IEA Predicts 90% Drop in Shipping Emissions by 2050. Can Maersk’s Bio-Methanol Deal be a Game-Changer?

Maersk

The shipping industry is an integral part of international trade. Over the past 40 years, global maritime trade has increased 10X in value. Just like other transportation sectors aviation and auto, shipping also has some level of carbon emissions.

In the Announced Pledges Scenario (APS), shipping emissions could fall significantly. IEA predicts by 2035, emissions from international shipping may drop by nearly 60%, and by 2050, they could fall by more than 90%.

This shift is expected as the shipping industry adopts cleaner fuels like biofuels, ammonia, and methanol. By 2050, low-carbon fuels may power over 80% of global shipping.

shipping IEA

The Two-Way Approach to Decarbonizing Shipping

Decarbonizing the shipping industry is crucial for meeting global emissions targets. Currently, two primary strategies are in place which are enhancing energy efficiency and transitioning to low-emissions fuels. These approaches offer complementary benefits and can significantly reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Boosting Energy Efficiency in Shipping

One of the simplest operational measures is “slow steaming,” which involves reducing the average speed of ships. This practice doesn’t require modifications to the vessels but can indirectly affect costs. While slow steaming can lower overall fuel consumption, it may also increase operational expenses due to a need for more ships to maintain the same shipping capacity. This is particularly significant for sectors relying on just-in-time delivery systems.

Many technologies to improve energy efficiency are already available. New regulations like the Carbon Intensity Index (CII) require ships to lower their emissions over time, encouraging both new ships and retrofits to adopt energy-saving features.

There are a variety of technical measures that can be implemented to improve a ship’s fuel efficiency. Some examples are:

  • Rigid Sails and Rotor Sails: Using wind for propulsion can reduce fuel usage.
  • Waste Heat Recovery: Capturing and reusing heat from the engine improves overall efficiency.
  • Anti-Fouling Hull Coatings: These prevent the growth of marine organisms on hulls, enhancing performance.
  • Hull Optimization: Streamlining hull shapes minimizes water resistance, boosting speed and efficiency.
  • Air Lubrication Systems: Generating microbubbles under the hull reduces friction.

Since 2010, the energy efficiency design of new ships has improved by 30-50%, driven by initiatives such as the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI). While current energy efficiency technologies are commercially available, they are not adopted very easily.

IEA predicts that efficiency gains of 5-10% or more by 2030 are feasible with highly advanced energy-efficient methods.

Now speaking about costs; the investment required for energy-efficient upgrades varies widely, but they often pay off through fuel savings. For instance, hull form optimization costs about $250,000 and can boost energy efficiency by 7.5%. More extensive retrofits, such as kite sails, can cost up to $1.2 million but offer smaller gains.

On the other hand, a new bulk carrier built with cutting-edge technology could be 40% more efficient than one built in 2023, while a retrofitted container ship could achieve about 30% in energy savings.

Transitioning to low-emission fuels

While improving energy efficiency is vital, it cannot completely eliminate emissions. This is why the shipping industry must also shift to low-emissions fuels to reach its net zero target.

Promising options for low-emission fuels are:

  • Biodiesel: Can be used in existing diesel engines with little modification.
  • Biomethane: A renewable alternative compatible with LNG engines.

These drop-in fuels have limitations based on the availability of sustainable biomass and high production costs. Despite being cheaper to implement, their overall costs may be higher due to market competition, particularly from aviation.

Advanced Alternatives: Methanol, Ammonia, and Hydrogen

  • Methanol: Gaining popularity, methanol-fueled vessels are on the rise. In 2023, the first methanol-fueled container ship with a dual-fuel engine began operation. However, methanol requires modifications to ship engines and tanks.
  • Ammonia: Although at a lower technology readiness level, ammonia offers a promising future due to its lack of carbon sourcing requirements. Approximately 20 ammonia-powered vessels are on order, with deliveries expected by 2026.
  • Hydrogen: Over 20 hydrogen-fueled vessels are currently operational or planned. Safety guidelines for hydrogen usage in shipping are being developed, aligned with those for ammonia.

Shipping companies will need to consider the total cost of ownership, including fuel costs over a vessel’s lifespan when deciding which fuel technology to adopt. While methanol may be cost-effective for smaller vessels, ammonia tends to be more economical for larger ships.

IEA

Future Emissions Trajectories

International maritime shipping emissions have risen sharply in recent years, with a peak of 0.67 Gt CO2 in 2023, accounting for around 2% of global energy-related CO2 emissions. Emissions reductions will heavily depend on policies that promote faster efficiency gains and the switch to low-emission fuels.

In a scenario aligned with the latest IMO GHG Strategy, emissions could be reduced by more than 90% by 2050 compared to 2023 levels, primarily through low-emissions fuels like ammonia.

As shipping activity is projected to increase significantly, implementing low-emission strategies becomes imperative. By 2040, fossil fuel use in shipping could drop from nearly 100% to less than 30%.

However, the transition to low-emission shipping technologies will require substantial investment and regulatory support. Nonetheless, the potential for significant emissions reductions makes it significant for the industry.

Maersk Seals Long-Term Bio-Methanol Deal to Achieve Zero-Emission in Shipping

Danish shipping giant A.P. Moller–Maersk has entered a long-term agreement with China’s LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd to purchase bio-methanol. This partnership strengthens Maersk’s commitment to zero-emission shipping. The press release revealed that,

It will meet Maersk’s methanol sustainability requirements including at least 65% reductions in GHG emissions on a lifecycle basis compared to fossil fuels of 94 g CO2e/MJ. The bio-methanol supply is set to begin in 2026.

Bio-fuels and e-methanol are emerging as go-to alternatives for major fossil fuel users, such as the shipping industry, due to their scalability and potential for sustainable production.

However, Maersk highlighted that the substantial cost difference between fossil fuels and greener options remains a significant barrier, challenging the shipping industry’s progress toward adopting alternative fuels and achieving net-zero targets.

Disclaimer: Source of all data and images from IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2024

MUST READ: Can Nuclear Power Propel Maritime into a Zero-Emission Era? Maersk to Explore Nuclear for Ships 

The post IEA Predicts 90% Drop in Shipping Emissions by 2050. Can Maersk’s Bio-Methanol Deal be a Game-Changer? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Can the Lithium Market Overcome Falling Prices and Weak Demand in 2024?

Can the Lithium Market Overcome Falling Prices and Weak Demand in 2024?

The lithium market has entered a period of price decline, mainly because of weaker demand conditions and an oversupply of lithium carbonate in key regions.

In October, seaborne lithium carbonate prices for Asia dropped by 3.8%, hovering around $10,000 per metric ton, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights analysis. 

seaborne China lithium price

The price dip reflects the seasonal winding down of demand typically seen at the end of the year when electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers prepare for a slowdown in post-peak sales. While September saw relative price stability, October’s downward shift reveals how the supply chain dynamics are pressing lithium markets. This is especially true in China’s case, which has been the dominant player in global EV sales in 2024. 

  • The slowdown underscores the lithium market’s key issue: maintaining demand growth and stabilizing prices amid fluctuating EV sales patterns.

China’s lithium market, the largest globally, saw prices fall by 3.3% in October, settling at about 73,000 yuan per ton. While a brief rebound was observed toward the end of the month, prices continue to reflect the underlying pressures of oversupply. This surplus is compounded by high inventories and the slower-than-expected uptake in EV markets outside of China. 

The global market’s current inability to absorb excess supply effectively sets the tone for a persistent price slump, possibly extending into the next several years.


Li-FT Power: Exploring & Developing Hard Rock Lithium Deposits In Canada

Li-FT Power Ltd. (TSXV: LIFT) recently announced its first-ever National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) compliant mineral resource estimate (MRE) for the Yellowknife Lithium Project (YLP), located in the Northwest Territories, Canada.

An Initial Mineral Resource of 50.4 Million Tonnes at Yellowknife.

This maiden estimate is a major milestone for the company and marks a significant step forward in the project’s development. Li-FT Power’s upcoming mineral resource is expected to further solidify Yellowknife as one of North America’s largest hard rock lithium resources.

Click to learn more about lithium and Li-FT Power Ltd. >>


Strategic Adjustments Among Lithium Producers

In response to these challenges, major lithium producers are taking action to manage costs and production levels. 

Companies like Sinomine Resource Group have opted to cut production in higher-cost regions. In Zimbabwe, for instance, Sinomine has minimized its petalite mining operations to prioritize spodumene extraction, which has a lower production cost. This shift reflects a broader industry trend, where companies focus on streamlining their operations to protect profit margins as market prices dip. 

Another significant strategic move within the industry was the recent acquisition of Arcadium Lithium by Rio Tinto. It is a substantial shift in the company’s approach to the lithium sector. This acquisition is particularly important for Rio Tinto as it extends the company’s footprint in lithium production beyond its existing projects in Serbia and Argentina, allowing it to target markets outside of China more effectively.

One of Arcadium’s main competitive advantages lies in its exploration of direct lithium extraction (DLE) technology. DLE can revolutionize the lithium market by unlocking reserves in brine deposits previously considered difficult to exploit using traditional methods. 

Presently, there are 13 DLE projects in operation, with total output projected to reach about 124,000 tonnes in 2024. According to Benchmark’s data, DLE technology can account for 14% of the global lithium supply by 2035, producing around 470,000 tonnes of LCE. This growth underscores the increasing role of DLE in meeting lithium demand for battery and EV markets.

Direct lithium extraction forecast

Global Investments and Expanding Lithium Supply Chain

Investments in lithium production continue to grow despite the current market downturn, which signals optimism about long-term demand. 

In October, General Motors made a notable move by increasing its stake in the Lithium Nevada project to 38% with an additional $625 million investment. This initiative speaks of a long-term commitment to secure local lithium supplies. It aligns with the U.S. government’s strategic push to strengthen domestic EV battery production and reduce reliance on imports. 

The U.S. Department of Energy has already extended a substantial loan of $2.26 billion to support phase 1 construction of this project. The figure reveals the critical importance of domestic lithium resources for national energy goals. 

While traditional methods dominate current production, the lithium market is also increasingly exploring technological advancements. General Motors and other industry stakeholders are actively pursuing direct extraction methods to unlock challenging lithium deposits. 

By experimenting with DLE, the U.S.-based Lithium Nevada project aims to reduce environmental impacts and shorten production timelines. These technological investments indicate that despite current pricing challenges, there’s confidence in lithium’s long-term demand potential. More so as EV adoption grows and global green energy transitions accelerate.

Long-Term Market Forecast and Expected Price Recovery

Looking ahead, lithium prices could remain in a tight range. S&P Global Commodity Insight’s forecasts suggest that the price of lithium carbonate will stay between $9,924 and $11,627 per metric ton until 2026. This projection reflects the industry’s cautious outlook as companies expect that demand growth will take time to balance the current surplus. 

  • Analysts predict that a substantial price recovery may not materialize until 2028, with a forecasted rise to $14,659 per metric ton, or about a 20.8% increase, as the market finally shifts into a deficit.

lithium price forecast S&P Global

The expected long-term supply shortage is largely tied to the anticipated increase in EV adoption and the renewable energy transition. Both of these demand drivers require significant lithium resources. 

However, automakers worldwide are adjusting their production strategies to balance profitability with sustainable growth. This brings uncertainty to the exact timing of the demand shift that will absorb today’s excess supply.

In summary, the lithium market in 2024 reflects a complex blend of challenges and opportunities. Prices remain low due to oversupply and fluctuating EV demand, especially outside of China, but the long-term outlook for lithium still holds promise.

The lithium industry’s ability to adapt to today’s market conditions will shape the future landscape of this essential resource, ensuring its place in the global shift toward a sustainable energy future.

The post Can the Lithium Market Overcome Falling Prices and Weak Demand in 2024? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Bank Of America Flags Liquidity Challenges in Carbon Markets: Will COP29 Usher in a New Era of Climate Finance?

cop29

This year’s COP29 summit will take place in Baku, Azerbaijan, from November 11-22. The focus will primarily be on delivering stronger climate finance and advancing a global carbon trading framework.

Interestingly, Bloomberg reported that Bank of America (BofA) has flagged liquidity concerns in carbon markets. It has highlighted the need for transparent and reliable trading standards, which is one of the key agendas of COP29. This is also a consequence of negotiators planning to change the dynamics of the carbon credit market in the future.

Here’s an in-depth look at what’s on the agenda for COP29 and why it matters.

COP29: Setting a New Climate Finance Target

For the first time since 2009, countries will meet at COP29 to reassess the funds required for climate action from developing countries. The decision will create a New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) for climate financing, which will replace the earlier fixed target of $100 billion per annum.

The NCQG aims to build the capacity of vulnerable nations to develop climate resilience and transition to low-carbon growth while protecting their communities from worsening climate impacts.

It’s already palpable that rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and increased costs for adaptation are imposing tremendous stress on developing countries. And this reassessment comes as a blessing during such inclement times.

Once there is mutual agreement on these issues, it will lay the foundation for carbon trading. This standardization will tackle liquidity challenges and broaden access to this facility for both developing and developed nations.

Bank of America Weighs in on Article 6.4 for the Future Carbon Credit Market

Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is anotherhigh-stakestopic to be discussed in COP29. Under this provision, countries are permitted to trade carbon credits with one another. Therefore, countries can meet their climate goals by investing in reducing emissions elsewhere.

For instance, a country rich in forest cover can sell credits generated from protecting its forests to fund its conservation efforts. The purchasing countries can then count these reductions toward their climate targets.

Negotiators are highly focused on Article 6.4, which sets up a new platform to harmonize carbon credit trading.

Abyd Karmali, Managing Director of ESG & Sustainable Finance at Bank of America, stated that Article 6.4 is vital for the future of the carbon credit market. He noted that this is a critical market and clear, legally binding standards are essential to ensure the carbon market supports emissions reduction goals.

Karmali is also an esteemed delegate who will be monitoring talks at the COP29 climate summit.

International carbon trading under Article 6, unlike the voluntary carbon market (VCM), will be subject to strict international oversight. These standards will help avoid some of the fraud andgreenwashingcharges that have plagued the voluntary markets and create a better and more trustworthy system for trading emissions reductions.

BloombergNEF’s Take on Carbon Trading

BloombergNEF has pointed out that new standards for carbon credits have boosted efforts to establish a global carbon trading system under the United Nations. However, these new guidelines seem to be weaker than the existing ones.

Even if they receive approval at the upcoming international climate summit in November, significant work remains to fully implement a mechanism that was first proposed in Article 6.4 of the 2015 Paris Agreement. However, experts hope that international standards can revitalize carbon trading and draw companies and governments away from the troubled VCM.

Layla Khanfar, a research associate at BloombergNEF, believes Article 6.4’s potential impact could be significant. She said,

“A finalized deal could lead to supply standardization and improve global liquidity. These are both valuable stepping stones towards a carbon credit market BNEF estimates could be valued at over $1 trillion by 2050.”

Voluntary Carbon Market’s Liquidity Problem

This leaves the VCM itself, in which nearly all corporations currently buy credits to offset their emissions, in deep trouble regarding liquidity.

We discovered from the same Bloomberg report that BofA has approached this market cautiously, citing low trading volumes and persistent accusations of greenwashing. These claims have eroded its credibility. According to MSCI, VCM volumes fell more than 20% last year, dropping to about $1 billion in trades.

Top companies such as Volkswagen, Telstra, and TotalEnergies have utilized the VCM as a method of balancing their emissions.

However, Karmali has said that “there’s simply not enough liquidity” to sustain it as a viable climate tool. He added that over the last two years, the market has experienced a steep decline, making it very difficult for participants to operate within the current systems.

The Transparency Milestone at COP29

COP29 marks the first full implementation of the enhanced transparency framework of the Paris Agreement. In this agreement, countries will have to submit their inaugural biennial transparency reports (BTRs) by the end of the year. These reports will contain details of their climate actions, including emissions reductions, adaptation strategies, and climate finance flows.

Subsequently, the Azerbaijani presidency launched the Baku Global Climate Transparency Platform to support this initiative. Notably, this platform particularly helps countries who are less familiar with climate reporting.

Transparent reporting will hold countries accountable and serve as a reliable resource for policymakers and stakeholders. The information in BTRs will be crucial for evaluating national climate commitments and identifying gaps in global action.

We expect COP29 will present an outstanding opportunity for a more sustainable and resilient future. Major emitters are stepping up with strong commitments, and financial institutions like Bank of America are backing these efforts. By encouraging collaboration and transparency, COP29 has all the potential to drive meaningful progress in carbon markets and climate finance.

Sources:

  1. BofA Calls Out Liquidity Barriers as Bankers Await CO2 Deal – BNN Bloomberg
  2. What to Expect at the 2024 UN Climate Summit (COP29) | World Resources Institute

The post Bank Of America Flags Liquidity Challenges in Carbon Markets: Will COP29 Usher in a New Era of Climate Finance? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Nickel Market is Changing Big Time: Is a Supply-Demand Shift Underway?

Nickel Market is Shifting Big Time, Here are The Major Changes to Know

Nickel, a key component in electric vehicle (EV) batteries and stainless steel, is experiencing significant changes in supply dynamics and pricing. Recent activities by Nickel Industries and market reactions to global economic conditions paint a picture of both challenges and opportunities in the nickel sector.

Nickel Industries Strategic Moves in Indonesia

Nickel Industries, an Australian company, could become one of the largest nickel resource holders in the world with its strategic acquisitions in Indonesia. 

In August 2024, the company signed agreements to purchase the Sampala project and secured a 51% stake in the Siduarsi project. These moves come amid a severe nickel ore shortage in Indonesia. This has led to a staggering 45% rise in local nickel prices since late 2023. 

According to Justin Werner, Managing Director of Nickel Industries, this acquisition is crucial for mitigating the impact of ore shortages and the high prices associated with them.

The Sampala project boasts a significant resource of 2.3 million metric tons of contained nickel metal, along with 200,000 metric tons of cobalt. Werner expects this resource to expand dramatically, potentially reaching up to 10 million metric tons of nickel metal. Once that happens, it will be among the top five known nickel resources globally. 

With plans to commence shipping ore by the end of 2025, Nickel Industries aims to ensure a self-sufficient ore supply for its operations in the Morowali Industrial Park.

In addition, the Siduarsi project has revealed an initial resource of 52 million dry metric tons at a promising nickel grade of 1.1%. This resource is anticipated to grow, and there are projections that the total contained nickel could double. Nickel Industries’ strong position in Indonesia positions it as a key player in the global nickel market.

Global Price Shifts and Market Impact 

While Nickel Industries is making headlines with its acquisitions, broader market trends are affecting nickel prices globally. 

  • The London Metal Exchange (LME) recently reported that nickel prices fell to $15,873 per metric ton by the end of October 2024. This decline followed a brief surge to a four-month high of $18,153 per ton earlier in the month. 

The drop was largely attributed to a lack of investor enthusiasm following China’s recent stimulus measures, which did not meet expectations for more aggressive economic support.

China is the world’s largest consumer of industrial metals, and its economic health is vital for nickel prices. After the Chinese central bank announced its stimulus package on September 24, 2024, investor confidence briefly increased, leading to higher nickel prices. 

However, as details of the package emerged and manufacturing activity in China remained weak, investor sentiment shifted, causing prices to retreat.

Data from S&P Global Commodity Insights maps in detail major market events impacting LME 3M nickel prices shown below.

nickel prices LME 3M drops

Adding to this volatility, stocks of Russia-origin nickel in LME warehouses increased significantly, rising 19.6% month over month, per S&P Global analysis. 

This surge in inventory occurs despite an LME ban on new deliveries from Russia in response to geopolitical tensions. As a result, a mix of increased nickel stocks and reduced investor confidence has put downward pressure on LME nickel prices.

Indonesia’s Production Strategy in Focus

Indonesia remains a pivotal player in the global nickel landscape. The country’s energy and mineral resources minister indicated that the government plans to regulate nickel ore production to maintain a balance between supply and demand. 

Such strategy is particularly important given the challenges posed by a new domestic mining approval system that has led some producers to import nickel ore from the Philippines, the second-largest nickel producer.

Interestingly, despite the tight supply situation, Indonesia’s primary nickel output increased by 14.5% year-over-year during the first eight months of 2024. The largest nickel producer is also trying to shift away from China-based ownership to qualify for the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

Indonesia primary nickel output growth 2024

This trend highlights the country’s potential to drive global nickel production growth. As Indonesia continues to manage its production levels carefully, it can maintain its status as a leading supplier in the nickel market.

How Do Future Nickel Prices Look Like?

Looking ahead, S&P Global analysts have revised their price forecasts for nickel. Following the October price fluctuations, the forecast for the LME nickel price in the December quarter has been upgraded to $16,583 per ton. This reflects a decline compared to the previous year.

Nevertheless, ongoing discussions in China about issuing significant amounts of debt to stimulate growth could improve investor sentiment and support nickel prices in the near future.

Projections show a surplus in the global primary nickel output over the next four years, growing annually at almost 6%. Yet, Indonesia’s evolving mining policies and production strategies introduce uncertainties that could affect this outlook. 

Global primary nickel output forecast
Chart from S&P Global Commodity Insights

The recent developments in both Nickel Industries and the broader nickel market underscore the dynamic nature of this essential metal industry. The future of nickel will depend not only on local production strategies in Indonesia but also on global economic conditions and investor confidence.

The post Nickel Market is Changing Big Time: Is a Supply-Demand Shift Underway? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

VCM Demand Surge: 147 Million Credits in 2024 Retired Amid Tightening Supply

VCM Demand Surge, 147 Million Credits in 2024 Retired Amid Tightening Supply

A new report from Viridios AI, a provider of carbon credit pricing and data, offers valuable insights into the current landscape of the voluntary carbon market (VCM). It shows the VCM experienced relatively low trading activity, with notable fluctuations in the prices of specific projects.

However, year-to-date retirements in 2024 reveal strong demand for carbon credits and they’ve exceeded those in the same period in 2023. We highlight the key insights below that may have a huge impact on the VCM’s future.

Demand Outpaces Supply With Record Carbon Credit Retirements

Viridios AI used data from the four major carbon registries in generating the graphs:

  • Verra,
  • Gold Standard,
  • American Carbon Registry, and
  • Climate Action Reserve.

As of now, 2024 year-to-date retirements have surpassed those in the same period in 2023, with a remarkable 147 million credits retired from the largest registries. 

carbon credit retirements cumulative per month Viridios AI

quarterly carbon credit retirements Viridios AI
Charts from Viridios AI

As seen in the first chart above, monthly cumulative carbon credit retirements keep on growing, with the recent month surpassing both the 2022 and 2023 results. Similarly, quarterly credit retirements in 2024 (second chart) exceeded those in the same period last year. 

This trend highlights a growing commitment among companies and organizations to offset their carbon footprints. It also reflects a robust demand for carbon credits in the face of increasing regulatory pressures and climate goals.

In contrast, the market shows signs of shifting from oversupply toward a tightening of inventory with a slowing growth rate. 

The graph reveals that monthly cumulative credit issuances, or credit supply, in 2024 are still growing. However, the amount (in metric tonnes) of issuances this year has significantly dropped compared to last year and even so since 2022. 

monthly Cumulative carbon Credits Issuances Viridios AI
Chart from Viridios AI

The quarterly carbon credit supply paints a different picture. While Quarters 1 and 2 have seen lower issuances in 2024 versus 2023, Q3 experienced much higher supply, with over 10 million metric tonnes compared to the same period last year. 

Quarterly Credit Issuances Viridios AI
Chart from Viridios AI

In a separate analysis, overall credit inventory has risen, but the rate of increase has slowed significantly—from 34% in 2021 to 8% in 2024 so far. 

VCM issuances, retirements and inventory growth Rich Gilmore
Source: Rich Gilmore (Carbon Growth Partners)

These changes point to a narrowing supply-demand market gap, especially as we approach the typical Q4 surge in voluntary carbon credit retirements. 

Credit Supply Challenges Loom

Supply issues are prominent, with REDD+ credit (projects including efforts to avoid deforestation and degradation) volumes declining. REDD+ credit volumes could face reductions exceeding 60% due to new methodologies like VM0048, making some projects financially unfeasible. 

Viridios AI data further suggests that the VCM experienced relatively low trading activity, with notable fluctuations in the prices of certain carbon projects.

The report shows that REDD+ credit prices in all regions, both for vintages 2018 and 2022, have been falling. The biggest retiree of REDD+ carbon credits for the last 30 days is the French energy major Engie SA. The company retired over 907 thousand metric tonnes of these credits from the Congo REDD+ project.

REDD+ carbon credit price
Chart from Viridios AI

Alternative sources, such as cookstove projects, may bridge part of the supply gap but also at reduced volumes. These projects lower carbon emissions through efficient cookstoves that release fewer pollutants and use less biomass. 

Viridios AI report reveals that prices for cookstove carbon credits are increasing in Latin America and Southeast Asia regions. On the other hand, prices in Africa for these projects have been dropping in all vintages (2018-2022). 

cookstove carbon credits price

Carbon Price Tension Ahead

The Viridios AI report on the VCM presents a complex picture of the shifting supply and demand landscape for carbon credits, highlighting trends that are likely to impact future pricing.

The key takeaway is a narrowing supply-demand gap as credit issuances slow, while retirements—reflecting demand—continue to surge. This dynamic has implications for the price stability of specific carbon credits, like those tied to REDD+ and cookstove projects.

The voluntary carbon market is increasingly used by companies to offset their emissions. However, with current low carbon credit prices discouraging new investments, the market’s capacity to meet rising demand may be limited. And with a continued strong retirement rate, this could drive prices up as supply struggles to keep pace, especially for high-quality carbon credits.

The upcoming discussions and decisions at COP29 will likely play a pivotal role in shaping the future of carbon markets, especially concerning the integration of REDD+ initiatives. Stakeholders will be watching closely as they navigate the evolving carbon market.

The post VCM Demand Surge: 147 Million Credits in 2024 Retired Amid Tightening Supply appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Canada’s $16.5 Billion Bet on Carbon Capture: Could It Cut Oil Sands Emissions?

Canada’s $16.5 Billion Bet on Carbon Capture, Could It Cut Oil Sands Emissions

A group of Canada’s largest oil sands companies, the Pathways Alliance, is in active discussions with Canada Growth Fund (CGF), the federal government’s $15-billion green investment arm, to secure backing for a substantial carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in northern Alberta. 

CCS technology is seen as one of the most effective solutions to reduce emissions in high-polluting sectors like oil, gas, and cement. Canada views this carbon management approach as essential for achieving its net-zero emissions goals.

Carbon Capture Enters the Big Leagues But Price Uncertainty Raises Concerns

The country currently operates several CCS projects that have stored around 44 million tonnes of CO₂ since 2000. 

The federal plan calls for tripling national CCS capacity by 2030 to meet its carbon emission reduction targets. This ambitious goal would require adding new facilities capable of capturing 15 million tonnes of CO₂ annually.

how carbon capture and storage works
Image from Congressional Budget Office.Gov

The Pathways Alliance project would include a $16.5-billion network for capturing and storing CO₂ emissions from over a dozen oil sands facilities. The captured CO₂ will be transported to a central hub in Cold Lake, Alberta. Once operational, this network would permanently store the captured CO₂ deep underground, supporting efforts to reduce emissions across Alberta’s oil sands industry.

This is a major step in decarbonization efforts for Canada’s oil and gas sector. However, oil sands executives remain wary of the potential financial risks tied to the future price of carbon

Adam Waterous, executive chairman of Strathcona Resources, emphasized the “stroke-of-the-pen” risk, a term used to describe the industry’s fear that regulatory changes or policy reversals, such as a shift in the carbon tax, could drastically impact the value of carbon credits.

Waterous, whose company is the first in the sector to strike a CCS deal with CGF, suggested that industry leaders are cautious about committing capital to projects that could ultimately result in stranded assets if carbon prices don’t stabilize.

Moreover, Waterous foresees a significant need for sequestered carbon from technology firms looking to offset emissions. In particular, a recent carbon capture deal between Microsoft and Occidental Petroleum, aimed at reducing data center emissions.

The Role of Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfD)

To address industry apprehensions, experts recommend using Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfD). It offers a guaranteed floor price for sequestered carbon. CCfDs help “de-risk” investments in emissions reduction technology by providing more stable pricing. 

They argue it could be a decisive factor in encouraging the Pathways Alliance and other companies to pursue costly CCS projects. 

Canada Growth Fund was partially designed to deploy tools like CCfDs to jumpstart green investments. However, it has not yet offered these to oil and gas producers, who are also seeking loan support for carbon capture technology.

The only oil and gas-related agreement involving CCfDs that CGF has reached thus far is with Entropy, a clean-tech company owned by Advantage Energy. The deal allows Entropy to sell carbon credits with an initial value of up to 185,000 tonnes at $86.50 per tonne. 

In contrast, oil producers seeking to meet compliance obligations through carbon credits have been unable to secure similar agreements with CGF, leaving a gap in support for some of the industry’s largest players.

World’s Largest CCS Project by Pathways Alliance

The Pathways Alliance comprises six major oil sands companies:

  1. Canadian Natural Resources,
  2. Suncor Energy,
  3. Cenovus Energy,
  4. Imperial Oil,
  5. MEG Energy, and
  6. ConocoPhillips Canada. 

If successful, their carbon capture and storage network would be the world’s largest and a landmark in global CCS projects. The alliance is eager to collaborate with Ottawa, recognizing the role government backing plays in ensuring the viability of large-scale CCS ventures. 

Kendall Dilling, president of the Pathways Alliance, expressed optimism over Ottawa’s commitment to de-risking industry investments, stating that they “look forward to continued engagement with the government.”

Other policy experts echoed the sentiment that any successful deal would depend on assurance that the operating costs for carbon capture and storage infrastructure will be viable in the long term. This happens if carbon pricing remains stable. 

Carbon Pricing: A Make-or-Break Factor

The fate of the Pathways Alliance’s CCS project will hinge on the development of carbon pricing policies and market demand. The recent surge in carbon credit retirements, representing demand, highlights a potential future trend that could significantly impact carbon prices. 

Remarkably, Rich Gilmore, CEO of Carbon Growth Partners, stated that although retirements have fluctuated in the past, 2024 looks set to hit a record high. He shared on LinkedIn some of his interesting insights regarding voluntary carbon market (VCM) growth. 

Rich Gilmore on voluntary carbon market growth
Source: Rich Gilmore via LinkedIn

As seen in the chart below, demand surged from November 2023 to January 2024, causing a sharp drop in inventory. This spike was largely due to Shell retiring around 17 million credits to hit its internal net emissions efficiency target. That’s one company offsetting about 28% of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions—without even touching Scope 3.

This shift, spurred by one major player, demonstrates the scale of impact that corporations can have on the VCM

VCM issuances, retirements and inventory growth Rich Gilmore
Source: Rich Gilmore (Carbon Growth Partners)

Now, imagine the impact when more companies commit to scaling their carbon reduction strategies taking Shell as an example. The demand could quickly outpace supply, driving up carbon credit prices and creating a more competitive market for offsets.

Shell’s industry has a strong reliance on carbon capture technology to help meet decarbonization targets. Canada, as part of its Emissions Reduction Plan, focuses on achieving substantial emission cuts in the oil and gas sector. 

As the country navigates its decarbonization goals, the Pathways Alliance’s CCS negotiations with CGF show the complexities of advancing green initiatives within a competitive, carbon-intensive sector.

With potential government support on the horizon, Canada’s oil sands companies could help make significant progress toward lowering emissions. Once it happens, it will set a precedent for industry-government collaboration on climate action in the years to come. 

The post Canada’s $16.5 Billion Bet on Carbon Capture: Could It Cut Oil Sands Emissions? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

U.S. DOE Approves $2.26 Billion for Nevada Lithium Mine

U.S. DOE Approves $2.26 Billion for Nevada Lithium Mine

The U.S. Department of Energy approved a $2.26 billion loan for Lithium Americas to construct the Thacker Pass lithium mine in Nevada. It is one of the largest mining investments by the Biden administration. 

The loan, originally approved in March, aligns with the White House’s objective to reduce dependency on China for lithium, a critical element for EV batteries. This announcement follows the recent approval of another lithium project by ioneer.

Thacker Pass Set to Boost U.S. Lithium Independence 

Expected to open later this decade, Thacker Pass will play a major role in the U.S. supply chain. It has the potential to become a key lithium supplier for General Motors (GM). GM recently increased its investment in the mine to nearly $1 billion, showing its importance to the company’s EV production goals.

According to GM’s SVP of Global Purchasing and Supply Chain, Jeff Morrison, getting lithium domestically will help them “control battery cell costs, deliver value, and create jobs”. 

As part of its Net Zero pathway, GM is targeting carbon neutrality across its global products and operations by 2040. 


Li-FT Power: Exploring & Developing Hard Rock Lithium Deposits In Canada

One of the most exciting exploration portfolios of hard rock lithium projects globally is managed by Li-FT Power. Three reasons to consider Li-FT Power:

  1. Resource Potential
  2. Expedited Strategy
  3. Infrastructure

Li-FT is advancing five key projects; all located in the extremely safe and friendly mining jurisdiction of Canada.

Learn more about this mineral exploration company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of lithium pegmatite projects >>

TXSV: LIFT | OTCQX: LIFFF | FRA: WS0
*** This content was reviewed and approved by Li-FT Power Ltd. and is being disseminated on behalf of Li-FT Power Ltd. by
CarbonCredits.com. ***


This recent project development is also highly significant for the Biden administration. White House climate advisor Ali Zaidi emphasized that secure mineral supplies are vital to the U.S. clean energy transition. Zaidi specifically stated that:

“The Biden-Harris Administration recognizes mineral security is essential to winning the global clean energy race.” 

The mine itself has been a politically complex project. It was initially permitted by former President Donald Trump and later approved for construction by a court following opposition from conservationists, ranchers, and Indigenous groups. Initial work began last year in this remote region near the Oregon-Nevada border.

Thacker Pass lithium mine project
Source: Lithium Americas

The estimated cost for the Thacker Pass mine has risen from $2.27 billion to nearly $2.93 billion. This is primarily due to higher engineering expenses, union labor agreements, and the decision to establish housing facilities for workers in this remote area. The loan, with a 24-year term and interest rates tied to the U.S. Treasury rate, offers a stable financial foundation to support the project’s extended construction and operational goals.

Securing Domestic Battery Supply Chains

Now that the loan has been finalized, Lithium Americas can move forward with large-scale construction, which may take 3 years.

  • In its first phase, Thacker Pass aims to produce 40,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate annually, enough for up to 800,000 EVs. 

CEO Jon Evans views this loan as critical to reducing the nation’s reliance on foreign lithium sources and enhancing domestic energy security.

Global lithium battery demand is set to surge, with worldwide demand expected to increase by over 5x and U.S. demand by nearly 6x by 2030. Although demand is growing, the U.S. remains largely import-dependent for battery materials and components. 

US lithium battery supply chain
Image from DOE website

Currently, the U.S. industry captures less than 30% of the economic value from each battery cell in its market, creating only $3 billion in value-added. By 2030, under a “business as usual” scenario, this could rise to $16 billion. However, the majority—about 70%—of economic value would still be imported.

China dominates the battery supply chain, controlling over 75% of cell production and a majority of material processing and refinement capacities. This global reliance presents vulnerabilities, especially with projected shortages in critical minerals like lithium, nickel, and copper. China’s control of supply and processing infrastructure heightens risks for U.S. energy security without a robust, comprehensive industrial strategy.

A $2 Billion Move for Clean Energy Goals

Without a secure lithium battery supply chain, the U.S. risks missing its key climate targets: a 40% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050. Failing to meet these goals or falling behind other nations on clean technology could weaken the U.S.’s global standing. 

To protect its security and interests, the federal government must prioritize developing a robust North American lithium battery supply chain that leverages domestic expertise and reduces reliance on foreign sources. The DOE’s $2.2 billion investment to build Nevada’s Thacker Pass lithium mine is a major move. 

Moreover, the expanded 45X tax credit is another significant step the US government has taken in building up its critical mineral supply chain. 

The Section 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit, part of the Inflation Reduction Act, is designed to boost domestic production of clean energy essentials, including renewable components, battery materials, and 50 key minerals for the energy transition. This credit offers a 10% tax reduction on production costs for highly refined metals, supporting supply chains in critical areas like EVs and green energy. 

Eligible minerals include lithium, other essential battery metals like nickel and graphite, and rare earth elements like neodymium.

The $2.26 billion investment in Thacker Pass is a landmark step in boosting U.S. lithium supply for EV batteries, reducing reliance on foreign sources, and reinforcing national energy security. Through projects like these, the country aims to secure critical mineral supplies needed to achieve its clean energy goals and stay competitive globally.

The post U.S. DOE Approves $2.26 Billion for Nevada Lithium Mine appeared first on Carbon Credits.

A Green Journey: Key Insights from Nikola’s First Sustainability Report

Nikola

Nikola, America’s favorite zero-emissions truck brand, released its first Sustainability Impact Report. This report provides a comprehensive picture of Nikola’s environmental and social initiatives and explains their progress toward sustainability goals.

Nikola owns battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) and hydrogen fuel cell (FCEV) Class 8 trucks, designed specifically to make the environment safer and cleaner. Most significantly, HYLA’s hydrogen refueling ecosystem offers a robust hydrogen infrastructure to support the shift to sustainable fuel sources.

Driving Towards a Zero-Emission Future

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports that transportation generates around 28% of direct U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Medium- and heavy-duty trucks alone account for about 23% of these emissions. However, the EPA also highlighted that with the rise in transportation costs and freight demands, zero-emission vehicles can be a solution for a sustainable future.

EPA NIKOLA

So Nikola’s mission is clear: to lead the transition to zero-emission technology across critical routes. Thereby, supporting a climate-friendly future for commercial transportation.

Steve Girsky, President and CEO of Nikola, stated,

“Our focus is on zero-emission technologies and the infrastructure to support them, decarbonizing what has been known as a very ‘dirty’ market segment, Class 8 trucks. Medium- and heavy-duty trucks produce more emissions than passenger cars and rail combined. Our commitment—our mission, really—to improving air quality, avoiding emissions, and mitigating our contributions to climate change is why most of us work for Nikola. What we are most proud of, besides our dedicated team, is bringing our battery electric truck to market while developing and launching our hydrogen fuel cell electric truck shortly thereafter.”

Nikola’s sustainability report reveals an interesting piece of information. The company was founded to tackle transportation emissions, specifically. In addition to its net-zero goals, it prioritizes drivers’ health, safety, and community well-being where Class 8 trucks operate.

The truck giant strongly believes that zero-emission transportation is achievable, which is why the company aims to expand its impact throughout the nation.

Environmental Impact and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Nikola recognizes the risks of climate change and the opportunities that proactive measures offer. The company has taken the following actions to address these risks and capitalize on opportunities:

  • Investment in clean technology and innovation
  • Measurement and identification of emission sources
  • Commitment to renewable energy and energy efficiency in operations
  • Installation of EV charging infrastructure for Nikola trucks and employees
  • Adoption of circularity principles and waste diversion strategies for improved sustainability

In 2023, Nikola’s total emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) were 5,155.56 MT CO₂e.

Nikola

Hydrogen Trucks Hit the Highway

In Q4 2023, the company introduced hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks on the road in North America. By year-end, 42 trucks were manufactured, with 35 delivered to dealers and seven retained for ongoing testing and fleet demonstrations.

Early in 2024, the first HYLA modular refueling station was launched in Ontario, California, alongside a new partnership with FirstElement Fuel to offer hydrogen fueling solutions in both Northern and Southern California, including Oakland.

Nikola views both battery electric trucks powered by the grid and hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks as essential to reducing emissions in heavy-duty transportation. The company remains dedicated to advancing both vehicle technologies and fueling infrastructure for broad deployment.

The 3-R Approach to Battery Lifecycles

Nikola is committed to a circular economy, where truck and battery components are built to last long. They can be reused and recycled efficiently. The company collaborates with partners to manage materials responsibly at every stage of a vehicle’s life, focusing on durability and resource efficiency.

Regarding battery sustainability, Nikola has a battery circularity policy based on the 3 Rs: remanufacture, reuse, and recycle all pre-consumer and production batteries. Currently, Nikola’s recycling partners recover up to 95% of materials from lithium-ion batteries, aiming to recycle 100% of scrapped batteries. Notably, last year, the truck titan reused 192 metric tons of batteries.

The company also believes in extending battery life as the most sustainable choice. They use advanced vehicle software to receive over-the-air (OTA) updates that improve battery efficiency and extend battery life before recycling.

Waste and Water Management

The report also highlights the company’s dedication to improving manufacturing practices and minimizing environmental impact. A Waste Management Committee meets regularly to measure performance and implement strategies. They prioritize recycling materials such as steel, aluminum, lithium-ion batteries, plastic, and cardboard. Additionally, Nikola is mindful of water usage, primarily using water for vehicle quality testing and recycling.

Nikola’s environmental impact data for the last year is as follows:

nikola

Resource and Energy Efficiency at Nikola Facility

Nikola is committed to maximizing its resource efficiency and minimizing its manufacturing impact. The 670,000-square-foot Coolidge facility uses advanced eco-friendly technologies, including energy-efficient LED lighting, HVAC systems, and daylighting to cut artificial lighting needs.

Additionally, smart-controlled energy systems optimize resource use, while on-site solar panels and EV charging stations support sustainable practices. Nikola has also deployed electric automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and forklifts to further reduce emissions.

The total energy consumption at the facility is 7,491,559 kWh, of which 771,960 kWh is generated through solar.

By embracing these initiatives, Nikola is paving the way for a more sustainable future.

Disclaimer: Data and visuals- Nikola Sustainability Impact Report

The post A Green Journey: Key Insights from Nikola’s First Sustainability Report appeared first on Carbon Credits.

U.S. Expands 45X Tax Credits: What Does It Mean For Nickel and Other Miners?

U.S. Expands Critical Mineral Tax Credits But Leaves Pure Miners Behind

The U.S. recently expanded a manufacturing tax credit to cover extraction and material costs, benefiting metal refiners but excluding pure mining companies. This update was announced in final regulations by the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

The credit, known as the Section 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit, is part of the Inflation Reduction Act. It aims to support the domestic production of clean energy products, including renewable components, battery materials, and 50 essential minerals critical to the energy transition. 

What is Section 45X Tax Credit and How Does It Work? 

Since its inception, the Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit has already spurred private-sector investments. It has driven $126 billion in investment announcements, including $6 billion targeted for critical minerals, according to the Treasury Department.

The 45X tax credit offers financial benefits for producing solar and wind components, battery parts, and refining or recycling critical minerals. Manufacturers earn credits based on unit production, electrical capacity, or production costs. Importantly, these credits are transferable, allowing companies to maximize their benefits.

  • Starting in 2023, the credit is available until 2032, with most goods phasing down to 75% of the credit value in 2030, 50% in 2031, and 25% in 2032, though critical minerals are exempt from this reduction. 

This stable, decade-long credit has encouraged long-term investments, with manufacturing investments rising 305%. According to Clean Investment Monitor data, they reached $89 billion in 2023-2024 from $22 billion in 2020-2022.  

actual manufacturing investments by technology

The 45X tax credit works by providing a specific tax credit value for each eligible component under IRS guidelines. To qualify, manufacturers must ensure their products meet the requirements outlined in the 45X regulation. Additionally, for the tax credit to be claimed, the component must be sold to an unrelated third party. 

The Expanded Scope of 45X Tax Credit

Initially, the tax credit did not cover extraction or material costs. However, after seeking industry input, the Biden administration decided to broaden the credit’s application.

With this change, the tax credit now includes costs related to materials and extraction for qualifying minerals and electrode materials, provided they meet specific conditions. The Treasury Department stated that this decision is intended to encourage investment in U.S. critical mineral extraction and processing. The broader goal is to enhance U.S. energy security and strengthen clean energy supply chains.

The 10% production cost tax credit applies to highly refined metals. This move is part of a U.S. strategy to build supply chains that support energy transition sectors, like electric vehicles and green energy. Eligible minerals include essential battery metals such as nickel, lithium, and graphite, along with rare earth elements like neodymium.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen commented that the final regulations will help companies investing in the U.S. clean energy economy. Additionally, the Treasury confirmed that the tax credit extends to components made with foreign-sourced materials.  This aspect of the rule is intended to ensure flexibility for U.S. manufacturers, particularly in sectors where certain raw materials are difficult to source domestically.

A Boost for Critical Mineral Refiners, But Pure Miners Miss Out

Nickel production, along with other battery metals, would greatly benefit from the tax credits. This comes timely after primary nickel production, which includes ferronickel for steelmaking and intermediates for EV batteries, saw significant growth. 

S&P Global Commodity Insights reported that the top 5 publicly listed nickel producers reached a combined output of 158,937 metric tons. It represents a substantial 35.6% increase from Q2 2023. This boost is largely attributed to the rising demand for refined nickel products, especially for use in EV batteries.

The recent nickel price slump has hit profitability industry-wide, yet companies are hesitant to cut production. They fear that doing so may lead to a loss in market share. 

With the expanded 45X credits, primary nickel producers will have more reasons to accelerate their production. 

However, the final rules of the expanded credit have not gone far enough in the eyes of many in the mining sector. Specifically, pure-play mining companies, which focus solely on extraction without refining, remain ineligible for the credit. 

Stimulus for Clean Energy Goals, Yet Gap Remains

The National Mining Association (NMA) has expressed disappointment, arguing that the regulations do not align with the original intent of Congress to strengthen the entire U.S. mineral supply chain

The organization had previously requested that the tax credit apply to all domestic mining companies, regardless of whether they also refine materials. However, the new rules limit credit only to producers who both mine and refine materials. This decision leaves out U.S.-based miners who do not have refining capabilities, and the credit still applies to imported materials.

Rich Nolan, president and CEO of the NMA, criticized this limitation. He stated that the rule does not adequately support efforts to address strategic vulnerabilities in U.S. mineral supplies, especially as it allows credit for foreign-sourced materials.

The NMA argues that this oversight hinders U.S. competitiveness, particularly against countries like China and Russia that dominate global mineral supply chains with cheaper materials.

As the clean energy market grows, balancing interests across the sector will remain challenging. Ensuring that a diverse range of domestic mining companies can benefit from the tax credit will be essential to achieving a resilient, self-sustaining U.S. critical mineral supply chain.

The post U.S. Expands 45X Tax Credits: What Does It Mean For Nickel and Other Miners? appeared first on Carbon Credits.