What The USD$91Billion In Nuclear Weapons Spending Could Have Bought Instead

In 2023, the nine nuclear-armed states collectively spent a staggering $91.4 billion on their nuclear arsenals, according to ICAN’s latest report titled “Surge: 2023 Global Nuclear Weapons Spending”.

That amount translates to an astonishing $2,898 per second, underscoring the immense financial commitment to maintaining and modernizing nuclear weapons.

The Billion-Dollar Nuclear Breakdown

Here’s how the spending breaks down among the top four nuclear-armed nations:

United States: The largest spender by far, allocating $51.5 billion, which accounted for 56% of the total expenditures among all nine nations. This spending also represented 80% of the overall increase in nuclear weapons spending compared to the previous year.
China: Followed with expenditures totaling $11.8 billion, emphasizing its significant investments in its nuclear capabilities.
Russia: Spent $8.3 billion, marking its ongoing commitment to maintaining a robust nuclear arsenal.
United Kingdom: Saw a notable 17% increase in spending, reaching $8.1 billion, reflecting its continued investment in nuclear deterrence capabilities.

The report highlights a troubling trend of escalating spending on nuclear weapons over the past five years, totaling $387 billion. This period has seen a 34% increase in annual expenditures, illustrating a global push by these nations to modernize and expand their nuclear capabilities despite international efforts towards disarmament and non-proliferation.

The financial windfall from nuclear weapons production also extends to private entities involved in their manufacture. Companies engaged in producing these weapons secured contracts worth at least $387 billion, some extending through 2040. 

In 2023 alone, new contracts added up to nearly $7.9 billion, further fueling profits and incentivizing lobbying efforts. In the US and France alone, firms spent $118 million on lobbying activities aimed at influencing policy and public perception related to nuclear weapons.

Source: ICAN Report

The Price of Nuclear Power: What $91B Could Buy Instead

ICAN’s report underscores the opportunity costs associated with such sky-high spending. For instance, the $91.4 billion annual expenditure on nuclear weapons could alternatively provide significant benefits to address pressing global challenges. 

This sum could fund renewable energy initiatives to power 12+ million homes with wind energy, cover a substantial portion of the funding gap (27%) needed to combat climate change, or even plant 1 million trees every minute.

Or that money could have been spent on purchasing uranium to fuel one of the cleanest energy sources – nuclear power. Industry reports show that investments in nuclear energy for the clean energy transition have not increased at the same pace as other energy sources like renewables. 

Nuclear capacity additions also show the same trend, with nuclear remaining flat over the years and in the coming years. 

However, US utilities significantly increased their uranium purchases by 27% in 2023 compared to the previous year, according to the latest annual report from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA)

US civilian nuclear power reactors purchased a total of 51.6 million pounds of U3O8 (uranium oxide), equivalent to 19,838 metric tonnes of uranium (tU). The majority of uranium deliveries to the US came from international sources, including Canada, Australia, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan.

READ MORE: US Targets 200 GW Nuclear Expansion to Meet Soaring Energy Demand

Uranium and The Quest for Securing Power Supplies

About 85% of the uranium purchases were made under long-term contracts, with a weighted average price of $42.42 per pound U3O8. The remaining 15% was acquired through spot contracts, at a higher weighted-average price of $51.64 per pound U3O8.

Commercial US inventories of uranium saw a year-on-year increase. It reached 152 million pounds U3O8 by the end of 2023, marking a 6% rise from the previous year.

These inventories include uranium in various stages of the nuclear fuel cycle, including material owned by brokers, converters, enrichers, fabricators, producers, traders, as well as plant owners and operators.

Looking ahead, the EIA forecasts a potential maximum demand of 433 million pounds of U3O8 over the next decade. This is based on existing contracts and unfilled market requirements from 2024 to 2033.

These findings highlight the US nuclear industry’s ongoing reliance on global uranium markets, with significant implications for energy security and international trade dynamics in the nuclear sector.

Kazatomprom, the world’s leading uranium producer, accounting for 40% of U3O8 supply, has not announced further production downgrades. But the company warns of limited sulphuric acid supplies affecting its targets.

Major producers like Cameco also predict supply deficits. Kazatomprom forecasts a shortfall of 21 million pounds by 2030, rising to 147 million pounds by 2040. Data from the World Nuclear Association shows a growing demand with limited supply, creating a significant gap.

Geopolitical factors complicate the outlook, such as the U.S. Senate reviewing a bill to ban enriched Russian uranium imports.

In response to the uncertain nuclear fuel future, countries are securing power supplies. Sweden plans to lift its uranium mining ban, holding 80% of the EU’s uranium deposits, and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry urges reconsideration of its uranium ban.

As the demand for nuclear power remains stable, ensuring a diversified supply chain will be crucial for meeting future energy needs while navigating geopolitical uncertainties.

SEE MORE: The Atomic Awakening… Fueled by Uranium

The post What The USD$91Billion In Nuclear Weapons Spending Could Have Bought Instead appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Google Invests in BlackRock’s New Green Power to Boost Taiwan’s Solar Capacity

Google has partnered strategically with BlackRock to develop a 1GW solar energy pipeline in Taiwan. In this collaboration, Google will make a significant capital investment in New Green Power, a leading solar developer in Taiwan, owned 100 % by a fund managed by BlackRock’s Climate Infrastructure business. This move aims to boost energy capacity and cut carbon emissions, especially as the demand for AI continues to rise.

A Cool Deal for Hot Energy in Data Centers

The press release notes that Taiwan is the prime hub for Google’s cloud technology with data centers and offices. Certainly, the energy demand is insane for these data centers. However, the country still relies on fossil fuels for ~ 85% of its power generation. Thus, this deal promises to meet the electricity needs of Google’s operations in Taiwan. It further aligns with its 24*7 carbon-free electricity (CFE) demand round the clock in all regions it operates.

Subsequently, Amanda Peterson Corio, Google’s Global Head of Data Center Energy highlighted,

“We’re aiming to reach net-zero emissions across our operations and value chain, supported by a goal to run on 24/7 carbon-free energy everywhere we operate. The path to reach these goals is challenging, and requires both commercial efforts and broader energy systems change. We’re excited to partner with BlackRock and New Green Power to advance the build out of clean energy on Taiwan’s electricity grid.”

source: Google

In this deal, Google has taken a stake in New Green Power to buy nearly 300 megawatts of renewable energy from BlackRock. It will be purchased through power purchase agreements (PPAs) and Taiwan Renewable Energy Certificates (T-RECS). Google and BlackRock did not disclose the size of their equity stake in NGP.

However, Amanda mentioned that the investment is expected to drive both equity and debt financing for the development of NGP’s 1-gigawatt solar pipeline.

David Giordano, Global Head of Climate Infrastructure of BlackRock noted,

“As we witness growth in demand for digital services, powered by AI and data-centric technologies, it becomes imperative to invest in the infrastructure that not only supports this growth but also aligns with our strategy to invest in clean energy. This partnership is a testament to our shared commitment to driving the transition to a low-carbon economy.”

MUST READ: Google and NV Energy: Powering Nevada’s Future with 115 MW of Geothermal Energy 

Mutual Gains with Robust Solar Capacity

Google plans to extend this clean energy capacity to its semiconductor suppliers and manufacturers. The semiconductor industry is a significant emissions hotspot due to energy-intensive chip manufacturing and operation. This deal directly supports Google’s clean energy objectives and would reduce Scope 3 supply chain emissions. The new solar capacity will directly power Google’s data centers and cloud region in Taiwan. It will also offer clean energy choices to nearby chip suppliers and manufacturers.

In 2023, Google’s Scope 3 emissions totaled ~10.8 mtCO2e, accounting for 75% of its overall carbon footprint. Some of these emissions significantly come from upgrading data center infrastructure and AI initiatives. Google has emphasized that reducing Scope 3 emissions depends on diverse suppliers across countries with varying clean energy access, posing greater challenges in the Asia-Pacific region.

Since last year Google has been investing continuously in their prime manufacturing hubs to achieve their goal of 5 GW of CFE. The tech giant aims to secure clean energy availability across its supply chain through this energy target.

New Green Power (NGP), headquartered in Taipei, is a prominent solar developer and EPC firm. It finances, builds, owns, and operates solar projects in Taiwan and Japan. It has efficiently built and managed more than 500 MW of domestic projects. These include the largest inland floating project (approximately 35 MW) and rooftop projects (around 15 MW) in Taiwan, alongside multiple utility-scale ground-mounted projects in southern Taiwan. With its strong local and international experience, NGP is taking charge of the renewable energy transformation in the region.

Speaking of the investment, it would foster Taiwan’s renewable energy grid and assist Google in achieving net-zero emissions throughout its operations and value chain by 2030.

BlackRock’s Role in Taiwan’s Energy Revolution

BlackRock’s Infrastructure Equity platform oversees over US$39B in client assets as of March 31, 2024, spanning its Climate and Diversified Infrastructure franchises. The largest asset manager company offers global investment opportunities and tailored solutions across energy sectors and asset classes. Furthermore, it leverages the significant investment potential of the energy transition valued at over US$100 trillion.

Ross Mackey, Portfolio Manager, Climate Infrastructure of BlackRock said:

“This is a pivotal moment for energy infrastructure in Taiwan. BlackRock’s Climate Infrastructure business is a leading investor in Taiwan’s solar industry and we are delighted to partner with Google to provide a scalable and sustainable energy solution for their operations in Taiwan.”

Similarly, Singapore is advocating for green data centers to manage the increasing energy demands of AI. It aims to provide at least 300 MW of additional capacity through green energy initiatives in the coming years.

This partnership represents a significant step towards sustainable energy solutions in the tech industry, promising a greener future for data centers and digital services in Taiwan.

MUST READ: BlackRock’s Insights on 2024 Low-Carbon Transition Investment Trends

Addressing Taiwan’s Energy Challenge

Taiwan leads global semiconductor production, producing nearly 60% of the world’s chips and a significant portion of advanced AI processors. However, the country heavily depends on non-renewable energy sources to sustain its industrial output.

About 97% of Taiwan’s energy comes from coal and natural gas, underscoring the urgency to shift towards renewable sources. This is the reason behind the country’s strive towards sustainable digital growth.

Taiwan aims to reach 20GW of solar capacity by 2025 and up to 80GW by 2050 to achieve its net zero goals.

Taiwan’s renewable energy future looks sunny with rapidly expanding solar developers like NGP, supported by strong partners such as BlackRock and Google. Undoubtedly, it’s a significant step towards sustainable energy solutions in data centers, digital services, and the entire tech industry.

READ MORE: US Solar Installations in Q1 2024 Surpass 100 GW Milestone 

The post Google Invests in BlackRock’s New Green Power to Boost Taiwan’s Solar Capacity appeared first on Carbon Credits.

What EV Demise? Tesla Stock Hit Highest Levels

Tesla shares surged Tuesday, reaching their highest levels since January, following the release of Q2 2024 production and delivery numbers that beat analysts’ expectations. This is amid the growing sentiment that the EV market is slumping.

Tesla reported delivering 443,956 vehicles in the second quarter and producing 410,831 vehicles. While deliveries were down 5% compared to the second quarter of 2023, they surpassed analysts’ consensus of around 438,019.

For the second consecutive day, Tesla was the biggest gainer on the S&P 500, with shares rising 10.2% to close at $231.26. The stock has gained 17% over the past two sessions, although it remains down about 7% since the start of the year.

Source: Reutuers

After a challenging first half of 2024, Tesla stock began to rebound last week amid optimism for its quarterly numbers. This is further boosted on Monday by positive delivery figures from several of Tesla’s Chinese rivals.

Tesla further announced it will release its Q2 financial results after the bell on July 23.

The EV leader’s positive results despite low market sentiment cement its uncontested place place in the EV industry. Its peers rather show a losing stance in their EV plans. 

Navigating EV Challenges

Polestar has faced slow sales and significant cash burn, losing nearly 95% of its value since spinning out of Volvo Car AB. Amid rising tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, Polestar is adapting its business plan. 

The US now imposes a 100% import levy, and the EU is set to formalize tariffs up to 48%. 

To mitigate these impacts, Polestar plans to reduce supply chain costs and shift some production to South Carolina this summer, aiming to reach break-even cash flow by 2025.

Mercedes-Benz has also revised its plan to become an all-EV brand by 2030, now investing millions into further developing internal combustion engines (ICE). Mercedes CEO Ola Källenius stated that combustion engines will last “well into the 2030s,” necessitating massive investments to meet stricter carbon emissions rules. 

The company admitted it was overly ambitious with its electrification goals – a common issue among automakers facing setbacks in EV transitions due to insufficient charging infrastructure and low demand.

Just 3 years ago, Mercedes’ parent company, Daimler, announced plans to switch from “EV first to EV only”. The company initially aimed for a lineup without diesel and gasoline engines by the decade’s end.

General Motors faced similar challenges with its Chevy Bolt, which suffered from battery issues leading to costly recalls. This reality check has prompted many automakers to revise their electrification timelines, realizing that the transition to EVs is more complex than initially anticipated. 

What Slump? Breaking Sales Records for EVs

Interestingly, South Korea seems undaunted by the decline in global electric vehicle sales. Both Kia and Hyundai are bucking the trend of declining EV sales with their record-breaking numbers in 2024. 

Kia set a new EV sales record, selling 29,392 units in the first half of the year. This marked the best half-year for EVs in the company’s history. The EV6 is Kia’s leading electric model, with 10,941 units sold, an increase of 31.3%.

Hyundai also reported impressive figures, with the Ioniq 5 having its best June ever and the Ioniq 6 sales up 113% compared to last year. 

Hyundai’s overall vehicle sales rose 2.2%, but June sales fell by 2.5%. Kia experienced a 2.0% drop in overall sales for the first half of 2024, with June sales down 6.5%.

Despite these declines, strong EV sales have significantly bolstered both brands, highlighting the growing importance of EVs in their portfolios.

Notably, Tesla has been approved by South Korea’s Ministry of Environment to sell regulatory automotive emission credits, also known as carbon credits, within the country in May. This marks a significant milestone for the EV giant, showcasing a stronger presence of EVs in the South Korean market.

READ MORE: Tesla Can Trade Carbon Credits in South Korea, Valued at $145M

Confirmation Amid EV Optimism

Another major news dampening the EV sentiment was the rumor that Northvolt will not pursue its $7-billion battery factory in Canada. The truth, however, is that Europe’s major EV battery maker confirmed it will proceed with the construction of such a factory on Montreal’s South Shore as planned. 

Northvolt specializes in lithium-ion batteries for EVs and energy storage. 

The Swedish battery manufacturer is behind schedule on its Scandinavian mega-factory and is conducting a strategic review to determine project timelines. The Montreal plant could start manufacturing electric battery cells and cathode active material by 2026.

This massive EV battery plant construction and Tesla’s undeniable EV push are both bullish for the very element that powers the EV revolution – lithium.

In March, lithium prices saw a slight increase, but they declined by June 2024 due to expected reductions in downstream battery production. A seasonal rebound in plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) sales is anticipated from September onward, which could help reduce market surpluses and stabilize prices.

Despite uncertainties such as potential supply cuts and project delays in the lithium market, the long-term outlook for PEV adoption remains promising, driven by the launch of more affordable vehicles, which could further support prices.

Amid challenges in the global EV market, Tesla’s stock price surge shows it remains the undisputed champ in the industry. While competitors like Polestar and Mercedes-Benz navigate setbacks, Kia and Hyundai set records, highlighting the evolving landscape of EVs and its main fuel lithium.

INTERESTING READ: Is the EV Market’s Momentum Slowing?

The post What EV Demise? Tesla Stock Hit Highest Levels appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Amazon’s Own Carbon Offset Standard Sparks Concerns Over Market Confusion

Amazon has taken a bold step by becoming the first company to sidestep the global standard for verifying carbon offsets, a standard developed by a non-profit heavily funded by Amazon’s founder, Jeff Bezos. This move is part of Amazon’s strategy to establish a new standard, enabling it to overcome the shortage of quality-labeled offsets and meet its ambitious goal of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040. 

However, this decision has raised concerns about potential market confusion and the dilution of carbon offset standards.

Redefining Carbon Offset Standards

Companies, including Amazon, purchase carbon offset credits from projects that absorb carbon, such as reforestation, to offset their emissions. Each carbon offset corresponds to a tonne of carbon dioxide reduced or removed from the atmosphere. 

Since the critic of the carbon offsets’ integrity began to scrutinize the market in 2021, the volume of these credits issued decreased. 

Despite the demand, the market for these offsets remains small due to a limited number of verifiable projects. 

To address this, Amazon has completed work on Abacus, a new framework for verifying carbon offsets, developed in partnership with carbon registry Verra. They started developing this carbon offset standard in 2022. 

This alternative standard is positioned as more ambitious than the one developed by the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM). ICVCM is the largest organization dedicated to validating carbon offsets.

Amazon’s head of carbon neutralization, Jamey Mulligan, who is also the architect of Abacus, stated that while the company supports ICVCM’s work, it seeks a higher standard to ensure real and verified impacts on emissions. He did not comment on whether Jeff Bezos was directly involved in this decision. 

Other major tech companies like Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, and Salesforce have already committed to purchasing up to 20 million metric tons of Abacus-certified credits.

However, the ICVCM has expressed concerns about the development of an alternative standard. Pedro Martins Barata, co-chair of ICVCM’s panel of experts, worries that multiple standards could lead to confusion in the market. 

Kelley Kizzier, a member of ICVCM’s board and director of corporate action at the Bezos Earth Fund, views Abacus as complementary rather than competitive to ICVCM, emphasizing the need for generating high-integrity offsets.

Meet Amazon’s “ABACUS” 

The market for voluntary carbon offsets, valued at $2 billion, remains constrained by skepticism over the effectiveness of the underlying projects. According to an Environmental Defense Fund analysis, the market currently offsets 300 million metric tons of emissions annually, but only a fraction of these offsets are verified. ICVCM’s primary quality label, CCP, covers only 27 million tons.

Last month, the organization revealed the first carbon-crediting methodologies approved for its Core Carbon Principles (CCPs) label.

READ MORE: ICVCM Reveals First CCP-Approved Carbon Credits Worth 27M

Amazon reported 71.3 million tons of carbon emissions in 2022, with the majority stemming from its supply chain. The company plans to become a significant buyer of carbon credits without substituting these credits for its broader decarbonization efforts. Amazon is evaluating over 70 proposals and aims to restore tens of thousands of hectares of degraded land.

Any developer meeting Verra’s methodology can apply for the Abacus label, which was developed with input from scientists, NGOs, and industry experts. Eron Bloomgarden, founder of Emergent, believes that while ICVCM’s work is crucial, it is insufficient for the market’s growth. He supports Abacus as it could help address major challenges like climate change and biodiversity extinction.

What Makes Abacus Different?

The new carbon credit label, Abacus, focuses on agroforestry and reforestation projects due to challenges with additionality, leakage, and durability. These projects have significant potential for climate, social, and environmental benefits.

Additionality: Abacus differs from traditional carbon credits by requiring developers to account for additionality from the project’s inception. They must track changes in carbon stock over time using a dynamic baseline, ensuring projects outcompete control plots in the surrounding landscape. This shifts the risk of non-additionality to project investors.

Leakage: Abacus aims to reduce leakage, which occurs when agricultural projects indirectly cause land-use changes and carbon loss. By supporting projects that make degraded land or nearby regions equally productive, Abacus helps maintain agricultural production rates, ensuring that carbon removal efforts do not compromise food security.

Durability: To address the issue of durability, Abacus continues using pooled buffer accounts to cover potential losses due to events like wildfires or harvests. However, it shortens the crediting period from 50 years to 30, which has minimal impact on investors’ financial outlooks. This change creates unaccredited removals that can compensate for partial losses, acting as an additional buffer pool.

In summary, Amazon’s development of the Abacus standard represents a pivotal move in the carbon offset market, aiming to enhance the supply of high-quality offsets while stirring debate about the implications for market coherence and the integrity of carbon offsetting practices.

SEE MORE: US Government Releases New Voluntary Carbon Credit Market Policy Guidelines

The post Amazon’s Own Carbon Offset Standard Sparks Concerns Over Market Confusion appeared first on Carbon Credits.

US Solar Installations in Q1 2024 Surpass 100 GW Milestone

The first quarter of 2024 marked a significant milestone for the U.S. solar industry, with installations rising by 21% year-over-year, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights data. This surge has pushed the nation’s cumulative solar capacity past the 100 GW mark. 

This is a testament to the accelerating adoption of renewable energy driven by favorable policies and market dynamics. Per S&P Global Market Intelligence data, developers installed 3,379 MW of utility-scale solar during this period, boosting the total solar capacity to an impressive 100,883 MW.

What Makes Solar Energy Shine Brighter

The increase in solar installations can be largely attributed to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and its associated incentives. These incentives have boosted the solar industry, enabling companies to capitalize on financial benefits and invest heavily in solar infrastructure. 

US Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm recently noted that wind and solar energy could surpass coal generation for the first time in US history. She highlighted the ongoing trend towards cleaner energy sources, aiming to achieve 80% clean energy on the path to 100% clean electricity by 2035.

Solar power is leading in the energy landscape, with around 56GW capacity of new additions in 2024. 

SEE MORE: Harnessing the Sun: America’s Solar Snapshot in April 2024

Sam Huntington, director of North American power and renewables analysis at S&P Global Commodity Insights, emphasized the robust growth trajectory of solar, saying that:

“In a lot of ways, solar is on [an] absolute tear, and we think it will continue at that pace. Solar is going to be doing a lot of the heavy lifting for the next seven years and continue.”

The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) reports that there are now 5 million solar projects in the U.S. These include both utility-scale and distributed solar installations. 

In perspective, the US solar industry displaces 198 million metric tons of carbon dioxide each year. That’s equivalent to shutting down 53 coal-fired power plants. Notably, the amount of reduced CO2 emissions (22 billion gallons of gas) can fuel traveling to the sun and back.

SEIA projects the 5M solar installations to double, reaching 10 million by 2030 and tripling by 2034. This rapid expansion highlights the growing acceptance and integration of solar power across various sectors of the economy.

Project developers have ambitious plans for 2024, aiming to add an additional 54,484 MW of new solar capacity. This pipeline includes 4,626 MW of announced projects, 19,278 MW in early development, 3,578 MW in advanced development, and a substantial 27,002 MW already under construction. 

More broadly, 228,197 MW of additional solar capacity is in various stages of development, projected to be completed by 2028, according to S&P Global data.

Project Development, Key Projects, and Regional Insights

Understanding the stages of project development is crucial for grasping the scale and progress of solar installations. S&P Global Market Intelligence categorizes projects under construction once building activities have commenced, excluding mere site preparation. 

Advanced development requires projects to meet at least two of the following criteria: 

securing financing, 
signing power purchase agreements, 
obtaining necessary permits, 
securing equipment, or having a contractor on board. 

Early development begins with the permitting process, and announced projects are listed in interconnection queues with accompanying public announcements or permitting actions.

The first quarter of 2024 saw the completion of the ten largest solar projects, totaling 1,912 MW, with Texas leading the way. Notable among these are the IP Lumina I Solar Project (Jade Solar) and IP Lumina II Solar Project (Andromeda Solar). They collectively added about 627 MW of solar capacity. 

These projects, owned by Intersect Power LLC, have secured renewable energy credits through agreements with two undisclosed companies.

Another remarkable solar project is the California Valley Solar Ranch (CVSR), situated in San Luis Obispo County, California. It’s among the most ambitious solar initiatives to date. Owned by NRG Energy and operated by SunPower, a leading developer of utility-scale solar projects, it boasts a capacity to produce 580 MW of power, showcasing the significant scalability of solar energy projects.

Nevada’s contribution to the solar boom, the Copper Mountain Solar Facility developed by Sempra Generation, has consistently increased its capacity, now standing at 802 MW. Its ongoing expansion demonstrates the potential of solar projects to meet rising energy demands effectively.

Solar Energy Future Outlook

The U.S. solar industry is poised for continued growth, driven by strong policy support, technological advancements, and increasing market demand. As the nation progresses toward its renewable energy goals, solar power will play an increasing role in the energy mix. The current trajectory suggests a bright future for solar energy, with significant capacity additions expected in the coming years.

Based on new solar projects coming online this year, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts substantial growth in solar power generation. Specifically, EIA anticipates a 75% increase from 163 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh) in 2023 to 286 billion kWh by 2025. 

Moreover, planned solar projects could significantly boost the solar capacity operated by the electric power sector in the country. Specifically, the capacity could increase by 38% to 131 GW by the end of 2024. This expansion reflects the growing investment and development in solar energy infrastructure across the U.S.

Corporations in America further fuels the bright future of solar power, with EIA projections shown below. They’re supporting the production of 100+ gigawatts (GW) of solar module manufacturing capacity.

As a result of these developments, solar energy continues to play a pivotal role in diversifying the nation’s energy portfolio and reducing carbon emissions.

READ MORE: Enbridge’s $1.2B Solar-Plus-Storage Project Fuels Path to Net Zero

The post US Solar Installations in Q1 2024 Surpass 100 GW Milestone appeared first on Carbon Credits.

World Bank Fuels India’s Carbon Market and Green Hydrogen with US$1.5B Boost

The World Bank approved $1.5B to boost India’s low-carbon energy. This operation aims to spark India’s green hydrogen market, expand renewable energy, and drive funding for low-carbon projects. The funding, announced on June 29 represents the second phase of the Low-Carbon Energy Programmatic Development Policy Operation.

Transforming India’s Renewable Energy Market with a US$1.5B Investment Plan

India, the fastest-growing enormous economy globally, is set to maintain its rapid expansion. To decouple this growth from emissions, scaling up renewable energy, particularly in hard-to-abate industrial sectors, is essential. This strategy aims to ramp up green hydrogen production and consumption, alongside accelerating climate finance to support low-carbon investments. Elaborating further, the second phase of US$1.5B is meant to transform India’s RE market by:

Producing ~ 450,000 MT of green hydrogen and 1,500 MW of electrolyzers annually from the financial year 2025-2026. It will cover the costs of the latest technology required for green hydrogen production.
Boosting renewable energy capacity by incentivizing battery energy storage solutions Additionally, it promotes renewable energy integration through incentives for battery energy storage and amendments to the Indian Electricity Grid Code. This is poised to reduce emissions by 50MTS annually.
Advancing the development of a national carbon credit market.

source: Energy Statistics India 2024

Auguste Tano Kouame, World Bank Country Director for India noted,

“The World Bank is pleased to continue supporting India’s low-carbon development strategy which will help achieve the country’s net-zero target while creating clean energy jobs in the private sector. Indeed, both the first and second operations have a strong focus on boosting private investment in green hydrogen and renewable energy.”

First Low-Carbon Energy Program Achievements

Last year (2023) in June, the World Bank approved the $1.5 B First Low-Carbon Energy Programmatic Development Policy Operation. According to the World Bank, this initiative facilitated transmission charge waivers for renewable energy in green hydrogen projects in India. It also outlined a clear strategy to launch 50 GW of renewable energy tenders annually and established a legal framework for a national carbon credit market.

Aurélien Kruse, Xiaodong Wang, and Surbhi Goyal, Team Leaders for the operation, jointly said,

The operation is helping in scaling up investments in green hydrogen and in renewable energy infrastructure. This will contribute towards India’s journey for achieving its Nationally Determined Contributions targets.”

The executives also praised India’s efforts to establish a robust domestic market for green hydrogen, supported by a fast-growing renewable energy capacity. They noted that the first tenders under the National Green Hydrogen Mission’s incentive scheme have attracted significant private sector interest.

India’s Renewable Energy Landscape through IEA Lens

IEA’s 2024 release talks about the connection between India’s economy and renewable energy demand. India’s GDP grew by 7.8% in 2023, making it the world’s fastest-growing major economy and the fifth largest globally. Energy demand in India is expected to outpace all regions by 2050 due to urbanization and increased demand for electricity, cement, and steel. This reliance on imported fossil fuels could increase carbon emissions significantly. Hence, an urgency to curb emissions and become net zero by 2070.

India has scaled up solar and wind investments and promoted domestic clean energy manufacturing through the Production Linked Incentives scheme. The country also boasts of strong energy efficiency programs and a new hydrogen policy.

Latest media reports say that India entered the sovereign green bond market in January 2023, issuing bonds worth $1B. This has spurred clean energy investments, reaching $68B in 2023. Fossil fuel investment also rose to $33 billion. To meet the energy and climate goals, India needs to double clean energy investment by 2030. However, this would suffice with an extra 20% boost. Lowering capital costs is key to making this happen.

As of March 2024, India’s thermal power accounts for 56% of installed capacity, while renewable energy sources contribute 32%, hydroelectric power 11%, and nuclear power 2%. The World Bank has supported this transition with this huge loan.

India’s goal is to build 47 GW/236 GWh of battery storage and produce 5 MMT of clean hydrogen by 2030.
India also plans to achieve 40 GW of electrolyzer manufacturing capacity, 30 MMT of carbon capture, and 2 MMT of sustainable aviation fuels by 2030.

Overall, the World Bank funding can accelerate India’s commitment to surpassing 500 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2030. Further aiming to lead in advanced energy solutions. With energy giants like Tata, Adani, and Reliance, the country is close to achieving its energy transition goals.

MUST READ: Adani Reaches India’s First 10,000 MW Renewable Energy Capacity

The post World Bank Fuels India’s Carbon Market and Green Hydrogen with US$1.5B Boost appeared first on Carbon Credits.

CATL Unveils Ambitious 2,000 km Electric Plane Vision

CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology), the global leader in EV batteries with a commanding 38% market share, has just achieved a major milestone. They successfully flew a 4T plane using their cutting-edge, ultra-high density “condensed batteries”. They are now setting their sights even higher, aiming to have an 8T electric plane with a range of 2,000 to 3,000 km (1,240-1,865 miles) ready for takeoff within 2027-2028.

CATL’s Condensed Battery to Fly Futuristic Electric Planes

The debut of the “Condensed Battery” at the Shanghai Auto Show last year’s April signaled that CATL has something huge in its plan. Dr. Robin Zeng, chairman and CEO of CATL, at the 15th World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, held in China’s Dalian city said,

“Players in the battery industry should compete on technology advancement, safety, reliability, delivering value that will accelerate the energy transition and secure our green future.”

Following this, he confirmed that electric aircraft of the future will utilize the high-density condensed battery. He noted the battery’s capability for long-range flights, making it suitable for private and business jets. The batteries will have an energy density of up to 500 Wh/kg in a single cell. This is 2x of average EV. Furthermore, the battery giant has collaborated Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (COMAC) to advance toward electrification of the aviation industry.

READ MORE: A $542M Raise Revolutionizes Lithium EV Battery Production 

The Dominance of CATL in the EV Battery Game

Meanwhile, according to SNE Research, CATL maintains its dominance in the EV battery market. It says,

The total global EV battery consumption volume in 2023 reached 705.5 GWh, with a year-on-year growth of 38.6%. 

From Ford to Tesla, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, etc. nearly every major car manufacturer relies on CATL’s innovative batteries. CATL is boosting growth by adding two more overseas plants. This expands their planned facilities in Germany, Thailand, Hungary, Indonesia, and two in the US with Ford and Tesla.

Dr. Zeng says, “Safety is a top priority for CATL.

Well, one of the reasons behind CATL’s market dominance is its rigorous safety standards. He emphasized the goal of improving the cell defect rate to one in a billion (PPB), which is to surpass the Six Sigma standard of one in a million (PPM).

Speaking at the “Not Losing Momentum on the Energy Transition” session on June 25, Dr. Zeng stressed that competition should span a product’s entire life cycle, not just focus on price cuts. He explained that comparing similarly priced products with different life cycle performances shows CATL’s batteries offer better value. Their lower cost/cycle and superior performance make them stand out.

Dr. Zeng further added that competing for long-term value is the key to the battery industry’s sustainable energy transition.”

From CATL’S news releases we discovered that, in 2023, CATL invested about 18.4B yuan (~ 2.59B U.S. dollars) in R&D. It led to breakthroughs like TENER, the world’s first mass-producible energy storage system with zero degradation in the first 5 years, and Shenxing PLUS, the world’s first LFP battery achieving a range over 1,000 km with 4C superfast charging.

Prioritizing Safety, Sustainability, and Recycling of Condensed Batteries

CATL manufactures battery materials including lithium salts, precursors, and cathode materials. It also recycles metals such as nickel, cobalt, manganese, lithium, phosphorus, and iron from waste batteries. These materials undergo processing and purification and are then used for battery production. Additionally, the company invests in and operates lithium, nickel, cobalt, and phosphorus resources to secure key materials for battery manufacturing.

Professor Ni Jun, Chief Manufacturing Officer of CATL, emphasized the critical importance of designing batteries with recyclability in mind. He noted,

“CATL has adopted a zero-carbon strategy to prioritize using reusable and renewable materials and facilitate recycling. In 2023, CATL recycled 100,000 tons of used batteries to produce 13,000 tons of lithium carbonate.”

Additionally, Zeng also unveiled plans for next-gen sodium-ion batteries, which promise lower costs, longer life, and better cold performance. These are expected to launch in the next year. He firmly believes in his vision of sustainable aviation and thus expressed himself by saying, 

“This technology is a game-changer for reducing fossil fuel use. Airplanes are significant polluters, and as battery tech improves, so will their ranges. I look forward to a future of travel powered by renewable energy.”

Media reports say that an 8T aircraft might seem small compared to a 31-ton Boeing 737 or a 41-ton Airbus A320. However, it is comparable to a Learjet 70/75, which weighs just over 7 tons and carries nine passengers. This seems to be the market CATL is targeting.

However, higher energy density increases the risk of thermal runaway. At 500 Wh/kg, safety must be CATL’s top priority. To overcome this challenge, the company will keep safety testing at the topmost priority to ensure flawless service in the coming years.

Until then, let’s wait for further exciting developments on CATL’s electric plane mission.

MUST READ: World’s Largest EV Battery Maker, CATL, Enters Carbon Credit Market

The post CATL Unveils Ambitious 2,000 km Electric Plane Vision appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The Ultimate Guide to Understanding Carbon Credits

Carbon Markets 101

A carbon market allows investors and corporations to trade both carbon credits and carbon offsets simultaneously. This mitigates the environmental crisis, while also creating new market opportunities.

New challenges nearly always produce new markets, and the ongoing climate crisis and rising global emissions are no exception.

The renewed interest in carbon markets is relatively new. International carbon trading markets have been around since the 1997 Kyoto Protocols, but the emergence of new regional markets have prompted a surge of investment.

In the United States, no national carbon market exists, and only one state – California – has a formal cap-and-trade program.

The advent of new mandatory emissions trading programs and growing consumer pressure have driven companies to turn to the voluntary market for carbon offsets. Changing public attitudes on climate change and carbon emissions have added a public policy incentive. Despite an ever-shifting background of state, federal, and international regulations, there’s more need than ever for companies and investors to understand carbon credits.

This guide will introduce you to carbon credits and outline the current state of the market. It will also explain how credits and offsets work in currently existing frameworks and highlight the potential for growth.

Executive Summary

1. Carbon Credits, Carbon Offsets, Carbon Markets – an introduction
2. What are carbon credits and carbon offsets?
3. How are carbon credits and offsets created?
4. What is the carbon marketplace?

4.1 Who are the top carbon companies? (Stocks, ETFs)

5. Overall size of carbon offset markets
6. How to produce carbon credits

6.1 Who verifies carbon credits?

7. How companies can offset carbon emissions
8. Voluntary vs. Compulsory: the biggest difference between credits and offsets
9. The two types of global carbon markets: voluntary and compliance
10. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
11. Opportunity to maximize impact
12. New revenue streams
13. Do carbon offsets actually reduce emissions?
14. Can you purchase carbon offsets as an individual?
15. Do I need carbon offsets or carbon credits?
16. Why should I buy carbon credits?
17. What is Blue Carbon?
18. Second order effects of blue carbon credits

1. Carbon Credits, Offsets and Markets – An Introduction

The Kyoto Protocol of 1997 and the Paris Agreement of 2015 were international accords that laid out international CO2 emissions goals. With the latter ratified by all but six countries, they have given rise to national emissions targets and the regulations to back them.

With these new regulations in force, the pressure on businesses to find ways to reduce their carbon footprint is growing. Most of today’s interim solutions involve the use of the carbon markets.

What the carbon markets do is turn CO2 emissions into a commodity by giving it a price.

These emissions fall into one of two categories: Carbon credits or carbon offsets, and they can both be bought and sold on a carbon market. It’s a simple idea that provides a market-based solution to a thorny problem.

2. What are carbon credits and carbon offsets?

The terms are frequently used interchangeably, but carbon credits and carbon offsets operate on different mechanisms.

Carbon credits, also known as carbon allowances, work like permission slips for emissions. When a company buys a carbon credit, usually from the government, they gain permission to generate one ton of CO2 emissions. With carbon credits, carbon revenue flows vertically from companies to regulators, though companies who end up with excess credits can sell them to other companies.

Offsets flow horizontally, trading carbon revenue between companies. When one company removes a unit of carbon from the atmosphere as part of their normal business activity, they can generate a carbon offset. Other companies can then purchase that carbon offset to reduce their own carbon footprint.

Note that the two terms are sometimes used interchangeably, and carbon offsets are often referred to as “offset credits”. Still, this distinction between regulatory compliance credits and voluntary offsets should be kept in mind.

3. How are carbon credits and offsets created?

Credits and offsets form two slightly different markets, although the basic unit traded is the same – the equivalent of one ton of carbon emissions, also known as CO2e.

It’s worth noting that a ton of CO2 does refer to a literal measurement of weight. Just how much CO2 is in a ton?

The average American generates 16 tons of CO2e a year through driving, shopping, using electricity and gas at home, and generally going through the motions of everyday life.

To further put that emission in perspective, you would generate one ton of CO2e by driving your average 22 mpg car from New York to Las Vegas.

Carbon credits are issued by national or international governmental organizations. We’ve already mentioned the Kyoto and Paris agreements which created the first international carbon markets.

In the U.S., California operates its own carbon market and issues credits to residents for gas and electricity consumption.

The number of credits issued each year is typically based on emissions targets. Credits are frequently issued under what’s known as a “cap-and-trade” program. Regulators set a limit on carbon emissions – the cap. That cap slowly decreases over time, making it harder and harder for businesses to stay within that cap.

You can think of carbon credits as a “permission slip” for a company to emit up to a certain set amount of CO2e that year.

Around the world, cap-and-trade programs exist in some form in Canada, the EU, the UK, China, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea, with many more countries and states considering implementation.

Companies are thus incentivized to reduce the emissions their business operations produce to stay under their caps.

In essence, a cap-and-trade program lessens the burden for companies trying to meet emissions targets in the short term, and adds market incentives to reduce carbon emissions faster.

Carbon offsets work slightly differently…

Organizations with operations that reduce the amount of carbon already in the atmosphere, say by planting more trees or investing in renewable energy, have the ability to issue carbon offsets. The purchase of these offsets is voluntary, which is why carbon offsets form what’s known as the “Voluntary Carbon Market”. However, by buying these carbon offsets, companies can measurably decrease the amount of CO2e they emit even further.

4. What is the carbon marketplace?

When it comes to the sale of carbon credits within the carbon marketplace, there are two significant, separate markets to choose from.

One is a regulated market, set by “cap-and-trade” regulations at the regional and state levels.
The other is a voluntary market where businesses and individuals buy credits (of their own accord) to offset their carbon emissions.

Think of it this way: the regulatory market is mandated, while the voluntary market is optional.

When it comes to the regulatory market, each company operating under a cap-and-trade program is issued a certain number of carbon credits each year. Some of these companies produce less emissions than the number of credits they’re allotted, giving them a surplus of carbon credits.

On the flip side, some companies (particularly those with older and less efficient operations) produce more emissions than the number of credits they receive each year can cover. These businesses are looking to purchase carbon credits to offset their emissions because they must.

Most major companies are doing their part and will or have announced a blueprint to minimize their carbon footprint. However, the amount of carbon credits allocated to them each year (which is based on each business’s size and the efficiency of their operations relative to industry benchmarks)., may not be enough to cover their needs.

Regardless of technological advances, some companies are years away from reducing their emissions substantially. Yet, they still have to keep providing goods and services in order to generate the cash they need to improve the carbon footprint of their operations.

As such, they need to find a way to offset the amount of carbon they’re already emitting.

So, when companies meet their emissions “cap,” they look towards the regulatory market to “trade” so that they can stay under that cap.

Here’s an example:

Let’s say two companies, Company 1 and Company 2, are only allowed to emit 300 tons of carbon.

However, Company 1 is on track to emit 400 tons of carbon this year, while Company 2 will only be emitting 200 tons.

To avoid a penalty comprised of fines and extra taxes, Company 1 can make up for emitting 100 extra tons of CO2e by purchasing credits from Company 2, who has extra emissions room to spare due to producing 100 tons less carbon this year than they were allowed to.

The Difference between the Voluntary and Compliance Markets

The voluntary market works a bit differently. Companies in this marketplace have the opportunity to work with businesses and individuals who are environmentally conscious and are choosing to offset their carbon emissions because they want to. There is nothing mandated here.

It might be an environmentally conscious company that wants to demonstrate that they’re doing their part to protect the environment. Or it can be an environmentally conscious person who wants to offset the amount of carbon they’re putting into the air when they travel.

For example: in 2021, the oil giant Shell announced the company aims to offset 120 million tonnes of emissions by 2030

Regardless of their reasoning, companies are looking for ways to participate – and the voluntary carbon market is a way for them to do just that.

Both the regulatory and voluntary marketplaces complement one another in the professional (and the personal) world. They also make the pool of buyers more accessible to farmers, ranchers, and landowners – those whose operations can often generate carbon offsets for sale.

4.1 Top Carbon Companies (Stocks, ETFs)

We list out the top 4 carbon companies of 2023 to watch in this article here. These are arguably the best carbon stocks with world class assets or management teams. We also have a list of highly curated companies to watch out for on our Stocks Watchlist page here.

5. Overall size of carbon offset markets

The voluntary carbon market is difficult to measure. The cost of carbon credits varies, particularly for carbon offsets, since the value is linked closely to the perceived quality of the issuing company. Third-party validators add a level of control to the process, guaranteeing that each carbon offset actually results from real-world emissions reductions, but even so there’s often disparities between different types of carbon offsets.

While the voluntary carbon market was estimated to be worth about $400 million last year, forecasts place the value of the sector between $10-25 billion by 2030, depending on how aggressively countries around the world pursue their climate change targets.

Despite the difficulties, analysts agree that participation in the voluntary carbon market is growing rapidly. Even at the rate of growth depicted above, the voluntary carbon market would still fall significantly short of the amount of investment required for the world to fully meet the targets set out by the Paris Agreement.

6. How to produce carbon credits

Many different types of businesses can create and sell carbon credits by reducing, capturing, and storing emissions through different processes.

Some of the most popular types of carbon offsetting projects include:

Renewable energy projects,
Improving energy efficiency,
Carbon and methane capture and sequestration
Land use and reforestation.

Renewable energy projects have already existed long before carbon credit markets came into vogue. Many countries in the world are blessed with a natural wealth of renewable energy resources. Countries such as Brazil or Canada that have many lakes and rivers, or nations like Denmark and Germany with lots of windy regions. For countries like these, renewable energy was already an attractive and low-cost source of power generation, and they now provide the added benefit of carbon offset creation.

Energy efficiency improvements complement renewable energy projects by reducing the energy demands of current buildings and infrastructure. Even simple everyday changes like swapping your household lights from incandescent bulbs to LED ones can benefit the environment by reducing power consumption. On a larger scale, this can involve things like renovating buildings or optimizing industrial processes to make them more efficient, or distributing more efficient appliances to the needy.

Carbon and methane capture involves implementing practices that remove CO2 and methane (which is over 20 times more harmful to the environment than CO2) from the atmosphere.

Methane is simpler to deal with, as it can simply be burned off to create CO2. While this sounds counterproductive at first, since methane is over 20 times more harmful to the atmosphere than CO2, converting one molecule of methane to one molecule of CO2 through combustion still reduces net emissions by more than 95%.

For carbon, capture often happens directly at the source, such as from chemical plants or power plants. While the injection of this captured carbon underground has been used for various purposes like enhanced oil recovery for decades already, the idea of storing this carbon long-term, treating it much like nuclear waste, is a newer concept.

Land use and reforestation projects use Mother Nature’s carbon sinks, the trees and soil, to absorb carbon from the atmosphere. This includes protecting and restoring old forests, creating new forests, and soil management.

Plants convert CO2 from the atmosphere into organic matter through photosynthesis, which eventually ends up in the ground as dead plant matter. Once absorbed, the CO2 enriched soil helps restore the soil’s natural qualities – enhancing crop production while reducing pollution.

6.1 Who verifies carbon credits?

Visit our article here on how carbon credits are verified by the market.

7. How companies can offset carbon emissions

There are countless ways for companies to offset carbon emissions.

Though not a comprehensive list, here are some popular practices that typically qualify as offset projects:

Investing in renewable energy by funding wind, hydro, geothermal, and solar power generation projects, or switching to such power sources wherever possible.
Improving energy efficiency across the world, for instance by providing more efficient cookstoves to those living in rural or more impoverished regions.
Capturing carbon from the atmosphere and using it to create biofuel, which makes it a carbon-neutral fuel source.
Returning biomass to the soil as mulch after harvest instead of removing or burning. This practice reduces evaporation from the soil surface, which helps to preserve water. The biomass also helps feed soil microbes and earthworms, allowing nutrients to cycle and strengthen soil structure.
Promoting forest regrowth through tree-planting and reforestation projects.
Switching to alternate fuel types, such as lower-carbon biofuels like corn and biomass-derived ethanol and biodiesel.

If you’re wondering how carbon offset and allotment levels are valued and determined through these processes, take a deep breath. Monitoring emissions and reductions can be a challenge for even the most experienced professional.

Know that when it comes to the regulated and voluntary markets, there are third-party auditors who verify, collect, and analyze data to confirm the validity of each offset project.

However, be careful when shopping online or directly from other businesses – not all offset projects are certified by appropriate third parties, and those that aren’t, generally tend to be of dubious quality.

8. Voluntary vs Compulsory: The biggest difference between credits and offsets

Participation in a cap-and-trade scheme typically isn’t voluntary. Your company either needs to abide by carbon credit limits set by regulators, or no such limits exist. As more and more countries adopt cap-and-trade programs, companies increasingly need to participate in carbon credit programs.

Carbon credits intentionally add an extra onus to businesses. In return, the best cap-and-trade programs provide a clear framework for reducing carbon emissions. Not all programs are created equal, of course, but at their best, carbon credits have a clear impact on total carbon emissions.

In contrast, carbon offsets are a voluntary market.

There’s no regulation that mandates companies to purchase carbon offsets. Doing so is going above and beyond, particularly for companies operating where cap-and-trade programs don’t exist yet. Precisely for that reason, offsets provide a few advantages that credits simply don’t.

9. The Two Types of Global Carbon Markets: Voluntary and Compliance

There’s one more important distinction between carbon credits and carbon offsets:

Carbon credits are generally transacted in the carbon compliance market.
Carbon offsets are generally transacted in the voluntary carbon market.

Global Compliance Market

The global compliance market for carbon credits is massive. According to Refinitiv the total market size is US$261 billion, representing 10.3Gt CO2 equivalent traded on the compliance markets in 2020. That further jumped to over US$950 billion in 2023 as seen in the chart below.

Source: Katusa Research, Refinitiv, LSEG

Mandatory schemes limiting the amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted have proliferated—and with them, a fragmented carbon compliance market is developing. For example, the European Union has an Emissions Trading System (ETS) that enables companies to buy carbon credits from other companies.

California runs its own cap-and-trade program, and nine states on the eastern seaboard have formed their own cap-and-trade conglomerate, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

Companies with low emissions can sell their extra allowances to larger emitters in a compliance market.

The Voluntary Carbon Market

The voluntary carbon market for offsets is smaller than the compliance market, but expected to grow much bigger in the coming years. It’s open to individuals, companies, and other organizations that want to reduce or eliminate their carbon footprint, but are not necessarily required to by law.

Consumers can purchase offsets for emissions from a specific high-emission activity, such as a long flight, or buy offsets on a regular basis to eliminate their ongoing carbon footprint.

Source: Katusa Research, Refinitiv, LSEG

 

10. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Consumers are increasingly aware of the importance of carbon emissions. Consequently, they’re increasingly critical of companies that don’t take climate change seriously. By contributing to carbon offset projects, companies signal to consumers and investors that they’re paying more than just lip service to combat climate change. For many companies, the CSR benefit can often outweigh the actual cost of the offset.

11. Opportunity to maximize impact

Not every carbon credit market is created equal, and it’s easy to find flaws even with tightly regulated programs like California’s. Carbon allowances in those markets might not actually be worth as much as they say on the tin, but since participation is mandatory, it’s hard for companies to control their own impact.

In theory, purchasing carbon offsets gives companies a more concrete way to reduce their carbon footprint. After all, carbon credits only deal with future emissions. But, carbon offsets let companies address even their historical emissions of CO2e right away.

Companies can also select the types of projects that provide the greatest impact – like Blue Carbon projects, for example.

Used correctly, carbon offsets are a way for companies to earn extra PR credit and achieve a more measurable reduction in carbon emissions. Since there’s no regulatory body overseeing carbon offsets, standards companies like Verra have become influential in vetting the carbon offsets market.

12. The offset advantage: New revenue streams

There’s one more big advantage of carbon offsets.

If you’re the company selling them, they can be a significant revenue stream! The best example of this is Tesla. Yes, that Tesla, the electric car maker, who sold carbon credits to legacy car manufacturers to the tune of $518 million in just the first quarter of 2021.

That’s a huge deal, and it’s single-handedly keeping Tesla out of the red. If the market for carbon credits continues to go up, and the pricing of credits keeps increasing, Tesla and other environmentally beneficial businesses could reap huge dividends.

13. Do carbon offsets actually reduce emissions?

Both offsets and credits don’t always work as intended. Voluntary carbon offsets rely on a clear link between the activity undertaken and the positive environmental impact.

Sometimes that link is obvious – companies that use carbon capture technology to remove CO2 emissions and lock them away can point to hard numbers.

Other programs, like offsets that promote green tourism or seek to offset the damage of international travel, can be more difficult to measure. The reputation of the organization issuing the credit determines the value of the offset. Reputable carbon offset organizations choose carbon projects carefully and report on them meticulously, and third-party auditors can help ensure such projects measure up to strict standards like those established by UN’s Clean Development Mechanism.

Once properly vetted, “high-quality” offsets represent tangible, measurable amounts of reductions in CO2e emissions that companies can use like they reduced their own greenhouse gas emissions themselves. Though the company has not yet actually reduced their own emissions, the world is just as well off as if the company had actually done so.

This way, the company has bought itself more time to make its operations more environmentally friendly, while as far as the atmosphere is concerned, they already have.

14. Can you purchase carbon offsets as an individual?

Unless you represent a large corporation, you’re unlikely to be able to purchase a carbon offset directly from the source company. For now.

Instead, you’ll need to turn to one of the growing number of third-party companies that function as intermediaries. While this may seem like an added step, these companies offer a few advantages.

The best ones also work as a verification mechanism. They vet and double-check to be sure that the carbon offsets you purchase are, well, actually offsetting carbon.

For example: Companies such as Galaxus, which is Switzerland’s #1 online retailer, offers consumers the ability to offset the carbon footprint of their purchase.

Carbon Footprint Calculator

Many organizations will also provide a carbon footprint calculator. You can use these calculators to determine exactly how many carbon offsets you will need in order to be carbon neutral.

For many investors, carbon offsets are a way to minimize their own carbon footprint and live an environmentally friendly lifestyle. The size of the market and the growing demand for carbon offsets indicate that there’s serious potential for companies that produce carbon credits to see large-scale growth over the next decades.

15. Do I Need Carbon Offsets or Carbon Credits?

Now that you know their differences and what they have in common, here’s how carbon credits and carbon offsets work in the grand, global scheme of emissions reduction.

The government is putting heavy caps on greenhouse gas emissions, meaning that companies will have to reconfigure their operations to reduce emissions as much as possible. Those that cannot be eliminated will have to be accounted for through the purchase of carbon credits.

Ambitious organizations, corporations, and people can purchase carbon offsets to reach net zero or even nullify all previous historical emissions.

Software giant Microsoft (MSFT), for instance, has pledged to be carbon negative by 2030, and to remove all carbon they’ve emitted since their founding by 2050.

So which do you need?

If you’re a corporation, the answer might just be “both” — but it all depends on your business goals, as well as the local regulations where your company operates. If you’re a consumer, carbon credits are likely unavailable to you, but you can still do your part by purchasing carbon offsets.

Returning to the illustration from earlier, our vital, global goal is to both stop dumping chemicals into the metaphorical water supply, and to purify the existing water supply over time. In other words, we need to both drastically reduce CO2 emissions, and work to remove the CO2 currently in the atmosphere if we want to materially reduce pollution.

16. Why should I buy carbon credits?

If you’re a corporation, there are plenty of compelling reasons as to why you should be seriously considering investing in carbon credits and offsets.

If you’re an individual looking to buy carbon credits, you’re likely interested for one of two reasons:

The first reason is that you’re environmentally conscious, and looking to do your part in combatting climate change by offsetting your own greenhouse gas emissions, or those of your family.

If that’s the case, then rest assured – carbon offsets from a reputable vendor such as Native Energy are the perfect way for you to negate your own carbon footprint.

The second reason you’re interested in buying carbon credits is because you think it represents an investment opportunity. The global carbon market grew 20% last year and that strong growth is expected to continue as climate change becomes an increasingly relevant concern to the world at large.

If you fall into the latter category, then head over to our carbon investor centre, where we showcase some of the best investment opportunities in the carbon sector right now.

17. What is Blue Carbon?

Blue Carbon are special carbon credits derived from sites known as blue carbon ecosystems. These ecosystems primarily feature marine forests, such as tidal marshes, mangrove forests and seagrass beds.

Yes, forests can grow in the ocean! Examples include the mangrove forests in sea bays, such as Magdalena Bay in Baja California Sur, Mexico.

Mangroves are trees (about 70 percent underwater, 30 percent above water) that have evolved to be able to survive in flooded coastal environments where seawater meets freshwater, and the resulting lack of oxygen makes life impossible for other plants.

Key Fact: Mangroves cover just 0.1% of earth’s surface

Mangrove trees create shelter and food for numerous species such as sharks, whales, and sea turtles. And thanks to their other second-order effects such as the positive impacts on corals, algae and marine biodiversity that have been so negatively impacted by activities such as over-fishing and farming, mangroves are considered to be extremely valuable marine ecosystems.

Over the past decade scientists have discovered that blue carbon ecosystems like these mangrove forests are among the most intensive carbon sinks in the world.

According to scientific studies, pound for pound, mangroves can store up to 4x more carbon than terrestrial forests.

This means that blue carbon offsets can remove enormous amounts of greenhouse gases relative to the amount of area they occupy. On top of that, they also provide a whole slew of other side benefits to their local ecosystems.

Accordingly, a blue carbon offset project will have its carbon offsets trade at a premium.

18. Second Order Effects of Blue Carbon Credits

Other positive second-order effects of mangrove forests include:

Their importance as a pollution filter,
Reducing coastal wave energy, and
Reducing the impacts from coastal storms and extreme events.

Blue carbon systems also trap sediment, which supports root systems for more plants.

This accumulation of sediment over time can enable coastal habitats to keep pace with rising sea levels.

In addition, because the carbon is sequestered and stored below water in aquatic forests and wetlands, it’s stored for more than ten times longer than in tropical forests.

The significant positive second-order effects attributed to each blue carbon credit are why many believe they will trade at a premium to other carbon credits.

Blue Carbon and the Food Footprint

There is a land-use carbon footprint of 1,440 kg CO2e for every kilogram of beef and 1,603 kg CO2e for every kilogram of shrimp produced on lands formerly occupied by mangroves. A typical steak and shrimp cocktail dinner would potentially burden the atmosphere with 816 kg CO2e if the ingredients were to come from such sources.

It’s estimated that over 1 billion tons of CO2 is released annually from degrading coastal ecosystems.

There are around 14 million hectares of mangrove aquaforests on Earth today. And many are under attack by the deforestation practices caused by intense shrimp farming

Are the shrimp you eat part of the problem? Soon, these shrimps will be labeled, and consumers will know and be required to cover the offset costs for the environmental damage.

To put things into perspective, 14 million acres of wetlands would absorb as much carbon out of the atmosphere as if all of California and New York State were covered in tropical rainforest.

Think of blue carbon as the “high grade” gold mine at the surface.

Oceanic Blue Carbon

In addition to coastal blue carbon mentioned above, oceanic blue carbon is stored deep in the ocean within phytoplankton and other open ocean biota.

The infographic below shows the typical blue carbon ecosystem:

There are many factors that influence carbon capture by blue carbon ecosystems. These include:

Location
Depth of water
Plant species
Supply of nutrients

Improving blue carbon ecosystems can significantly improve the livelihoods and cultural practices of local and traditional communities. In addition, restoring blue carbon regions provides enormous biodiversity benefits to both marine and terrestrial species.

Conclusion

Carbon markets provide a crucial mechanism for mitigating the climate crisis by enabling the trade of carbon credits and offsets. This system, which originated with international agreements like the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, has evolved to include both regulatory and voluntary markets, each playing a significant role in reducing global emissions.

While carbon credits function within mandatory cap-and-trade programs to control corporate emissions, voluntary carbon offsets offer an avenue for businesses and individuals to proactively reduce their carbon footprint.

The market’s potential for growth is significant, driven by increasing consumer awareness, corporate social responsibility, and innovative solutions like blue carbon projects. These markets not only help manage emissions but also create new revenue streams and investment opportunities, making them a vital component in the global effort to combat climate change.

www.carboncredits.com

The post The Ultimate Guide to Understanding Carbon Credits appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The Top 3 Copper Stocks of 2024

Avoiding a climate crisis presents significant challenges, especially in transitioning power and transportation systems to renewable and clean energy. This transition will vastly increase copper demand, surpassing current production levels, and giving major stocks a big lift. 

Copper’s exceptional conductivity makes it crucial for the energy transition. Copper is found in most appliances like toasters, air conditioners, microchips, cars, and homes. 

Interesting fact: The average car contains 65 pounds of copper, while a typical home has over 400 pounds. 

Constructing advanced grids for decentralized renewable sources and stabilizing their supply requires extensive copper wiring. Solar and wind farms, which cover large areas, demand more copper per power unit than centralized coal and gas plants. Electric vehicles (EVs) use over twice as much copper as gasoline cars. 

Meeting net zero carbon emission targets by 2035 may require doubling annual copper demand to 50 million metric tons. Even conservative estimates foresee a one-third demand increase over the next decade.

What more is the recent surge in copper prices starting early this year as you can see below. In May 2024, it reached almost $5 per pound in LME.

So, there could be no wiser move than investing in copper to ride along this rising demand. We believe so, too, that’s why we have considered some of the best copper stocks in 2024. Here are the top three copper stocks that would be worthy to add to your investment portfolio this 2024. 

The World’s Largest Copper Reserve Holder: Southern Copper

Market Cap: US$85.24 billion

For investors seeking substantial exposure to copper, Southern Copper Corporation’s reliance on this metal can be appealing. The prominent Mexican mining company primarily focuses on copper production, boasting the largest reserves of the metal globally. 

However, its operations extend beyond copper, producing valuable by-products such as silver, zinc, and molybdenum. This diversification, while significant, doesn’t overshadow its primary reliance on copper, which accounted for about 79% of the company’s net sales over the 3 years ending December 31, 2022.

Southern Copper’s stock has experienced notable volatility over the past few years. After a stellar performance in 2020, where the share price surged over 50%, the company saw a decline of more than 7% over the subsequent 2 years. 

However, 2023 marked a recovery, with the share price climbing nearly 25% in the first nine months. And it further skyrocketed in the beginning of 2024 and reached the first-time high in May. 

The recent uptick in copper prices has not only bolstered the company’s market performance but also enabled it to increase dividend payments significantly. At its current share price, the stock offers an attractive dividend yield of 5.4%, making it appealing to income-focused investors.

Strategic Investments and Project Development

Holding the largest copper reserves globally, Southern Copper is also operating top-tier assets in investment-grade countries like Mexico and Peru.

The company’s commitment to expanding its portfolio and reserves is evident through its significant capital investment program, exceeding $15 billion, planned for this decade. It aims to enhance and expand its operations across several high-potential projects, including:

Buenavista Zinc, Pilares, El Pilar, and El Arco Projects in Mexico: These projects are crucial for the company’s growth strategy. El Arco, in particular, benefits from significant infrastructure investments aimed at enhancing its competitiveness.
Tia Maria, Los Chancas, and Michiquillay Projects in Peru: These projects further diversify the company’s portfolio and strengthen its position in the global copper market.

From Southern Copper website

Southern Copper’s operations in Mexico and Peru provide a strategic advantage due to the stability and investment-grade ratings of these countries. This geographical diversification into regions with favorable mining regulations and robust infrastructure supports the company’s long-term growth and sustainability.

BHP Group: Casting A Wide Net in Copper

Market Cap: US$142.99 billion

BHP Group is a world-leading resources company engaged in the extraction and processing of minerals, oil, and gas. As a major player in the global copper market, the Australian miner is committed to innovative practices and sustainability, aiming to supply essential resources efficiently and responsibly.

BHP owns and operates several copper mines in Chile and the Olympic Dam in South Australia.

Copper is BHP’s second-largest revenue generator after iron ore. This mineral segment plowed over US$16 billion into the company’s income in 2023, with 1,716.5 kilotons of copper production.

The world’s largest mining company seeks to cast a wide net in copper with its exploration project in the high Arctic known as Camelot Project. 

BHP launched this program early this year, covering the Queen Elizabeth Islands in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut. The project aims to assess the potential for copper across six locations, spanning thousands of square kilometers. Exploration sites include Ellesmere Island, approximately 800 kilometers from the North Pole, Melville Island, Ellef Ringnes Island, and Axel Heiberg Island.

In response to the surge in copper prices, mining companies are scrambling to increase supply including BHP. The Australian mining giant recently announced a strategic partnership with Ivanhoe Electric to explore copper and other essential minerals.

Their collaboration aims to identify new sources of these critical resources, driven by the global shift towards clean energy and the electrification of various industries.

The exploration agreement with Ivanhoe Electric is structured in two stages. The first phase focuses on project generation, involving exploratory activities by both companies. If successful, the subsequent phase could lead to the formation of joint ventures to develop and operate mining projects.

More recently, BHP has made a bold move to expand its copper exposure by making a $39 billion bid for Anglo American. However, the offer was put off the table, delaying the company’s aim to cement its dominance in the copper market. Still, the Australian miner continues to explore significant copper projects and find ways to deepen its involvement in the sector.

MUST READ: Carbon Emissions Averted? BHP and Anglo-American Deal Off the Table

Coppernico Metal: Pioneering Copper-Gold Exploration in South America

Coppernico Metals Inc. is an exploration company dedicated to generating value for its shareholders and stakeholders through meticulous project evaluation and exploration excellence. The company aims to discover world-class copper-gold and nickel deposits in South America, leveraging its experienced management and technical teams’ proven track record in raising capital, discovery, and monetization of exploration successes.

Coppernico is currently centered on two primary projects in Peru: the Sombrero and Takana projects. The company either owns or has the right to purchase up to 100% control of the concessions. 

The Sombrero district, in particular, is a major focus due to its promising geological prospects. It features significant copper-gold values from surface samples and historical drilling, targeting skarn, porphyry, and epithermal deposits. 

Takana hosts high-grade copper-nickel occurrences with multi-kilometer mineralization trends. Initial dialogues have already started with communities near the Takana project, showing promising signs for future access agreements in the coming months.

Strategic Expansion, Evaluation, and Listing Plans

In its quest to offer diversified upside for shareholders, Coppernico has evaluated numerous exploration opportunities across South America. The company has narrowed its focus to 15 priority projects, aiming to identify additional assets that complement the discovery potential of Sombrero. 

Beyond Peru, Coppernico is also concentrating on exploration opportunities in Ecuador. The region has seen considerable success with several companies, including Solaris Resources, SolGold, Cornerstone, Dundee Precious Metals, and Lundin Mining.

The junior exploration company is an unlisted reporting issuer actively seeking listings on Canadian and U.S. stock exchanges. It plans to pursue a stock exchange listing application once it fulfills the requirements, a move that’s part of Coppernico’s broader strategy to enhance its visibility and attract a broader investor base.

In May this year, the company successfully closed its $19.37 million private placement financing. The financing included participation from Teck Resources Limited, a prominent Canadian mining company, under a subscription agreement. 

With its robust project pipeline, strategic evaluations, and plans for stock exchange listings, Coppernico is well-positioned to capitalize on its exploration successes and deliver substantial value to its shareholders. 

What Comes Next for Copper?

Copper’s pivotal role in achieving net zero emissions is increasingly recognized, especially in renewable energy technologies and electric vehicles (EVs). However, projections indicate a potential supply-demand gap, necessitating substantial investments in production and recycling to meet growing demand and sustainability goals.

Key industries driving copper consumption include equipment manufacturing, construction, infrastructure, and emerging sectors like EVs and green technologies. With the rising adoption of EVs, solar panels, and other clean energy technologies, copper demand is expected to double by 2035.

In light of ambitious net zero targets for 2035, industry estimates suggest that annual copper demand may need to reach 50 million metric tons. Even conservative projections anticipate a one-third increase in demand over the next decade, propelled by significant investments in decarbonization initiatives from both public and private entities.

Meeting this escalating demand presents challenges, such as declining ore grades and environmental concerns around mining. Addressing these requires significant investments, potentially driving copper prices higher.

READ MORE: Copper Prices Are Plunging at Over 2% After Hitting Near 52-Week High

Analysts predict continued price growth due to supply-demand imbalances and increasing demand from the green energy sector.

Uncertainties surrounding China’s economic recovery and the US Federal Reserve’s monetary policy add complexity to future copper price trajectories. However, analysts remain optimistic about copper’s long-term prospects, driven by the energy transition and increasing demand from sectors like EVs and renewable power.

As nations compete for limited future copper supplies, securing domestic or friendly sourcing and refining capabilities becomes a strategic imperative. Strategic investments in copper production and recycling are crucial to meet growing demand and achieve net zero emissions amidst the expanding renewable energy infrastructure and EV adoption.

The post The Top 3 Copper Stocks of 2024 appeared first on Carbon Credits.