Satellite Found Alarming Methane Emissions in Turkmenistan

Methane emissions from two major fossil fuel fields in Turkmenistan last year are contributing more to global warming than the total carbon emissions of the UK, satellite data from Kayrros has shown.

Kayrros analyzed datasets from satellite imagery through its Methane Watch program that tracks methane (CH4) emissions worldwide. 

The company told The Guardian that the oil and gas fields together leaked CH4 emissions equivalent to a total of 366 million tonnes of CO2, greater than the UK’s entire CO2 emissions in 2022 – 331 million tonnes of CO2.

Methane Emissions Flaring Up

Methane is the second most abundant anthropogenic GHG after CO2 which is responsible for about 20% of global emissions. This gas is more than 25x as potent as CO2 at trapping heat in the atmosphere. It can be emitted from various sources, natural or anthropogenic (human-influenced) such as:

Landfills 
Oil and natural gas systems
Agricultural activities
Coal mining
Wastewater treatment
Industrial processes

Over the last 200 years, methane concentrations in the air have more than doubled, largely because of human-related activities.

Methane emissions have gone up alarmingly since 2007. Climate scientists said that this rising CH4 emissions may be the biggest threat to keep global temperatures below 1.5C. 

Together, CH4 emissions from Russia, U.S., China, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, and Nigeria account for about 50% of the entire anthropogenic methane pollution. The specific source of methane varies per country. For instance, Russia releases the gas from natural oil and gas systems while coal production is responsible for China’s emissions. 

And only recently, highest emissions of methane was discovered in Turkmenistan that are also mostly from its oil and gas fields, which experts claim to be “mind-boggling” and “infuriating”. 

Turkmenistan – the Worst Methane Super-Emitter 

The NASA monitoring device revealed that Turkmenistan is one of the worst ‘super-emitters’ of methane in the world. 

The space agency’s Earth Surface Mineral Dust Investigation (EMIT) advances studies of airborne dust and its impact on climate change. But scientists can also use the EMIT device to detect places with the most significant methane emissions. 

Satellite imagery identified Turkmenistan as the country with the highest number of super-emitting events – 184 out of 1,005 events. Moreover, Kayrros also discovered that 70 out of the top 100 biggest super-emitter events were in Turkmenistan.

The biggest event with the highest gas leak of all also happened in the country, on the Caspian coast. The fossil fuel field in the western part of the coast released about 2.6 million tonnes of methane in 2022. The other field in the east leaked 1.8 million tonnes.

Kayrros analysis determined that 427 tons of methane is leaking each hour in August last year. That is equal to the emission rate of 67 million cars. 

The analyzed data covers a 4-year period, from 2019 to 2022, which show a level trend for Turkmenistan’s total emissions. Overall, the country is responsible for 840 methane super-emitting events, including leaks from wells, tanks, and pipes.

According to Kayrros, Turkmenoil, the national oil company, owned most of the facilities leaking the potent gas. The gas rich Central Asian country is China’s second biggest supplier of gas.

Another large emitter of methane is the Permian Basin oilfield in New Mexico. It’s one of the largest oilfields in the world, generating a plume about 2 miles long.

The third CH4 super-emitter is a waste-processing complex in Iran, emitting a plume at least 3 miles long. Methane is a byproduct of decomposition, and so landfills are also a major source. 

Kayrros said that methane leaks from oil and gas systems can be avoided by doing proper maintenance, repairing valves and pipes that leak, and replacing worn parts. 

Antoine Rostand, Kayrros president, said that the management of methane emissions was extremely poor and out of control. Rostand also said that:

“We know where the super emitters are and who is doing it. We just need the policymakers and investors to do their job, which is to crack down on methane emissions.”

The Need to Manage CH4 Emissions 

The world pays a lot of attention to cutting CO2 emissions while methane emissions are often overlooked. But in fact, about ⅓ of the global warming in the past hundred years was due to methane.

There has been a global methane pledge to cut human-caused emissions by 30% by 2030 declared during the Glasgow UN Climate Summit in 2021. 150 national governments participated but some of the major emitters haven’t signed up, including Turkmenistan.

If only Turkmenistan can stop the leaks from its aging Soviet-era oil and gas equipment and practices, it can be the world’s largest methane reducer, experts say. But it wasn’t a priority for the country’s current president, Serdar Berdimuhamedov.

Experts believe that this year’s climate conference happening in the United Arab Emirates, COP28, presents an opportunity to propel methane emission cutting actions in the country. The UAE has strong ties with Turkmenistan and expertise in oil and gas production.

The UAE is also a member of the Global Methane Pledge and its national oil company, Adnoc, is part of the OGMP2 (Oil and Gas Methane Partnership 2.0), a voluntary UN initiative to reduce methane leaks. Adnoc said it will build a supergiant gas field in Turkmenistan and have other energy projects in the country. It ranks in the top 5 lowest emitters in the oil and gas industry and also has one of the lowest methane intensities (0.01%).

Hopes are high that the COP28 will be a wake-up call for Turkmenistan and other super-emitters of methane to bring down their emissions.

The post Satellite Found Alarming Methane Emissions in Turkmenistan appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Musk Breaks Ground on Tesla’s $1 Billion Texas Lithium Refinery

Tesla and Elon Musk break ground at the site of the electric carmaker’s new lithium refinery in Corpus Christi, the first of its kind in North America, which will cost $1 billion upon completion. 

Tesla and Lithium Production for EVs

Last year, Musk tweeted that Tesla may get into the lithium mining and refining business directly due to the high cost of the metal element. He also said that the availability of battery-grade lithium was a “fundamental chokepoint” for the EV industry and other sectors.

The Tesla and SpaceX tech CEO showed the average price of lithium per tonne, which increased massively last year – $78,032/tonne. It has soared up to over 480% from 2021 to 2022, per Benchmark Mineral Intelligence data. 

That big growth is driven by the upsurge in EV sales and a struggle to secure supply.

Musk said that there’s no shortage of lithium because it’s available almost everywhere but extracting and refining it is slow. True enough, there are deposits of lithium all over the U.S. to meet the growing demand.

The US Geological Survey reported that the country has 750,000 tonnes of recoverable lithium in 2021. This figure will go up as new reserves are discovered and established.

Global lithium production increased by 21% in 2022 compared to 2021, surpassing the highest in 2018 levels. 

This increase was not because of new mines, but in large part due to existing Australian capacity getting online. Chile producers also increased production levels by several thousand tonnes.

The US is home to the world’s biggest lithium deposits after those in the so-called Lithium Triangle region in South America – Argentina, Bolivia and Chile. While the states of Nevada, North Carolina, and California together housed about 4% of the world’s lithium reserves.

Still, EV battery production capacity is rising at twice the speed of lithium supply.

Here’s the analysis by cicenergigune of North American EV battery gigafactories.

Source: cienergigune

The U.S. is currently producing only about 1,000 tonnes of lithium. But the country is projected to produce 91 GWh of lithium-ion batteries in 2025, which needs more than 75,000 tonnes of lithium content. 

According to BloombergNEF, an increase of more than 300% in installed lithium cell production capacity worldwide is expected to reach about 1,769 GWh. China (63%) still takes the lead, followed by Europe (15%) while the US (9%) falls down to the third spot. 

Lithium Cell Production Capacity in 2025

Lithium, a non-ferrous metal, is also known as “white gold” and is valuable in making EVs as it’s the lightest and least dense solid element. What that means for Tesla is producing EV units with a high power-to-weight ratio. 

So unsurprisingly, the giant EV maker plans to build in-house lithium refinery and battery materials processing, refining, and manufacturing operations for its sustainable product line. Tesla’s investment in this facility is critical to its mission to accelerate the world’s transition to clean and sustainable energy. 

That largely involves turning on the switch on EV production and accelerating end-use electrification and sustainable power generation and storage. This path enables Tesla to improve its bottom line while significantly earning revenues through its carbon credit sales. The credits are from the carbon emission reductions achieved with the company’s EV production. 

The $1 Billion Lithium Refinery 

Tesla will invest $375 million to construct the refinery to do away with its reliance on outside lithium supply. Once finished, the site will represent an investment of over $1 billion

Musk further said that Tesla aims to produce enough battery-grade lithium hydroxide at the South Texas facility to make 1 million electric cars each year. Their goal is also to produce more lithium than what the rest of North America produces in that location.

Mining giant Albemarle revealed plans to invest $1.3 billion in a lithium processing facility in South Carolina last March. The company’s Silver Peak mining site in Clayton Valley in Nevada is currently the only one operating lithium mine in the US. It produces around 6,000 tons each year of lithium carbonate, representing only 1% of the world’s lithium carbonate supply

Tesla expects its Texas facility to also process other intermediate lithium sources, such as recycled batteries and manufacturing scrap. The 1,200+ acre facility will be the place of the first industrial deployment of an acid-free lithium refining route.

Acid-free Lithium Refining Process 

The conventional process of refining ore into battery-grade lithium usually involves crushing the raw material, heating it at high temperatures, and mixing it in a slurry with acids. Hydrochloric acid is often used in this process, which is considered hazardous by the U.S. Clean Air Act.

But Tesla’s innovative acid-free lithium processing will use less hazardous reagents and produce usable byproducts. It says in its Texas Comptroller’s filings that the refinery’s byproduct, a mixture of sand and limestone, will make beneficial use of traditional waste streams for producing construction materials. 

Musk asserted that the facility will have no toxic emissions, saying “you could live right in the middle of the refinery and not suffer any ill effects.”

However, he didn’t disclose what would be the exact chemistry that Tesla will use for its acid-free lithium refinery. Yet, Texas Republican Governor, Greg Abbott, praised Elon Musk as the greatest entrepreneur on the planet.

The post Musk Breaks Ground on Tesla’s $1 Billion Texas Lithium Refinery appeared first on Carbon Credits.

VC Funding in Climate Prediction Tech Startups Soars Up

The renewed need to focus on predicting weather or climate and protecting against its impacts makes ClimateAi’s platform and other climate prediction tech startups more important than ever, attracting more funds from venture capital investors. 

Climate change is quickly hastening and its impacts are destroying food production and infrastructure, depleting water resources, and killing lives. Its effects are obvious, from immense heat waves to destructive floods and wildfires. 

Meanwhile, there has been a growing group of climate intelligence startups using AI and data to predict weather like ClimateAi. They’re increasing in number quickly, which VCs believe to significantly make communities and businesses adapt to climate change. 

Investment Into Climate Tech Startups Skyrockets

Studies show that extreme weather events are likely to become more frequent or more intense as the planet heats up. So what’s that got to do with startups?

From predicting any chances for rain for a planned vacation to possible flood or fire incidence of constructing properties, climate tech startups offer both consumers and companies weather prediction services. 

They use AI along with a host of data points from satellites to provide real-time weather and climate determinations.

And as the effects of climate change get worse, the data that these VC-backed startups produce and manage keep on growing. So does the amount of VC funding they receive; weather prediction is a hot theme among funded tech startups recently.

According to Crunchbase data, investments into weather and climate prediction startups went up, from over $145 million in 2017 to over $541 million in 2021. A sample of investment in the space revealed at least 23 startups focusing on climate prediction have secured funding. 

ClimateAi, in particular, had raised $22 million last month in its Series B funding round led by Four Rivers Group. Other investors that participated include Neotribe’s Ignite fund, Yaletown Partners, Radical Ventures, Neotribe Seed Fund, and Academy Investor Network.

ClimateAi: What it Does and How its Platform Works

The new round brings ClimateAi’s total funding to $38 million. Since its oversubscribed Series A fundraising, the climate tech startup had grown its annual revenue by a factor of 5. The California-based startup had also increased its customer base 4x

ClimateAi’s unique platform, ClimateLens, uses AI technologies to produce actionable weather and climate-related insights for businesses worldwide. 

The startup works with companies across industries to build climate resilience, from research and development to operations and supply chain. These include agriculture, food and beverages, manufacturing, finance, apparel, retail, energy, and government and NGOs.

The company’s technology can identify locations for climate-smart expansions for certain crops and manufacturing sites, for instance. 

Their data can also help manufacturers adjust shipment or delivery schedules to maximize efficiency at times of good weather. It could help wineries as well to learn which places will have more rainfall to plant crops next season.

ClimateAi’s climate resilience platform also helps companies and governments in the aspects of climate risk management, asset diligence and portfolio management, demand planning, sales and marketing, and sustainability and TCFD reporting.

Proceeds from the latest funding round will be for expanding into new territories such as India and low-income countries where climate adaptation is urgent. The funds will also help the climate tech startup grow its team for continued AI-backed innovations in climate resilience. 

Climate Tech Innovations Across Sectors

As climate change issues seep through all sectors, the applications for climate prediction technologies are increasing and widening. These climate technologies are also scalable, the reason why VC investors are pouring money into this growing sector. 

Many of the startups operating in this market are using the platform-as-a-service model. This allows them to use the same climate data for various purposes and offer them to different entities.

That only means weather and climate tech startups have found their way into almost every sector, expanding from the agriculture and energy industries. ClimateAi’s CEO, Himanshu Gupta asserted that:

“Tomorrow there’s going to be every company on this planet Earth whose operations and supply chains will be impacted by climate change… And if they act on it, it will lead to not only increased profits for these companies, but also improved resilience for the communities they serve.”

Venture funding into climate-risk startups favor the areas of property, travel, and insurance since 2017. 

Another climate-focused startup, One Concern, closed over $22 million to help real estate developers understand climate risks to their properties. The climate resilience tech firm enables companies to focus on their adaptation strategies through its resilience analytics. 

Tomorrow.io, a SaaS weather intelligence platform that provides real-time weather forecasts, has raised $20 million to help retail and sporting businesses cut down energy expenses using climate analytics.

As more and more sectors are bearing the brunt of the climate crisis, climate prediction startups will also see more investors backing up their innovations. 

The post VC Funding in Climate Prediction Tech Startups Soars Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Protected: American Lithium – The True Story of Nixon’s Nucleargate

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

The post Protected: American Lithium – The True Story of Nixon’s Nucleargate appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Revolutionary Ocean Capture Technology: Turning the Tide on Climate Change

Caltech researchers have founded a startup called Captura, which aims to develop direct ocean capture (DOC) technology. This technology seeks to filter CO2 out of seawater, enabling oceans to absorb more greenhouse gasses. 

As a result, less CO2 remains in the atmosphere, which contributes to climate change. 

The project has the backing of fossil fuel giants and Big Tech companies. However, the technology is still in its early stages and needs to prove its effectiveness and potential side effects.

Harnessing Henry’s Law to Combat Climate Change

Captura was established in 2021 and subsequently won a $1 million award from Elon Musk’s XPrize competition in 2022. With funding from the US’s largest gas utility, the startup is now setting up its most significant pilot project at the Port of Los Angeles. This project will test the feasibility and environmental impact of the technology.

The underlying principle of Captura’s technology is Henry’s Law. The law seeks to establish an equilibrium between the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere and the oceans. 

The Captura DOC Process

The Captura process starts by pulling a stream of filtered ocean water into its system. Less than 1% of this water is pre-processed to purify the seawater into pure salt water. This water is then processed in the company’s patented electrodialysis technology. 

By drawing CO2 out of seawater through electrodialysis, the technology aims to capture the gas for storage or sale as a product. Once treated, the CO2-deficient water is released back into the ocean, allowing it to absorb more CO2 from the atmosphere.

Captura’s process uses only renewable electricity and ocean water to remove CO2 from the air with no by-products and no absorbents.

Addressing Environmental Concerns and Industry Skepticism

The pilot project at the Port of Los Angeles is a significant scale-up compared to Captura’s first pilot in Newport Beach, California, launched in August last year. This new direct ocean capture project aims to remove approximately 100 tons of CO2 from the ocean annually. This amount is equivalent to taking 22 cars off the road for a year. 

The primary goal of the pilot is to test the technology under real-world conditions and ensure its impact on ocean water is benign.

Captura’s First Pilot in Newport Beach, California

However, conservation groups have expressed concerns about the technology’s potential risks. One such risk is the possibility of plankton being filtered out during the water treatment process. 

Plankton forms the base of the entire marine food web, and many other marine animals depend on these microscopic organisms for sustenance.

Another concern is the potential for increased industrial activity and noise pollution in already stressed marine ecosystems. The technology requires the filtering of seawater, which could lead to additional stress on marine life. 

Moreover, the long-term storage of captured CO2 raises questions about the environmental impact and potential leakage of stored gas.

Skepticism also arises from the involvement of fossil fuel companies in funding carbon removal projects. Critics argue that these companies may be using carbon removal technologies as a distraction from the need to reduce fossil fuel extraction and use. This skepticism has led to questions about the technology’s role as a genuine climate solution.

Bolstering the Value of Direct Ocean Capture

Despite these concerns, Captura has secured a contract with Frontier, an initiative backed by Stripe, Alphabet, Meta, Shopify, and McKinsey. The goal of this initiative is to make it easier for companies to offset emissions through emerging carbon removal technologies. Through Frontier, Captura plans to sell carbon credits representing tons of CO2 removed from the ocean.

The carbon credits will likely come from another pilot plant scheduled for construction next year. By selling these credits, Captura aims to demonstrate the value of its technology in combating climate change. 

The success of the pilot projects will be crucial in determining the viability and environmental impact of DOC technology.

In conclusion, Captura’s direct ocean capture technology has the potential to make a significant contribution to reducing CO2 levels in the atmosphere. However, the technology is still in its infancy and must prove its effectiveness and environmental impact. 

The involvement of fossil fuel companies in funding carbon removal projects raises concerns about the technology’s role in truly providing a climate solution. Despite this, the DOC startup still managed to secure a contract with large companies. 

The results of Captura’s pilot projects will be crucial in determining the technology’s potential as a viable and eco-friendly solution to combat climate change.

The post Revolutionary Ocean Capture Technology: Turning the Tide on Climate Change appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Carbon Credits and the Sustainable Development Goals: Aligning Climate Action with Global Priorities

Carbon credits from climate actions represent a crucial part of a strategy to mitigate climate change while supporting the global priorities on advancing sustainable development goals. 

This decade has been dedicated by the United Nations on restoring ecosystems and reversing their degradation. A successful completion of this huge task achieves a lot of priorities – abating climate change, alleviating poverty, promoting equality, etc. Collectively, they are aligned under the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Carbon credits are a well established market mechanism that allows organizations or companies to tackle their greenhouse gas emissions by supporting projects that reduce or remove carbon. These projects often involve land management practices that sequester carbon, making them critical in achieving the Paris Agreement climate goals. 

But more importantly, they can also meet many of the sustainable development goals. This article will explain how carbon credits can help in aligning climate actions with global priorities on SDGs.    

Pricing Carbon is A Climate Action, Plus More

Assigning a real-world value to the cost of emitting CO2 and other GHGs through carbon credits receives both criticism and appreciation. Some consider it greenwashing while others find it an essential tool to reverse the effects of climate change. 

But most people agree on one point – putting a price on carbon forces individuals and companies to pollute less.

Thus, it’s not surprising that carbon credits have become popular as companies strive to reduce their carbon emissions. And as more money is poured into climate action, more corporations are looking to offset their emissions through carbon credits. 

Carbon credits are from activities or projects that avoid, reduce, or remove CO2 emissions. Each credit is equal to one tonne of avoided, reduced, or removed carbon. 

Industry estimates show that demand for carbon offset credits will increase exponentially, primarily because of corporate net zero pledges. These commitments will bolster trading of carbon credits in the voluntary market (VCM), funding actions that mitigate the climate. 

A lot of large companies find that investing in actions that generate carbon credits is the best option they have to curb their emissions. But some of them don’t know how or which projects align with SDGs that match their corporate sustainability priorities. 

Not all carbon offset projects may cover a broad range of sustainability areas. But each project can produce other benefits that go beyond carbon sequestration. The financing provided through carbon credits can bring other social and economic benefits, otherwise known as co-benefits

The Value-driven Model of Carbon Credits

There are various ways in considering carbon credits but not all projects factor in the additional value of delivering sustainable development. Some, like the cost-based model, take into account the costs of implementing a project while ensuring its viability. 

It takes into account the costs of implementing a project while ensuring its on-going viability. But they miss factoring in the socio-economic benefits delivered by a project. That’s what the value-driven model tries to address. 

For example, community-based clean cookstoves projects, which often deliver health benefits to women and children, often have higher value than large-scale renewable energy projects, for instance. So, if the carbon offsets these projects produce reflect those co-benefits, they’re priced or valued more. 

Co-benefits also refer to the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals.

Some carbon standards consider the beyond-carbon impacts of a project and reflect them in the final price of carbon credits.

Here’s an example of various project types that have different shared values based on the SDGs they deliver.

Source: Gold Standard

The Agenda for Sustainable Development: UN 17 SDGs

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by the UN parties in 2015, is a roadmap to ensure sustainable social, environmental, and economic progress worldwide. At its heart are the UN 17 SDGs, an urgent call for action by all countries in a global partnership.

The United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals

They believe that ending poverty must go hand-in-hand with improving health and education, lowering inequality, and bolstering economic growth – all while tackling climate change.

Though climate action, SDG 13, is one of the goals, it should go together with other sustainable development areas. 

The Paris Agreement builds upon the global efforts and priorities specified under climate action and sets GHG emissions mitigation targets. It aims to prevent global warming from going above 2°C in this century relative to pre-industrial levels. It also promotes climate adaptation, mitigation, and finance to fight the climate crisis the world faces.

The Agreement advances cooperative approaches where countries can work together voluntarily to meet their climate goals. It also establishes the carbon credit market that facilitates climate action, supports sustainable development, while ensuring environmental integrity and transparency.

The creation of the 17 SDGs provides important momentum for integrating sustainable development into international carbon market agreements.

Alignment of Carbon Credits and Sustainable Development Goals

Climate change mitigation and co-benefits can go hand in hand if considered from the early stages of the project. Careful integration of sustainable development goals into a carbon credit project’s blueprint can ensure their successful delivery.

Most often, nature-based climate solutions like afforestation or improved forest management projects (REDD+) produce higher valued carbon credits. But carbon credits with several co-benefits or bundled with sustainable development goals keep on creating higher or premium values. 

Let’s provide two examples of projects that successfully align climate action with global priorities on SDGs. 

Water Borehole Project

One example is the water borehole project by Plannet Zero in Mozambique, a country in southeastern Africa. The project involves the installation and repair of water boreholes throughout the Manica province in western Mozambique.

The boreholes provide access to clean water and eliminate the need for boiling water to make it safe for drinking. The project is also reducing about 10,000 tonnes of CO2 or its equivalent each year. 

Apart from its carbon reduction outcomes, the project also delivers several co-benefits and SDGs.

Water borehole project co-benefits:

3125 additional people gain access to safe water
Improvement of indoor air quality due to reduced need to boil water 
Reduction in the occurrence of water-borne diseases locally 
Time spent collecting firewood will be reduced by >30 minutes a day with the removed need for wood fuel to boil water
The boreholes are monitored and tested annually for water quality
Water point committees will be set up and trained to ensure that they are empowered to manage the boreholes

The project delivers these specific sustainable development benefits:

SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
SDG 5: Gender Equality
SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
SDG 13: Climate Action

The boreholes covered by the project will be powered entirely by emission-free technologies such as hand or solar-powered pumps. They, in turn, produce carbon credits linked with other sustainable development goals the project meets.

Clean and Efficient Cookstoves

Most of the household cooking in many countries in Africa and Asia is done by women. They also spend a lot of time collecting wood for fuel and often cook indoors without proper ventilation. 

The clean and efficient cookstove project by Gold Standard seeks to tackle the major development issues of this cooking practice. The goal is to serve the most vulnerable communities while tackling health issues associated with traditional cookstoves while promoting financial security and women empowerment. 

The project generates verified carbon credits, sold and in turn, deployed more efficient cookstoves. 

Source: Gold Standard website

Apart from delivering about 950,000 tonnes of emissions reductions that help fight climate change, SDG 13, the project also brings these other sustainable development benefits:

SDG 1: No Poverty – Households used less of their income and time on acquiring wood fuel, while also offering direct consumer financing or access to microfinance institutions.
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being – By reducing fuel consumption by 50%, indoor air quality improved, which reduces related health problems.
SDG 5: Gender Equality – Women need less time daily to gather wood fuel, and some of them are recruited and empowered as cookstove entrepreneurs. 
SDG 7: Affordable & Clean Energy – The cookstoves burn biomass fuel more efficiently.
SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth – More time to look for additional employment as well as job opportunities in cookstove production.
SDG 13: Climate Action – Reduced carbon emissions
SDG 15: Life on Land – Reduced wood sourcing from non-renewable sources, reducing deforestation.

Various Climate Actions Flowing to Each SDG

At the center of a successful climate action or project that generates carbon credits is partnerships – the UN SDG 17. Both the water borehole and cookstove projects facilitate cooperation among private sector, governments, and nonprofits to achieve desired development goals.  

An investor that considers only a carbon project in terms of its carbon reduction benefits is choosing the tree over the entire forest. Opting for carbon credits that supports a number of sustainable development goals that also align with corporate sustainability delivers great benefits. 

Apparently, each SDG has its own targets to achieve but it can also tackle other development issues like SDG 13. More significantly, every climate action can deliver impacts that flow to more than just one SDG. 

Moreover, meeting other sustainable development goals are also eligible for producing different types of carbon credits. 

For example, projects that speed up the clean energy transition (SDG 7) can generate renewable energy credits. This type of carbon credit is from replacing fossil fuel energy sources by renewables such as hydro, solar, and wind.

In sum, investing in carbon credit projects is more than worth it. They can be developed or implemented in a way that mitigates effects of climate change while also addressing other global sustainable priorities. 

The post Carbon Credits and the Sustainable Development Goals: Aligning Climate Action with Global Priorities appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Ex-NBA Rick Fox’s Startup Raises $12M in Pre-Seed Investment

Partanna, a startup co-founded by former NBA star Rick Fox, has secured a $12 million pre-seed investment from Cherubic Ventures for making concrete that avoids and removes carbon dioxide, which generates carbon avoidance and removal credits in return. 

Partana is now valued at $190 million, according to PitchBook data.

Cement Carbon Pollution

Cement is the most widely-used substance after water. The global cement industry is responsible for emitting 8% of the total carbon footprint, much more than aviation’s emissions. 

If the industry were a country, it would be the 3rd-biggest emitter of CO2 in the world, after the U.S. and China. Its emission comes from the huge amounts of CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuels, which is often coal. 

Producing Portland cement, a binder holding the aggregates together, requires heating limestone and other minerals at elevated temperatures. The process releases tons of CO2 into the air. 

And that’s what Partana is trying to change with its unique concrete formulation perfected by the company’s co-founder Sam Marshall.

Partana’s Concrete: Removing Carbon Like a Tree

Based in the Bahamas, Partanna was founded in 2021 together by Rick Fox and Sam Marshall. The company claims that its carbon-negative building material is just as affordable, versatile, and durable as traditional cement.

But how Partanna’s concrete is made is much better for the environment and the construction industry in general. 

Instead of using Portland cement, a big source of CO2 emissions, the concrete startup is using a special mixture of natural and recycled ingredients cured at ambient temperature. They don’t use high-energy process that pollutes the air and warms the planet.

What makes Partanna’s concrete a game-changer in the construction industry is the use of locally-sourced recycled components, reduced processing costs, and the generation of carbon credits

Brine and Slag 

These are two key components of Partanna’s concrete. 

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the world generates around 190 million – 280 million metric tons of steel slag, a waste product from steel production. 

Meanwhile, about 16,000 desalination plants worldwide are producing brine, which Partanna uses instead of freshwater. If applied at a large-scale desalination plant, Partanna’s brine technology can remove millions of units of CO₂ each day. It can also reduce the amount of brine that ends up in the oceans and waterways.  

Using steel slag and brine replaces Portland cement as a binder in making Partanna’s concrete. This makes the building material production capable of reducing both energy costs and carbon emissions. 

Plus, the chemical reaction called carbonation during the material’s curing process removes CO2 from the air just like a tree. 

While regular cement also does that, it’s not as much as Partanna’s concrete. As per Fox, each Partanna block can absorb carbon dioxide 100x faster than a regular cement block. 

Since almost all environments contain CO2 and some water, the absorption continues throughout the life of the concrete block. This makes Partanna’s building material carbon negative and eligible for carbon credits.

Generating Avoidance and Removal Carbon Credits 

At its current stage, the startup’s financial advantage over competitors is largely from carbon credits. The company says that:

“We are entering the market at a very opportune time where we can offer a high volume of credits that meet the criteria for the highest-value pricing.”

Partanna is selling carbon credits that come from the production of its concrete. A single block of its concrete generates 14.3 kg (31.4 lbs) of carbon credits. Around 80% of that from the CO2 it absorbs over its lifetime. 

In a sample calculation, the company said that one 1,250 square-foot home would remove almost 130 metric tons of CO2 and avoid another 54 metric tons.

So, the total avoided and removed CO2 per house is about 184 metric tons. The total carbon credit potential of the house is also the same – 184 carbon credits. Each credit represents a metric ton of avoided/removed CO2. 

So, how does Partanna’s concrete carbon removal compares to a tree CO2 removal?

Unlike a tree, Partanna’s concrete blocks don’t need to be watered. In fact, its brine-based technology doesn’t require fresh water at all. Here’s how its net carbon removal compares to a tree, without accounting for the avoided emissions:

Partanna’s standard CMU (concrete masonry unit) block is 25% stronger than traditional CMU

Verra, the world’s largest carbon crediting program, approved Partanna and its carbon removal to be listed on its VCS registry last year. It is the first verified carbon-absorbing building material to generate tradable carbon credits.

The government of Bahamas had signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Partanna for the company to supply concrete for 1,000 homes over the next 3 years. The startup also attracted interests from the Middle East with Fox signing another MoU with a real estate developer owned by the Saudi Public Investment Fund

By turning buildings into carbon sponges, Fox said that Partanna is “delinking pollution from development”.

The $12 million pre-seed funding shows that there’s a significant demand for Partanna’s concrete carbon removal. It caught the startup off guard, Fox says, which prompts the company to plan a large Series A.

The post Ex-NBA Rick Fox’s Startup Raises $12M in Pre-Seed Investment appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The Death of Diesel Gives Birth to ZEVs

A new report from the Gladstein, Neandross & Associates (GNA) highlights the growing shift towards zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) and renewable fuels in the transportation sector. 

The fourth annual State of Sustainable Fleets Market Brief reveals that public policy and funding have shifted sharply towards building the ZEV market and phasing out diesel engine development at an accelerated pace. 

This shift is driven by a combination of regulatory requirements, public incentives, and market demand. Furthermore, advances in technology and increasing concerns about climate change and air pollution further encourage moving away from diesel.

The GNA report concludes that:

“The past 18 months have laid the roadmap for a zero-emission future in many states and produced early signals that the era of the diesel engine, the workhorse of HD [heavy-duty] vehicles, will end sooner than many predicted.”

Increasing Regulatory Pressure for ZEVs

According to the report, some clean fuels and vehicles are now superior to gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles for many fleet applications. Also, the use of renewable fuels and advanced tech drivetrains has been growing. 

One major reason is the increasing regulatory pressure to transition away from conventional fuels to cleaner alternatives. California’s zero-emission vehicle or ZEV sales mandates, in particular, have forced market players to embrace the change.

Then the US Environmental Protection Agency set the most stringent standards ever on the transportation sector’s emissions that contribute to air pollution. This adds tens of thousands of dollars – $30,000 – to the cost of new diesel engines while also requiring further ongoing maintenance. 

Meanwhile, public sector funding fell while incentives and subsidies soared to historic highs following the introduction of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) last year. 

Public incentive funding for clean fleet technologies and vehicles will average $32 billion each year for the next 4-5 years. The focus of this investment will be on the ZEV market and infrastructure. 

A total of 13 states have passed or are considering some form of California’s 2020 Advanced Clean Trucks (ACT) mandate for manufacturers to start selling ZEVs. 

Notably, 75% of the surveyed fleets that have never used clean drivetrain technologies before plan to up their use in the next 5 years.

Furthermore, the production capacity for renewable diesel (RD) to replace fossil diesel has doubled in 2022. Uptake by private sector fleets surveyed grew about 10% for the same year compared to 2021. 

In particular, almost 30,000 medium-duty battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) have already been ordered. Whereas plans to use more clean drivetrains and fleet technologies (e.g. propane, battery-electric, and fuel-cell electric vehicles) were still over 80%.

Other Key Findings on Clean Transportation 

The report also showed another significant result: supply and demand for renewable diesel grew in states with carbon credit markets. Domestic RD production doubled from 2021 (800 million gallons) to 2022 (1.7 billion gallons). 

There has been a drop in the credit price linked to big volumes of renewable fuels traded in California’s carbon credit market. But estimates say that the industry can still achieve its production capacity goal in 2024 – 5 billion gallons

Additionally, renewable natural gas replaced nearly all fossil natural gas in California transportation for the second year in a row. Even more remarkable is the finding that orders for medium-duty and heavy-duty BEVs grew by a whopping 640%. And 92% of the fleets surveyed have plans to increase their use.

The report also reveals that the public hydrogen station network grew by 12% to 54 stations in 2022. It also suggests that hydrogen fuel projects unveiled last year will bring over 900 metric tons a day by 2023

Hydrogen fueling network developers also plan to construct stations outside of California across the central mid Atlantic and southwestern U.S., which is a first for public fueling networks. 

ZEVs and Carbon Credits 

California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) market has been driving the demand for zero emission or clean technology in the transportation sector. The program creates a marketplace for technologies that generate carbon credits based on emission reductions brought by fuel or energy use.

Carbon credits are generated from initiatives that reduce, remove, or avoid carbon emissions. Each carbon credit represents one tonne of carbon reduced by using ZEV and other clean technologies.

The supply of several low carbon fuels such as RD and RNG had increased. This pushed down the price of carbon credits for the past 2 years as seen in the chart. 

The falling price for a carbon credit traded under the LCFS market continued in 2022, dropping 44%. In the same year, credit prices averaged $99.66 per metric ton (MT) and declined to as low as $56.10/MT in late October.

That is a significant drop from the highest peak of $219/MT in February 2020. Type 1 credit transaction – credits sold on the “spot” market –  totaled to over $560 million. Overall transactions surged past $3.7 billion in 2022, marking a 24% increase in credit volume. 

A big part of the transactions happening on the California LCFS market involves Tesla, the largest seller of carbon credits so far. The biggest EV maker had, again, grabbed attention with its 12% increase in Q1 2023 revenue from selling carbon credits.

The automaker recorded $521 million carbon credit sales in the first quarter compared to $467 million in Q4 2022. Tesla has been earning big revenues from carbon credits for the previous years, reporting a record $1.78 billion in 2022 alone.

Overall, the State of Sustainable Fleets report demonstrates that significant progress is being made towards a more sustainable and equitable future in the transportation sector with zero-emission vehicles. The growing momentum towards ZEVs and renewable fuels will bring diesel to an end, driving carbon credits market up. 

The report provides a powerful tool for sparking collaboration and promoting decarbonization in the commercial road transport sector.

The post The Death of Diesel Gives Birth to ZEVs appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Israel to Fail 2030 Climate Pledge

Israel is lagging behind its own climate pledges, according to a report published by the Environmental Protection Ministry.

The country is set to reduce its global warming emissions by just 12% by 2030. This is well below the 27% target it pledged to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 

The report states that only 19% of energy will be generated by renewable sources by the end of the decade, compared with the official goal of 30%

These revelations come at a time when countries around the world are working to reduce their carbon footprints to combat the effects of climate change.

Failing to Meet Climate Pledge

The annual report reviewed progress until 2021 on official emissions reduction targets across the economy and various sectors. The benchmark for reduction levels is the rate in 2015. 

The report predicts gaps between targets and realistic achievements on almost every pledge that the Israeli government has made.

Largest dump site in Israel, Dudaim

The UN expects Israeli emissions from solid waste to drop by at least 47% by the end of the decade, compared with 2015, but these will likely only diminish by 19%, according to the report.

The electricity sector is meant to see a 30% drop in emissions by 2030, compared to 2015. But it is likely to only reach a cut of 21%. Industry is also supposed to meet a 30% reduction, but is likely to reduce its emissions by just 17%

Most of the emissions cuts in 2021 came from the electricity sector as a result of using less coal. Emissions from waste dropped by 4% during that year, but increased by 13% in industry and by 2% in transportation.

The report also shows that Israel is far less ambitious than other developed nations in reducing its carbon footprint. It states that Israel only reduced its total emissions throughout 2020 by 2%, compared with 11%-20% in other Western countries. 

A further 3% were reduced in 2021 but this pace is nowhere near enough to hit the 27% target by 2030, the report says.

The reasons for this slow pace are huge delays in reduction plans and lack of budget for implementing them.

What the Israeli Government Should Do 

To meet its targets, Israel needs to pass a Climate Law that obliges the government to meet its goals, sets out the infrastructure for doing so, and provides certainty to the market. The report lists a number of steps that the government should take to speed up and meet its declared targets. These include the following measures:

Converting methane from sewage treatment plants into energy, 
Developing and implementing programs to slash emissions in agriculture
Ensuring energy efficiency in general, closing petrochemical industries in the northern city of Haifa by 2030, and 
Moving much faster towards replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy to generate electricity.

Additional steps include closing coal-fired power plants, making solar panels mandatory on all new buildings, adapting the electricity distribution network so that it can cope with more renewable energy, and providing cash incentives to install EV car charging stations and solar panels on sites that are already in use, such as parking lots.

Meeting Targets with Carbon Credits 

Carbon credits could play a role in Israel’s efforts to meet its climate pledge. A carbon credit is a permit that allows a company or country to emit a certain amount of greenhouse gases.

Carbon credits can be traded on carbon markets, allowing companies or countries to offset their emissions by funding emissions reduction projects in other countries. In this way, Israel could offset some of its emissions by investing in emissions reduction projects in other countries.

The use of carbon credits has been controversial recently, with critics arguing that they allow polluters to continue polluting. However, supporters of carbon credits argue that they can provide a source of funding for emissions reduction projects in developing countries that might not otherwise have the resources to undertake such projects.

In conclusion, Israel is falling behind on its climate targets, and urgent action is needed to reduce the country’s emissions.

The post Israel to Fail 2030 Climate Pledge appeared first on Carbon Credits.