Nickel has moved from being a niche industrial metal to a critical pillar of the global energy transition, along with copper, lithium, and uranium.

Once primarily used in stainless steel, nickel is now critical for high-energy-density batteries, electric vehicles (EVs), grid storage, aerospace alloys, and emerging hydrogen infrastructure.

Essentially, it’s now another mineral on that list, albeit one that seems to have largely flown under most investors’ radars thus far. However, it’s understandable why that’s been the case – after all, the primary use for mined nickel has long been industrial, with over three-quarters of global nickel demand being for things like alloy production or electroplating.

Nickel Basics: Types, Grades, and Industrial Uses

Nickel is a silvery-white transition metal with high corrosion resistance, ductility, and thermal stability. Its unique properties make it indispensable in alloys and electrochemical applications.

Nickel is generally classified into two main categories:

• Class 1 nickel: High-purity nickel metal, powders, briquettes, and salts such as nickel sulfate. These are essential for battery cathodes, advanced alloys, and aerospace applications.
• Class 2 nickel: Ferronickel and nickel pig iron (NPI), primarily used in stainless steel production.

Historically, stainless steel accounted for roughly two-thirds of nickel consumption, providing a stable demand base. However, batteries have emerged as the fastest-growing segment, particularly for nickel-rich cathode chemistries such as NMC (nickel-manganese-cobalt) and NCA (nickel-cobalt-aluminum).

Aerospace, defense, and superalloys also rely heavily on nickel for high-temperature and corrosion-resistant applications.

This dual-market nature—spanning bulk industrial use and high-tech energy transition applications—makes nickel one of the most structurally complex metals in the critical minerals ecosystem.

Nickel Processing Technologies: The Backbone of the EV and Steel Boom

Not all nickel is equal, and processing technology determines where it ends up. Nickel processing is the set of industrial methods used to extract nickel from its ores and turn it into usable forms for various industries, including stainless steel, batteries, and alloys. Essentially, it’s how raw nickel in rocks becomes the high-purity metal or chemical compounds needed for manufacturing.

Nickel is mined mainly from two types of ores:

• Sulfide ores – Found deep underground, easier to process, high purity.
• Laterite ores – Found near the surface, lower nickel content, more challenging to process.

The Case Of Battery Grade Nickel

In order to be used in an electric vehicle, nickel must first be refined to extremely high purities, creating what’s known as “battery grade” nickel. Following this, it then needs to be dissolved in sulphuric acid to create nickel sulphate, which can then be used to produce battery cathodes.

Nickel’s high energy density, which allows it to hold more charge for less weight, makes high-nickel battery chemistries more desirable in EV batteries. While the first iterations of the lithium-ion battery used equal proportions of nickel, manganese, and cobalt, modern ones use as much nickel as manganese and cobalt combined.

And as technology continues to progress, it’s expected that the ratio will rise to as much as 80% nickel, or even more.

Now here’s a simple breakdown of the processing technologies:

Pyrometallurgy Still Dominates Stainless Steel

High-temperature smelting remains the most common route for nickel extraction. Rotary kiln–electric furnace (RKEF) and flash smelting convert sulfide and laterite ores into ferronickel or nickel pig iron (NPI). These products suit stainless steel, but they consume large amounts of energy and emit significant CO₂.

Notably, NPI and ferronickel continue to anchor global supply.

Hydrometallurgy Powers Battery-Grade Nickel

Hydrometallurgical routes, especially high-pressure acid leaching (HPAL), are becoming critical for EV batteries. HPAL converts laterite ores into mixed hydroxide precipitate (MHP) and then into nickel sulfate for cathodes.

Refining and Recycling Gain Momentum

Electrorefining and solvent extraction deliver high-purity Class 1 nickel. Refined products made up around 60% of the nickel market in 2024. Recycling is also rising as a low-carbon supply source.

In short, nickel processing is splitting into two markets: low-cost NPI for steel and high-purity nickel for batteries. This divide is reshaping supply chains, investment flows, and decarbonization strategies across the metals industry.

The Volatile Nickel Price Cycle 

Unlike lithium, the nickel market is much more complex. The metal sits at the crossroads of geopolitics, industrial demand, and changing battery technology. Over the past five years, nickel prices have been highly volatile.

For example, during the 2022 LME squeeze, prices spiked above $100,000 per tonne. Then they dropped sharply to around $13,900 per tonne in early 2025.

• Since then, they have started to recover, reaching about $17,200 per tonne by February 2026.

This volatility shows how sensitive nickel is to supply, demand, and global events. As EV demand grows, the nickel market will continue to face swings.

This volatility reflects a structural mismatch between supply expansion and shifting demand patterns. Massive Indonesian production growth has flooded the market, while battery chemistry trends toward lithium iron phosphate (LFP) have reduced nickel intensity in mass-market EVs. At the same time, premium EVs and aerospace applications continue to rely heavily on Class 1 nickel, creating a bifurcated market structure.

For investors, policymakers, and corporates, nickel represents a critical test case for the energy transition economy. Understanding its supply chain, macro drivers, and long-term price scenarios is essential for navigating the next decade of critical minerals markets.

• SEE MORE: Nickel’s Wild Ride: What’s Driving Prices and Future Demand?

Global Nickel Supply: Indonesia’s Dominance and Market Impact

Indonesia has reshaped the global nickel market more than any other country. In 2024, its nickel in mine production was 2.2 million tonnes (mt), an increase of 158% over the previous five years. Its rise was fueled by a combination of raw-ore export bans, massive Chinese-backed investments in downstream processing, and the rapid deployment of high-pressure acid leach (HPAL) facilities for battery-grade nickel.

By consolidating both mining and smelting, Indonesia has established a vertically integrated nickel ecosystem capable of supplying both stainless steel and battery markets at low cost.

Policy Controls and Quota Management

Despite its dominance, Indonesia’s nickel supply faces tightening government controls in 2026. The government sharply reduced the nickel ore production quota (RKAB) to 250–260 million wet metric tonnes (wmt), down from 379 million wmt in 2025 and 298 million wmt initially approved for 2025—a cut of roughly 34%.

The move aims to align ore output with domestic smelter capacity, curb oversupply, and support prices. Following the announcement, LME nickel prices surged past $18,000/t before stabilizing near $17,200/t in February 2026.

Delays in RKAB approvals have already halted operations at mines such as PT Vale Indonesia, signaling enforcement risks for the policy. Meanwhile, demand growth is tempered by slower stainless steel uptake and the structural shift toward LFP batteries, which has helped sustain a global surplus forecast of 261–288 kt in 2026 despite production cuts.

Indonesia’s strategic approach—resource nationalism, controlled expansion, and downstream integration—has fundamentally altered global nickel pricing. Low production costs and government-backed industrial policy allow Indonesian producers to remain profitable even during periods of weak prices.

• However, S&P Global noted that, “Indonesia is still projected to more than double its production over the next decade to an estimated 4.97 MMt by 2035.”

China’s Role in the Nickel Supply Chain

China continues to dominate the processing of nickel intermediates and battery materials. Chinese firms have financed and built much of Indonesia’s upstream infrastructure, including HPAL plants and mixed hydroxide precipitate (MHP) facilities.

It is also the single largest consumer of nickel, driven by domestic stainless steel production and battery manufacturing. Policy shifts, stimulus measures, and industrial planning decisions in China have an outsized impact on global nickel markets, influencing both price and supply chain dynamics.

Other Global Producers

Beyond Indonesia and China, major nickel-producing countries include Russia, the Philippines, Canada, Australia, and New Caledonia. However, many high-cost producers have struggled to compete with Indonesia’s integrated, low-cost production model. For example, BHP suspended operations at its Nickel West facility in Western Australia amid persistent low prices, highlighting the competitive pressures faced by high-cost producers.

This dynamic has accelerated consolidation in the global nickel industry, with strategic repositioning focused on securing downstream processing and high-grade nickel for energy transition applications.

Nickel Demand Dynamics: Stainless Steel vs. Batteries

Stainless Steel: The Legacy Anchor

Stainless steel remains the primary driver of nickel demand, accounting for roughly two-thirds of consumption. Demand is closely tied to construction, infrastructure, and manufacturing activity. China, the world’s largest stainless steel producer, remains a key macro driver for nickel demand globally.

Class 1 Nickel: Powering the EV Boom

Nickel demand for batteries has grown fast over the past decade. Class 1 nickel, with purity above 99.8%, is key for high-energy NMC and NCA batteries. These batteries power premium EVs, giving longer driving ranges and lighter, more efficient vehicles. Advanced cathodes now contain 60–80% nickel, with some designs targeting 90%+ nickel content.

By 2030, nickel-heavy batteries could reach 1,320 MWh globally, covering about 80% of all EV lithium-ion batteries. Battery demand is expected to use over 50% of Class 1 nickel by 2027, growing at 12–15% per year. The average EV battery now contains 28–30 kg of nickel.

But there are risks:

• LFP batteries, which contain no nickel, are growing in lower-cost EVs, especially in China. Nickel intensity per vehicle has fallen nearly one-third since 2020.

• Policy differences affect supply: China held 63.5% of global nickel demand in 2025, Europe prioritizes allied supply, and US policies are less stable.

The Lights Are Green for Nickel

Forecasts from the International Energy Agency (IEA) project nickel demand more than doubling by 2035 under current pledges, potentially tripling in net-zero scenarios driven by EVs and storage.

IEA also projects that nickel use in EV batteries, renewables, and stainless steel is projected to push nickel demand above 5.5 Mt by 2035. As Indonesia tightens output and China dominates downstream processing, Western economies face rising exposure to supply disruptions and geopolitical leverage.​ Even conservative outlooks show 8-9x EV battery demand growth by 2050, despite late-decade plateaus from chemistry shifts.

• READ MORE: Nickel Demand to Triple by 2030: Can the Market Keep Up?

Long-Term Supply Outlook: From Oversupply to Potential Deficit

As per INSG last year, supply vastly outpaced demand, hitting 209-212 kt global surplus. Recently, S&P Global projected a 156,000-tonne surplus in 2026. However, the same analysis also says that today’s surplus will not last forever.

The report projects that global nickel stocks will peak around 2028. After that, inventories will begin to fall as demand improves and supply growth slows. By the early 2030s, the market balance will flip.

By 2031, S&P Global expects the primary nickel balance to turn negative. EV battery demand will grow as electrification expands. Stainless steel consumption will recover alongside global manufacturing. Significantly, Indonesian supply growth will slow as easy expansions may run out, and regulatory risks can increase.

Once inventories drop below comfortable weeks-of-consumption levels, prices respond quickly. S&P Global points to nickel prices rising toward $25,000 per tonne or higher, especially for Class 1 material.

Policy and Geopolitics: Resource Nationalism and Market Fragmentation

Indonesia exemplifies modern resource nationalism. The government’s export bans, production quotas, and mine suspensions aim to capture downstream value and stabilize prices.

Western governments are responding with critical minerals strategies, including subsidies, domestic mining support, and restrictions on Chinese supply chains. This could fragment the global nickel market into competing blocs, heightening geopolitical risk for downstream industries.

Most importantly, the Trump administration sees developing U.S. nickel supply chains as key to reducing dependence on foreign sources and boosting the domestic industry. Efforts include promoting new mining projects, speeding up permits for critical mineral operations, and exploring tariffs or other trade measures to support local production. One major example is a copper-nickel project in Minnesota, led by a joint venture between Glencore and Teck Resources.

Macro Drivers: Energy Transition, Industrial Demand, and Monetary Policy

Nickel is highly sensitive to macroeconomic and policy conditions. Industrial demand tracks global manufacturing cycles, while battery demand depends on EV adoption rates, subsidies, and consumer behavior.

Interest rates, inflation, and currency fluctuations affect nickel through speculative flows and production financing costs. Meanwhile, energy transition policies, carbon pricing, and ESG mandates are reshaping supply chains, pushing automakers and battery manufacturers to secure long-term nickel supply agreements.

Nickel’s Role in Carbon Markets and Net-Zero Strategies

Nickel’s importance extends beyond industrial use. Battery supply chains are central to decarbonization, embedding nickel demand in national net-zero strategies. Companies increasingly link nickel sourcing to ESG frameworks, carbon disclosure requirements, and sustainability-linked financing.

At the same time, nickel production drives greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. According to a disclosure from the International Finance Corporation (World Bank Group), under a scenario accounting for declining ore grades and cleaner grids, emissions could rise 90% from 2020 to 2050. Additionally, a lack of decarbonization could push emissions to 164%.

Most emissions come from processing rather than mining. Pyrometallurgical routes for Class 2 nickel (used in stainless steel) are coal-intensive, while Class 1 battery-grade nickel has lower emissions. Shifting to EV-focused, Class 1 production can help limit emissions growth.

Thus, cleaner processing, low-carbon production, and recycling could give automakers and battery makers a competitive edge, while decarbonized electricity is key to controlling nickel emissions as production rises.

Top 3 Nickel Producers Signal Tight Supply Heading into 2026

The global nickel market entered 2026 with cautious signals from its largest producers. Industry analysts revealed that mining output stayed broadly flat, disruptions persisted, and companies focused more on battery-grade processing than expanding supply. This reinforced expectations of a structurally tight nickel market.

Nornickel

Norilsk Nickel, or Nornickel, reported stable but slightly lower production in 2025. The company produced 199,000 tonnes of nickel, down 3% year-on-year, mainly due to a shift toward lower-grade disseminated ore. Production recovered in the fourth quarter, rising 9% quarter-on-quarter to 58,000 tonnes after scheduled maintenance in Q3. Nearly all nickel came from the company’s own Russian feedstock, highlighting its self-reliant supply chain.

For 2026, Nornickel guided nickel output between 193,000 and 203,000 tonnes, signaling flat production with no major expansion plans. Nornickel’s market capitalization stood at about $31 billion as of February 2026, underscoring its role as a major global supplier despite geopolitical constraints.

The lack of growth from one of the world’s key Class 1 nickel producers suggests limited incremental supply from Russia.

Vale

Brazil’s Vale continued to position itself as a strategic player in the battery metals supply chain. The company plans a nickel sulfate refinery in Bécancour, Québec, with deliveries to General Motors targeted for the second half of 2026, pending regulatory approvals. This move highlighted Vale’s push toward high-purity battery materials rather than bulk nickel mining.

Vale’s market capitalization was around $69–70 billion in early 2026, making it one of the largest diversified miners with significant nickel exposure. It produced 175,000 tonnes of nickel in 2025, reaching the high end of its guidance. Growth came from Canadian operations in Sudbury and Long Harbour and restarts in Brazil.

Looking ahead, Vale Indonesia warned its 2026 mining quota won’t meet demand for new nickel smelters. The approved quota is only about 30% of what the company requested, raising concerns that upcoming processing plants could face ore shortages.

Vale and partners are building three HPAL plants for EV battery nickel. The Pomalaa plant, starting in August 2026, will need 21 million tonnes of limonite ore per year, while Bahodopi will require 10.4 million tonnes annually. These projects represent over $6.5 billion in investment and highlight the growing pressure on Indonesia’s nickel supply.

Glencore

Glencore’s 2025 Full‑Year Production Report showed nickel output from its own sources at 71,900 tonnes, down about 7% from 82,300 tonnes in 2024. This decline was driven by lower production at both Integrated Nickel Operations (INO) and the Murrin Murrin operations. The reported figure excludes 5,000 tonnes from the Koniambo project, which is in care and maintenance.

In the fourth quarter of 2025, nickel production (including third‑party feed) was around 35,300 tonnes, slightly below the prior quarter. Glencore also gave 2026 nickel guidance of 70,000–80,000 tonnes, reflecting a relatively flat outlook after the 2025 drop.

Its nickel business is part of a broader diversified metals portfolio, with the company also producing copper, zinc, cobalt, coal, and other commodities. Nickel remains important to its strategy, especially given rising EV battery demand, but output challenges and asset transitions affected annual totals.

As of February 2026, Glencore’s market capitalization is widely reported to be around $58–61 billion (USD) based on its London Stock Exchange listing and share price.

This positions Glencore as a major diversified mining and commodity trading company, though smaller in market value than some of its peers like Rio Tinto or BHP. The company’s valuation reflects its breadth across metals, energy, and marketing operations, and its prospects are often shaped by commodity price swings and operational performance.

Risks and Opportunities for Investors and Policymakers

The top nickel producers showed limited growth in mining output while accelerating investments in battery-grade processing. Ore quality challenges, regulatory delays, and operational disruptions continued to constrain supply. At the same time, electric vehicle demand and energy transition needs kept rising.

The lack of aggressive supply expansion from major producers suggests the nickel market could remain structurally tight through the late 2020s, especially for high-purity Class 1 nickel required in batteries.

This is why nickel stocks present a unique combination of risks and opportunities. Supply concentration, policy interventions, and technological disruption create price volatility. Conversely, long-term demand from electrification, aviation, and hydrogen infrastructure provides structural upside.

Investors must navigate cyclical price swings, while policymakers balance industrial policy with market stability. Strategic supply agreements, diversification, and technology adoption will be crucial for managing risk.

Conclusion: Nickel’s Strategic Decade Ahead

Nickel is entering a decisive decade. The metal is so vital for the global energy transition, but faces structural uncertainty from supply expansion and evolving battery technology.

The next ten years will determine whether nickel becomes a stable metal of clean energy supply chains or a cautionary case study in commodity oversupply and industrial policy missteps. For institutions, understanding nickel’s macro dynamics, supply chains, and policy risks is essential. The metal’s trajectory will shape not only battery markets but also the geopolitics of the global energy transition.

• READ MORE: Top 4 Nickel Companies Driving Electrification and Clean Energy in 2025 

Vistra Corp. (NYSE: VST) closed 2025 with strong operational and financial momentum. Headquartered in Irving, Texas, the Fortune 500 power producer operates one of the largest competitive electricity portfolios in the United States.

Last year, the company expanded its fleet, strengthened long-term partnerships, and delivered record operational performance. At the same time, it positioned itself to benefit from rising electricity demand driven by data centers, electrification, and AI growth.

• It now owns and operates roughly 44,000 megawatts (MW) of generation capacity across natural gas, nuclear, coal, solar, and battery storage assets. That capacity can power about 22 million homes.

Financial Performance Shows Underlying Strength

For the year ended December 31, 2025, Vistra reported GAAP net income of $944 million. This figure included an $808 million unrealized pre-tax loss from commodity hedges expected to settle in future years.

Although net income declined compared to 2024, the drop mainly reflected accounting impacts from rising forward power prices. Higher forward prices typically increase the long-term value of Vistra’s generation portfolio. As a result, the underlying business remains strong.

Ongoing Operations Adjusted EBITDA reached $5.9 billion, up $269 million year over year. Stronger retail margins and contributions from newly acquired assets supported the increase. Cash flow from operations totaled $4.07 billion, reinforcing liquidity and balance sheet strength.

2026 Expectations

For 2026, Vistra expects its adjusted EBITDA to range between $6.8 billion and $7.6 billion, while its adjusted free cash flow before growth is projected between $3.93 billion and $4.73 billion.

Importantly, these projections exclude potential impacts from the pending Cogentrix acquisition and recently signed nuclear agreements.

• READ MORE: AI Demand to Drive $600B From the Big Five for GPU and Data Center Boom by 2026

Meta and Amazon Anchor Vistra’s Nuclear Growth Strategy

The company operates the second-largest competitive nuclear fleet in the United States, providing steady, carbon-free baseload electricity that supports both grid reliability and corporate decarbonization goals.

• In early 2026, the company signed 20-year power purchase agreements with Meta, covering more than 2,600 megawatts of nuclear energy across its PJM facilities. As Meta expands its AI capabilities and data center footprint, it needs dependable, around-the-clock power. These agreements secure long-term access to emissions-free electricity while giving Vistra predictable revenue streams.

Importantly, the structure of the contracts goes beyond traditional energy sales. They include capacity payments and plant uprates, allowing higher output from existing nuclear units. This approach improves asset efficiency for Vistra while ensuring price stability and supply certainty for Meta.

• Vistra also strengthened its clean energy partnerships in Texas. Last year, it signed a separate 20-year agreement with Amazon Web Services for up to 1,200 megawatts of nuclear power from the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. The deal supports Amazon’s growing data operations with firm, carbon-free electricity and locks in long-term value for the company.

Together, these agreements reinforce the long-term viability of Vistra’s nuclear fleet. Long-term license renewals for the PJM units extend the life of critical zero-carbon infrastructure and strengthen grid reliability. At the same time, they position Vistra to meet rising corporate demand for clean, dependable power in the AI-driven economy.

Expanding Solar and Natural Gas 

Vistra also commissioned the 200-MW Oak Hill Solar Facility on a reclaimed coal mine site. The project includes a PPA with AWS, expanding the clean energy collaboration.

In November 2025, it closed a 2,600-MW acquisition from Lotus Infrastructure Partners. Shortly after, it announced plans to acquire Cogentrix Energy, adding approximately 5,500 MW of gas-fired capacity. The transaction is expected to close in mid-to-late 2026.

Additionally, it has also begun construction on two new gas units totaling 860 MW at its Permian Basin plant, effectively tripling that site’s capacity. In addition, it executed uprates across its Texas gas fleet to increase efficiency and output.

These investments reflect a balanced approach. As renewable penetration increases, flexible gas generation helps stabilize the grid and manage peak demand.

Advancing Emissions Reduction Goals

Vistra’s Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions declined for the third consecutive year in 2024, primarily due to reduced coal generation. Scope 1 includes carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, with carbon dioxide representing the largest share.

• The company targets a 60% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2030 compared to 2010 levels. It also aims to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

Corporate sustainability efforts extend beyond generation. The company’s headquarters operates on 100% Green-e Wind renewable energy certificates. Nuclear-based emissions-free energy certificates also support fleet electricity usage. Together, these certificates covered more than 30% of corporate electricity consumption in 2024.

Positioned for Long-Term Value Creation

Vistra enters 2026 with strong momentum. Long-term nuclear PPAs with Meta and Amazon, expanded gas capacity, disciplined hedging, and growing renewable assets provide earnings visibility.

As electricity demand rises from AI, electrification, and digital infrastructure, companies with scale and reliability will benefit. Vistra’s integrated model of combining retail operations, nuclear baseload, flexible gas assets, and renewables positions it to capture that growth.

With projected EBITDA exceeding $7 billion in 2026 and potential upside from acquisitions, Vistra is not only adapting to the evolving energy market. It is actively shaping its future.

• READ MORE: Meta Signs Three Nuclear Deals of Up to 6.6 GW to Fuel AI Data Center Growth

The post Vistra Leverages Nuclear Partnerships with Meta and Amazon to Drive 2026 Growth appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS F1 Team has stepped up its climate action strategy with a major expansion of its global carbon dioxide removal (CDR) portfolio. The team has added seven new projects across multiple carbon removal pathways, making it one of the most diverse portfolios in global sport.

This move is a long-term, multi-year investment designed to support high-integrity, science-backed climate solutions. While emissions reduction remains the top priority, the team recognizes that some emissions cannot be eliminated. That is where durable carbon removals come in.

The expansion marks another milestone in Mercedes’ broader Net Zero journey — one built on practical solutions, data transparency, and industry collaboration.

A Clear Net Zero Roadmap

Mercedes tracks its carbon footprint in two ways. First, it measures Race Team Control emissions (RTCe). These include Scope 1, Scope 2, and selected Scope 3 emissions that the team can influence directly. Second, it reports its total emissions across Scopes 1, 2, and 3.

Unlike many companies that only focus on direct emissions, Mercedes extends its control boundary to include upstream transport, waste, fuel-related activities, business travel, employee commuting, and energy use. This broader approach aligns with Formula 1’s 2030 Net Zero commitment.

The team has set two major targets:

• Achieve Race Team Control Net Zero by 2030
• Reach Full Net Zero across all scopes by 2040

For its 2030 goal, Mercedes plans to cut 75% of RTC emissions compared to its 2022 baseline. The remaining 25% will be addressed through high-quality carbon removals, following the Oxford Offsetting Principles.

Progress so far is significant. By 2024, the team had already reduced its Race Team Control emissions by 35% compared to 2022.

Where the Emissions Cuts Came From

The 35% reduction came from targeted operational changes. During the European race season, 98% of logistics used HVO100 biofuel. This low-carbon fuel helped slash transport emissions. Meanwhile, 68% of aviation emissions were addressed through Sustainable Aviation Fuel certificates (SAFc).

At its Brackley factory in the UK, Mercedes reduced gas consumption and improved energy efficiency. The team also continued electrifying its company vehicle fleet.

However, not everything went smoothly. In 2024, an F-gas leak at the factory temporarily increased Scope 1 emissions. F-gases have high global warming potential, so even small leaks can have an outsized impact. While the team has already transitioned to lower-impact refrigerants where possible, some cooling systems still rely on high-impact gases. Mercedes has tightened monitoring systems and plans to shift to better alternatives as soon as viable options become available.

Despite this setback, the overall emissions trend remains downward. The team now aims to fully eliminate Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2026, with any small residual amounts neutralized through removals.

Building a Long-Term Carbon Removal Strategy

Even with aggressive cuts, some emissions remain hard to eliminate — especially across global supply chains. Purchased goods and services represent a large share of Scope 3 emissions. These are complex and often outside direct control.

That is why Mercedes is investing in durable, verifiable, and scalable carbon removals.

In total, the team is investing in roughly 18,900 tonnes of CO2 equivalent across nature-based, hybrid, and engineered removal projects. These investments support the 2030 Race Team Control Net Zero goal.

Importantly, the strategy follows the Oxford Offsetting Principles. This means prioritizing permanent removals and gradually shifting from short-term nature-based offsets toward long-term engineered solutions.

A Diverse Portfolio Across Technologies

To reduce risk and build resilience, Mercedes has spread its investments across several technologies and geographies. The portfolio now spans:

• Direct Air Capture
• Biochar, Biomass Storage
• Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS)
• Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement
• Enhanced Rock Weathering

Frontier: One key partner is Frontier, supporting durable removal technologies. Through this agreement, Mercedes backs solutions such as direct air capture and enhanced weathering. These technologies aim to store carbon for more than 1,000 years and eventually reduce costs below $100 per tonne. The team expects to begin receiving credits from Frontier-backed projects as early as 2027.

Blaston Farm: In the UK, Mercedes works with Blaston Farm near Silverstone to support regenerative agriculture. This project removes carbon while restoring soil health and boosting biodiversity. The team signed a three-year agreement and used 2,000 tonnes of removals from the project against its 2024 footprint. Advanced soil monitoring combines direct sampling with AI-driven image analysis, improving both accuracy and scalability.

Chestnut Carbon: In the US, Mercedes partnered with Chestnut Carbon to restore degraded agricultural land in the southeastern region. The first project will convert 200 hectares into biodiverse forests by planting more than 260,000 native trees. Since 2022, Chestnut Carbon has planted over 17 million trees across 30,000 acres. The collaboration is expected to deliver 1,000 to 1,500 tonnes of carbon removals annually starting in 2027.

The broader portfolio also includes projects in Brazil, Canada, Denmark, and India. This geographic spread reflects the team’s goal to create impact in regions connected to the Formula One race calendar.

All projects are curated and verified by CUR8, a carbon removal marketplace that assesses durability, transparency, and methodology. This adds an extra layer of credibility to the portfolio.

• FURTHER READING: Frontier’s $31.3M Offtake with Planetary Signals a New Era for Ocean Carbon Removal

Collaboration Beyond the Track

Mercedes understands it cannot solve climate challenges alone. The team actively collaborates within and beyond motorsport.

It participates in the F1 ESG Working Group, sharing best practices across the grid. Internally, its Sustainability Working Group connects team partners to exchange ideas and tackle shared challenges.

Notably, Mercedes was the first motorsport team to sign The Climate Pledge, committing to Net Zero across total emissions by 2040.

Team partners such as Signify, UBS, and Nasdaq support high-integrity climate solutions as well. Meanwhile, companies like Meta and Microsoft have played a major role in scaling the carbon removals industry, helping create demand for early-stage technologies.

Speaking at Economist Impact’s Sustainability Week, Head of Sustainability Alice Ashpitel emphasized that emissions reduction remains the priority. However, she stressed that high-quality removals are essential for dealing with residual emissions. By investing early across different technologies and regions, the team aims to help scale durable climate solutions while delivering benefits to communities and ecosystems.

Engineering Change On and Off the Track

Formula One has committed to Net Zero by 2030. As one of the sport’s most prominent teams, Mercedes is positioning itself at the forefront of that transition.

The team’s approach combines aggressive emission reductions, early investment in permanent carbon removal technologies, and strong governance. Instead of relying on short-term offsets, it is helping build a long-term carbon removal market capable of delivering climate impact at scale.

This strategy reflects the same engineering mindset that drives success on the track: test, refine, optimize, and scale.

By cutting emissions where it has control and investing in durable removals where it does not, Mercedes is shaping a credible path toward Net Zero. The goal is not just to meet targets but to help raise standards across motorsport and beyond.

In a sport defined by speed and precision, Mercedes is proving that climate leadership also requires bold action and long-term thinking.

• READ MORE: Mercedes-Benz Goes Electric: Biggest Model Launch Set for 2026 & Zero-Emission Commitment 

The post Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS Expands Carbon Removal Portfolio to Accelerate Net Zero Push appeared first on Carbon Credits.

A new regulatory filing in the European Union shows that several major carmakers will not join the 2026 carbon credit pool led by Tesla. The filing lists Stellantis, Toyota Motor Corporation, and Subaru Corporation as absent from the Tesla-led alliance for the coming compliance year.

The change highlights an important shift in the European auto market. Carbon credit trading has become a major financial lever for electric vehicle makers, especially Tesla. At the same time, legacy automakers are investing heavily in electric and hybrid vehicles to reduce their dependence on regulatory credits.

EU Filing Reveals Breakup in Tesla’s Carbon Credit Alliance

The European Union allows automakers to join “emissions pools” to meet strict fleet-wide carbon targets, as shown below. In these alliances, companies combine their fleets when regulators calculate average CO₂ emissions.

Carmakers with high emissions can offset them by joining a pool led by a low-emission manufacturer such as Tesla.

According to an EU filing dated February 27, 2026, Tesla is recreating its carbon credit pool for the year. However, Stellantis, Toyota, and Subaru are not currently listed as members.

The absence marks a change from 2025. That year, the Tesla pool included a large group of automakers: Tesla, Stellantis, Toyota, Subaru, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Suzuki, and Leapmotor. These partnerships helped companies comply with EU emissions targets while their EV production ramped up.

For 2026, the pool appears smaller. Current participants include Tesla alongside Ford Motor Company, Honda Motor Company, Mazda Motor Corporation, and Suzuki Motor Corporation.

However, companies can still join later. Automakers are allowed to enter pooling agreements until December 2026, leaving the door open for changes during the year.

How Tesla Turns Carbon Credits Into Billions in Revenue

Tesla’s role in carbon pools comes from its all-electric lineup. Since the company sells only zero-emission vehicles, its fleet emissions are far below EU regulatory limits. This creates excess regulatory credits. Tesla can sell those credits to other automakers that struggle to meet the limits.

Globally, Tesla has earned nearly $2 billion in 2025 from emissions credits, according to its report filings. The EV maker has earned a total of around $12.4 billion since 2017.

These revenues have historically played an important role in Tesla’s profitability. In several earlier years, regulatory credits accounted for a large share of the company’s net income.

• MUST READ: Tesla Reports First-Ever Annual Revenue Drop in 2025, Carbon Credit Sales Also Dip 28%

In Europe alone, analysts previously estimated that Tesla’s pooling arrangements could generate more than €1 billion in annual credit revenue. For traditional automakers, buying credits is often cheaper than paying regulatory fines.

Under EU rules, companies that fail to meet emissions targets face penalties of €95 per gram of CO₂ above the limit for every car sold. This can add up quickly for large manufacturers selling millions of vehicles each year.

Carbon credit pooling, therefore, acts as a compliance bridge while companies transition their fleets to electric vehicles.

Why Some Automakers Are Leaving the Pool

The absence of Stellantis, Toyota, and Subaru from the 2026 pool may reflect several strategic changes across the industry.

First, the European Commission adjusted the compliance timeline. Instead of assessing emissions strictly for 2025, regulators now allow compliance based on the average emissions between 2025 and 2027.

This change gives automakers more flexibility. Companies that expect their emissions to fall in the next two years may decide they no longer need to buy credits immediately.

Second, many legacy manufacturers have expanded their production of hybrid and electric vehicles. For example:

• Toyota has one of the world’s largest hybrid fleets.
• Stellantis has expanded its EV lineup across brands such as Peugeot, Opel, Fiat, and Jeep.
• Subaru sells hybrid vehicles and is developing more EV models with Toyota.

These changes could reduce their reliance on Tesla’s credits in the short term. There are also corporate partnerships reshaping the market. Stellantis has a joint venture with Leapmotor, which sells EVs in Europe and could help offset emissions within the group.

• SEE MORE: Stellantis and Leapmotor Forge Carbon Credit Deal Amid Booming EV Market

Europe’s Strict Climate Rules Are Reshaping the Auto Market

The EU has some of the world’s strictest vehicle climate rules. Under the bloc’s current standards, automakers must steadily cut average fleet emissions. These targets support the EU’s broader climate goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 55% by 2030 compared with 1990 levels.

The long-term objective is even more ambitious. The EU plans to phase out sales of new gasoline and diesel cars by 2035, effectively shifting the market toward zero-emission vehicles.

As a result, the European EV market has grown rapidly. Battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) accounted for 15% in 2024. In 2025, this share rose to 19%, reflecting continued EV market growth amid stricter emissions rules.

Hybrid vehicles also play a large role in the transition. Many manufacturers use hybrids to reduce fleet emissions while EV adoption grows.

Tesla’s EV Dominance Still Anchors the Carbon Credit Market

Despite changes in the credit market, Tesla remains one of the most influential players in the global EV industry. The company delivered about 1.81 million vehicles in 2024, making it one of the largest electric car producers worldwide. However, deliveries dropped to 1.6 million in 2025.

• Tesla’s main models include: Model 3, Model Y, Model S, and Model X.

The carmaker also continues to expand its production footprint. Major factories operate in the United States, China, and Germany. The company’s Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg plays a key role in supplying EVs to the European market.

However, BYD has overtaken Tesla in EV sales in 2025, both in the EU market and globally.

As EV adoption rises, the role of regulatory credits may gradually shrink. More automakers will meet emissions targets using their own electric vehicles rather than buying credits. Yet, credits still provide a useful financial buffer for Tesla during the transition period.

Are Carbon Pools a Temporary Bridge for the Auto Industry?

Carbon credit pooling reflects the uneven pace of the automotive transition. Some companies, like Tesla, moved early into fully electric vehicles. Others are still shifting large gasoline and diesel fleets toward cleaner technology.

Pooling allows the industry to comply with regulations while maintaining vehicle supply and avoiding sudden price increases.

Yet, the system may evolve. As more automakers scale EV production, fewer companies will need to buy credits. This could gradually reduce the value of Tesla’s carbon credit business, as the 2025 sales drop shows.

At the same time, tightening climate policies and rising EV demand could create new market dynamics.

For now, Tesla remains at the center of the regulatory credit ecosystem. The 2026 EU filing shows that alliances are shifting, but the underlying system still plays an important role in the global transition to low-carbon transportation.

The coming years will reveal whether carbon pools remain a major financial tool or become a temporary bridge as the auto industry moves toward fully electric fleets.

• READ MORE: BYD Banks 6.2M Carbon Credits Potentially Worth US$217M Under Australia’s EV Efficiency Scheme

The post Tesla’s Carbon Credit Empire Faces a Shake-Up as Stellantis, Toyota, Subaru Exit EU Pool appeared first on Carbon Credits.