North America’s Largest Biochar Plant Announced In Canada

A consortium of Canadian and French companies, including Airex Energy, Groupe Rémabec, and SUEZ, are investing C$80 million to construct North America’s largest biochar production facility.

This initiative highlights the growing global recognition of biochar’s potential in carbon sequestration and soil enhancement.

The plant will be located along the north shore of the Saint Lawrence River in Port-Cartier, Quebec, Canada.

The Quebec Biochar Plant: A Major Step in Canada’s Decarbonization Efforts

The Port-Cartier facility is Canada’s first industrial-scale biochar production plant, marking a significant milestone in the country’s net zero efforts.

The first phase of the plant will be finalized in 2024. It will focus on transforming forestry waste into biochar, contributing to a circular economy, and playing a crucial role in the fight against climate change.

With an initial production capacity of 10,000 tonnes per year, the plant will triple its annual production capacity by 2026. This makes it the largest biochar plant in North America.

The consortium aims to produce 350,000 tonnes of biochar by 2035.

They have identified locations in Europe and Africa where they can access the input to produce biochar, as well as potential buyers.

The Project’s Impact and Plans

The facility, owned by CARBONITY, a joint venture equally owned by the three partners, will employ 75 people locally. It will produce carbon-rich biochar with high environmental qualities from the residual biomass of Groupe Rémabec’s operations.

The project will sequester 75,000 tonnes of carbon per year.

By sequestering carbon, biochar production will generate guaranteed, certified carbon credits. First Climate will then sell them on the voluntary carbon market.

This project became possible thanks to the financial participation of the Quebec and Canadian governments. A federal official commented on this milestone, the Minister of Sport and Minister responsible for CED, said that:

“Government of Canada has made concrete commitments to demonstrate that a strong economy and a healthy environment go hand-in-hand. That is why Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CED) is granting a repayable contribution of $3M to CARBONITY for its set-up project in Port-Cartier.”

Biochar: A Powerful Tool for Carbon Sequestration and Soil Enhancement

Biochar is a charcoal-like substance produced from plant matter. It’s created through a process called pyrolysis, where organic material is heated in a high-temperature, low-oxygen environment.

The result is a stable form of carbon that resists decomposition, effectively locking away carbon that would otherwise return to the atmosphere. When added to soil, biochar can significantly improve soil health, enhancing water retention, nutrient availability, and microbial activity. All these lead to increased crop productivity.

Moreover, the production of biochar can generate Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) carbon credits. These credits can be sold or traded, providing an additional revenue stream for biochar producers and incentivizing further carbon sequestration efforts.

Airex earlier this year raised $38M to increase capacity at another Quebec facility that torrefies biomass.

A Shift in the Carbon Credits Market

The construction of the Quebec biochar plant signifies a shift in the carbon credits market. As countries and corporations strive to achieve their carbon neutrality goals, the demand for effective carbon offsetting solutions is growing.

Biochar production offers a tangible, measurable way to offset carbon emissions. The carbon credits generated from this process can attract significant interest from environmentally conscious investors and corporations.

Used as a soil amendment, biochar offers several benefits, including carbon sequestration, increased nutrient retention, and optimized soil aeration and drainage. Its properties allow it to contribute to soil regeneration, limit the use of fertilizers and sustain water resources.

When added to concrete or asphalt formulations, biochar brings new functionalities to the final material while helping to reduce its carbon footprint, a key issue for the construction sector.

Lastly, the production of biochar at high-temperature and with oxygen-free pyrolysis will generate surplus energy in the form of steam or pyrolysis oil, which is reusable on site.

In summary, here are just some of the potential industrial uses of biochar:

Source: Osman et al. (2022). Environ Chem Lett 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01424-x

The Future of Biochar and Carbon Management

The emergence of North America’s largest biochar plant in Quebec is a milestone in the world’s journey toward sustainable carbon management. It highlights the potential of biochar as a solution for carbon sequestration, waste management, and soil enhancement.

With the establishment of the Port-Cartier facility, the future of biochar and carbon management looks promising. The project shows the potential of biochar in sequestering carbon while setting a precedent for future initiatives in the sector.

As we continue to grapple with the challenges of climate change, such initiatives offer a beacon of hope, showing us that with innovation and commitment, a sustainable future is within our reach.

The post North America’s Largest Biochar Plant Announced In Canada appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Toyota Reveals Solid-State EV Battery with 745-Mile Range, Cuts Emissions by 39%

Toyota reveals its solid-state EV battery technology which claims to have a 745 mile range and 10 minute charging time. Solid-state batteries can reduce the carbon emissions of electric vehicle (EV) batteries by 39%, but it needs 35% more lithium.

The world’s largest carmaker by sales caught the markets by surprise by announcing its plans to commercialize its solid-state battery technology by 2027. 

Toyota’s Next-Gen EV Battery Technology 

Last month, Toyota announced that as the next-generation EV continues to use new batteries, they’re “determined to become a world leader in battery EV energy consumption.”

This week, the Japanese carmaker, which has been lagging behind rivals in rolling out EVs, unveiled its solid-state battery breakthrough. The automaker said that it was able to simplify ways to produce the materials used in making solid-state batteries. 

Toyota further noted that this discovery will enable it to halve the size, cost, and weight of EV batteries. That also means significantly cutting charging times to 10 minutes or less while increasing the driving range to 1,200 kilometers (745 miles). Currently, the luxury brand Lucid Air holds the longest drive range of 516 miles. 

President of Toyota’s R&D center for carbon neutrality, Keiji Kaita, commented that they’re planning to achieve reductions both in their liquid and solid-state batteries. He further said that this new battery will be simpler to make than a conventional lithium-ion battery. 

The car company has been working on this technology since 2012 and it’s becoming a reality as Toyota now have over 1,000 solid-state battery patents – more than any other carmaker.

Noting Toyota’s announcement, analysts remarked that this could be a game-changer for the industry. And it can also help the Japanese carmaker be closer to the leading EV maker Tesla. Most of Tesla’s EV units are powered by conventional lithium-ion batteries using liquid electrolytes. 

Kaita also said they discovered ways to address the durability problems with EV batteries. And that they now are confident to mass-produce solid-state batteries by 2027 or 2028. 

Ford and BWM also tested these batteries late last year.

What are Solid-State Batteries?

Solid-state batteries are considered by industry experts as the most promising technology to fix major EV battery concerns. These particularly include charging time, driving range, capacity, and safety risks like catching fire.

Some experts call solid-state the “kiss of death” for gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles.

These batteries replace a liquid electrolyte with a solid material and use lithium metal instead of graphite at the anode. Here’s how Toyota’s solid-state battery differs from the current, liquid-based version and how it can change the industry.



Solid-state batteries offer high energy density, meaning they can store more energy with less materials. They also typically require no toxic materials.

More remarkably, research shows that this new technology can help mitigate the climate impact of EV batteries.  

As shown below, batteries made from most sustainably sourced materials can cut carbon emissions further down by 39%. This emission reduction could probably be due to simplified production processes and faster charging times. 

Moreover, more efficient mining methods such as extracting lithium from geothermal wells can also contribute to lower climate impacts. Solid-state batteries may need up to 35% more lithium than the current lithium-ion technology, but they use far less cobalt and graphite. 

Driving Up the Demand for More Lithium 

Lithium, also called white gold, is the unsung hero of the clean energy transition by powering up the EV revolution. Countries and major EV makers are scrambling to secure lithium. If solid-state batteries dominate the industry, demand for this critical mineral will soar up much higher than is currently projected. 

In the European Union, the bloc’s proposed Batteries Regulation for lithium requires responsible sourcing and recycling of the EV element. The EU policy will ensure that there’s enough lithium supply for solid-state batteries. European governments still need to finalize the regulation. 

In the U.S., the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) incentivizes EV manufacturers that source their batteries locally or from free-trade partners. But the country needs to ramp up its domestic lithium supply to meet the skyrocketing demand. This is where rare lithium companies like the American Lithium Corporation come to the rescue. The company has two of the largest lithium deposits in the Americas.

According to an industry expert, improving the methods used in extracting and processing the raw materials in solid-state batteries, including lithium, is the key to slashing their climate impact

Toyota’s solid-state battery revelation didn’t disclose key details such as battery performance in cold temperatures, energy density, and raw materials. The giant carmaker aims to manufacture 3 million battery-electric units each year by 2030 — 50% with solid-state batteries.

Will Toyota’s battery breakthrough change its course and make it a leader in the EV revolution? That’s what the industry has to watch out for. 

The post Toyota Reveals Solid-State EV Battery with 745-Mile Range, Cuts Emissions by 39% appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Indonesia’s Coal Emissions at Record High, Up 33% in 2022

Indonesia’s coal emissions in 2022 hit a record high, as per preliminary analysis, which makes the country one of the biggest emitters of carbon from fossil fuels worldwide. 

The data analyzed was from the Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM), showing that coal consumption in the country is highest ever in 2022 than any year. It jumped by 33%, from 559 million barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) in 2021 to 746 BOE in 2022. 

Highest Ever Growth in Coal Emissions 

As seen in the chart, coal has spiked up with a huge margin in comparison to other energy sources. This increase in coal burning also resulted in skyrocketing greenhouse gas emissions from coal and other fossil fuels. 

According to the Global Carbon Project, the organization that calculated CO2e emissions from Indonesia’s fossil fuel burning, the rise in coal caused the Asian country’s GHG emissions to increase massively by more than 20%.

The top 10 biggest carbon emitters haven’t seen this increase in the last fifteen years, says one senior analyst in the organization. 

Increases in oil and gas, plus coal, emissions bring Indonesia’s total fossil fuel CO2 emissions to 619 million metric tons. 

With these increases, Indonesia will be the world’s 6th-highest fossil polluter in 2022, up from the 9th place in 2021. The top 3 spots go to the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and Russia. 

If this trend continues this year, the Southeast Asian nation will hold the 6th spot, for sure. Still, the country’s CO2e footprint per capita (2.7 tonnes) remains lower than that of the United States (15 tonnes). 

Global average for emissions intensity is 7.5 tonnes per capita.

Indonesia is the 3rd-largest coal producer in the world and is a major coal consumer itself. And with new coal plants on the pipeline, the nation’s coal consumption will grow consistently until 2029. 

There’s also not enough intent and action to slow down coal mining in the country, more so decommission the mines. This is amid Indonesia’s commitment to reach net zero emissions by 2060. 

As per ESDM estimates, the country will produce more coal in 2023, at 694 million tonnes. That’s a 5% increase from the 2022 target of 663 million tonnes. This projection is largely due to the expected high demand from India and China, the country’s major coal export partners. 

Indonesia’s 2022 coal sales to Europe also reached historical highs. This is largely due to a shift to coal among European utilities prompted by high gas prices. The EU embargo on Russian coal because of its conflict with Ukraine enabled Indonesian suppliers to tap the European market. 

Is the Energy Transition Still Possible?

With the growing coal production and its carbon emissions, will Indonesia be able to still reach its energy transition targets?

The answer to this question is crucial as experts said that it significantly impacts the 1.5°C global temperatures threshold. After all, the Southeast Asian largest economy is one of the world’s largest emitters.

The country inked a landmark deal last year called the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) in which developed nations (G7) will invest $20 billion in Indonesia to help it ramp up transition to renewable energy. 

This historic agreement will allow the country to limit power sector sectors to 29 million Mt by 2030. But this will be possible if Indonesian coal-fired power plants are retired and new projects are frozen. 

Adding more coal plants is part of President Joko Widodo’s flagship program to add 35 gigawatts to Indonesia’s national grid. The program calls for building hundreds of different kinds of power plants but most of the increase in capacity will be from coal-fired plants. 

One more major factor driving coal production up is the growing demand in the metals industry, particularly the nickel sector.

Complementing the Soaring Demand for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Indonesia is the world’s largest producer of nickel, a key element used in making lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and renewable energy storage.

The current administration wants to make the country an EV powerhouse. That means relying on Indonesia’s abundant nickel reserves, whose production also increased by 60% last year. 

Given that the nation’s power grid is largely run by coal (43%) and mining nickel is highly carbon intensive, it contributes largely to the rise in coal production and emissions. 

Moreover, the carbon per KwH of power generation in Indonesia is so much more than most other nickel producers. For example, comparing it to Canada, the Asian country will produce about 9x as much carbon per KwH of electricity.

Processing nickel requires smelters which are powered by coal-fired electricity plants, a.k.a. captive plants. New smelters were built in 2017 and started operations in 2019.

Unfortunately, retiring or replacing these plants are difficult; it needs investments in new infrastructure. And shutting them down means halting the smelters critical for processing battery-grade nickel. 

With that, it seems that Indonesia’s best hope to achieve its climate targets in the power sector is to stop building new fossil fuel plants and rather invest in renewable energy infrastructure. 

Last month, a group of global experts, Coal to Clean Credit Initiative (CCCI), announced they are developing a world-first “coal-to-clean” carbon credit program that incentivizes the transition away from coal-fired power plants to renewable energy in emerging economies.

The post Indonesia’s Coal Emissions at Record High, Up 33% in 2022 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

UAE to Invest $54B in Renewable Energy as Part of Net Zero Goal

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is planning to invest $54 billion on renewables over the next 7 years as part of its strategies to reach net zero emissions by 2050. 

The UAE approved its National Energy Strategy with the aim to triple its share of energy coming from renewable sources. The Middle Eastern country also sets its eyes on hydrogen as a key source of clean energy. 

This plan comes as the major oil-producing nation will host the upcoming COP28 climate conference in November. 

UAE National Energy Strategy

Same with other major oil producers, fossil fuels still outweigh the push for a cleaner energy system globally. And the UAE received huge scrutiny from various climate activists for choosing Sultan al-Jaber, ADNOC head, to lead COP28.

Yet, the country was the first to reveal its 2050 zero goal in the region. Big part of the target is approving the country’s National Energy Strategy 2050

Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed appointed Mohamed Hassan Alsuwaidi, Abu Dhabi wealth fund CEO and Masdar’s deputy chairman, to oversee the $54 billion investment. 

Apart from relying more on renewables, other plans are to improve energy efficiency and promote the use of clean energy. 

The strategy’s objective is to support research and development programs in clean energy technologies, on top of driving investments in the sector. Specifically, the UAE hopes to achieve 14GW capacity of clean energy by 2030, up from 9.2GW current capacity. 

Moreover, the strategy’s objective is to gain up to $27 billion financial savings by 2030. Overall, it targets an energy mix combining different sources of clean energy to satisfy these energy goals: 

44% clean energy
38% gas
12% clean coal
6% nuclear

In the near-term, the Arabic nation seeks to increase its share of clean energy to 30% by 2031. In the long-term, it hopes to cut carbon emissions from power generation by 70% by 2050. 

At a glance, here’s the UAE’s energy strategy to reach net zero emissions by midcentury.

Last year, the Arab country inked a $100 billion clean energy deal with the U.S. Their PACE (Partnership for Accelerating Clean Energy) agreement will deploy 100GW of clean energy in the two countries as well as in emerging economies by 2035. Earlier this year, the partners announced a $20 billion investment to fund 15 GW of clean and renewable energy projects.

The UAE’s oil and gas giant had also committed $15 billion to invest in low-carbon projects to cut emissions and meet decarbonization goals.

Along its national energy strategy, the UAE Cabinet has also approved its National Hydrogen Strategy.

“Top 10” Hydrogen Producer 

The country’s hydrogen strategy seeks to make the UAE part of a global “top 10” hydrogen (H2) producer by 2031. This strategy builds on the previous roadmap unveiled during the COP26 climate talks in 2021. 

The goal is to produce 14 million to 22 million tons per year of hydrogen by 2050. Highlighting this plan, Sheikh Mohammed remarked:

“The strategy aims to promote the UAE’s position as a producer and exporter of low-emission hydrogen over the next eight years through the development of supply chains, the establishment of hydrogen oases and a national research and development centre.”

The government expects to get 25% market share of low carbon hydrogen and derivatives in major import markets by 2030. It will initially focus on Europe, India, Japan, and South Korea, while also exploring export opportunities in other markets. 

To date, the Abu Dhabi nation is well on its way for low carbon hydrogen development with more than 7 projects planned to deliver 0.5 million tons per year. The details of each project are as follows:

The country’s ambition is to be a global leader in low carbon hydrogen and home to a robust hydrogen ecosystem. Low carbon hydrogen refers to H2 made with low carbon emissions pertaining to either of these two hydrogen technologies: 

Blue hydrogen from fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage 
Green hydrogen made through electrolyzer powered by renewable energy 

Hydrogen is the key enabler in UAE’s net zero strategy and here’s the timeline for making this goal a reality. 

Ultimately, the UAE government will invest over $163 billion by 2050 to meet the rising energy demand and ensure a sustainable growth for its economy.

The post UAE to Invest $54B in Renewable Energy as Part of Net Zero Goal appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Navigating the Path to Net Zero: VCMI’s Claims Code of Practice

The Voluntary Carbon Market Integrity Initiative (VCMI) launched its Claims Code of Practice which aims to give companies a rulebook to follow for making credible climate claims using carbon credits on their path to net zero. 

VCMI first published the draft of the Claims Code in June last year. Since then, it went through beta testing by companies and rigorous consultations, and multi-stakeholder collaboration. 

A wide range of nonprofits, international organizations, companies, governments, and industry groups supported VCMI. Climate experts worldwide find the Code a welcome step forward for the VCM after it receives massive criticism. 

VCMI’s Claims Code promotes the use of the “contribution claims” model in financing climate actions through carbon credits. This approach builds market integrity and confidence in VCM as asserted by Rachel Kyte, Co-Chair of VCMI’s Steering Committee saying:

“Voluntary carbon markets bring considerable benefits as part of companies’ net-zero transition and as a means of financing climate transition worldwide… The Claims Code will give greater confidence and develop trust in those who use it. If you build integrity, trust will follow, and trust is the foundation of a high value, high impact market.”

The Code’s 3 Tiers of Corporate Claims

From the provisional bronze, silver, and gold, the final claim tiers or levels are now Silver, Gold, and Platinum. Each of them acknowledges investment in emission reductions and removals beyond corporate action to reach their net zero goals. 

Not all that glitters is gold because Platinum, not Gold, is the best available level for companies to claim. 

The chart shows the respective thresholds for each tier, representing the number of carbon credits retired (carbon emission reductions claimed). This is proportional to the remaining emissions in the year when a company makes a claim. Remaining emissions are emissions that remain in a given year as a company progresses towards its near and long-term targets.

VMCI will provide further guidance on this, particularly on the Measurement, Reporting, and Assurance (MRA) framework, additional claim tiers and claim names, in November 2023.

Making a VCMI Claim

To make a VCMI Claim, a company should go through these four steps:

Comply with VCMI’s Foundational Criteria
Choose which VCMI Claim to make from the 3 tiers
Buy carbon credits that meet quality thresholds – ICVCM’s Core Carbon Principles (CCP)
Disclose information and get 3rd-party assurance following the VCMI MRA Framework

In finalizing the Claims Code, the VCMI has been working with other major initiatives that drive corporate climate action. These include the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Markets (ICVCM), Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi), and Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). 

A Code for High-Integrity Carbon Credit Market

When used with integrity, VCMs can accelerate climate mitigation and contribute significantly to the Paris Agreement goals and UN SDGs.

Thousands of companies are investing in the VCM to tackle their carbon emissions through high-quality carbon credits. Thus, it’s critical that the market has clear and transparent guidance on how to make voluntary use of carbon credits as part of their climate goals. 

VCMI Claims Code provides that guidance and more to prevent abusive use of carbon credits, e.g. greenwashing. It will bring integrity to the VCM and make it a powerful tool to get the world to net zero.

Allister Furey, CEO and co-founder of Sylvera commented on the launch of the Claims Code:

“The VCMI’s guidance is a solid step forward for resolving confusion and uncertainty around what claims companies can make about their climate action, and for overall climate action transparency with the inclusion of comprehensive requirements to disclose credit use.” 

The publication of this code of practice is indeed crucial in helping companies channel climate finance to credible climate action. But others also said that much more still needs to be done and carbon credits are not a silver bullet. There are other ways to invest in climate action.

Yet, the Code is a good starting point for entities looking to voluntarily use carbon credits toward their climate goals. By using it, companies can demonstrate their climate leadership, address reputation risks, and be ready to position themselves in a low-carbon transition.  

Ultimately, when paired with ICVCM’s Core Carbon Principles that guide the supply side of the market, VCMI’s Claims Code of Practice brings “end-to-end” integrity that allows for critical market development.

The post Navigating the Path to Net Zero: VCMI’s Claims Code of Practice appeared first on Carbon Credits.

First ISSB Reporting Standards Are Out, What Investors Must Know

The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) has published its first two finalized standards, the first ever set of global reporting standards for ESG investors. The standards pave the way for companies to report on and disclose their climate and sustainability.  

The standards are designed to be the foundation for a uniform and comprehensive global baseline of sustainability disclosures that investors have long desired. They mark the culmination of an 18-months long work. 

The New Era of ESG Reporting

The standards consist of two separate frameworks for climate and sustainability reporting. The framework for disclosing sustainability-related financial information is known as IFRS S1 while IFRS S2 is for climate information. 

Together, they usher in a new era of ESG – environmental, social and governance – reporting and disclosures in capital markets.

ESG became the banner for investors and served as their measuring tool in comparing companies. The term became the household name in the capital markets around the world, until a huge number of financial products and assets were labeled with ESG. 

Bloomberg estimated that global ESG will surpass $41 trillion assets in 2022 and $50 trillion by 2025

Apparently, ESG turned into a multi-trillion dollar business. But it was plagued with the issue of greenwashing or the mislabeling of ESG products. It’s the biggest concern, both for companies and more so for the investors.   

And so, the ISSB aims to address this issue and finally publish the long-awaited ESG reporting standards.

The ISSB frameworks will affect what information companies include in their financial reports, prompting them to reflect ESG risks. Also, they’re not new but build on the previous works of existing standards and frameworks, including the following:

Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), 
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), 
Value Reporting Foundation’s Integrated Reporting Framework, and 
Industry-based guidance from the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). 

More importantly, the ISSB Standards will ensure that companies provide ESG information alongside their financial statements, within the same reporting documents.

And for the first time, they created a common language for companies to disclose the climate-related risks and opportunities of their prospects. 

ISSB Global Baseline for Sustainability Reporting 

The lack of a global baseline ESG reporting framework made ESG investing confusing to investors. But with the new standards, ISSB’s vice-chair, Sue Lloyd, said that:

“Investors can be confident that, when they compare companies, they’re doing that on a like-by-like basis when they’re making their investment decisions.”

Under the ISSB climate standards (IFRS S2), companies need to: 

Determine their GHG emissions, which include all sources – Scopes 1, 2, and 3 – according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol unless called to use other measures.
Disclose the amount and percent of assets or activities prone to climate-related transition and risks.
Report on how much capital expenditure they spend on climate-related risks and opportunities.
Disclose whether or not they use internal carbon pricing and explain how.
Report on climate-related targets.

Under the ISSB sustainability standards (IFRS S1), companies have to: 

Report information significant to financial prospects that may affect their investment decisions.
Discuss how they will identify and monitor sustainability-related risks.
Explain governance processes to track sustainability risks.

The new ISSB Standards are also based on the concepts that underpin the IFRS Accounting Standards, which 140 jurisdictions require. The standards are applicable worldwide, establishing a truly global baseline. 

While the European Union has started their own standard-setting activities, the US Securities and Exchange Commission is still working on getting businesses to disclose their carbon emissions. The SEC requires companies to report on their absolute carbon emissions, including scope 3.

The Next Steps: Scope 3 Emissions

In finalizing the ESG reporting standards, over 1,400 comment letters were considered. And one major feedback on climate reporting is on Scope 3, which is challenging for most companies. 

Corporations need to map their entire value chain to report on their emissions. To address this concern, the ISSB gave companies one more year to report on their Scope 3 information. They also provided other support and guidance in measuring and reporting Scope 3.

Companies can start applying the final version of the ISSB reporting standards next year. That means the first reports using the frameworks will be available to investors in 2025. 

Companies can also focus on climate reporting first and disclose sustainability in the next year while countries can decide if they’ll make ISSB standards mandatory. 

Ultimately, the global standards will help improve trust and confidence in companies’ climate and sustainability disclosures to inform investment decisions.

The post First ISSB Reporting Standards Are Out, What Investors Must Know appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Lululemon to Recycle Textiles Infinitely with Plastic-Eating Enzymes

A plastic-eating enzyme by Australian recycling startup Samsara Eco found its way into the fashion industry through clothing giant Lululemon. 

Lululemon teamed up with the startup and held a minority stake in it, though the amount wasn’t revealed. This multi-year collaboration marks the Canadian athletic wear company’s first investment in a recycling company. 

More notably, it represents the fashion industry’s commitment to promoting new approaches that emit less carbon and recycle old textiles. 

Why Recycle Plastic in Textiles?

The fashion industry’s emissions account for about 10% of annual global carbon emissions, and that will increase by 50% by 2030. The industry is also using tons of plastic-derived textiles from petroleum.

Around 70% of the materials used in making apparel such as pants, skirts, jackets, and other clothes contain plastic, be it polyester, nylon, spandex, or acrylic. 

Unfortunately, very little of these plastic-derived materials go to recycling facilities. The US Environmental Protection Agency estimates that only 15% of them are recycled.

As much as 87% of discarded textiles, which are 90% reusable and recyclable, end up in landfills or incinerators. And demand for apparel continues to grow, meaning more plastics will be needed to make new clothes. 

That also means the fashion or apparel industry needs more plastic recycling efforts to avoid using virgin plastic materials. 

Currently, there are two major ways for fashion companies like Lululemon to recycle textiles: mechanical and chemical using solvents. Both options are problematic because the former approach doesn’t allow the recovered plastics to be recycled several times while the latter often uses too much energy.

This is what Samsara Eco, which raised a $37 million Series A round, addresses with its innovative enzymatic approach.

Samsara Eco’s Infinite Recycling Tech

Samsara Eco uses enzymes that can attack complex plastics (polymers) and revert them back to their original chemical composition (monomers). This is what makes the startup’s recycling technology infinite. 

It can make new, virgin-grade plastics without the need to use fossil fuels again. Plus, it also uses less heat to break down the textiles more efficiently, as per Paul Riley, Samsara Eco’s CEO. He further explained their company’s plastic recycling process using the enzyme:

“Our process can handle hard-to-recycle plastics, contaminated plastics, mixed plastics and plastics containing additives (like colors) again and again, and now textiles in a low-heat environment that is carbon neutral.”

Samsara Eco Plastic Recycling Process

Riley added that their enzymatic recycling technology can produce virgin-like plastics without trading off the environment. It has a low carbon emission and doesn’t need high temperatures to break down plastic waste.

Putting that in context, the enviro-tech startup can stop releasing 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere annually. 

This matters a lot because manufacturing virgin plastics made from fossil fuels significantly contributes to global warming. And projections show that by 2050, the plastics sector will consume 15% of the carbon budget.

Samsara Eco aims to recycle 1.5 million metric tons of plastic each year by 2030. Right now, the world produces about 391 million metric tons of plastic a year and has a total of 8.3 billion tons of plastic waste.

Samsara Eco’s partnership with Lululemon will make the startup the first to infinitely recycle nylon and polyester. Together, these plastic materials comprise about 60% of apparel manufactured. 

Using the startup’s plastic recycling enzyme technology, Lululemon seeks to repurpose nylon and polyester blends from old apparel to make new collections. Voicing the fashion brand’s concern with plastic, especially nylon, Yogendra Dandapure of Lululemon said:

“Nylon remains our biggest opportunity to achieve our 2030 sustainable product goals. Through Samsara Eco’s patented enzymatic process, we’re advancing transforming apparel waste into high-quality nylon and polyester, which will help us live into our end-to-end vision of circularity.”

Other Textile Recycling Technologies

Scientists have been working on finding the most cost-effective ways to break down plastics for decades, particularly polyethylene terephthalate (PET).

Collaborative efforts and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) help ramp up practical applications of plastic-eating enzymes. 

A different team discovered a natural enzyme PETase that’s capable of degrading PET plastic while modifying it using machine learning. They called it FAST-PETase – functional, active, stable, and tolerant PETase.

Another startup, Circ, has also developed a unique hydrothermal processing technology for recycling blended textiles, like polyester-cotton blends. The Circ system uses hot water, pressure, and chemical solvents to recycle both materials, recovering 90% of the waste textile.

A Connecticut-based company, Protein Evolution, is also developing a similar enzymatic approach for recycling plastics. They turn leftover nylon and polyester from used textiles into materials for new collections.

These companies may also be eligible for earning plastic credits or carbon credits. Each plastic credit is equal to one ton of plastic waste that would otherwise have not been collected or recycled.

Companies can leverage plastic credits along with carbon credits to address their sustainability concerns. Many firms also consider plastic waste reduction as part of their net zero commitments.

Same with other circular economy approaches, Samsara Eco needs more years to scale up and commercialize its technology. But the kind of support from clothing giants and popular fashion brands like Lululemon is a great milestone. 

The post Lululemon to Recycle Textiles Infinitely with Plastic-Eating Enzymes appeared first on Carbon Credits.

TotalEnergies, Petronas, Mitsui to Develop CCS Hub in Southeast Asia

Energy major TotalEnergies has partnered with Petronas and Mitsui to develop a Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) hub in Southeast Asia.

The partners will assess several carbon storage sites in the Malay basin, including both saline aquifers and depleted offshore fields. 

The agreement will take forward the initiatives outlined in their signed Memoranda of Understanding in 2022.

Tri-Party Deal to Decarbonize Asian Customers

The deal aims to develop a carbon merchant storage service to decarbonize industrial customers in Southeast Asia, one of the fastest growing regions of the world. 

Estimates of carbon storage capacity in the region are uncertain. But analysis shows that the theoretical capacity to store CO2 may surpass the region’s needs. Most of this capacity is in deep saline formations. 

CCS can help the fast-growing economies of Southeast Asia be on track to net zero emissions. According to the International Energy Agency, about 90% of energy demand growth of the region since 2000 has been met by fossil fuels. It is also home to large coal and liquefied natural gas exporters. 

Thus, CCS technology can be significant in helping Southeast Asia transition to an energy mix that aligns with climate goals. 

Carbon capture in the region needs to reach at least 35 Mt CO2 in 2030 to be in line with the 2015 Paris Agreement goals. By 2050, that capacity must exceed 200 Mt, with CCS deployed at scale across the fuel, industry and power sectors. 

However, developing a CCS value chain for hard-to-abate emissions in the region needs a specific regulatory framework and considerable investment. 

Achieving the level of CCS deployment shown in the chart above will need about $1 billion each year by 2030. This financial requirement needs international support, more debt financing, and substantial private-sector investment. 

First-of-its-Kind CCS Solution

The tri-party agreement among TotalEnergies, Mitsui, and Petronas will establish a “first-of-its-kind integrated CCS solution for industries in the Asia-Pacific region”, according to Petronas. 

Malaysia’s state-owned firm further noted that the deal shows Petronas’ commitment to turn the country into a regional CCS hub.

The strategic partnership involves all aspects of CCS development in the region, including:

Studying potential CO2 storage sites, 
Assessing maturing depleted fields and saline aquifiers for storage, 
Identifying potential customers, 
Determining the best technical means to transport captured CO2 from regional industrial hubs to Malaysia, and 
Creating the most appropriate legal and business structure for CCS commercialization in Malaysia. 

Remarking on the agreement, TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanné said that: 

“We will bring to the partnership our strong CCS expertise, anchored in Europe with a first integrated project in Norway due to start next year and several other projects that will contribute to meeting our carbon storage capacity target of ten million tonnes per year by 2030.”

For the Japanese oil firm, Mitsui will use its “expertise in the oil and gas upstream activities and extensive business networks” to contribute to the CCS hub project in Southeast Asia. 

TotalEnergies also entered into a separate deal with Petronas’ renewable energy subsidiary Gentari. They will develop renewable energy projects in the Asia-Pacific region. 

Their goal is to jointly create the 100 MW Pleasant Hills solar project in Australia and generate low-carbon electricity from it to deliver to Roma field’s gas production and processing facilities. This project will help cut the emissions of Gladstone LNG, in which both energy majors hold a stake.

The planned volumes and dates of the Malaysian CCS hub project weren’t revealed.

The post TotalEnergies, Petronas, Mitsui to Develop CCS Hub in Southeast Asia appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Pharma’s AstraZeneca Invests $400 Million to Plant 200 Million Trees

AstraZeneca, a global pharmaceutical leader, has launched a significant environmental sustainability initiative, AZ Forest. This ambitious project aims to plant and maintain 200 million trees worldwide by 2030, a commitment backed by a robust investment of $400 million.

This initiative is a part of AstraZeneca’s science-based net zero strategy, “Ambition Zero Carbon,” which employs advanced technologies for long-term monitoring of tree health, soil and water quality, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration.

The AZ Forest initiative is a testament to AstraZeneca’s commitment to environmental sustainability. By planting and maintaining 200 million trees, the company is taking a proactive step towards mitigating climate change and promoting biodiversity.

This initiative also underscores the company’s belief in the power of partnerships, as it involves collaboration with experts and local communities across the globe.

AstraZeneca’s Carbon Reduction Goals

AstraZeneca is committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 98% from its global operations and fleet by 2026. This target is a clear demonstration of the company’s commitment to environmental sustainability and its recognition of the role businesses must play in combating climate change.

Moreover, AstraZeneca aims to halve its entire value chain footprint by 2030. This includes emissions from all its activities, from the sourcing of raw materials to the distribution and use of its products.

The company’s ultimate goal is to achieve science-based net zero by 2045 at the latest, a target that aligns with global efforts to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

How Much Carbon Does a Tree Sequester?

According to One Tree Planted, an average tree can absorb approximately 10 kilograms, or 22 pounds, of carbon dioxide per year for the first 20 years.

Factors such as tree species, location, growing conditions, soil nutrients, local climate, water availability, and sunlight significantly influence this absorption rate.

By using the conservative estimate of 10kg per tree per year, those 200,000,000 trees can potentially sequester 2 million tonnes per year.

This could go towards their own carbon insetting initiatives or they could potentially generate carbon credit, which could potentially yield substantial financial returns.

But that all depends on the price of carbon, the last year the price of nature-based credits went from around $18 a credit and is hovering just over $1.

If the price of carbon goes back up then these 2 million credits could hold considerable financial value.

Carbon Credits: A Lucrative Potential

Carbon credits are a key element of international carbon trading schemes, offering a way to offset greenhouse gas emissions. One carbon credit equates to the removal of one tonne of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Given the potential of AstraZeneca’s 200 million trees to generate 2 million carbon credits per year, the financial value could be substantial, especially with the expected surge in demand for carbon credits.

The market for carbon credits is dynamic and influenced by a variety of factors, including regulatory policies, technological advancements, and market demand and supply dynamics.

As more countries and corporations commit to reducing their carbon emissions, the demand for carbon credits is expected to increase, potentially leading to higher prices and greater financial returns for carbon credit holders.

Beyond Carbon Credits: Ecosystem Services and Reputation

In addition to carbon credits, AstraZeneca’s reforestation initiative could yield other ecosystem services, such as water purification, soil conservation, and biodiversity preservation. These services have indirect economic benefits.

For example, healthy forests can regulate water flow, reducing the risk of floods and droughts. They can also provide habitat for a wide variety of species, supporting biodiversity and contributing to ecosystem resilience.

Furthermore, the initiative could enhance AstraZeneca’s reputation as a sustainable and responsible company. In today’s world, where consumers, investors, and other stakeholders are increasingly conscious of environmental issues, companies that demonstrate a commitment to sustainability can gain a competitive advantage.

AstraZeneca’s reforestation initiative represents a significant commitment to environmental sustainability and a strategic investment in carbon credits. It showcases the potential for corporations to contribute to climate action while also creating financial value.

Setting a Precedent for Corporate Environmental Responsibility

AstraZeneca’s reforestation initiative sets a precedent for other corporations to follow, demonstrating that environmental responsibility and business strategy can be mutually reinforcing.

By investing in reforestation and carbon credits, AstraZeneca is showing that it is possible to contribute to climate action while also creating financial value. This sends a powerful message to other corporations, encouraging them to also take steps towards environmental sustainability.

In conclusion, AstraZeneca’s AZ Forest initiative is a significant step toward environmental sustainability. By planting 200 million trees, the company is not only helping to combat climate change but also creating potential financial value through carbon credits.

This initiative serves as a model for other corporations, demonstrating that it is possible to contribute to climate action while also achieving business objectives.

The post Pharma’s AstraZeneca Invests $400 Million to Plant 200 Million Trees appeared first on Carbon Credits.