reduce emissions.
CQC was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in Washington D.C., USA, with local offices in India, Malawi, Malaysia, Singapore, Cambodia and Australia. Its global teams lead project operations across Sub-Saharan Africa, Central America, and South and Southeast Asia.
The developer creates high impact carbon offset credits under three operational platforms:
Efficient Lighting, and
Sustainable Energy (Nature-based Projects).
Together, they form the so-called Transformation Carbon projects. They all comply with specific carbon offset standards. They then go through rigorous 3rd-party assessments by auditors to ensure credits are real and measurable.
Currently, CQC certifies all new projects under the Verra Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) same with other top carbon offset project developers on our list.
Each project is registered onto a cloud-based data management system using Android phones or tablets. Registration involves data collection for monitoring and follow-up.
Doing all these are critical for project evaluation, verification, and improvement.
So, for high integrity and high impact offsets that help the poorest communities, CQC tops this project category.
As you can see, each project developer has its own set of processes when developing a project. But overall, you have to carefully think about the specific results you want to achieve.
They may follow the same offsetting standards but not all carbon offset project developers will make it to the top of our list. You’ll never go wrong with any of them.