A team of engineers at MIT has developed a new type of nanofiltration membrane that could make carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems six times more efficient. Their innovation addresses one of the biggest technical challenges in carbon capture: when the ions used in the process mix together, they create water and reduce efficiency.

Current CCS systems rely on two key chemical reactions. The first pulls diluted carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the air; the second releases that CO₂ in pure form for long-term storage. But when the positively and negatively charged ions used in both steps combine, they produce water. This not only weakens the chemical reactions but also wastes energy.

MIT’s new membranes act like tiny barriers that separate the ions. This prevents them from reacting with each other too early. As a result, the CCS process uses less energy, improves output, and could cut costs by up to 30%.

CCS Is Getting a Boost from Innovation

This breakthrough comes at a time when CCS technology is growing quickly. The International Energy Agency (IEA) said global CO₂ capture and storage capacity hit over 50 million metric tons in early 2025. The IEA expects this number to climb to 430 million metric tons by 2030.

The MIT team’s membranes could help reach those goals faster. Making carbon capture cheaper and more efficient makes it more appealing to industries that emit a lot of CO₂.

Nano But Mighty: What Makes the Membrane Different

MIT engineers offer a key carbon capture innovation: nanofiltration. This method uses membranes with tiny holes. These holes can filter out ions while allowing other molecules to pass. These filters keep the key ingredients for CCS from mixing too early, which prevents them from forming water and weakening the reaction.

Before this technology, many CCS systems had to deal with a trade-off between reaction speed and purity. The faster the process ran, the more the ions would combine in unwanted ways. That led to higher energy use and lower CO₂ capture rates.

With the new filter, reactions can run faster without losing performance. That could make CCS more practical for real-world use—not just in research labs, but in factories, power plants, and even ships or mobile units.

The better process helps smaller companies and countries use CCS. This is great for those who didn’t have the resources before. If used widely, this membrane could ease a big hurdle in carbon removal projects around the world.

Why Big Tech Cares About Carbon Capture

Big Tech companies are now key players in the fight against climate change. They want to protect the environment and meet their own sustainability goals.

As companies create more energy-demanding data centers for AI, cloud services, and digital storage, their carbon footprints are increasing quickly, alongside their growth, as shown below. Rising energy use leads companies like Microsoft, Apple, and Google (the hyperscalers) to seek reliable ways to balance their emissions. Carbon capture and storage offers one of the most promising tools for this.

CCS is different from traditional offsets like tree planting. It removes carbon dioxide from the air and stores it underground or in stable materials. This is key for Big Tech. Their climate goals often need removal-based offsets. These offsets actively take CO2 out of the air. They can’t just rely on avoidance methods that cut future emissions.

According to expert analysis, tech firms rely on carbon removal offsets more than other industries, such as oil, gas, or aviation. Their growing reliance on carbon removal aligns with the surge in demand for new CCS technologies.

MIT’s carbon capture nanofiltration membranes are a great innovation. They could make CCS six times more efficient and cut costs by 30%. This is exactly what companies need.

• RELATED: Microsoft Leads as Carbon Removal Credits Hit 8 Million Tonnes in 2024

The team’s analysis revealed that current systems cost a minimum of $600 per ton of carbon dioxide captured. However, by adding the nanofiltration component, the cost drops to around $450 per ton.

Simon Rufer, one of the authors of the study, noted: 

“People are buying carbon credits at a cost of over $500 per ton. So, at this cost we’re projecting, it is already commercially viable in that there are some buyers who are willing to pay that price. It’s just a question of how widespread we can make it.”

As pressure mounts from investors, customers, and regulators, Big Tech needs scalable, science-backed solutions. That’s why they’re not only buying carbon credits. They’re also investing in science and engineering for the next generation of carbon removal.

Carbon Markets Are Booming, Driving CCS Growth

The carbon market is growing fast. Here, companies buy and sell credits to offset emissions. Carbon removal credits are key to this growth.

In 2024, the volume of newly contracted carbon removal credits increased by 74%, according to Bloomberg. These credits let companies reduce their emissions. They do this by funding projects that capture or remove CO2 from the air. This includes nature-based projects like reforestation as well as advanced carbon capture and storage systems.

The market is expected to further grow in 2025, driven largely by demand from major corporations. Microsoft made up almost two-thirds of new carbon removal contracts last year. That’s about 5.1 million credits, followed by Google. These figures show how seriously companies are taking climate commitments. Many aim for net-zero emissions within the next two decades.

CCS technologies, like those from MIT, are boosting interest. They help meet demand by providing high-quality removal solutions.

In the coming years, carbon markets will likely become even more important. They offer a flexible way for companies to meet climate goals while supporting innovation in emissions reduction. 

Carbon capture is no longer just a scientific idea—it’s becoming a major industry. And innovations like MIT’s carbon capture nanofilters could help it scale faster than expected. As countries and companies face pressure to reach net-zero emissions, CCS offers a critical solution for sectors that can’t easily go fully green.

• READ MORE: Netherlands Invests $726 Million in Aramis CCS as Shell and Total Shift Strategies

The post MIT’s Nanotech Breakthrough Supercharges Carbon Capture And May Cut Costs by 30% appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The demand for reliable business news is growing. Top media outlets, CNN, BBC, The New York Times, Reuters, and The Wall Street Journal remain trusted sources globally. Each continues to adapt to digital platforms while upholding core journalism values: accuracy, impartiality, and transparency.

As per the latest media reports and surveys, the following media outlets have stood out in 2025, delivering excellence and credible news.

• CNN remains a global leader in breaking news and real-time reporting, with a strong international presence and digital reach.

• BBC is recognized for its journalistic integrity, impartiality, and expansive global network, making it one of the most trusted and fastest-growing news websites.

• The New York Times continues to set editorial standards with investigative journalism and in-depth analysis, maintaining a vast digital subscriber base and global influence.

• Reuters is a primary source for unbiased business, financial, and world news, with a massive global footprint and syndication to other outlets.

• The Wall Street Journal is a key resource for business and financial insights, trusted by professionals and recognized for its factual reporting and market analysis.

Misinformation spreads rapidly online. So trust is more critical than ever, and readers certainly prefer unbiased news. Such reporting not only builds public confidence but also keeps governments, institutions, and corporations accountable.

However, as media shifts from print to digital, its environmental impact also evolves. So here we would discuss the carbon footprint of these media giants and their sustainability efforts to meet net-zero targets.

• READ MORE: TikTok’s 50-Million-Ton Carbon Crisis: Almost 7x Bigger Than Meta’s Footprint

The Media Industry’s Carbon Footprint

While switching from print to digital cuts down paper waste, it also creates carbon emissions. Online publishing, video streaming, and real-time updates rely on large data centers that use a lot of energy.

Thus, the carbon footprint of media outlets, especially those with significant digital and streaming operations, has become a major environmental concern.

• Research from Futuresource and InterDigital estimates that the TV and video streaming industry accounts for 4% of total global emissions.

Print editions, like those from The New York Times, still generate emissions from production and delivery. Meanwhile, parent companies like Warner Bros. Discovery (CNN) are adopting renewable energy and reducing waste across operations.

Also, AI-driven reporting cuts travel emissions but adds energy demand. To remain sustainable, the media industry must invest in green data infrastructure and transparent carbon reporting.

1. CNN Rides Warner Bros.’ Green Goals

CNN hasn’t published a standalone carbon footprint or its own emissions report. However, its parent company, Warner Bros. Discovery, has committed to clear sustainability goals that influence CNN’s operations.

Digital Shift Drives Emissions

CNN runs energy-heavy operations, including streaming, news gathering, and data centers. Its shift to digital-first content reduced paper waste but increased electricity use.

Streaming, a key part of CNN’s digital platform, drives global demand for data. Experts estimate that video streaming alone may cause up to 1% of global carbon emissions.

Thus, CNN benefits from its parent company’s broader sustainability plan. Warner Bros has taken steps to cut environmental impact and lower greenhouse gas emissions by:

• Invested in renewable energy and energy efficiency across operations
• Support industry-wide environmental standards
• Rolled out waste reduction initiatives across its media brands.

Leading with Climate Coverage

CNN plays a vital role in climate journalism. It consistently reports on climate change, carbon emissions, clean energy, and sustainability innovation.

Its stories spotlight technologies like carbon capture, sustainable aviation fuel, and renewable power, keeping the public informed and engaged. CNN also covers major policy moves, such as the EU’s push for sustainable aviation fuel and the global net-zero by 2050 target.

These company-wide actions help reduce CNN’s indirect environmental impact.

2. BBC Targets Net Zero by 2050 with Strong Emissions Cuts

The BBC aims to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, aligning with the UK government’s climate goals. It has outlined its environmental sustainability strategy, emphasizing its commitment to becoming Net Zero and Nature Positive.

It plans to cut direct emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) by 46% and value chain emissions (Scope 3) by 28% by 2030, using 2019/20 as the baseline. The SBTi approved both short- and long-term goals.

• Its total emissions amounted to 374,063 tons CO₂e in 2023/24, up 7% from the 2019/20 total of 350,893 tons.

The increase is attributed to value chain emissions as they remain a growing challenge.

However, by 2023/24, it reduced Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 21%, exceeding its target of 17%. It achieved this by upgrading buildings, cutting gas use, and reducing diesel in production.

Notably, the media company now requires all non-news TV productions to meet the BAFTA Albert sustainability standard. Producers must submit carbon action plans and measure emissions. As of January 2024, the BBC ended mandatory offsetting and redirected efforts toward direct decarbonization.

With these initiatives, they remain committed to sustainable operations and credible climate reporting.

3. New York Times’ (NYT) Emission-Cutting Strategy

The New York Times has taken steps to lower its environmental impact by improving energy efficiency across its facilities and using more sustainable methods in printing and distribution.

It measures its Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions using the financial control boundary method defined by the GHG Protocol. This approach helps identify emission sources and areas for reduction. The company bases its carbon reduction target on the GHG Protocol’s market-based method.

Between 2019 and 2023, the company reduced its purchased electricity use by 16%. However, Scope 2 location-based emissions rose by 18% during the same period. This increase mainly resulted from a less renewable power mix in New York City.

The company’s progress toward its carbon-neutral target depends, in part, on the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) reaching its goal of 70% renewable electricity by 2030 and a zero-emission grid by 2040.

4. Thomson Reuters: Climate Action and ESG Progress

Reuters operates in over 200 locations, providing accurate, fact-based reporting.

Thomson Reuters sees ESG as important for long-term success. The board oversees key ESG areas, but employees lead efforts in sustainability, inclusion, and community work.

It supports global standards like the UN Global Compact and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. It also works to promote UN Goal 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions.

Environmental Commitments and Climate Goals

The company continues to reduce its global environmental impact by using 100% renewable electricity across all operations. This is done by matching energy use with renewable energy credits worldwide. Thomson Reuters also works with suppliers to lower emissions across its value chain.

In 2020, it joined the SBTi, and its key goals include:

• Cutting Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50% by 2030 (from a 2018 baseline)
• Reducing Scope 3 emissions from energy, travel, and commuting by 25% by 2025 (from a 2019 baseline)
• Ensuring 65% of supplier spending aligns with science-based targets by 2025

Since 2020, it has sourced 100% renewable power and reduced Scope 1 and 2 emissions by over 93% from 2018 levels. Business travel emissions are down 63% from 2019. Currently, 41% of its suppliers (by spend) have committed to science-based climate targets.

Thomson Reuters uses carbon offsets for its remaining emissions and to stay carbon neutral. It also spends 7% of its U.S.-based budget with diverse suppliers and plans to maintain this level through 2024.

5. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) Carbon Footprint Not Separately Reported

The Wall Street Journal is owned by Dow Jones & Company, which in turn is a subsidiary of News Corp.

There is no publicly available, standalone carbon footprint report specifically for WSJ as of 2025. Any emissions data or sustainability disclosures would be included under the broader corporate reporting of Dow Jones or News Corp, not as a separate WSJ-specific document.

News Corp aims to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. However, WSJ’s environmental impact is mainly from digital and print operations, but specific figures are not published.

A study from The Business Research Company revealed that the global media market is set for strong growth in 2025, rising from $2,616.7 billion in 2024 to $2,833.22 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.3%.

• This upward trend is expected to continue, reaching $3,814.84 billion by 2029 at a CAGR of 7.7%.

Growth is fueled by a rising global population, rapid tech advancement, media mergers, and increased mobile video consumption.

Meanwhile, Statista projects the global digital newspapers and magazines segment will generate $41.28 billion in 2025, growing to $44.54 billion by 2029 at a CAGR of 1.92%. The U.S. will lead with an expected $16.73 billion in revenue. Subscription-based models are gaining popularity as audiences seek premium content.

By 2025, trusted media outlets will go beyond reporting news. They will embrace digital transformation, fight misinformation, and work to lower their environmental impact. In an era defined by data and climate awareness, credibility and sustainability will define the media landscape.

• READ MORE: CDR and Carbon Credits: NASDAQ Surveys the Key Trends Shaping Corporate Sustainability

The post Top 5 Media Outlets Leading the Low-Carbon Shift in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The European Parliament has approved a big change to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). This update makes the carbon import rules of the EU CBAM simpler. It also gives a major exemption for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

The new rule passed with a strong 564-20 vote. It sets a 50-tonne annual import limit. This change exempts about 90% of importers but still targets 99% of embedded emissions. These changes are a key milestone in European carbon policy. They aim to balance emissions responsibility with economic flexibility.

What Does the 50-Tonne Threshold Mean for SMEs?

The new CBAM framework supports small businesses. It reduces the expensive and complicated carbon compliance burden.

Under the new rules, SMEs that import less than 50 tonnes annually will no longer face CBAM’s import carbon tax. This greatly eases the workload for most importers, but it still holds bigger polluters responsible.

The EU is now taking a more inclusive approach to environmental laws. It has aligned with the Omnibus I simplification package. SMEs make up most of the EU’s import market by number, but not by emissions. Now, they can focus on sustainable growth without facing too much regulatory pressure.

Lawmakers emphasized that supporting smaller enterprises doesn’t dilute climate objectives. Instead, it makes room for innovation in business areas often left out of the green transition. This happens because of high compliance costs.

How Will Emissions Accountability Shift?

The new laws keep a close eye on the sectors that produce most carbon emissions. Industries such as steel, cement, fertilizer, aluminum, and chemicals remain central targets of the CBAM. Most businesses can get exemptions, but the system still detects nearly all emissions from imports in key sectors.

This design protects the environment and tackles carbon leakage. Carbon leakage happens when production moves outside the EU to dodge emission costs.

EU reforms cut emissions by 175 Mt CO₂e but cause 34 Mt more in partner countries. This carbon leakage is reduced by CBAM. With it, non-EU emissions fall by 0.12 tonnes per EU tonne avoided.

Global emissions drop 0.54%. Low-emission exporters like Türkiye and Canada benefit, while high-emission ones like India see small losses.

Thus, the updated CBAM regulates imported emissions. It also strengthens anti-circumvention rules. This way, companies outside the EU have carbon obligations similar to those inside the EU.

CBAM’s Environmental and Carbon Footprint Impact

The reforms support the EU’s climate law mandate to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030. The CBAM still targets the main sources of emissions, even with wider exemptions. This helps reduce carbon in high-impact industries.

In 2022, the EU CBAM would have applied to $132 billion in trade—0.37% of global trade and 3% of EU imports. Most of this came from iron and steel, especially from China, Türkiye, and Russia, per the OECD policy brief.

CBAM-covered sectors made up 7% of EU manufacturing, 2.3% of output, 1.1% of value-added, and 0.6% of jobs. The mechanism counts emissions from fuel use (Scope 1), electricity (Scope 2), and some inputs (Scope 3).

• It would have covered 171 Mt CO₂e in 2022, or 0.31% of global emissions. With a carbon price of €80, it could raise €14.7 billion ($15.3 billion) per year.

Streamlined reporting procedures and improved authorization processes for larger importers aim to boost operational efficiency and close compliance gaps. These changes also lower barriers to investment in low-carbon technologies.

Forecasters expect that the new CBAM could cut emissions in covered sectors by up to 30% by 2027, compared to 2020 levels. That pace helps the EU meet its environmental goals. It also holds major emitters accountable.

Moreover, simplification does not come at the expense of impact. New data shows that most carbon-intensive imports are still regulated. This is true even with many low-volume importers being exempt. The result is a clear, data-driven plan. It protects environmental progress and considers economic needs.

How Are Markets Reacting to the CBAM Revisions?

Analysts expect the new rules to reshape supply chains and elevate investments in cleaner alternatives. Big companies will likely choose certified low-carbon suppliers. They may also invest in carbon capture and reduction technologies.

• RELATED: Carbfix Secures First EU Permit for Onshore Carbon Capture and Storage

These changes could reshape competition, especially in steel and aluminum markets. In these areas, production that emits a lot has less room for compliance mistakes.

Businesses that emit more will feel more pressure to cut down their carbon output. These CBAM changes should boost activity in the carbon market. Clear regulations usually boost investment in carbon credit trading, tech innovation, and emissions tracking solutions.

In this regulatory context, Europe retains its edge. The exemption helps SMEs by reducing compliance barriers. However, focusing on high-emitting imports keeps the carbon market’s signal strong. This ensures prices drive sustainable behaviors across the most impactful sectors.

International and Supply Chain Effects

The updated CBAM could accelerate global movement toward carbon regulatory alignment. Countries that export carbon-heavy goods might need to rethink their climate policies. This change will help them keep trading with the EU. By focusing on climate accountability, Europe’s role as a leader in global trade grows.

Firms that operate globally will likely see more attention on their emissions data and supply chain practices. Focusing on upstream emissions may push suppliers in less-regulated markets to adopt greener practices. This effect could promote global transparency in carbon emissions accounting. This is a key step for decarbonization worldwide.

What Comes Next for EU Carbon Policy?

The European Parliament’s action shows ongoing support for a practical, multi-layered way to control emissions. The balance between climate ambition and economic pragmatism is now central to the EU’s carbon tax reforms.

As the 2030 emissions reduction deadline approaches, further refinement of carbon market policies and trade-aligned environmental legislation is expected.

In the short term, lawmakers are likely to track the CBAM’s implementation impact on SMEs and high-emitting sectors. If necessary, adjustments could tighten compliance expectations or expand reporting obligations.

Observers expect more guidance from the European Commission soon. They also see deeper ties between CBAM and the Emissions Trading System (ETS).

The refined CBAM presents a clear policy signal: the EU intends to lead on climate through enforceable, scalable carbon regulation. This reform keeps strong emission controls and helps businesses stay resilient. It sets the stage for a carbon management strategy that supports the economy while also protecting environmental goals.

• READ MORE: EU Greenlights Nearly €1 Billion for Green Hydrogen Projects

The post EU Parliament Approves CBAM Changes to Aid SMEs and Cut Emissions appeared first on Carbon Credits.

JPMorgan Chase, one of the largest banks in the world, has entered a landmark agreement with Vancouver-based carbon removal company CO280. The deal is worth $90 million and involves the purchase of 450,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) over the next 13 years. This move shows more confidence in carbon removal tech. It also reflects a strong effort by companies to combat climate change in clear, measurable ways.

The deal makes JPMorgan the first major bank to commit to engineered carbon dioxide removal at this scale. Each ton of carbon will cost less than $200, a notable price improvement in a field that has often struggled with high costs. This long-term agreement boosts CO280’s growth. It also speeds up new carbon capture projects in North America.

Turning Pulp and Paper Mills into Carbon Removal Facilities

CO280 is taking a different approach to carbon capture. The company is retrofitting old pulp and paper mills. They will use carbon capture technology instead of building new factories. These mills produce biogenic CO₂, a carbon dioxide from natural sources, like wood and plants.

CO280 aims to capture emissions before they reach the atmosphere. Then, it stores them permanently underground in deep geological formations.

The technology used comes from SLB (formerly Schlumberger) and is known as SLB’s “Capturi” system. It captures up to 95% of CO₂ emissions from flue gas and purifies them for transport to secure storage locations.

CO280 partners with legacy mills. This choice saves time and money by avoiding new infrastructure. It also helps cut emissions right at the source. This model is scalable, cost-efficient, and a strong example of how to bring older industries into the clean energy future.

The method uses the current infrastructure and supply chains of the pulp and paper sector. This sector emits around 88 million tons of biogenic CO2 each year in the U.S.

By retrofitting instead of rebuilding, CO280 cuts down on complexity, cost, and risk. It also speeds up deployment and keeps mills running smoothly. This approach also supports local economies by preserving jobs and using established supply networks.

• RELATED: Microsoft’s Big Bet on Carbon Removal: 3.7 Million Tons with CO280

JPMorgan’s Climate Strategy in Action

JPMorgan has been working on ways to reduce its carbon footprint and support a low-carbon economy. The company has committed to financing $2.5 trillion in sustainable investments by 2030. Out of that, $1 trillion is for green projects. This includes renewable energy, energy efficiency, and carbon capture. This $90 million deal with CO280 fits directly into that framework.

According to Taylor Wright, Head of Operational Sustainability at JPMorgan Chase, the bank is focused on “solutions that can scale and be verified.” She noted:

“We’re thrilled to continue to help speed and scale the growth and development of CDR technologies with this latest offtake. CO280’s ability to provide near-term, affordable removals at scale is a key catalyst for making high-quality, engineered CDR available to a wider range of buyers.”

Engineered carbon removal is different from nature-based solutions like tree planting. It is seen as more measurable and permanent. The agreement with CO280 marks a move to better carbon removal credits. These credits can be audited, monitored, and verified for many years.

The 13-year term lets CO280 raise more funds. It can keep growing its pipeline of retrofit projects. As more mills adopt the model, the volume of carbon captured will increase, and costs could go down even further.

A Growing Market for Carbon Removal

JPMorgan’s deal with CO280 is part of a growing trend. According to BloombergNEF, the global carbon management market could exceed $800 billion by 2030. Engineered carbon removal was once viewed as costly and experimental. Now, it is drawing significant investment.

Microsoft, Stripe, Shopify, and Frontier have made similar deals. They aim to support carbon capture startups. Frontier is a carbon removal fund backed by tech companies. Early offtake agreements help startups grow. They lower prices and build the infrastructure for large-scale operations.

• CO280’s offering stands out because it delivers carbon removal for under $200 per ton.

Engineered removals cost more than nature-based offsets, which are often under $50 per ton. However, they are seen as more durable and reliable. They will be key to solving climate issues. This is especially true for sectors like aviation, shipping, and heavy industry. These sectors are tough to decarbonize.

Securing carbon removal for under $200 per ton is a big deal. Early-stage engineered CDR projects usually cost over $500 per ton. This price drop shows that CO280’s technology is now mature. 

As seen below, more CDR suppliers expect to have the average cost per metric tonne to go down by 2030. Lower prices make high-quality engineered CDR easier to access and more appealing to many companies.

JPMorgan’s financial support adds credibility and visibility to this model. This helps attract more institutional investment in carbon removal. The deal comes after JPMorgan made several agreements worth over $200 million. This shows the bank’s strong role in backing climate technology on a large scale.

The Role of MRV: Making Carbon Removal Trustworthy

One of the biggest challenges facing the carbon credit market is trust. Critics say many voluntary carbon credits rely on weak assumptions or results that can’t be verified. That’s why CO280’s commitment to strong MRV standards (monitoring, reporting, and verification) is so important.

Every ton of CO₂ taken out through the JPMorgan agreement will be measured with third-party tools and checked by independent audits. This ensures that the carbon is not only captured but also stored in a way that is safe and permanent.

CO₂ will be stored in Class VI wells. These wells follow U.S. federal rules and are made for long-term storage of carbon dioxide.

A Blueprint for Scalable Climate Solutions

CO280 plans to continue expanding and is seeking further investment to bring more facilities online. The JPMorgan deal is a signal to other investors that carbon capture can be both environmentally and financially viable.

Each retrofit project could remove 100,000 metric tons of CO₂ per year. With dozens of mills across North America, the potential impact is significant.

From a climate perspective, biogenic CO₂ removal is particularly valuable. Capturing and storing carbon from renewable sources, like trees, has a net-negative effect.

Thus, CO280 doesn’t just cut emissions. It also removes carbon from the air. This helps balance out emissions from sectors that can’t fully go green.

The partnership between JPMorgan Chase and CO280 represents a promising shift in how major companies approach climate solutions. Their agreement uses real-world infrastructure and proven technology to deliver measurable, permanent results. With strong verification, clear pricing, and local job creation, this project serves as a blueprint for other corporations looking to invest in high-quality carbon removal.

• READ MORE: From Sea to Sky: MOL & Climeworks Launch Maritime Carbon Removal First

The post Banking in Carbon: JPMorgan Chase Invests $90M in Carbon Removal with CO280 appeared first on Carbon Credits.