Is Trump’s Coal Comeback Derailing America’s Climate Commitments?

Trump coal US

U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at reviving the coal industry. This move comes as U.S. electricity demand rises for the first time in 20 years, driven by AI data centers, electric vehicles, and cryptocurrency mining.

As per U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), coal once powered half the nation’s electricity, but today, it accounts for less than 20%. Cheaper natural gas from fracking and the growth of solar and wind have reduced coal use over time.

us coal 2023

DOE Unveils Five Steps to Support America’s Coal 

Following Trump’s executive order titled “Reinvigorating America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright announced new actions from the Department of Energy (DOE). These steps aim to modernize coal technologies, boost critical mineral production, and improve the energy grid.

He said,

“The American people need more energy, and the Department of Energy is helping to meet this demand by unleashing supply of affordable, reliable, secure energy sources– including coal.”

“Coal is essential for generating 24/7 electricity generation that powers American homes and businesses, but misguided policies from previous administrations have stifled this critical American industry. With President Trump’s leadership, we are cutting the red tape and bringing back common sense.”

Here are the DOE’s five main initiatives:

1. Return of the National Coal Council

The DOE is bringing back the National Coal Council, which ended during the Biden administration. The 50-member group will advise on coal’s future and include voices from coal producers, users, suppliers, and local leaders.

2. $200 Billion in Energy Financing

Through the Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment Program, the DOE is offering $200 billion in low-interest loans. These funds will support coal-powered projects—upgrading old plants, restarting closed facilities, or building new ones using existing infrastructure.

3. Steelmaking Coal Named ‘Critical Material’

The DOE and Department of the Interior are recommending that coal used for steelmaking be officially listed as a critical material in the 2025 assessment. This status highlights the importance of maintaining a steady supply for national security and the economy.

4. Extracting Minerals from Coal Ash

The DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory has developed new technology to pull valuable minerals from coal ash. These materials are key for defense, manufacturing, and clean energy industries.

5. Commercial Use of Coal Byproducts

The DOE is also working with labs and startups to turn coal ash into useful products. This move supports building a U.S.-based supply chain for materials that are now mostly imported from countries like China.

Energy Security and Job Growth

The Trump administration believes coal still has a major role to play in U.S. energy security. Coal is cost-effective, available in all weather, and still abundant. Reviving the coal industry could lower power costs, stabilize the grid, and bring back high-paying jobs.

The EIA reported that natural gas supplied 43% of U.S. utility-scale electricity in 2023, while coal dropped to 16%. This decline was mainly pushed by phasing out fossil fuels.

coal 2023 usa

With trillions of dollars in untapped coal resources, the U.S. could also export more to help its allies and stay competitive.

The policy statement declares that coal is vital for both economic and national security. It stresses the need to end policies that discourage coal use, promote coal exports, and support coal-powered electricity.

Burning Coal Packs a Toxic Punch

Burning coal for electricity remains one of the most harmful sources of air pollution in the U.S. It releases several major pollutants.

  • Sulfur dioxide (SO₂)
  • Nitrogen oxides (NOₓ)
  • Particulates
  • Carbon dioxide (CO₂)
  • Mercury and heavy metals
  • Fly ash and bottom ash

Some of these toxic substances can cause severe respiratory and lung problems and even hinder neurological development.

Although U.S. regulations now require fly ash emissions to be captured, coal ash storage still poses significant environmental threats. In the past, ruptures at coal ash impoundments have caused severe downstream damage.

Coal’s Role in U.S. Emissions Still Looms Large

As per EIA, in 2022, coal burning for energy contributed around 19% of total U.S. energy-related CO₂ emissions. Coal accounted for a major 55% of CO₂ emissions within the power sector.

Despite a 2.7% drop in coal production in 2023 to 577.9 million short tons (MMst), the electric power sector still consumed 387.2 MMst. It’s roughly 91% of the total U.S. coal use.

But ironically, the number of coal mines slightly increased from 548 to 560, indicating that there’s still a demand despite declining output.

The latest data from Ycharts shows that US Coal Consumption was 38.59M t in last December.

US coal production
Source: Ycharts

Emissions Reduction Goals at Risk

A report by Carbon Brief showed that the U.S. had fallen behind on its climate goals. This means decarbonization had slowed down. By 2035, emissions are expected to be only 24- 40 % lower than 2005 levels.

That was still far from the Paris Agreement’s targets of a 50–52% reduction by 2030 and a 61–66% reduction by 2035.

coal emissions

The study further showed that in 2024, emissions barely changed. It fell just 0.2%, despite coal use dropping to its lowest in nearly 60 years. This stagnation was mainly due to:

  • A rise in electricity demand.
  • Increased transportation emissions.
  • Economic growth of 2.7%.

It also emphasized that rolling back regulations through Trump’s executive orders alone could add between 270 and 470 million metric tons of CO₂ equivalent emissions by 2035. This would account for roughly 25–50% of the total emissions increase expected if all of Biden’s climate policies were repelled.

Coal Comeback vs. Climate Goals: Can America Have Both?

The U.S. is the world’s second-largest emitter and has the highest per-capita emissions. That puts a big responsibility on the country to lead climate action.

But hitting the 2030 climate goal won’t be easy. The Rhodium Group says emissions must fall by 7.6% every year from 2025 to 2030. And undoubtedly, that’s a steep drop.

Coal emissions

At the same time, the Department of Energy is pushing to bring coal back. The focus is on boosting energy reliability, creating jobs, and securing critical materials. Trump supports this move and plans to remove barriers to make coal central to America’s energy mix again.

The EIA further forecasts that U.S. energy-related CO₂ emissions will rise by 2% in 2025 and dip by 1% in 2026. This year’s increase will be driven by:

  • Coal: Emissions are expected to rise due to more coal-fired power generation.
  • Natural gas: Its use will grow, mainly for heating in homes and businesses.
  • Petroleum: Emissions will climb as demand for distillate fuel oil and jet fuel increases.

This shift raises a big question. As coal makes a comeback, is the U.S. falling further behind on climate goals? Well, short-term energy gains may come at the cost of long-term climate progress. Only time will tell!

The post Is Trump’s Coal Comeback Derailing America’s Climate Commitments? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Trump’s New EO Sparks A New Battle Over States’ Climate Power

Trump’s New EO Sparks A New Battle Over States’ Climate Power

On April 8, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump signed a new executive order called “Protecting American Energy from State Overreach.” The order directs the federal government to stop states from enforcing laws related to climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) policies. This move could change how states fight climate change in the future.

What Does the Executive Order Say?

The new executive order gives power to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. She must identify state laws that focus on:

  • Climate change
  • Carbon and greenhouse gas emissions
  • Environmental justice
  • ESG initiatives
  • Carbon taxes and cap-and-trade programs

If any of these state laws are found to be “illegal” or go against federal law, the attorney general is ordered to take steps to block or stop them. Bondi has 60 days to report back to the President with actions taken and any further recommendations.

Why Did Trump Issue the Order?

According to the order, Trump’s goal is to support “American energy dominance.” This means making it easier to produce oil, gas, coal, critical minerals, nuclear, and other energy sources inside the U.S. Trump believes some state climate policies make energy more expensive and harm national security. 

The order states:

“These state laws and policies weaken our national security and devastate Americans by driving up energy costs for families coast-to-coast, despite some of these families not living or voting in States with these crippling policies.”

Trump further says that states like New York and Vermont have passed laws that unfairly punish fossil fuel companies. These states want companies to pay for their past role in causing climate change. The executive order calls these efforts “extortion” and says they are unconstitutional.

number of cases filed against fossil fuel companies
Source: Zero Carbon Analytics

California’s cap-and-trade system was also named. Under this system, businesses must buy credits if they go over their carbon limit. Trump’s order says this creates extra costs and makes it hard for companies to operate.

How Did States React?

Some states strongly disagreed with Trump’s action. Governors Kathy Hochul (New York) and Michelle Lujan Grisham (New Mexico) responded with a joint statement. Both are leaders of the U.S. Climate Alliance, a group of 24 governors committed to fighting climate change. They said:

“We will keep advancing solutions to the climate crisis that safeguard Americans’ fundamental right to clean air and water, create good-paying jobs, grow the clean energy economy, and make our future healthier and safer.”

In short, they believe states have the right to protect the environment and will continue to do so, even if the federal government tries to stop them.

Support from the Oil and Gas Industry

The American Petroleum Institute (API), a trade group for the oil and gas industry, welcomed Trump’s move. API said the order would stop states from illegally punishing companies that provide energy to American families.

Ryan Meyers, a senior vice president at API, said, “We welcome President Trump’s action to hold states like New York and California accountable.”

What Are the Legal Issues?

The executive order could start new legal fights between states and the federal government. In the U.S., both state and federal governments can pass laws. But the Constitution limits how much states can control things like interstate commerce and foreign trade.

Trump’s order argues that state climate laws break these rules. For example, if New York tries to fine a company for emissions that happened in another state or country, it may be seen as overstepping its power.

Still, legal experts say it’s unclear how far the federal government can go to stop these state laws. Past efforts to block climate lawsuits have had mixed results. For instance:

  • Lawsuits by New Jersey and New York were dismissed this year.
  • Lawsuits in California and Hawaii are still ongoing.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court refused to dismiss climate lawsuits in 2024.

States With Climate Targets Could Be Affected

As of now, 14 states have set net-zero targets to reduce emissions by midcentury. These include large states like California, New York, and Illinois. The new executive order could challenge their ability to enforce those goals.

States like California also require companies to report their climate risks. These climate disclosure rules could also be blocked by Trump’s order.

ESG Policies in the Crosshairs

The order also mentions ESG rules. These are policies that consider environmental and social factors when making business or investment decisions.

Since 2021, at least 41 states have introduced ESG-related laws. Twenty states have passed anti-ESG laws. These laws try to stop the use of ESG factors in investments.

Only 8 states have passed pro-ESG laws, which support clean energy and responsible investing. Trump’s order may be used to block pro-ESG laws or stop investors from avoiding fossil fuel companies.

A Shift in Federal Climate Policy

Trump’s action marks a big change from the previous administration. Under President Biden, the U.S. supported climate action:

  • Biden kept the U.S. in the Paris Climate Agreement.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) defended rules on climate risk reporting.
  • Federal agencies joined global climate networks.

Trump’s administration has done the opposite, and it has:

  • Pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Agreement again.
  • Paused federal funding for many climate programs.
  • Stopped defending the SEC’s climate rules in court.

READ MORE: Donald Trump Exits Paris Agreement, Again: What It Means for the U.S. and the World?

What Happens Next?

It’s still not clear how much power the executive order will have. Attorney General Bondi will likely face legal challenges from other states. Courts will have to decide if the federal government can stop states from enforcing climate rules.

In the meantime, states say they won’t back down. They plan to keep fighting climate change and protecting their rights.

Trump’s new executive order has opened a new chapter in the fight over climate change in the U.S. It could reshape how states create and enforce environmental laws. The oil and gas industry supports the move, but many states and legal experts are ready to push back.

The post Trump’s New EO Sparks A New Battle Over States’ Climate Power appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Microsoft and IAG Extend SAF Deal to Slash 113,000 Tonnes of Scope 3 Emissions

MICROSOFT

Microsoft and International Airlines Group (IAG), the parent company of British Airways, Iberia, Vueling, Aer Lingus, LEVEL, IAG Loyalty, and IAG Cargo, have extended their groundbreaking Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) deal by five more years. It aims to support Microsoft’s goal to reduce Scope 3 lifecycle emissions from business travel and air freight.

  • Explaining further, Microsoft will co-fund an additional 39,000 tonnes of SAF that will cut 113,000 tonnes of lifecycle emissions.

The renewed agreement is an extension of their 2023 collaboration, when both companies pledged to support low-carbon aviation. For Microsoft, it’s a huge step toward achieving its 2030 carbon-negative goal.

Microsoft Targets Scope 3 Emissions with Major SAF Deal

Microsoft’s Scope 3 emissions rose by 30.9% in 2023 compared to its 2020 baseline. This increase was mainly due to the growth of its data center operations and the hardware needed to support them. Business travel and air freight also remain major contributors.

  • Total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were 15.4 MtCO₂e in 2023, a 29.1% rise compared to the 2020 baseline.
  • Currently, over 96% of Microsoft’s total emissions come from Scope 3.
Microsoft emissions
Source: Microsoft

The tech giant is already boosting clean energy use across its supply chain and investing in low-carbon technologies for hard-to-decarbonize industries, such as steel, concrete, and other building materials used in its data centers.

The company’s $1 billion Climate Innovation Fund has already invested in LanzaJet, showing the company’s strong commitment to supporting next-generation fuel solutions and accelerating climate technology.

Thus, this deal is a significant part of Microsoft’s net-zero emissions pathway. It expects SAF use to make a notable impact on its air travel and freight shipments’ emissions.

microsoft emissions
Source: Microsoft

SAF: A Key Step Toward Greener Flights, But Challenges Remain

Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is a cleaner alternative to traditional jet fuel. According to the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation, SAF includes synthetic fuels, biofuels made from plant or waste materials, and recycled carbon fuels and not fossil fuels.

While it doesn’t cut emissions from aircraft engines directly, it lowers overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions when considering the full life cycle, i.e., from production to use.

  • SAF reduces carbon emissions (on a greenhouse gas lifecycle basis) typically by 80% or more compared with the fossil jet fuels it replaces.

However, there are still big hurdles. Both IAG and Microsoft have acknowledged that scaling SAF production remains a challenge, largely due to high costs. SAF is still 3 to 4 times more expensive than traditional jet fuel. Notably, a small percentage of airline fuel today is SAF. Its production and availability need to grow much faster to make a real impact.

Consequently, the European Union introduced the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation. It’s also a part of the Fit for 55 plan that aims to cut emissions by 55% by 2030.

EU SAF

The regulation pushes fuel suppliers at EU airports to gradually mix more SAF into their fuel blends. Eventually, it can make the shift toward more sustainable flying easier.

The SAF will be sourced from two locations:

  • Phillips 66’s refinery in Humberside, UK, using used cooking oil and food waste.
  • LanzaJet’s Freedom Pines Fuels facility in Georgia, USA, using bioethanol.

Both SAF sources are ISCC-certified (International Sustainability & Carbon Certification). Additionally, the SAF used in this deal will not add new fossil carbon to the atmosphere as it recycles existing carbon.

How the Deal Benefits IAG and What are its Future Plans 

However, this SAF deal benefits both Microsoft and IAG. While Microsoft can control its emissions from travel and freight, IAG can boost its SAF investments and lower its direct flight emissions.

IAG airlines follow carbon reduction rules under the EU, UK, and Swiss Emissions Trading Schemes. They also support CORSIA’s global plan to cap net aviation emissions.

Emission Reduction Goals

IAG aims to have net-zero emissions by 2050.

  • By 2025, it plans to cut carbon emissions per passenger kilometer by 10%—from 87.3g in 2020 to 80g.

To reach this, they’re adding 142 new aircraft that burn up to 25% less fuel. This also brings fuel use down to just 3.17 liters per 100 passenger kilometers.

  • By 2030, it intends to bring net emissions down to 22 million tonnes. That would be a 20% drop and will save 160 million tonnes of CO₂ over the decade.
IAG net zero emissions
Source: IAG

Boosting SAF Use

Notably, the sustainable fuel from this agreement will power flights across IAG’s brands, including British Airways. In 2021, it set a target of using one million tonnes of SAF annually by 2030. Currently, the airline uses SAF for 1.9% of its total annual fuel. The right policy support could cut as much carbon as taking one million cars off the road annually.

  • By 2030, IAG aims to increase SAF use 100 times compared to 2022 levels. Its target is to reach 10% SAF by 2030 and 70% by 2050.
SAF IAG
Source: IAG

As of last December, the company had committed over $3.5 billion to SAF offtake deals. This is based on expected energy prices and contract terms.

This deal shows how companies can drive greener skies. By supporting cleaner fuels like SAF and influencing wider supply chains, Microsoft and IAG are taking the right steps to fight climate change.

The post Microsoft and IAG Extend SAF Deal to Slash 113,000 Tonnes of Scope 3 Emissions appeared first on Carbon Credits.

New York Requires Large Emitters to Report Their Greenhouse Gas Emissions

New York Requires Large Emitting Entities to Report Their Greenhouse Gas Emissions

New York State has proposed a new rule requiring large companies and facilities to report their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This rule is not intended to reduce emissions immediately but to improve data collection to understand where emissions are coming from. That data will help the state take stronger action in the future.

This rule is an early step in the state’s climate plan, especially as it prepares to launch a “cap-and-invest” program in 2025. The reporting rule would start with emissions data from 2026, and companies would have to submit reports in 2027. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) leads this effort.

Who Would Need to Report?

The rule would apply to many types of businesses that emit large amounts of greenhouse gases. This includes not only facilities that directly release pollution into the air but also companies that supply fuels or other products that create emissions later.

  • Any business that emits 10,000 metric tons or more of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) per year must report. For comparison, that’s about the same as the emissions from 2,200 gas-powered cars in one year.

Types of companies and facilities that may need to report include:

  • Power plants
  • Waste incinerators and landfills
  • Large industrial factories that burn fossil fuels
  • Natural gas compressor stations
  • Heating fuel and gasoline suppliers
  • Fertilizer and lime distributors
  • Anaerobic digesters and other waste treatment systems

According to the DEC, thousands of entities across New York could fall under the rule. These businesses will need to measure their emissions or use standard methods to estimate them. Some may already report this information to federal programs, which they can reuse for state reporting.

NEw York GHG emissions by sector
Source: https://climate.ny.gov/

Refer to this factsheet to know more about the said mandatory reporting.

Why the Rule Matters

The state needs accurate data to meet its climate goals under the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA). This law, passed in 2019, sets some of the toughest climate targets in the country. New York aims to:

  • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2030
  • Reach 85% emissions reductions by 2050
  • Get 100% clean electricity by 2040
New York GHG emissions
Source: New York DEC

Accurate data is needed by the state to understand emissions sources and their scale. Right now, the DEC says data is incomplete for many parts of the state’s economy. Some sectors—like transportation, heating fuels, and industrial processes—have gaps in reporting. This rule will help fill those gaps.

How the Reporting Will Work

Companies will need to submit their emissions through an online reporting system developed by the DEC. The agency is also creating a reporting tool to help companies figure out if they are required to report and how to do it correctly.

For example, companies may be asked to report:

  • Direct emissions from their own facilities
  • Indirect emissions from fuels they sell or transport
  • Activities that lead to other forms of carbon pollution

Some reports may need to be verified by a third party. This is to make sure the data is correct and can be trusted for future climate programs. The rule also allows companies to submit data they already send to federal or state programs, making the process easier and less costly.

The Cap-and-Invest Connection

This reporting rule is tied to New York’s upcoming cap-and-invest program. That program, expected to begin in 2025, will place a cap on total greenhouse gas emissions across the state. Emitting entities have to buy “allowances” for the emissions they produce. The fewer allowances available, the more companies will pay if they go over their limits.

Money raised from this system will go into a Climate Action Fund to pay for clean energy projects, home energy improvements, and transportation upgrades. It will also help protect low- and moderate-income households from higher energy prices.

The reporting rule is a key part of getting that system ready. If the state doesn’t know how much a company is emitting, it won’t be able to manage the cap properly or ensure the rules are fair.

Responding to Federal Rollbacks

The emissions reporting rule also prepares New York to stay on track, even if federal rules change. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) already has a greenhouse gas reporting program. However, some experts have raised concerns that future federal policy changes could affect the reliability of existing programs.

DEC Acting Commissioner Amanda Lefton said the rule will help New York “fill the data gaps left behind by proposed federal rollbacks” and make sure the state has “accurate and reliable data.” She further noted:

“The proposed Reporting Rule will enable us to collect the information necessary to develop effective strategies that reduce harmful air pollution and direct investments where they are most needed, while also protecting New York’s consumers and economic competitiveness.”

Public Input and Next Steps: A Step Toward Climate Action

The proposed rule is now open for public comment. The DEC is collecting comments until July 1, 2025, and is holding public events to explain the rule and get feedback. These include:

  • Two public webinars
  • Three in-person hearings
  • Two virtual hearings

After the comment period, the DEC will review all suggestions and release a final version of the rule. If approved, companies will start collecting data in 2026 and submit their first reports in 2027.

New York GHG emissions reporting timeline
Source: DEC

While this rule doesn’t lower emissions on its own, it is an important foundation for climate action. It will help New York:

  • Measure progress toward its goals
  • Create stronger climate policies
  • Promote compliance with climate regulations
  • Support clean energy investments
  • Protect vulnerable communities

With better data, New York can make smarter decisions about where to spend money, where to reduce pollution, and how to support people affected by climate change.

Governor Kathy Hochul has also proposed a $1 billion “Sustainable Future Fund” that would use money from the cap-and-invest to support job training, home retrofits, public transit, and renewable energy in disadvantaged areas.

In the years ahead, the emissions data gathered under this rule will guide all of these efforts.

New York’s proposed GHG emissions reporting rule is a big step toward building a cleaner, more sustainable future. By requiring large emitters to report their emissions, the state is preparing for bigger programs to reduce pollution and invest in climate solutions. It aims to balance regulatory accountability with support mechanisms for affected businesses.

The post New York Requires Large Emitters to Report Their Greenhouse Gas Emissions appeared first on Carbon Credits.

SolarBank Taps Data Center Expert Jonathan Martone to Power Its Next Big Move

SolarBank Taps Data Center Expert Jonathan Martone to Power Its Next Big Move

Disseminated on behalf of SolarBank Corporation.

SolarBank Corporation (NASDAQ: SUUN; Cboe CA: SUNN, FSE: GY2) is stepping into the fast-growing data center world, and it’s bringing in one of the best to lead the way. On April 9, 2025, SolarBank announced it had brought in data center expert Jonathan Martone to help guide its plans to enter the data center market. Martone has over 25 years of experience in the field, working with companies big and small across North America.

This move comes as data centers — the buildings that store and power the internet — are becoming more important than ever. With AI, cloud services, and digital tools growing fast, the world needs more places to process data. That also means a lot more energy is needed to power these centers.

SolarBank’s Smart Step into Data Centers

SolarBank is known for developing solar and battery energy storage projects. The company now aims to bring clean energy into the world of data. 

Back in November 2024, the company shared its plans to expand into this new market. Since then, it has been looking at different opportunities to build or partner on new data center projects.

Adding Martone as a strategic advisor is a big step in that direction. Dr. Richard Lu, President and CEO of SolarBank, said, 

“I am honoured that Jonathan Martone has agreed to join SolarBank as an advisor. An industry leader like Jonathan will bring significant value to SolarBank as he will help support SolarBank’s strategic expansion into the rapidly growing data center market. Jonathan has significant contacts and is one of the leaders in North America in understanding site selection and the components to ensure a successful operation. The growth of data hungry artificial intelligence deployments continues and SolarBank is seeking to help support this demand.”

Even though this is a new area, SolarBank has years of experience in renewable energy.

The company has built over 100 megawatts of solar and battery storage systems and has a development pipeline of more than 1 gigawatt. It focuses on community and distributed solar projects across Canada and the United States.

SolarBank projects
Source: SolarBank

These projects provide clean power to homes, businesses, and utilities.

Who is Jonathan Martone?

Jonathan Martone, a seasoned expert in data centers and telecommunications, has helped plan and design hundreds of data centers across North America. He now works as an independent advisor, supporting companies as they build, plan, and grow their digital infrastructure.

He works closely with private equity firms, developers, and operators to find good sites for new data centers. This means looking at things like:

  • Does the land have enough power?
  • Are there strong Internet connections nearby?
  • Can clean energy be used for operations?
  • Are the right transformers and grid systems available?
Jonathan Martone
Source: LinkedIn

Martone also understands how to make sure data centers can serve big tech companies like AWS (Amazon Web Services), Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure. He’s worked with major clients, including EdgeConnex, Overwatch Capital, and Form8tion Data Centers. His specialties include cloud services, fiber networks, high-voltage systems, and energy-efficient designs.

Why This Deal Matters

Data centers are the heart of the internet. Every time we stream a video, use AI, or save files to the cloud, we’re using data center power. But running these centers takes a huge amount of electricity. Their rapid expansion has led to a significant surge in electricity consumption. 

In the third quarter of 2024, U.S. data centers used 46,000 megawatts (MW) of power. This rise was mainly due to the growing need for AI applications and cryptocurrency mining. 

AI models, particularly large-scale ones like GPT-4, require substantial computational power for training and operation. Training such models can consume up to 1 gigawatt-hour (GWh) of electricity each.

As companies increasingly adopt AI-driven solutions, this energy demand is expected to rise further. ​S&P Global expects this demand to rise to 59,000 megawatts by 2029.

US utility power demand from data centers 2029
Source: S&P Global Commodity Insights

This escalating energy consumption poses challenges for utility companies striving to meet the growing demand. Dominion Energy Virginia, for instance, has 40.2 gigawatts (GW) of contracted capacity waiting to connect to the grid. That’s almost double its capacity from July 2024. 

Similarly, Southern Co. has increased its five-year capital plan by $14 billion to enhance electricity generation and transmission infrastructure.

The environmental impact is also a concern. Tech giants like Microsoft and Google plan to run carbon-free data centers by 2030. However, the fast growth of these centers might outstrip the rise of renewable energy. This could lead to a greater dependence on fossil fuels. ​

That’s where SolarBank comes in. By evaluating the build out of data centers that use solar power and batteries, the company hopes to reduce carbon emissions while still meeting rising energy needs.

This is also a big business opportunity. The data center market is growing quickly, especially with the rise of artificial intelligence. SolarBank’s entry into the space could help provide for cleaner, greener data storage.

By combining its clean energy expertise with data center planning, SolarBank is hoping to build a powerful new business model — one that supports the digital world with less impact on the planet.

What Happens Next?

Right now, SolarBank is still exploring different data center projects. It hasn’t signed any final deals yet, but the company is in talks with several groups. With Martone’s help, SolarBank will be able to:

  • Evaluate potential sites
  • Understand energy and utility  needs
  • Connect with new partners
  • Create smart and scalable designs

While this new direction is exciting, SolarBank also warns that there are risks involved.

Building a data center isn’t easy. It requires finding the right land, getting permits, hiring contractors, and securing enough financing. On top of that, energy rules and government incentives could change, making some future projects harder or more expensive to complete.

SolarBank also reminds investors that they don’t currently own or operate any data centers. These plans are still in the early stages.

As more companies look to reduce their carbon footprint, clean energy data centers are likely to grow in demand. By partnering with Martone, SolarBank is preparing to meet that demand head-on.

This report contains forward-looking information. Please refer to the SolarBank press release entitled “Data Center Expert Jonathan Martone Retained by SolarBank Corporation to Power Strategic Expansion” for details of the information, risks and assumptions.


Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.

Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.

The post SolarBank Taps Data Center Expert Jonathan Martone to Power Its Next Big Move appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Top 4 Carbon Removal Stocks Set to Suck Up and Cash In

Top 4 Carbon Removal Stocks Set to Suck Up and Cash In

More companies and governments are investing in carbon removal technologies to help them reach net-zero emissions. With stricter climate rules and companies feeling pressure to reduce carbon footprints, carbon removal stocks are becoming appealing investment options.

Why Carbon Removal Stocks Are Gaining Traction in 2025

Carbon removal companies work to take carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the air. They either store it for good or change it into useful products.

Carbon removal is different from carbon offset initiatives. While offsets balance emissions by reducing them elsewhere, carbon removal actively eliminates CO₂. This makes it essential for industries that struggle to cut emissions.

The carbon removal sector could grow quickly in the next few years. More policymakers, companies, and investors are showing support to scale up the industry. In 2025, here are the top four carbon removal stocks worth watching and keeping on your radar. Let’s break down each one of them, what technology they’re innovating, and other major initiatives. 

1. Net Power Inc. (NYSE: NPWR): Innovating Zero-Emissions Energy

Net Power inc stock
Source: Nasdaq

Net Power Inc. is a U.S.-based clean energy technology company founded in 2010, specializing in generating reliable, on-demand electricity from natural gas with near-zero emissions. The company is revolutionizing the energy sector with its proprietary Allam Cycle technology.

It generates electricity from natural gas while capturing and storing CO₂ emissions. Furthermore, it can capture around 97% of CO₂ emissions during the process. This innovative approach also virtually eliminates other pollutants, including nitrogen oxides (NOₓ) and sulfur oxides (SOₓ).

Net power allam cycle technology
Source: Net Power

Net Power’s modular plant design occupies about 15 acres per facility and offers scalability from 250 megawatts (MW) up to 2 gigawatts (GW). The company is aiming to deploy its first utility-scale power plant by 2028.

Unlike traditional natural gas plants, Net Power’s system prevents emissions from reaching the atmosphere, offering a potential breakthrough for clean energy production.

Operational Developments:

  • La Porte Demonstration Facility: The company completed major plant upgrades and initiated the first phase of the equipment validation program with Baker Hughes. 

  • Project Permian: Located near Midland-Odessa, Texas, this is Net Power’s first utility-scale project. Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) work continued with Zachry Group and was on track to conclude in Q4 2024. The project aims for initial power generation between the second half of 2027 and the first half of 2028.

  • Air Separation Unit (ASU) Partnership: Net Power announced Air Liquide as the ASU supplier for Project Permian, integrating this component into the overall plant design.

Strategic Initiatives:

Net Power has improved site evaluations for new projects in North America. This includes locations in Alberta, Canada, and several sites in the U.S. These efforts involve collaborations with natural gas producers, carbon sequestration providers, and data center developers.

The company signed a Limited Notice to Proceed (LNTP) with Baker Hughes. This deal is worth about $90 million. It covers the purchase of long-lead materials for the turboexpander and important equipment for the first utility-scale power plant. ​

These developments underscore Net Power’s commitment to advancing its clean energy technology. It is also expanding its project portfolio despite financial challenges.

2. Shell Plc (NYSE: SHEL): Leading in Carbon Capture Initiatives

Shell Plc stock
Source: Nasdaq

Shell Plc, a global energy conglomerate, is making significant strides in carbon removal to align with its net-zero emissions targets. The company has pledged to reduce absolute emissions by 50% by 2030 compared to 2016 levels. Carbon removal, particularly carbon capture and storage (CCS), plays a critical role in achieving this goal.

CCS captures carbon dioxide (CO₂) from industrial processes. It stores the gas underground to stop it from entering the atmosphere.

Shell’s Major CCS Initiatives:

  1. Quest Project (Canada): Since 2015, the Quest facility at Shell’s Scotford complex in Alberta has captured and stored over 8.8 million tonnes of CO₂. Shell is moving forward with the Polaris CCS project at Scotford. This project aims to capture about 750,000 tonnes of CO₂ each year. It will cut emissions from the refinery by up to 40% and from the chemicals complex by 22%. ​

  2. Northern Lights Project (Norway): In collaboration with Equinor and TotalEnergies, Shell is investing $714 million to expand the Northern Lights carbon storage facility. This expansion will boost CO₂ injection capacity from 1.5 million to over 5 million tonnes each year. It will tackle nearly 10% of Norway’s annual emissions.

  3. Gorgon Project (Australia): As a partner in the Gorgon CCS project operated by Chevron, Shell contributes to one of the world’s largest CCS operations. By December 2023, the project had stored more than 10 million tonnes of CO₂.

  4. Daya Bay CCS Hub (China): Shell, along with ExxonMobil and CNOOC, is exploring the development of a large-scale CCS hub in Guangdong Province. The proposed facility aims to capture up to 10 million tonnes of CO₂ annually, supporting China’s goal of carbon neutrality by 2060. ​

These initiatives reflect Shell’s commitment to deploying CCS technologies globally. It works with industry partners and governments to mitigate carbon emissions and support the transition to a low-carbon energy future.

Carbon Credit Market Leadership

Shell showed its commitment to cutting emissions by retiring 14.5 million carbon credits in 2024. Most of these credits backed forestry and land-use projects that aim to protect current carbon stores.

top carbon credit buyers in 2024
Chart from Allied Offsets Report

The company has invested in nature-based solutions. These include reforestation and wetland restoration, which both help enhance carbon sequestration.

3. Delta CleanTech Inc. (CSE: DELT): Specializing in Carbon Capture Solutions

Delta CleanTech stock
Note: Delta CleanTech changed its name to Regenera Insights Source: Marketscreener

​Delta CleanTech Inc., established in 2004 and headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, focuses on clean energy technology. The company specializes in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). It also works on solvent and glycol reclamation, as well as carbon credit validation and management.

  • Note: The company has changed its name to Regenera Insights.

Key Business Areas

  1. CO₂ Capture Technology: Delta provides CO₂ capture solutions using its LCDesign® technology. This technology is scalable for facilities that manage 1 to 1,000 tonnes of CO₂ daily.

  2. Solvent and Glycol Reclamation: Through its subsidiary, PurificationRX, Delta provides solvent purification technologies aimed at reducing emissions and promoting material reuse.

  3. Carbon Credit Services: Carbon RX, a subsidiary, focuses on carbon credits. It originates, validates, and streams these credits. The company is expanding from agriculture to many industries that capture and reduce carbon.

delta cleantech carbon capture tech
Delta Carbon Capture Technology Source: Delta Cleantech

Strategic Initiatives and Partnership 

Delta CleanTech has launched several strategic initiatives to expand its carbon capture efforts. In November 2021, it teamed up with the Chenglin Group. They aim to boost CO₂ capture in China. Their focus is on the cement, coal, and natural gas industries.

In June 2022, Delta partnered with Muskowekwan First Nation. They created a blockchain carbon credit system, which boosts security and makes credits from Indigenous lands easier to trade.

In April 2024, the company joined a $1.5 million research grant with the University of Guelph. They aim to develop AI-driven carbon capture technologies. In February 2022, Delta partnered with Aspen Technology to improve CO₂ capture modeling and cost analysis.

These efforts speak of the company’s commitment to carbon removal, making it one of the top stocks to watch out for.

4. Mitsubishi Corporation (TYO: 8058): Advancing Global Carbon Capture Initiatives

Mitsubishi Corporation stock
Source: Nasdaq

Mitsubishi Corporation is working on big carbon capture and storage projects around the world. The company has set a target of achieving net-zero emissions across its global operations by 2050, with CCS playing a key role in this strategy.

Strategic Partnerships and Initiatives:

In January 2023, MC signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Nippon Steel Corporation and ExxonMobil Asia Pacific to study and establish CCS value chains in the Asia-Pacific region. This collaboration aims to capture CO₂ emissions from Nippon Steel’s steelworks in Japan. It also evaluates the infrastructure needed for storage in Malaysia, Indonesia, and Australia. ​

In March 2024, MC teamed up with ENEOS Corporation, JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration, and PETRONAS CCS Solutions. They will explore the feasibility of a CCS value chain from Tokyo Bay to Malaysia.

The project plans to capture around 3 million tonnes of CO₂ each year from industries in Tokyo Bay. It could expand to 6 million tonnes annually, with the goal of starting operations by 2030.

Carbon Credit Initiatives:

  • NextGen CDR AG: MC teamed up with South Pole to create NextGen CDR AG. This company buys and sells carbon credits from carbon removal technologies, such as CCUS. This initiative will help implement these technologies on a large scale. It does this by creating new revenue streams through credit sales.

NextGen CDR Facility

  • Australian Integrated Carbon Investment: MC and Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK) bought a 40% stake in Australian Integrated Carbon (AIC). AIC aims to capture CO₂ by regenerating Australia’s native forests. The goal is to sequester up to 5 million tonnes of CO₂ each year. By 2050, the total target is 100 million tonnes.​

Through these strategic partnerships and investments, Mitsubishi Corporation shows a strong commitment to advancing carbon capture, storage, and removal technologies. All these help contribute to global decarbonization efforts and the realization of a low-carbon economy.

Conclusion

Investing in companies dedicated to carbon removal and capture, such as Net Power, Shell, Delta CleanTech, and Mitsubishi Corporation, offers potential for financial returns while supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy. These companies lead in creating and using key technologies to meet global climate goals.

What more, the carbon removal sector is expected to grow significantly in the coming decades. This growth is driven by increasing regulatory support, corporate net-zero commitments, and advances in technology.

As countries around the world tighten emissions rules, the need for carbon removal and direct air capture solutions will likely grow. This trend could set these carbon removal companies up for long-term success. Investors looking to join the clean energy shift will find these carbon removal stocks as great chances to be part of the next wave of climate innovation.

The post Top 4 Carbon Removal Stocks Set to Suck Up and Cash In appeared first on Carbon Credits.

International Carbon Credits Back on the Table? EU’s Climate Goal Gets a Twist

International Carbon Credits Back on the Table? EU's Climate Goal Gets a Twist

The European Union (EU) is considering a new plan to help meet its 2040 climate goal. According to sources, the European Commission may allow countries to use international carbon credits under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This would be a big change from the EU’s current rule, which says climate targets must be met using domestic actions only.

Countdown to 2040: Can the EU Hit Its Green Target in Time?

The European Commission has proposed a target to cut EU greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040 compared to 1990 levels. This goal is part of the EU’s plan to become “climate neutral” or net-zero zero by 2050. 

EU 2040 climate goal
Source: Climate Action Tracker

Achieving the 2040 climate targets entails substantial financial commitments. The EU estimates a need for around €660 billion annually in energy investments during the 2031-2050 period. This represents about 3.2% of the EU’s GDP.

However, the official proposal for the 2040 goal has been delayed.

One reason for the delay is the growing political debate. Some governments and lawmakers worry that the green policies may hurt industries, especially with rising global competition and trade issues like U.S. tariffs. Because of this, the Commission is now exploring more flexible options to reach the 2040 goal.

One option is the use of international carbon credits. 

Reuters reports that sources say the Commission is thinking about a new idea. They might let EU countries use international carbon credits to help meet part of the 2040 target. This would mean that countries could support CO2-reduction projects in other parts of the world—such as forest restoration in Brazil—and count those emissions savings toward their EU goals.

This would be a major shift for the EU. Until now, the EU’s climate targets have focused only on domestic efforts. International credits were banned from the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) after 2020 due to problems in the past.

What Are International Carbon Credits?

A carbon credit is a certificate that shows one tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) has been reduced or removed from the atmosphere. These credits can be created by projects such as planting trees, using cleaner energy, or capturing emissions. Countries or companies can buy these credits to offset their own emissions.

Under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, countries can trade these credits internationally. This helps fund climate projects in developing countries and allows other countries to meet their climate goals in a more flexible way. These projects include initiatives like reforestation, renewable energy installations, and methane capture

EU’s Past Experience with Carbon Credits

Between 2008 and 2020, the EU allowed companies to use international credits under the ETS. Over 1.6 billion credits were used. Many of these credits came from the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI) systems under the Kyoto Protocol.

However, this system had problems. Many projects failed to deliver the promised emissions cuts. Some even led to fraud. Moreover, the many cheap credits lowered the carbon price in the EU. This made it easier for companies to pollute. This slowed down progress on cutting emissions inside the EU.

Because of these issues, the EU stopped accepting international credits after 2020. The current rules for the EU ETS focus only on domestic actions. 

According to the European Environment Agency (EEA), the following would be the forecasted trend of the supply and demand of EU carbon credits until 2030.

EU carbon credits outlook 2030
Source: EEA

Given the 2040 climate goals, the EC is thinking about bringing back international carbon credits. This would offer more flexibility in meeting emission reduction targets. 

Article 6 Explained: A Second Chance for Global Offsets

The Paris Agreement introduced a new system under Article 6 to improve the way international carbon credits (ITMOs) work. This system includes rules to avoid double counting, ensure credits are real, and improve transparency.

PACM Article 6.4 how it works

Supporters of Article 6 say it can help developing countries get more climate funding. If the EU uses these credits again, it could also help poorer countries develop greener economies.

Critics, however, warn that the Article 6 system is still not strong enough. Some carbon credit projects may still overestimate emissions savings or fail to remove carbon in a permanent way. There are also concerns that switching back to international offsets may reduce the pressure on the EU to cut emissions at home.

The Contradicting Views from Experts

Some experts and groups are urging caution. Linda Kalcher from Strategic Perspectives said international credits have faced many issues. These include fraud and poor environmental benefits.

Others, like Andrei Marcu of the ERCST think-tank, believe that developing countries would welcome the move. These countries often need more climate finance and would benefit from EU support for local carbon projects.

Carbon Market Watch, an environmental group, warned that using carbon credits and removals instead of real domestic reductions could weaken the EU’s climate ambition. They particularly noted that:

“Carbon Market Watch warns that reckless reliance on Article 6 credits and carbon removals is not a replacement for domestic emissions reductions commitments.”

The EU’s climate laws and scientific advisors have strongly supported domestic emissions cuts. The European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change has said the EU should cut 90–95% of emissions by 2040 through domestic action only.

Buying credits from other countries may help meet targets on paper. However, experts say it does not reduce pollution inside the EU. They warn that it could slow the shift away from fossil fuels and delay investments in clean energy and green jobs within Europe.

What’s Next: Will the EU Go Global on Carbon Trading?

The European Commission says it is still aiming for a 90% cut by 2040, but it is also listening to calls for more flexibility. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said the 90% cut is the “starting point” and plans to propose the final target before summer.

Any target must be approved by EU countries and the European Parliament. This means more talks and possibly changes before anything is final.

If the EU decides to include international carbon credits in its 2040 plan, it would mark a big policy shift. The decision could impact how the world sees the EU’s climate leadership and how the global carbon credit market develops in the future.

The post International Carbon Credits Back on the Table? EU’s Climate Goal Gets a Twist appeared first on Carbon Credits.

China’s First-Ever Sovereign Green Bond Hits Global Market: Will It Power Its Net Zero Ambitions?

china

China’s Ministry of Finance (MoF) issued its first sovereign green bond, denominated in Chinese currency to the value of USD824m, on the London Stock Exchange. This is China’s first green sovereign bond and also its first sovereign bond issued overseas. The move shows China’s rising role in global green finance.

This plan started taking shape in early 2024. In January, officials from China and the UK met to discuss green finance. Then, in February, China’s Ministry of Finance released a detailed green bond framework. It explained how the funds raised will contribute to mitigation and adaptation, natural resource protection, pollution control, and biodiversity preservation. This helped China start offering green bonds to international investors.

China’s Green Bonds: A Journey That Began in 2014

China’s green bond journey started back in 2014. That year, Sean Kidney, head of the Climate Bonds Initiative, worked with China’s central bank on a task force. Their goal was to build a green bond market.

Since then, China has made huge progress. By 2023, the country was issuing more than USD 150 billion in green bonds every year. It also created clear rules, strong government support, and trusted agencies to check the quality of green projects.

Now, with its first sovereign green bond sold overseas, China is taking the next big step. This move shows that the country is ready to lead globally in green finance.

Part of Carbon Neutral Goals

Climate Action Tracker analyzed China’s emissions, and they are still rising. By 2030, they’re expected to be just 0.5% to 1.6% higher than earlier forecasts—reaching around 13.8 to 14.6 billion tonnes of CO₂.

In a more conservative outlook, emissions might peak before 2025 and then drop slowly—about 0.5% each year. But if China speeds up its shift to renewables and cuts back on coal, then it would lead to a faster decline to about 1% per year. Technically, it can save up to 750 million tonnes of CO₂ by 2030.

Still, even in both of these scenarios, China’s current climate policies aren’t strong enough to make a big dent this decade. To meet the 1.5°C climate goal of the Paris Agreement, China will need to boost its climate action in its next big policy plan (2026–2030).

china carbon emissions net zero
Source: Climate Action Tracker

Thus, this bond fits right into China’s national green plan and net-zero goals. Since 2013, China has followed the idea of “Ecological Civilization.” This means growing the economy while protecting nature.

China’s long-term sustainability plan includes major goals like the following:

  • The Five-Sphere Integrated Plan
  • The 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025)
  • Peaking carbon emissions before 2030
  • Reaching carbon neutrality by 2060

All of these support China’s “Beautiful China” vision that aims to make green development a key part of the country’s future.

Furthermore, China is using modern tools like artificial intelligence, smart tech, renewable energy, and carbon capture to make this successful. These technologies will help monitor the environment, save energy, and reduce pollution. They also support the growth of cleaner industries and smarter cities.

China emissions

Investors Can Now Join the Green Effort

This new green bond connects money with climate action. It gives investors a chance to support China’s green goals directly.

Apart from Government backing, businesses and local communities also play a big role. Green business ideas, government rewards, and public action all help push China toward a cleaner future.

More significantly, these bonds could help finance renewable energy projects, green transport systems, waste-to-energy plants, and climate-resilient urban infrastructure

Thus, this bond is more than a financial tool. It shows China’s commitment to building a greener, healthier world.

China Sets a High Bar for Its Green Bonds

China has created a green bond framework that meets top global and local standards. It follows both the China Green Bond Principles (2022) and the ICMA Green Bond Principles (2021 with the 2022 Appendix). By aligning with these trusted guidelines, China builds strong trust among investors—especially those who care about sustainability and ESG values.

The framework focuses on four main parts: how the money is used, how projects are chosen, how the funds are managed, and how results are reported.

All the money raised from these green bonds will go toward eco-friendly projects listed in China’s national budget. This includes building green infrastructure, funding ongoing green programs, offering tax breaks for clean initiatives, and supporting local governments working on climate action.

Furthermore, the MoF will track all fund transactions in an internal register. Every year, it will share reports showing where the money went and what environmental benefits it achieved. This clear reporting gives confidence to investors and shows that their money is used productively.

Paving the Way for Future Climate Investments

This debut is likely just the start. The Ministry of Finance has built a framework to support future green bond issuances. These could be bigger and offered in different currencies.

As interest in low-carbon development grows and China pushes for cleaner, high-quality growth, more green bonds from the government are expected to follow.

This crucial step paved the way for China to issue green sovereign bonds to global investors. It came at a moment when global sustainable debt is about to hit USD 6 trillion, following Climate Bonds standards.

The post China’s First-Ever Sovereign Green Bond Hits Global Market: Will It Power Its Net Zero Ambitions? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Copper Prices Crash as U.S.-China Tariff War Triggers Market Mayhem

Copper

Just two weeks ago, copper prices were climbing fast due to the US stockpiling ahead of new tariffs. Traders warned that new US tariffs on copper could squeeze global supply. But things turned around quickly. But now, the copper rally has reversed into a full-blown crash.

This is a direct outcome of President Donald Trump’s trade war, aka “Trump Tariffs,” that is shaking the global market. Investors now fear that the new tariffs will slow down demand for copper worldwide.

The Copper Price Shock: Traders Scramble, Markets Tumble

Bloomberg reported, on Friday, April 4, copper prices dropped sharply, along with stock markets. The fall continued till Monday. In the London Metal Exchange, copper prices sank as much as 7.7% before bouncing back slightly to $8,735 a ton.

copper price
Source: Bloomberg

Earlier, we saw how traders rushed to send copper to the US before tariffs hit, driving premiums as high as $500 a ton. Big players like Mercuria and Trafigura even predicted prices could reach $12,000 a ton. But things changed rapidly when Trump shortened the tariff timeline, giving buyers very few days in hand.

Because of this, copper is piling up outside the US. Global buyers have more to choose from, but many aren’t interested. With demand dropping due to tariffs, the extra supply doesn’t help.

Chile’s Price Cut Signals Looming Economic Strain

Chile, the world’s biggest copper producer, is preparing to lower its copper price estimate for 2025. It’s a telltale sign of growing global economic concerns.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Chile’s copper agency, Cochilco, held its 2025 price forecast at $4.25 per pound in February. This came after it raised the estimate from $3.85 back in May 2024.

It also kept the 2026 forecast at $4.25. Cochilco expects copper prices to stay above $4.00 per pound for the next ten years.

  • But the new data show copper prices to average between $3.90 and $4 per pound this year, which is below its previous forecast.

The final figure will be announced by the end of April. However, Juan Ignacio Guzman, head of Chilean mineral consulting firm GEM, said,

“If the trade war triggers a recession, prices could tumble to as low as $3 a pound — or about $6,600 a ton.”

copper price
CSource: Bloomberg

Chile, which produced 24% of the world’s copper last year, is now feeling the pressure.

In a separate report from the Shanghai Metals Market, we discovered that,

  • Chilean Customs data showed that Chile exported 182,338 metric tons of refined copper, including 33,496 metric tons to China in March.
  • Exports of copper ore and concentrate totaled 1,304,782 metric tons, with China receiving 810,135 metric tons in the same month.

Earlier this year, in January and February, Chile’s copper production dropped compared to the previous month. Exports to China also declined during that period.

Analysts Warn of More Trouble Ahead

The Bloomberg report highlighted that the worst might not be over. Max Layton, global head of commodities research at Citigroup Inc., warned that the global trade shake-up could lead to a historic market correction. Citi now expects copper prices outside the US to average $8,500 this quarter — but they also say the risk of further drops is high.

BNP Paribas SA strategist David Wilson, who had warned prices could collapse, now sees the downtrend continuing in the short term. Goldman Sachs still believes in copper’s long-term value but admits that slower global growth could delay the expected supply shortage.

Meanwhile, JPMorgan now expects the US to fall into a recession this year. UBS estimates that every 1% drop in US GDP could cut output in export-driven Asian economies like Taiwan and South Korea by up to 2%.

China’s 34% Tariff Sparks Copper Stock Rout

Copper stocks have taken a beating amid falling prices, global slowdown fears, and rising trade tensions. The sharp selloff followed news from China’s Xinhua News Agency that Beijing will impose a 34% tariff on all US imports starting April 10.

Here’s a quick look at how major mining companies are reacting:

  • Freeport-McMoRan: Shares dropped 13.1% in a single day. The stock is down 24.1% this week, bringing its market value to $41.9 billion.
  • BHP Group and Rio Tinto: BHP’s shares fell 9.5%, cutting its value to $107.3 billion. Rio Tinto’s dropped 6.4%, is now valued at $93.5 billion. Both saw trading volumes nearly triple the usual.
  • Southern Copper: Based in Mexico, the company fell 9.6% on Friday alone, pushing its weekly loss to 16.7%. Its market value now stands at $62.4 billion.
  • Zijin Mining: This Chinese mining giant lost 7.2%, dropping to a market cap of $56.9 billion. It’s one of the few firms producing over 1 million tonnes of copper a year.
  • Glencore and Anglo American: Glencore dropped 11.5%, while London-listed Anglo American fell 11%. Their market caps now stand at $36.9 billion and $28.6 billion, respectively. Both are down about 20% this week.
  • Canadian Miners (Teck Resources, Ivanhoe Mines, First Quantum): Canadian copper stocks saw sharp losses. Teck dropped 12.1%, Ivanhoe fell 12.6%, and First Quantum slid 12.8% as investors pulled back across the board.
  • Hindustan Copper: In India, shares fell 5.4% over the past five days and are down 15.7% so far in 2025.

KNOW MORE: Copper Prices Slump Below $9,000: What Does It Mean for Global Growth?

What started as a bullish rush has turned into a brutal crash. With tariffs rising and demand shrinking, copper is now a symbol of deeper market fears. Global supply chains are out of sync, and the world’s top miners are feeling the heat. If trade tensions escalate, this copper price crash may face a difficult recovery.

The post Copper Prices Crash as U.S.-China Tariff War Triggers Market Mayhem appeared first on Carbon Credits.